Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

Ferric C. Fang, R. Grant Steen, and Arturo Casadevall
PNAS published ahead of print October 1, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
Ferric C. Fang
Departments of aLaboratory Medicine andbMicrobiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Grant Steen
cMediCC! Medical Communications Consultants, Chapel Hill, NC 27517; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arturo Casadevall
dDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Thomas Shenk, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved September 6, 2012 (received for review July 18, 2012)

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Correction for Fang et al., Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast, 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%). Incomplete, uninformative or misleading retraction announcements have led to a previous underestimation of the role of fraud in the ongoing retraction epidemic. The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has increased ∼10-fold since 1975. Retractions exhibit distinctive temporal and geographic patterns that may reveal underlying causes.

  • bibliometric analysis
  • biomedical publishing
  • ethics
  • research misconduct

Footnotes

  • ↵1F.C.F., R.G.S., and A.C. contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arturo.casadevall{at}einstein.yu.edu.
  • Author contributions: F.C.F., R.G.S., and A.C. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109/-/DCSupplemental.

Next
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Misconduct and retractions
Ferric C. Fang, R. Grant Steen, Arturo Casadevall
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2012, 201212247; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Misconduct and retractions
Ferric C. Fang, R. Grant Steen, Arturo Casadevall
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2012, 201212247; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

More Articles of This Classification

Biological Sciences

  • Highly disordered histone H1−DNA model complexes and their condensates
  • Thermodynamic favorability and pathway yield as evolutionary tradeoffs in biosynthetic pathway choice
  • SUMO protease SENP1 deSUMOylates and stabilizes c-Myc
Show more

Medical Sciences

  • Metastatic growth instructed by neutrophil-derived transferrin
  • Reducing dynamin 2 (DNM2) rescues DNM2-related dominant centronuclear myopathy
  • The ReFRAME library as a comprehensive drug repurposing library and its application to the treatment of cryptosporidiosis
Show more

Related Content

  • In This Issue
  • Correction for Fang et al., Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Molecular and Cellular Biology Experience
  • If the papers don't come to the journal...
  • Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure
  • Reply to Argüelles and Argüelles-Prieto, "Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?"
  • Graduate Biomedical Science Education Needs a New Philosophy
  • Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview
  • 47 Years of IAI: a Glance in the Mirror and the Road Ahead
  • Estimating monotonic rates from biological data using local linear regression
  • Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
  • Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide
  • A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences
  • Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game
  • Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic review
  • The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
  • Does the Anonymous Voice Have a Place in Scholarly Publishing?
  • How likely is it that biological agents will be used deliberately to cause widespread harm?: Policymakers and scientists need to take seriously the possibility that potential pandemic pathogens will be misused
  • Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance
  • Vigilante Science
  • Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research
  • Are clinical trials units essential for a successful trial?
  • How Do You Know It Is True? Integrity in Research and Publications: AOA Critical Issues
  • The Fraud and Retraction Epidemic
  • Challenges for a Research Publication: Quantity, Quality, and Crowd Wisdom
  • Should research fraud be a crime?
  • Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania
  • Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications
  • US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
  • Research fraud and The Bone & Joint Journal
  • Publishing Medical Research: A Marketplace on the Commons
  • Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct
  • Concealment, Lying, and Exaggeration in Research
  • Scopus (362)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

You May Also be Interested in

Robert Reed explains genetic controls on butterfly wing colors.
Paintbrush for butterfly wings
Robert Reed explains genetic controls on butterfly wing colors.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Better understanding how the truffles reproduce has major implications for farmers, chefs, and foodies enamored with the expensive, pungent fungus. Image courtesy of Shutterstock/Vitalina Rybakova.
Inner Workings: The mysterious parentage of the coveted black truffle
Better understanding how the truffles reproduce has major implications for farmers, chefs, and foodies enamored with the expensive, pungent fungus.
Image courtesy of Shutterstock/Vitalina Rybakova.
PNAS QnAs with NAS foreign associate and metabolic engineer Sang Yup Lee
PNAS QnAs
PNAS QnAs with NAS foreign associate and metabolic engineer Sang Yup Lee
Researchers report a species of early bird with a combination of bird-like and dinosaur-like bone morphologies, and the structure of the bird’s shoulder girdle highlights the role of developmental plasticity in the early evolution of birds, according to the authors.
Dinosaur-like forms in early bird shoulders
Researchers report a species of early bird with a combination of bird-like and dinosaur-like bone morphologies, and the structure of the bird’s shoulder girdle highlights the role of developmental plasticity in the early evolution of birds, according to the authors.
Honey bee. Image courtesy of Vivian Abagiu (The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX).
Effect of glyphosate on honey bee gut
A study suggests that the herbicide glyphosate disrupts bee gut microbiota, increasing bees’ susceptibility to pathogens, and that glyphosate’s effects may contribute to the largely unexplained increase in honey bee colony mortality.
Image courtesy of Vivian Abagiu (The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX).
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (41)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2018 National Academy of Sciences.