New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
Edited by Thomas Shenk, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved September 6, 2012 (received for review July 18, 2012)
This article has a correction. Please see:

Abstract
A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast, 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%). Incomplete, uninformative or misleading retraction announcements have led to a previous underestimation of the role of fraud in the ongoing retraction epidemic. The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has increased ∼10-fold since 1975. Retractions exhibit distinctive temporal and geographic patterns that may reveal underlying causes.
Footnotes
↵1F.C.F., R.G.S., and A.C. contributed equally to this work.
- ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arturo.casadevall{at}einstein.yu.edu.
Author contributions: F.C.F., R.G.S., and A.C. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109/-/DCSupplemental.
Citation Manager Formats
More Articles of This Classification
Biological Sciences
Related Content
Cited by...
- Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Molecular and Cellular Biology Experience
- If the papers don't come to the journal...
- Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure
- Reply to Argüelles and Argüelles-Prieto, "Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?"
- Graduate Biomedical Science Education Needs a New Philosophy
- Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview
- 47 Years of IAI: a Glance in the Mirror and the Road Ahead
- Estimating monotonic rates from biological data using local linear regression
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide
- A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences
- Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game
- Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic review
- The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
- Does the Anonymous Voice Have a Place in Scholarly Publishing?
- How likely is it that biological agents will be used deliberately to cause widespread harm?: Policymakers and scientists need to take seriously the possibility that potential pandemic pathogens will be misused
- Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance
- Vigilante Science
- Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research
- Are clinical trials units essential for a successful trial?
- How Do You Know It Is True? Integrity in Research and Publications: AOA Critical Issues
- The Fraud and Retraction Epidemic
- Challenges for a Research Publication: Quantity, Quality, and Crowd Wisdom
- Should research fraud be a crime?
- Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania
- Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications
- US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
- Research fraud and The Bone & Joint Journal
- Publishing Medical Research: A Marketplace on the Commons
- Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct
- Concealment, Lying, and Exaggeration in Research














