• PNAS Alerting Services
  • Sign-up for PNAS eTOC Alerts

Evolutionary limits to cooperation in microbial communities

  1. Kevin R. Foster1
  1. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom; and Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
  1. Edited by W. Ford Doolittle, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, and approved November 7, 2014 (received for review July 4, 2014)

Significance

Microbes form dense and diverse communities that affect every aspect of our lives. Microbial communities are often viewed as cooperative networks with species working together toward a common goal. Here, we critically evaluate this view using an ecoevolutionary model. We show that cooperating with other species can be a poor evolutionary strategy, because it renders a cell dependent on species that may not be nearby. Moreover, when cooperative exchanges do evolve, they are inefficient and reduce the productivity of the community. Evolution by natural selection then limits the potential for productive cooperation between microbial species. We argue that understanding these limits and how to overcome them will be key to engineering microbial communities for our own ends.

Abstract

Microbes produce many compounds that are costly to a focal cell but promote the survival and reproduction of neighboring cells. This observation has led to the suggestion that microbial strains and species will commonly cooperate by exchanging compounds. Here, we examine this idea with an ecoevolutionary model where microbes make multiple secretions, which can be exchanged among genotypes. We show that cooperation between genotypes only evolves under specific demographic regimes characterized by intermediate genetic mixing. The key constraint on cooperative exchanges is a loss of autonomy: strains become reliant on complementary genotypes that may not be reliably encountered. Moreover, the form of cooperation that we observe arises through mutual exploitation that is related to cheating and “Black Queen” evolution for a single secretion. A major corollary is that the evolution of cooperative exchanges reduces community productivity relative to an autonomous strain that makes everything it needs. This prediction finds support in recent work from synthetic communities. Overall, our work suggests that natural selection will often limit cooperative exchanges in microbial communities and that, when exchanges do occur, they can be an inefficient solution to group living.

Footnotes

  • 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: kevin.foster{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk.
  • Author contributions: N.M.O. and K.R.F. designed research; N.M.O. and R.N. performed research; N.M.O. and R.N. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; N.M.O. and K.R.F. analyzed data; and N.M.O., R.N., and K.R.F. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1412673111/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

Online Impact