• TrendMD is the leading scholarly content discovery solution.
  • Sign-up for PNAS eTOC Alerts

Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2

  1. F. Ian Woodwardj
  1. aDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, United Kingdom;
  2. bPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany;
  3. cDepartment of Geography, Humboldt University, D-10099 Berlin, Germany;
  4. dMet Office Hadley Centre, Exeter EX1 3PB, United Kingdom;
  5. eInstitute Pierre-Simon Laplace, 75252 Paris, France;
  6. fLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
  7. gCentre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, United Kingdom;
  8. hCentre for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan;
  9. iMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, D-07745 Jena, Germany; and
  10. jDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom
  1. Edited by Katja Frieler, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany, and accepted by the Editorial Board August 31, 2013 (received for review January 31, 2013)

Abstract

Future climate change and increasing atmospheric CO2 are expected to cause major changes in vegetation structure and function over large fractions of the global land surface. Seven global vegetation models are used to analyze possible responses to future climate simulated by a range of general circulation models run under all four representative concentration pathway scenarios of changing concentrations of greenhouse gases. All 110 simulations predict an increase in global vegetation carbon to 2100, but with substantial variation between vegetation models. For example, at 4 °C of global land surface warming (510–758 ppm of CO2), vegetation carbon increases by 52–477 Pg C (224 Pg C mean), mainly due to CO2 fertilization of photosynthesis. Simulations agree on large regional increases across much of the boreal forest, western Amazonia, central Africa, western China, and southeast Asia, with reductions across southwestern North America, central South America, southern Mediterranean areas, southwestern Africa, and southwestern Australia. Four vegetation models display discontinuities across 4 °C of warming, indicating global thresholds in the balance of positive and negative influences on productivity and biomass. In contrast to previous global vegetation model studies, we emphasize the importance of uncertainties in projected changes in carbon residence times. We find, when all seven models are considered for one representative concentration pathway × general circulation model combination, such uncertainties explain 30% more variation in modeled vegetation carbon change than responses of net primary productivity alone, increasing to 151% for non-HYBRID4 models. A change in research priorities away from production and toward structural dynamics and demographic processes is recommended.

Footnotes

  • 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: adf10{at}cam.ac.uk.
  • Author contributions: A.D.F. and W.L. designed research; A.D.F., W.L., T.T.R., R. Keribin, R.B., P. Cadule, P. Ciais, D.B.C., R.D., P.D.F., A.I., R. Kahana, A.K., M.R.L., K.N., S.O., R.P., P.P., S.S., N.V., L.W., A.W., and F.I.W. performed research; A.D.F., T.T.R., and R. Keribin analyzed data; and A.D.F. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. K.F. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1222477110/-/DCSupplemental.

Online Impact