New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Early modern human diversity suggests subdivided population structure and a complex out-of-Africa scenario
-
Edited by Erik Trinkaus, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, and approved January 15, 2009 (received for review September 1, 2008)
This article has a correction. Please see:

Abstract
The interpretation of genetic evidence regarding modern human origins depends, among other things, on assessments of the structure and the variation of ancient populations. Because we lack genetic data from the time when the first anatomically modern humans appeared, between 200,000 and 60,000 years ago, instead we exploit the phenotype of neurocranial geometry to compare the variation in early modern human fossils with that in other groups of fossil Homo and recent modern humans. Variation is assessed as the mean-squared Procrustes distance from the group average shape in a representation based on several hundred neurocranial landmarks and semilandmarks. We find that the early modern group has more shape variation than any other group in our sample, which covers 1.8 million years, and that they are morphologically similar to recent modern humans of diverse geographically dispersed populations but not to archaic groups. Of the currently competing models of modern human origins, some are inconsistent with these findings. Rather than a single out-of-Africa dispersal scenario, we suggest that early modern humans were already divided into different populations in Pleistocene Africa, after which there followed a complex migration pattern. Our conclusions bear implications for the inference of ancient human demography from genetic models and emphasize the importance of focusing research on those early modern humans, in particular, in Africa.
Footnotes
- 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gerhard.weber{at}univie.ac.at
-
Author contributions: G.W.W. designed research; P.G., F.L.B., P.M., A.S., H.S., and G.W.W. performed research; P.G., F.L.B., P.M., and A.S. analyzed data; and P.G., F.L.B., and G.W.W. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Citation Manager Formats
More Articles of This Classification
Social Sciences
Related Content
Cited by...
- A demographic perspective on the Middle to Later Stone Age transition from Nasera rockshelter, Tanzania
- New chronology for Ksar 'Akil (Lebanon) supports Levantine route of modern human dispersal into Europe
- Brain ontogeny and life history in Pleistocene hominins
- Late Pleistocene age and archaeological context for the hominin calvaria from GvJm-22 (Lukenya Hill, Kenya)
- Genomic and cranial phenotype data support multiple modern human dispersals from Africa and a southern route into Asia
- Random walk as a null model for high-dimensional morphometrics of fossil series: geometrical considerations
- Effect of ancient population structure on the degree of polymorphism shared between modern human populations and ancient hominins
- Specific inactivation of two immunomodulatory SIGLEC genes during human evolution
- Archaic human ancestry in East Asia
- Ancient watercourses and biogeography of the Sahara explain the peopling of the desert
- A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome
- The origin of Neandertals
- Additional evidence on the use of personal ornaments in the Middle Paleolithic of North Africa














