New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies
Edited* by Charles S. Spencer, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, and approved August 27, 2013 (received for review May 9, 2013)
This article has a reply. Please see:

Significance
How did human societies evolve from small groups, integrated by face-to-face cooperation, to huge anonymous societies of today? Why is there so much variation in the ability of different human populations to construct viable states? We developed a model that uses cultural evolution mechanisms to predict where and when the largest-scale complex societies should have arisen in human history. The model was simulated within a realistic landscape of the Afroeurasian landmass, and its predictions were tested against real data. Overall, the model did an excellent job predicting empirical patterns. Our results suggest a possible explanation as to why a long history of statehood is positively correlated with political stability, institutional quality, and income per capita.
Abstract
How did human societies evolve from small groups, integrated by face-to-face cooperation, to huge anonymous societies of today, typically organized as states? Why is there so much variation in the ability of different human populations to construct viable states? Existing theories are usually formulated as verbal models and, as a result, do not yield sharply defined, quantitative predictions that could be unambiguously tested with data. Here we develop a cultural evolutionary model that predicts where and when the largest-scale complex societies arose in human history. The central premise of the model, which we test, is that costly institutions that enabled large human groups to function without splitting up evolved as a result of intense competition between societies—primarily warfare. Warfare intensity, in turn, depended on the spread of historically attested military technologies (e.g., chariots and cavalry) and on geographic factors (e.g., rugged landscape). The model was simulated within a realistic landscape of the Afroeurasian landmass and its predictions were tested against a large dataset documenting the spatiotemporal distribution of historical large-scale societies in Afroeurasia between 1,500 BCE and 1,500 CE. The model-predicted pattern of spread of large-scale societies was very similar to the observed one. Overall, the model explained 65% of variance in the data. An alternative model, omitting the effect of diffusing military technologies, explained only 16% of variance. Our results support theories that emphasize the role of institutions in state-building and suggest a possible explanation why a long history of statehood is positively correlated with political stability, institutional quality, and income per capita.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: peter.turchin{at}uconn.edu.
Author contributions: P.T., T.E.C., and S.G. designed research; P.T., T.E.C., E.A.L.T., and S.G. performed research; P.T. and T.E.C. analyzed data; and P.T., T.E.C., and S.G. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
↵*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1308825110/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
Citation Manager Formats
More Articles of This Classification
Social Sciences
Related Content
Cited by...
- Why war is a man's game
- Parasites and politics: why cross-cultural studies must control for relatedness, proximity and covariation
- Bayesian inference of spreading processes on networks
- Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organization
- Threat and parochialism in intergroup relations: lab-in-the-field evidence from rural Georgia
- Sackler Colloquium on Extension of Biology Through Culture: Pursuing Darwins curious parallel: Prospects for a science of cultural evolution
- Intrafamily and intragenomic conflicts in human warfare
- The social brain: scale-invariant layering of Erdos-Renyi networks in small-scale human societies
- Demic and cultural diffusion propagated the Neolithic transition across different regions of Europe
- Evolution of cultural traits occurs at similar relative rates in different world regions
- Reply to Thomas: Diffusion of military technologies is a plausible explanation for the evolution of social complexity, 1500 BCE-AD 1500
- Does diffusion of horse-related military technologies explain spatiotemporal patterns of social complexity 1500 BCE-AD 1500?














