Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Mitochondria, complexity, and evolutionary deficit spending

Nick Lane and William F. Martin
PNAS February 9, 2016. 113 (6) E666; published ahead of print January 25, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522213113
Nick Lane
aDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nick.lane@ucl.ac.uk
William F. Martin
bInstitute of Molecular Evolution, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

This article has letters. Please see:

  • Relationship between Letter and Reply - February 09, 2016
  • Relationship between Research Article and Letter - December 22, 2015
  • Article
  • Authors & Info
  • PDF
Loading

Lynch and Marinov (1) challenge our findings (2) that mitochondria are essential to the prokaryote−eukaryote transition. Their paper states: “Lane and Martin introduced the cost of a gene as an argument for the impossibility of high levels of cellular/developmental complexity without a power-generating mitochondrion.” Scrutinizing bioenergetic costs, they conclude that “an energetic boost associated with the emergence of the mitochondrion was not a precondition for eukaryotic genome expansion” (1).

In fact, our paper (2) was not about the bioenergetic costs of a gene at all. We considered energy availability per gene: supply, not demand. Lynch and Marinov (1) fail to consider supply. Their calculations are interesting, but their conclusions about mitochondria and eukaryote complexity are untrue.

In terms of supply, bacteria are not ATP-deficient. However, if bacteria are scaled up to eukaryotic proportions, their energy availability per gene falls dramatically, because ATP synthesis depends on the surface area of bioenergetic membranes, whereas the cost of protein synthesis depends on cell volume (2). Even if the costs of protein synthesis fall slightly with volume, as argued (1), the ATP supply capacity of a eukaryote-sized bacterium to meet those costs falls by orders of magnitude, which severely restricts bacterial genome size and gene expression (2), explaining the lack of overlap between bacteria and eukaryotes in cell volume and genome size. In Lynch and Marinov’s calculations (1), ATP synthesis is, inexplicably, unconstrained.

Bacteria with invaginated membranes have more surface area for generating ATP. Why don’t they become “eukaryotic”? The difference relates to mitochondrial genes, which are indispensable for controlling respiration (3). As in 200,000-ploid giant bacteria (2), large cyanobacteria have hundreds of complete genome copies (4), positioned right next to bioenergetic membranes. The costs of extreme polyploidy, ignored by Lynch and Marinov (1), offset the advantage of increased surface area.

Consequently, giant bacteria are metabolically active only at their ATP-synthesizing cell surface (2). In eukaryotes, mitochondrial genome reduction and specialization allow ATP supply to scale freely with increased cell volume. Large cells with one nuclear genome, not thousands of cytosolic ones, could increase gene expression throughout their cytosol, supported energetically by mitochondria. Lynch and Marinov neglect the fundamental difference between prokaryote and eukaryote bioenergetic architecture. In giant prokaryotes, the cell interior is not complex, it is inert (2).

Finally, gene expression requires high concentrations of ribosomes, by far the most expensive cell component. By weight, Escherichia coli is 20% rRNA and 40% ribosomes, whereas 60% of yeast transcripts are rRNA, and half the mRNA encodes ribosomal protein (5). Lynch and Marinov neglect ribosomes. The energetic penalties they concede for moderately increased gene expression (1) are exacerbated for the most highly expressed genes in the cell—those for ribosomes, the enablers of gene expression. However, ribosomes are absent in their cost accounting.

Lynch and Marinov provide an account of ATP expenses that ignores the most costly component of the cell—ribosomes—and the source of eukaryotic ATP—mitochondria. When estimating cash flow within nations, the cost of government must be tallied, and tax income, too. Spending is constrained by income. Unlike governments, evolution does not tolerate deficit spending.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: nick.lane{at}ucl.ac.uk.
  • Author contributions: N.L. and W.F.M. analyzed data and wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lynch M,
    2. Marinov GK
    (2015) The bioenergetic costs of a gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(51):15690–15695
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Lane N,
    2. Martin W
    (2010) The energetics of genome complexity. Nature 467(7318):929–934
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Allen JF
    (2015) Why chloroplasts and mitochondria retain their own genomes and genetic systems: Colocation for redox regulation of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(33):10231–10238
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Griese M,
    2. Lange C,
    3. Soppa J
    (2011) Ploidy in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 323(2):124–131
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Kobayashi T
    (2011) Regulation of ribosomal RNA gene copy number and its role in modulating genome integrity and evolutionary adaptability in yeast. Cell Mol Life Sci 68(8):1395–1403
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mitochondria, complexity, and evolutionary deficit spending
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Mitochondria and evolutionary deficit spending
Nick Lane, William F. Martin
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2016, 113 (6) E666; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522213113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Mitochondria and evolutionary deficit spending
Nick Lane, William F. Martin
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2016, 113 (6) E666; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522213113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

More Articles of This Classification

  • Are most cancer cases a consequence of an immune deficiency caused by thymic involution?
  • Strengthening the immune system for cancer prevention
  • Shortcomings of the immunological model of carcinogenesis
Show more

Related Content

  • Mitochondria and bioenergetics of eukaryotic cells
  • Cost of a gene
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Farming the mitochondrial ancestor as a model of endosymbiotic establishment by natural selection
  • Reply to Lane and Martin: Mitochondria do not boost the bioenergetic capacity of eukaryotic cells
  • Scopus (6)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

You May Also be Interested in

Karina Guziewicz and Artur Cideciyan explain a potential gene therapy approach for macular degeneration.
Gene therapy for retinal disease
Karina Guziewicz and Artur Cideciyan explain a potential gene therapy approach for macular degeneration.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
PNAS Profile of Alexander Rudensky, winner of the Vilcek Prize in Biomedical Science
PNAS Profile
PNAS Profile of Alexander Rudensky, winner of the Vilcek Prize in Biomedical Science
Ambrosia beetles, which bore into host trees and cultivate fungi, select trees with elevated ethanol content because ethanol promotes growth of preferred fungal species.
Fungus-farming beetles use alcohol to screen symbionts
Ambrosia beetles, which bore into host trees and cultivate fungi, select trees with elevated ethanol content because ethanol promotes growth of preferred fungal species.
Image courtesy of Gernot Kunz (Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Graz, Austria).
A study examines the walking and climbing capabilities of human ancestors.
Evolution of human locomotion
A study examines the walking and climbing capabilities of human ancestors.
Researchers have engineered the complete biosynthetic pathway for a potential cancer drug into a single yeast strain, paving the way toward the commercial brewing of medically important compounds.
Brewer’s yeast engineered to produce potential cancer drug
Researchers have engineered the complete biosynthetic pathway for a potential cancer drug into a single yeast strain, paving the way toward the commercial brewing of medically important compounds.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/Republica.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (16)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Authors & Info
  • PDF
Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Press

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2018 National Academy of Sciences.