A functional genomic perspective on human well-being
- Barbara L. Fredricksona,
- Karen M. Grewenb,
- Kimberly A. Coffeya,
- Sara B. Algoea,
- Ann M. Firestinea,
- Jesusa M. G. Arevaloc,
- Jeffrey Mac, and
- Steven W. Colec,d,1
- aDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599;
- bDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599;
- cUniversity of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and
- dJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Norman Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, AIDS Institute, and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
-
Edited* by Burton H. Singer, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, and approved July 2, 2013 (received for review March 20, 2013)
Abstract
To identify molecular mechanisms underlying the prospective health advantages associated with psychological well-being, we analyzed leukocyte basal gene expression profiles in 80 healthy adults who were assessed for hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, as well as potentially confounded negative psychological and behavioral factors. Hedonic and eudaimonic well-being showed similar affective correlates but highly divergent transcriptome profiles. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from people with high levels of hedonic well-being showed up-regulated expression of a stress-related conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA) involving increased expression of proinflammatory genes and decreased expression of genes involved in antibody synthesis and type I IFN response. In contrast, high levels of eudaimonic well-being were associated with CTRA down-regulation. Promoter-based bioinformatics implicated distinct patterns of transcription factor activity in structuring the observed differences in gene expression associated with eudaimonic well-being (reduced NF-κB and AP-1 signaling and increased IRF and STAT signaling). Transcript origin analysis identified monocytes, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and B lymphocytes as primary cellular mediators of these dynamics. The finding that hedonic and eudaimonic well-being engage distinct gene regulatory programs despite their similar effects on total well-being and depressive symptoms implies that the human genome may be more sensitive to qualitative variations in well-being than are our conscious affective experiences.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: coles{at}ucla.edu.
-
Author contributions: B.L.F., K.M.G., S.B.A., and S.W.C. designed research; B.L.F., K.M.G., K.A.C., S.B.A., A.M.F., J.M.G.A., J.M., and S.W.C. performed research; S.W.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; B.L.F., K.A.C., and S.W.C. analyzed data; and B.L.F. and S.W.C. wrote the paper.
-
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
↵*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
-
Data deposition: The data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (accession no. GSE45330).
-
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1305419110/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.




