Extensive remyelination of the CNS leads to functional recovery
- Departments of aMedical Sciences and
- dPathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, 2015 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706;
- bWisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 445 Easterday Lane, Madison, WI 53706; and
- cHarlan Laboratories, P.O. Box 44220, Madison, WI 53744
-
Edited by Hector F. DeLuca, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, and approved February 18, 2009 (received for review December 9, 2008)
Abstract
Remyelination of the CNS in multiple sclerosis is thought to be important to restore conduction and protect axons against degeneration. Yet the role that remyelination plays in clinical recovery of function remains unproven. Here, we show that cats fed an irradiated diet during gestation developed a severe neurologic disease resulting from extensive myelin vacuolation and subsequent demyelination. Despite the severe myelin degeneration, axons remained essentially intact. There was a prompt endogenous response by cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage to the demyelination, with remyelination occurring simultaneously. Cats that were returned to a normal diet recovered slowly so that by 3–4 months they were neurologically normal. Histological examination of the CNS at this point showed extensive remyelination that was especially notable in the optic nerve where almost the entire nerve was remyelinated. Biochemical analysis of the diet and tissues from affected cats showed no dietary deficiencies or toxic accumulations. Thus, although the etiology of this remarkable disease remains unknown, it shows unequivocally that where axons are preserved remyelination is the default pathway in the CNS in nonimmune-mediated demyelinating disease. Most importantly, it confirms the clinical relevance of remyelination and its ability to restore function.
Footnotes
- 1To whom correspondence should be sent. E-mail: duncani{at}svm.vetmed.wisc.edu
-
Author contributions: I.D.D., A.B., J.C., and R.D.S. performed research; I.D.D. and Y.K. analyzed data; and I.D.D. wrote the paper.
-
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.








