Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands

Romy van der Lee and Naomi Ellemers
PNAS September 21, 2015. 201510159; published ahead of print September 21, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510159112
Romy van der Lee
Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ravanderlee@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Naomi Ellemers
Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Susan T. Fiske, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved August 19, 2015 (received for review May 26, 2015)

This article has letters. Please see:

  • Relationship between Research Article and Letter - December 15, 2015
  • Relationship between Research Article and Letter - December 22, 2015
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Authors & Info
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Women remain underrepresented in academia as they continue to face a leadership gap, salary gap, and funding gap. Closing the funding gap is of particular importance, because this may directly retain women in academia and foster the closing of other gaps. In this study, we examined the grant funding rates of a national full population of early career scientists. Our results reveal gender bias favoring male applicants over female applicants in the prioritization of their “quality of researcher” (but not “quality of proposal”) evaluations and success rates, as well as in the language use in instructional and evaluation materials. This work illuminates how and when the funding gap and the subsequent underrepresentation of women in academia are perpetuated.

Abstract

We examined the application and review materials of three calls (n = 2,823) of a prestigious grant for personal research funding in a national full population of early career scientists awarded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Results showed evidence of gender bias in application evaluations and success rates, as well as in language use in instructions and evaluation sheets. Male applicants received significantly more competitive “quality of researcher” evaluations (but not “quality of proposal” evaluations) and had significantly higher application success rates than female applicants. Gender disparities were most prevalent in scientific disciplines with the highest number of applications and with equal gender distribution among the applicants (i.e., life sciences and social sciences). Moreover, content analyses of the instructional and evaluation materials revealed the use of gendered language favoring male applicants. Overall, our data reveal a 4% “loss” of women during the grant review procedure, and illustrate the perpetuation of the funding gap, which contributes to the underrepresentation of women in academia.

  • gender bias
  • research funding
  • success rates
  • academia
  • STEM

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: ravanderlee{at}fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
  • ↵2Present address: Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.

  • Author contributions: R.v.d.L. and N.E. designed research; R.v.d.L. performed research; R.v.d.L. analyzed data; and R.v.d.L. and N.E. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • *External reviewing is conducted by international experts in the topic and field of the application proposal. Although these experts report their evaluation to the review committee, they are not considered members of the review committee.

  • †Scientists are allowed to apply twice within the first 3 y after obtaining their PhD. These data were available only for one call, that is, applicants who applied in 2012.

  • ‡Applications were rated on a nine-point Likert scale ranging from 1, “excellent,” to 9, “unsuccessful.” Lower scores thus indicated more favorable evaluations and led to higher prioritization of applicants.

  • §Applications were evaluated twice by the interview committee, once before the interview and once after the interview. Because these two scores were highly correlated (r > 0.60, P < .001 for all), here we present the average interview evaluation.

  • **Applicants’ track record data were not available for analysis.

  • ††We did not take into account the written communications containing explicit references to the NWO’s gender policy, resulting in 53 documents coded for gender-exclusive language use.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1510159112/-/DCSupplemental.

Next
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Gender contributes to grant funding success
Romy van der Lee, Naomi Ellemers
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2015, 201510159; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Gender contributes to grant funding success
Romy van der Lee, Naomi Ellemers
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2015, 201510159; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

More Articles of This Classification

Social Sciences

  • The Matthew effect in science funding
  • Social contagion of ethnic hostility
  • Neuronal activity regulates neurotransmitter switching in the adult brain following light-induced stress
Show more

Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

  • Neuronal activity regulates neurotransmitter switching in the adult brain following light-induced stress
  • The computational form of craving is a selective multiplication of economic value
  • Individuals, institutions, and innovation in the debates of the French Revolution
Show more

Related Content

  • Gender bias and Simpson’s paradox
  • Acceptance of evidence for gender disparities
  • Multiple indicators point to gender disparities
  • No evidence that gender contributes to funding
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • A systematic analysis of UK cancer research funding by gender of primary investigator
  • Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada
  • Perceptions and experiences of a gender gap at a Canadian research institute and potential strategies to mitigate this gap: a sequential mixed-methods study
  • A "Scientific Diversity" Intervention to Reduce Gender Bias in a Sample of Life Scientists
  • No evidence that gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands: A reaction to van der Lee and Ellemers
  • Reply to Volker and Steenbeek: Multiple indicators point toward gender disparities in grant funding success in The Netherlands
  • Reply to Albers: Acceptance of empirical evidence for gender disparities in Dutch research funding
  • Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpsons paradox
  • Scopus (23)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

You May Also be Interested in

Karina Guziewicz and Artur Cideciyan explain a potential gene therapy approach for macular degeneration.
Gene therapy for retinal disease
Karina Guziewicz and Artur Cideciyan explain a potential gene therapy approach for macular degeneration.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
PNAS Profile of Alexander Rudensky, winner of the Vilcek Prize in Biomedical Science
PNAS Profile
PNAS Profile of Alexander Rudensky, winner of the Vilcek Prize in Biomedical Science
Ambrosia beetles, which bore into host trees and cultivate fungi, select trees with elevated ethanol content because ethanol promotes growth of preferred fungal species.
Fungus-farming beetles use alcohol to screen symbionts
Ambrosia beetles, which bore into host trees and cultivate fungi, select trees with elevated ethanol content because ethanol promotes growth of preferred fungal species.
Image courtesy of Gernot Kunz (Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Graz, Austria).
A study examines the walking and climbing capabilities of human ancestors.
Evolution of human locomotion
A study examines the walking and climbing capabilities of human ancestors.
Researchers have engineered the complete biosynthetic pathway for a potential cancer drug into a single yeast strain, paving the way toward the commercial brewing of medically important compounds.
Brewer’s yeast engineered to produce potential cancer drug
Researchers have engineered the complete biosynthetic pathway for a potential cancer drug into a single yeast strain, paving the way toward the commercial brewing of medically important compounds.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/Republica.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (16)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Authors & Info
  • PDF
Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Press

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2018 National Academy of Sciences.