War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies
- aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06235-3042;
- bCentre for Ecology and Conservation, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, United Kingdom;
- cSouth Woodham Ferrers, CM3 5GU, England; and
- dDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Department of Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
-
Edited* by Charles S. Spencer, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, and approved August 27, 2013 (received for review May 9, 2013)
Significance
How did human societies evolve from small groups, integrated by face-to-face cooperation, to huge anonymous societies of today? Why is there so much variation in the ability of different human populations to construct viable states? We developed a model that uses cultural evolution mechanisms to predict where and when the largest-scale complex societies should have arisen in human history. The model was simulated within a realistic landscape of the Afroeurasian landmass, and its predictions were tested against real data. Overall, the model did an excellent job predicting empirical patterns. Our results suggest a possible explanation as to why a long history of statehood is positively correlated with political stability, institutional quality, and income per capita.
Abstract
How did human societies evolve from small groups, integrated by face-to-face cooperation, to huge anonymous societies of today, typically organized as states? Why is there so much variation in the ability of different human populations to construct viable states? Existing theories are usually formulated as verbal models and, as a result, do not yield sharply defined, quantitative predictions that could be unambiguously tested with data. Here we develop a cultural evolutionary model that predicts where and when the largest-scale complex societies arose in human history. The central premise of the model, which we test, is that costly institutions that enabled large human groups to function without splitting up evolved as a result of intense competition between societies—primarily warfare. Warfare intensity, in turn, depended on the spread of historically attested military technologies (e.g., chariots and cavalry) and on geographic factors (e.g., rugged landscape). The model was simulated within a realistic landscape of the Afroeurasian landmass and its predictions were tested against a large dataset documenting the spatiotemporal distribution of historical large-scale societies in Afroeurasia between 1,500 BCE and 1,500 CE. The model-predicted pattern of spread of large-scale societies was very similar to the observed one. Overall, the model explained 65% of variance in the data. An alternative model, omitting the effect of diffusing military technologies, explained only 16% of variance. Our results support theories that emphasize the role of institutions in state-building and suggest a possible explanation why a long history of statehood is positively correlated with political stability, institutional quality, and income per capita.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: peter.turchin{at}uconn.edu.
-
Author contributions: P.T., T.E.C., and S.G. designed research; P.T., T.E.C., E.A.L.T., and S.G. performed research; P.T. and T.E.C. analyzed data; and P.T., T.E.C., and S.G. wrote the paper.
-
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
↵*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
-
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1308825110/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.





