![]() |
||||||||||
|
Hubble's Guide to the Expanding Universe by cbrownlee{at}nas.edu PNAS Staff writer
For such a fundamental assumption of modern astronomy, the realization that the universe is growing is relatively new. Only 74 years ago, scientists were aware of little motion outside the comparatively static interior of the Milky Way. The revelations of a single researcher, Edwin Hubble, rushed expansion straight to the forefront, opening up the entire branch of astronomy known as cosmology. His famous paper, published in PNAS in 1929 (1), proved with observational evidence that galaxies are moving away from us with a speed proportional to their distance. Hubble's revolutionary vision of a swelling cosmos gave astronomers new insight into the birth of our universe, as well as a glimpse of its future evolution. |
||||||||||
Measuring
Success in Light Years
However, Hubble's heart was with the stars. After one year as a high school teacher, he signed on as a graduate student at Yerkes Observatory at the University of Chicago and earned his PhD in astronomy. Although a short term as an enlisted soldier in World War I almost sidetracked him once again, Hubble was invited to join the staff of Mt. Wilson Observatory in 1919.
"It's not a trivial job in astronomy when you can't go out and walk across the field and measure how far it is, or send someone out to make a roadmap," said Haynes. However, in the early 1900s, astronomer Henrietta Leavitt perfected a technique to gauge the distance to a type of star known as a Cepheid variable (2). These stars vary in brightness over a period related to their distance. With the powerful Mt. Wilson telescope, Hubble was able to spot Cepheid variable stars in the nebulae and calculate their approximate distance. The measurements far exceeded any distances for stars in the Milky Way, leading Hubble to conclude that the nebulae were spiral galaxies much like our own. He published this research in 1925 in The Astrophysical Journal (3). |
||||||||||
| A
Universe Like Raisin Cake Concurrent with Hubble's research, other scientists were studying Doppler shifts in the light coming from galaxies. Like the change in pitch from a passing car radio, light waves also change in frequency with velocity. The effect is invisible to the naked eye, but it is detectable with measurements taken from photographic plates. Hubble's contemporary researchers had noticed that many of the galaxies were redder than they should be--a possible indicator that the galaxies were moving away.
The usual example for Hubble's law is a raisin cake, says Neta Bahcall, an Academy member and astronomer at Princeton University. "Put a raisin cake in the oven, and it's very small. Then you let it go, and the distance between the raisins is like the distance between the galaxies - it gets larger and larger with time," she said. The inescapable deduction is that the universe, like the cake, is also growing larger and larger, expanding indefinitely with time. |
||||||||||
| An
Uncertain Future Since Hubble's 1929 PNAS paper, the science of cosmology has expanded almost as much as the universe. Today, thousands of scientists all over the world study the tenets of cosmology, including the origin, structure, and relationships of objects in the universe. At least 31 universities in the United States offer doctoral programs in the field, and several journals, including The Astrophysical Journal, The Astronomical Journal, and PNAS, regularly publish new cosmological research.
"Very nearby, Hubble's Law is very good. But we've found that if you look over big enough spans of distance, the distance and velocity are not exactly proportional to each other," said Robert Kirshner, an Academy member and astronomer at Harvard University.
"The universe may be like Los Angeles," Kirshner jokes. "It's one-third substance and two-thirds energy."
Currently, researchers are using another powerful telescope to conduct the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, the largest study of galactic velocities to date. The results of this research may provide some much-needed insight into the future of our universe, continuing Hubble's goal of understanding our cosmos. However, new findings are likely to spur an additional round of questions, similar to the uproar that followed publication of Hubble's original 1929 research. "We used to be able to explain what the universe was doing to our students and now we can't anymore," said Haynes. |
||||||||||
| References 1. Hubble, E. (1929) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA15, 168-173.|Article| 2. Leavitt, H. (1912) Harv. Coll. Obs. Circ. 173. 3. Hubble, E. (1925) Astrophys. J.62, 409. 4. Schmidt, B. P., Suntzeff, N. B., Phillips, M. M., Schommer, R. A., Clocchiatti, A. Kirshner, R. P., Garnavich, P., Challis, P., Leibundgut, B., Spyromilio, J., et al. (1998) Astrophys. J.507, 46-63. |Article| 5. Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Della Valle, M., Deustua, S., Ellis, R. S., Fabbro, S., Fruchter, A., Goldhaber, G., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E. et al. (1998) Nature (London)391, 51-54. |Article| |
||||||||||
|
|