• Research in the physical sciences including applied physical sciences; astronomy; earth, atmospheric, and planetary sciences; and physics.
  • Science Sessions: The PNAS Podcast Program

A reassessment of human cranial plasticity: Boas revisited

  1. Richard L. Jantz
  1. *Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 409 Carpenter Building, University Park, PA 16802; and Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, 250 South Stadium Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996
  1. Edited by Henry C. Harpending, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved August 30, 2002 (received for review July 1, 2002)

Abstract

In 1912, Franz Boas published a study demonstrating the plastic nature of the human body in response to changes in the environment. The results of this study have been cited for the past 90 years as evidence of cranial plasticity. These findings, however, have never been critiqued thoroughly for their statistical and biological validity. This study presents a reassessment of Boas' data within a modern statistical and quantitative genetic framework. The data used here consist of head and face measurements on over 8,000 individuals of various European ethnic groups. By using pedigree information contained in Boas' data, narrow sense heritabilities are estimated by the method of maximum likelihood. In addition, a series of t tests and regression analyses are performed to determine the statistical validity of Boas' original findings on differentiation between American and European-born children and the prolonged effect of the environment on cranial form. Results indicate the relatively high genetic component of the head and face diameters despite the environmental differences during development. Results point to very small and insignificant differences between European- and American-born offspring, and no effect of exposure to the American environment on the cranial index in children. These results contradict Boas' original findings and demonstrate that they may no longer be used to support arguments of plasticity in cranial morphology.

Footnotes

    • To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: css186{at}psu.edu.

    • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

    • See commentary on page 14622.

    • Received July 1, 2002.

    Online Impact

    Related Article