New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
The Lucretian swerve: The biological basis of human behavior and the criminal justice system

Abstract
It is widely believed, at least in scientific circles, that living systems, including mankind, obey the natural physical laws. However, it is also commonly accepted that man has the capacity to make “free” conscious decisions that do not simply reflect the chemical makeup of the individual at the time of decision—this chemical makeup reflecting both the genetic and environmental history and a degree of stochasticism. Whereas philosophers have discussed for centuries the apparent lack of a causal component for free will, many biologists still seem to be remarkably at ease with this notion of free will; and furthermore, our judicial system is based on such a belief. It is the author’s contention that a belief in free will is nothing other than a continuing belief in vitalism—something biologists proudly believe they discarded well over 100 years ago.
Footnotes
- 1E-mail: cashmore{at}sas.upenn.edu.
This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2003.
Contributed by Anthony R. Cashmore, January 12, 2010 (sent for review September 9, 2009)
Author contributions: A.R.C. wrote the paper.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Citation Manager Formats
More Articles of This Classification
Inaugural Article
Biological Sciences
Related Content
Cited by...
- Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates
- Profile of Anthony R. Cashmore
- Reply to Hinsen: Free will, vitalism, and distinguishing cause from effect
- A scientific model for free will is impossible
- Reply to Anckarsater: A belief in free will is based on faith
- Has biology disproved free will and moral responsibility?
- A justice system that denies free will is not based on justice
- Reply to McEvoy: The judicial system is based on a false understanding of the biology of human behavior














