Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

A mechanism of covalent substrate binding in the x-ray structure of subunit K of the Escherichia coli dihydroxyacetone kinase

Christian Siebold, Luis Fernando García-Alles, Bernhard Erni, and Ulrich Baumann
PNAS July 8, 2003 100 (14) 8188-8192; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0932787100
Christian Siebold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis Fernando García-Alles
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Erni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Baumann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Communicated by Saul Roseman, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, May 9, 2003 (received for review September 2, 2002)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Dihydroxyacetone (Dha) kinases are homologous proteins that use different phosphoryl donors, a multiphosphoryl protein of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent carbohydrate:phosphotransferase system in bacteria, ATP in animals, plants, and some bacteria. The Dha kinase of Escherichia coli consists of three subunits, DhaK and DhaL, which are colinear to the ATP-dependent Dha kinases of eukaryotes, and the multiphosphoryl protein DhaM. Here we show the crystal structure of the DhaK subunit in complex with Dha at 1.75 Å resolution. DhaK is a homodimer with a fold consisting of two six-stranded mixed β-sheets surrounded by nine α-helices and a β-ribbon covering the exposed edge strand of one sheet. The core of the N-terminal domain has an α/β fold common to subunits of carbohydrate transporters and transcription regulators of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent carbohydrate:phosphotransferase system. The core of the C-terminal domain has a fold similar to the C-terminal domain of the cell-division protein FtsZ. A molecule of Dha is covalently bound in hemiaminal linkage to the Nε2 of His-230. The hemiaminal does not participate in covalent catalysis but is the chemical basis for discrimination between short-chain carbonyl compounds and polyols. Paralogs of Dha kinases occur in association with transcription regulators of the TetR/QacR and the SorC families, pointing to their biological role as sensors in signaling.

  • glycerone
  • hemiaminal
  • phosphoenolpyruvate
  • phosphotransferase
  • transcription regulation

Dihydroxyacetone (Dha) kinases convert free Dha into the glycolytic intermediate Dha phosphate (DhaP). In methylotrophic yeast, Dha is the primary product of methanol assimilation (1). In bacteria, Dha is formed by oxidation of glycerol or aldol cleavage of fructose-6-phosphate (2, 3). In animal cells, Dha is a gluconeogenic precursor (4–6). The Dha kinase of Escherichia coli was discovered in the proteome as two spots, which were up-regulated in the ptsI mutant, lacking enzyme I of the phosphoenolpyruvate(PEP)-dependent carbohydrate:phosphotransferase system (PTS) (7) and displayed strong amino acid sequence similarities to the N- and C-terminal domains of the ATP-dependent Dha kinase of Citrobacter freundii (7, 8). The two subunits, termed DhaK and DhaL (SWISS-PROT entries P76015 and P76014), are encoded in an operon together with a third protein, DhaM (SWISS-PROT entry P37349). DhaM is a multiphosphoryl protein of the PTS with sequence similarity to the IIA domain of the mannose transporter (PDB ID code 1PDO; ref. 9), the phosphoryl carrier protein HPr (PDB ID code 1PTF; ref. 10) and the N-terminal domain of enzyme I (PDB ID code 1ZYM; ref. 11). DhaM is phosphorylated by PEP through enzyme I and the phosphoryl carrier protein HPr and serves as the phosphoryl donor instead of ATP (12): Math

No similarity with known protein folds could be predicted for DhaK and DhaL. DhaK, DhaL, and DhaM were overexpressed and purified (12). Whereas DhaL precipitates already at low protein concentration, DhaK is soluble. Here we describe the x-ray structure of DhaK with Dha covalently bound to a histidine in the active site.

Materials and Methods

Protein Purification and Activity Assay.E. coli DhaK was overproduced in E. coli WA2127ΔHIC(ptsI) as described (12) and purified by ion exchange chromatography over DEAE cellulose (C545, Fluka) and ResourceQ (Amersham Pharmacia) and gel filtration over Superdex 200 (Amersham Pharmacia). DhaK was concentrated to 30 mg·ml-1 in 5 mM Hepes, pH 7.5/2mM DTT. The apoform of DhaK was generated between DEAE and ResourceQ chromatography by incubation of the DhaK–Dha complex with PEP and catalytic amounts of the PTS proteins (enzyme I, HPr) DhaM and DhaL. DhaK activity was measured in a coupled assay by reduction of DhaP with glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. The disappearance of NADH was monitored continuously in a Spectramax 250 plate reader (Molecular Devices) at 30°C (12).

Crystallization and Data Collection. The DhaK–Dha complex and the apoprotein were crystallized from 80 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0/160 mM (NH4)2SO4/17% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000/15% (wt/vol) 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD) using hanging drop vapor diffusion. The crystals had the symmetry of the space group P21212 (a = 96.5 Å, b = 97.4 Å, c = 86.0 Å, α = β = γ = 90°) and they diffracted to 1.75 Å resolution after flash-freezing at 105° K in the native mother liquor. Native and derivative diffraction data were collected on a RAXIS-IV imaging plate detector mounted on a Rigaku RU300 generator equipped with Yale mirrors (Molecular Structure, The Woodlands, TX). All data were processed by using the HKL program package (13).

Structure Solution and Refinement. The DhaK structure was determined by the multiple isomorphous replacement (MIR) method. Heavy-atom sites were located with SHELX (14). Phases were calculated by using SHARP (15) and improved by solvent flattening by using the program SOLOMON (16). An initial protein model was built into the electron density by using the programs ARP/WARP (17) and O (18). Noncrystallographic symmetry restraints were used to refine the model at 1.75 Å resolution by using the program REFMAC (19). Details of the crystallographic analysis are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Crystallographic data, structure solution, and refinement statistics

Results

Structure Determination and Overall Architecture. The structure of DhaK was solved by MIR at 2.5 Å resolution. Refinement against 1.75-Å data resulted in an R factor of 17.1% and an Rfree of 20.1%, with excellent stereochemistry (Table 1). The asymmetric unit contains one physiological dimer (Fig. 1A). Residues 20–368 of the DhaK monomer are well ordered, with the exception of residues 205–217. The monomer can be divided into two domains, with each composed of a six-stranded β-sheet, which are covered by α-helices (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Structure of the DhaK–Dha complex. (A) Ribbon diagram of the DhaK dimer. The subunits are gray, the N-terminal domain is blue, the C-terminal domain is green, the β-ribbon is red, and the contact helices are orange. The atoms of His-230 with Dha in a hemiaminal linkage are shown as a yellow stick model. (B and C) Experimental 2 Fo-Fc electron densities of the active site complexed with Dha and empty at 1.75-Å resolution contoured at 1.5 σ. Hydrogen bonds are indicated as black dotted lines. Only the pro-R OH (*) is surface exposed.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Models of DhaK subunit colored by structural entities. (A) Folding diagram. β-strands depicted by a Δ are running downward. For clarity, the folding diagram of the upper sheet has been rotated +60° around an axis perpendicular to the lower sheet. (B) Stereoview of backbone related to Fig. 1 A by a 50° rotation around the horizontal axis. The N-terminal domain is cyan and the IIA core is blue (boxed area), the C-terminal domain is green with the FtsZ core boxed, the β ribbon is red, and contact helices 1 and 8 are orange. The hemiaminal between His-230 and Dha and His-66 and Asp-119 are depicted in the green and blue ball-and-stick representation, and the Trp-267/Trp-274 zipper in the red ball-and-stick representation.

The core of the N-terminal domain (residues 55–195) possesses a similar fold as the IIA domain of the mannose transporter (PDB ID code 1PDO; ref. 9). It consists of a central four-stranded parallel β-sheet surrounded by 5 helices (Fig. 2, blue boxed area). Helix 4 and 5 form a hairpin, which is characteristic of the IIA fold. Overlay of the DhaK core with the IIA domain using the DALI server (20) yields a Z score of 9.3 and an rms deviation of 2.5 Å for 106 Cα atoms (Fig. 3, red and blue backbone traces). The IIA core of DhaK is extended on the N-terminal side by two antiparallel strands (residues 33–54) and the dimerization helix 1 (residues 20–32). On the C-terminal side it is connected to the next domain. This second domain also consists of a six-stranded mixed β-sheet (Fig. 2). It is covered by two helices on the solvent-exposed side and packed against the first helix of the helix hairpin (residues 161–175) on the other side. The C-terminal 15 residues of the polypeptide chain fold back onto the N-terminal domain. The fold assumed by the leftmost four β-strands and the two solvent-exposed helices (Fig. 2 A, green boxed area) also occurs in the C-terminal domain (residues 249–339) of the bacterial cell-division protein FtsZ of M. jannaschii (Fig. 3, green backbone traces, PDB ID code 1FSZ; ref. 21) with a Z score of 5.8 and an rms deviation of 2.3 Å for 72 Cα atoms. Inserted into this common fold is the active site loop of DhaK consisting of two short antiparallel β-strands bearing the active site His-230. The DhaK dimer interface is formed by helices 1 and 8 (Fig. 2), which intersect at an angle of 70°. A total of 9.3% (2,390 Å2) of the accessible surface is buried on dimer formation.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Superposition of backbone traces of DhaK (blue), IIAMan (red), and the C-terminal domain of FtsZ (green, residues 249–339). The conserved histidine and aspartic acid residues at the topological switch points of the fold are indicated in ball-and-stick representation. Superimposable regions of DhaK are dark blue; nonalignable regions are light blue.

The Twisted Two-Strand β-Ribbon. A prominent feature on the outer surface of DhaK is a β-ribbon (Fig. 2, residues 255–284), which caps the edge of the N-terminal β-sheet (residues 137–142). It is inserted between the first helix and second β-strand of the FtsZ fold. The ribbon contains two conserved tryptophans (Trp-267 and Trp-274), which form a Trp zipper, a motif that is proposed to stabilize β-hairpins in their strongly twisted conformation (22, 23). A comparison of homologous Dha kinase sequences reveals that the β ribbon is present only in DhaK of Gram-negative bacteria, where it covers an edge strand, which is composed exclusively of hydrophobic residues. In the Dha kinases of Gram-positive bacteria and eukaryotes, the corresponding edge strand contains a glutamic acid residue. Charged residues and β-ribbons are devices that have been proposed to protect edge strands of regular β-sheets from aggregation with any other β-strands they encounter (23). The ribbon itself is constrained by the Trp zipper and thereby protected from aggregation into a larger β-sheet.

Dha-Binding Site. Unexpected electron density at His-230 in the C-terminal domain could unambiguously be assigned to a molecule of Dha bound as a hemiaminal to the Nε2 of the imidazole ring (Fig. 1B). The covalently bound substrate is further held in place by a network of hydrogen bonds to residues of the N-terminal domain. The geminal aminoalcohol group at C-2 of Dha forms a hydrogen bond with the Nε2 of His-66, and the OH groups at C1 and C3 are coordinated by the carboxyl group of Asp-119 and the main-chain amide hydrogen of Gly-63 (Fig. 1B). His-230 is at the turn of a loop suspended from the two rightmost β-strands of the C-terminal domain, its imidazole ring being fixed by a hydrogen bond between the Nδ1 and the side-chain carboxylate of Glu-232. His-66 and Asp-119 are at the topological switch point of the core fold common to DhaK and IIAMan (Fig. 3). The imidazole ring of His-66 is held in place by a hydrogen bond between its Nδ1 atom and the main-chain carbonyl oxygen of Thr-333.

Dha is buried in a cavity. Only the pro-R OH group (Fig. 1B) is surface exposed and ready for a electrophilic attack by phospho-His-9 of DhaM (12). Dha binding must be tight because no substrate was added at any stage of the protein purification. By chance, Dha also was not removed in vivo, because DhaK was expressed in a ptsIptsH strain, where DhaM cannot be phosphorylated and Dha is consequently not phosphorylated either (12). In fact, ≈0.8 mol of DhaP per mol of DhaK are readily released in vitro on incubation of the complex with PEP and catalytic amounts of the phosphotransferase components enzyme I, HPr, DhaM and DhaL (Fig. 4A). This indicates that Dha is bound to the active and not to an allosteric site. Consistent with this conclusion is the observation that mutations of His-230 to alanine or lysine completely abolished kinase activity (results not shown).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Activity and amino acid sequence of the active site. (A) Liberation of DhaP from the DhaK–substrate complex. Highly purified DhaK (110 μM) was incubated with an excess of PEP and catalytic amounts of EI, HPr, DhaL, and DhaM. The release of DhaP (broken line) was monitored by its reduction with glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. DhaP at the indicated concentrations was reduced in parallel (solid lines). (B) Alignment of the active-site sequences of representative PEP-dependent and ATP-dependent DhaK orthologs and of two representative paralogs involved in transcription control. *, His-66, Asp-119, and His-230. DhaK of E. coli (SWISS-PROT entry P76015), YcgT1 of Sinorhizobium meliloti (SWISS-PROT entry Q92WN2; ref. 37), and Lactococcus lactis (Q9CIV8; ref. 38) are subunits of PEP-dependent Dha kinase. YcgT2 of S. meliloti (SWISS-PROT entry Q92WN4) and L. lactis (SWISS-PROT entry Q9CIW0) are domains and subunits of putative transcription regulators of the SorC and TetR/QacR families. DhaK and DAK are ATP-dependent Dha kinases of C. freundii (SWISS-PROT entry P45510), man, and the yeast Pichia pastoris (SWISS-PROT entry O74192).

DhaK was freed of Dha by incubation with DhaL and the PTS components, the apoprotein crystallized under the same condition as the DhaK–Dha complex, and the structure solved at 2.0 Å resolution (Table 1). The difference Fourier map with phases derived from the DhaK–Dha complex model revealed strong extra-negative density at the position of the covalently bound Dha molecule. But otherwise, removal of Dha did not detectably alter the conformation of the active site (Fig. 1C).

The Family of DhaK Paralogs. A BLASTP (24) search revealed genes for DhaK-like protein subunits and domains in >50 Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as in many eukaryotes. PTS-dependent and ATP-dependent Dha kinases are discernible by phylogenetic clustering but no sequence motif emerged which could be considered to be critically relevant for phosphoryl donor recognition. A second operon for putative transcription regulators and DhaK-like proteins is often found immediately adjacent to the catalytic operon (Fig. 5). Assuming that proteins encoded in an operon are functionally related, it is likely that these DhaK-like proteins are paralogs with regulatory functions. The active site residues are also invariant in these paralogs (Fig. 4B). Fig. 5 shows relationships by fold and function of representative examples. A two-domain protein of Sinorhizobium meliloti consists of an N-terminal domain belonging to the SorC family of transcription regulators (25) and a DhaK-like C-terminal domain. A DhaK paralog of Lactococcus lactis is encoded in an operon together with YceG, a protein belonging to the TetR/QacR (26, 27) family of repressors. It remains to be elucidated how the DhaK paralogs are activated by ligand binding and whether the activated state is eventually terminated by phosphorylation of the ligand in a PTS-dependent reaction.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Domain and subunit composition of representative Dha kinases and their associated transcription regulators. The catalytic Dha kinase subunits are framed (dotted line). Homologous subunits and domains are labeled as follows: DhaK-like (slanted lines) and DhaL-like (vertical lines). The IIA folds are gray and the core fold of DhaK is black. The invariant His are indicated by white dots (phosphorylation sites) and white squares (hydrogen bonding of Dha). Established and putative transcription regulators are indicated as open arrows. ManX is a subunit (IIABMan) of the mannose transporter. The horizontal alignment of the proteins reflects the organization of the respective operons. Functionally characterized proteins are indicated by their gene names, proteins for which a function is suggested are indicated by their SWISS-PROT entry number.

Discussion

The x-ray structure of the DhaK subunit of the E. coli Dha kinase reveals that Dha is bound by a hemiaminal linkage between the imidazole ring and the carbonyl group. Hemiaminals are generally unstable. Those with primary amines react further by elimination of water to give Schiff bases or enamines. Those with secondary amines can form enamines if an α-hydrogen is present but not a Schiff base. In the DhaK active site the hemiaminal is stabilized by a hydrogen bond between the geminal alcohol and the imidazole ring of His-66. We propose that this hemiaminal does not directly participate in chemical catalysis, in contrast to the hemithioacetal intermediate of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase or the Schiff base intermediate of an aldolase (28). The experiments in support of this conclusion are (L.F.G.-A., unpublished data): (i) Glyceraldehyde and erythrose are phosphorylated by the Dha kinase at the β-OH and the γ-OH, respectively, and not like Dha at the α-OH. Similarly, a tomato enzyme homologous to the Dha kinase phosphorylated 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone at OH-4, and not at OH-3 (29). (ii) Substrate and product are both covalently bound. Strong electron density at His-230 reappears after soaking crystals of substrate-free DhaK with DhaP. The equilibrium dissociation constants of DhaK are 8 μM for Dha and 1.6 mM for DhaP. At a physiological DhaP concentration of ≈50 μM (30) product inhibition of DhaK is minimal. (iii) No exchange of hydrogen against deuterium at C-1 of Dha could be detected when the Dha kinase reaction was performed in D2O. This finding suggests that no enamine is formed that could increase the acidity of the α-OH. In conclusion, it appears improbable that the hemiaminal affects the reactivity of the α-OH. Such an effect is even less plausible for the β-OH and γ-OH of glyceraldehyde and erythrose, which are separated from the hemiaminal by one and two extra carbon–carbon bonds.

Covalent binding of substrates by bonds that do not participate in the catalyzed reaction is unusual, and to our knowledge, has not been observed before. What might be its function? We propose that formation of the hemiaminal is the chemical basis for efficient discrimination between short-chain ketoses and aldoses on one hand and the structurally similar polyalcohols on the other. The former are chemically reactive and potentially toxic, even at low concentrations (31, 32). The latter are compatible solutes, which accumulate to high concentrations as osmoprotectants, for instance in yeast (33). Removing a potentially noxious compound in the presence of a neutral or beneficial requires strong discrimination. In accord with this idea, glycerol in concentrations up to 20% (2.2 M) is neither a substrate nor an inhibitor of E. coli Dha kinase which, however, turns over the small amounts of contaminants present in commercial glycerol lots (unpublished data). On the other hand, glycerol kinases, which form no covalent intermediates and therefore may lack the specific discrimination between carbonyl compounds and polyols, do phosphorylate both glycerol and Dha (34, 35).

Dha kinases exist in two forms: ATP-dependent, and PEP-dependent. In eukaryotes that do not have a PTS, all Dha kinases are ATP-dependent. In bacteria most Dha kinases are PEP-dependent and only a few (for instance, C. freundii) are ATP-dependent. Strong amino acid sequence conservation suggests that all Dha kinases have a common ancestor, which, according to the results of phylogenetic clustering, might have been ATP-dependent. At some time in the course of evolution, the bacterial Dha kinases must then have switched from ATP to the PTS as provider of high-energy phosphate. However, the core fold of DhaK could also point in an opposite direction. This structure appears in a number of PTS proteins, in the DhaM subunit of Dha kinases itself, in the IIA subunit of the mannose family of PTS transporters, and in the transcription regulator LevR of Bacillus subtilis (Fig. 5, black and gray). Whereas the amino acid sequence similarity between IIAMan, DhaM, and LevR (Fig. 5, gray) is modest, it is nonexisting between the cores of DhaK and IIAMan (Fig. 5, black and gray). It is noteworthy that a histidine and an aspartic acid are invariant at the topological switch point of each fold (Fig. 3). However, they perform different functions. His-66 and Asp-119 of DhaK bind the substrate by hydrogen bonding (Fig. 1 A). His-10 of IIAMan (His-9 of DhaM and His-585 of LevR) is phosphorylated, and Asp 67 of IIAMan stabilizes and/or activates His-10 by formation of a hydrogen bond to the Nδ1 of the imidazole ring (9, 36).

DhaK of E. coli is the first, to our knowledge, and so far the only soluble carbohydrate phosphotransferase that utilizes the PTS as source of high-energy phosphate, all others being membrane proteins. It appears unlikely to us that DhaK could serve as a model for understanding the mechanism of vectorial phosphorylation by the carbohydrate transporters of the PTS (enzymes II). First, DhaK does not share amino acid sequence similarity with membrane-spanning domains of any PTS transporter, and second, phosphoryl groups are transferred directly from the IIA domain and not via a IIB domain as in transporters. In conclusion, DhaK is an example of a PTS protein, which is shared between bacteria and eukaryotes. Whether the common ancestor was a PTS protein or a kinase cannot yet be decided.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 3100-063420 and the Ciba-Geigy Jubiläumsstiftung. Ta6Br14 compound was a generous gift from Prof. Robert Huber, Max Planck Institute, Martinsried, Germany.

Footnotes

    • ↵‡ To whom correspondence may be addressed: E-mail: erni{at}ibc.unibe.ch or ulrich.baumann{at}ibc.unibe.ch.

    • ↵† Present address: Division of Structural Biology and Oxford Protein Production Facility, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom.

    • Abbreviations: Dha, dihydroxyacetone; DhaP, Dha phosphate; DhaK, DhaL, and DhaM, subunits of the Escherichia coli Dha kinase; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PTS, PEP-dependent carbohydrate:phosphotransferase system; Trp, tryptophan.

    • Data deposition: The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.rcsb.org [PDB ID codes 1OI2 (for subunit K of the E. coli dihydroxyacetone kinase bound to dihydroxyacetone) and 1OI3 (for subunit K of the E. coli dihydroxyacetone kinase in its apo-form)].

    • Received September 2, 2002.
    • Copyright © 2003, The National Academy of Sciences

    References

    1. ↵
      Luers, G. H., Advani, R., Wenzel, T. & Subramani, S. (1998) Yeast 14, 759-771.pmid:9675820
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      Nonomura, A. M. & Benson, A. A. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9794-9798.pmid:1409701
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      Schurmann, M. & Sprenger, G. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11055-11061.pmid:11120740
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      Fesq, H., Brockow, K., Strom, K., Mempel, M., Ring, J. & Abeck, D. (2001) Dermatology (Basel) 203, 241-243.pmid:11701979
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. Ivy, J. L. (1998) Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 30, 837-843.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      Taguchi, T., Murase, S. & Miwa, I. (2002) Cell Biochem. Funct. 20, 223-226.pmid:12125098
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      Beutler, R., Kämpfer, U., Schaller, J. & Erni, B. (2001) Microbiology 147, 249-250.pmid:11158340
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      Daniel, R., Stuertz, K. & Gottschalk, G. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 4392-4401.pmid:7635824
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      Nunn, R. S., Markovic-Housley, Z., Génovésio-Taverne, J. C., Flükiger, K., Rizkallah, P. J., Jansonius, J. N., Schirmer, T. & Erni, B. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 259, 502-511.pmid:8676384
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      Jia, Z., Vandonselaar, M., Hengstenberg, W., Quail, J. W. & Delbaere, L. T. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 236, 1341-1355.pmid:8126724
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      Liao, D. I., Silverton, E., Seok, Y. J., Lee, B. R., Peterkofsky, A. & Davies, D. R. (1996) Structure (London) 4, 861-872.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      Gutknecht, R., Beutler, R., Garcia-Alles, L. F., Baumann, U. & Erni, B. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 2480-2486.pmid:11350937
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    14. ↵
      Sheldrick, G. M. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 628-641.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    15. ↵
      de La Fortelle, E. & Bricogne, G. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 472-494.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    16. ↵
      Abrahams, J. P. & Leslie, A. W. G. (1996) Acta Crystallogr. D 52, 30-42.pmid:15299723
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. ↵
      Perrakis, A., Morris, R. & Lamzin, V. S. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 458-463.pmid:10331874
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y. & Cowan, S. W. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. A 47, 110-119.pmid:2025413
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., Lebedev, A., Wilson, K. S. & Dodson, E. J. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. D 55, 247-255.pmid:10089417
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      Holm, L. & Sander, C. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 218, 183-194.pmid:2002501
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      Lowe, J. & Amos, L. A. (1998) Nature 391, 203-206.pmid:9428770
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      Cochran, A. G., Skelton, N. J. & Starovasnik, M. A. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5578-5583.pmid:11331745
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2754-2759.pmid:11880627
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410.pmid:2231712
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      Wohrl, B. M., Wehmeier, U. F. & Lengeler, J. W. (1990) Mol. Gen. Genet. 224, 193-200.pmid:2277638
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      Orth, P., Schnappinger, D., Hillen, W., Saenger, W. & Hinrichs, W. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 215-219.pmid:10700280
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      Schumacher, M. A., Miller, M. C., Grkovic, S., Brown, M. H., Skurray, R. A. & Brennan, R. G. (2001) Science 294, 2158-2163.pmid:11739955
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    28. ↵
      Allard, J., Grochulski, P. & Sygusch, J. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3679-3684.pmid:11274385
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      Herz, S., Kis, K., Bacher, A. & Rohdich, F. (2002) Phytochemistry 60, 3-11.pmid:11985845
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    30. ↵
      Fersht, A. (1999) in Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding (Freeman, New York), p. 366.
    31. ↵
      Tessier, F. J., Monnier, V. M., Sayre, L. A. & Kornfield, J. A. (2002) Biochem. J. 369, 705-719.
      OpenUrl
    32. ↵
      Molin, M., Norbeck, J. & Blomberg, A. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 1415-1423.pmid:12401799
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    33. ↵
      Blomberg, A. (2000) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 182, 1-8.pmid:10612722
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    34. ↵
      Jin, R. Z., Forage, R. G. & Lin, E. C. (1982) J. Bacteriol. 152, 1303-1307.pmid:6292169
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      Johnson, E. A., Burke, S. K., Forage, R. G. & Lin, E. C. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 160, 55-60.pmid:6090436
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    36. ↵
      Erni, B., Zanolari, B., Graff, P. & Kocher, H. P. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 18733-18741.pmid:2681202
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    37. ↵
      Finan, T. M., Weidner, S., Wong, K., Buhrmester, J., Chain, P., Vorholter, F. J., Hernandez-Lucas, I., Becker, A., Cowie, A., Gouzy, J., et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9889-9894.pmid:11481431
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    38. ↵
      Bolotin, A., Wincker, P., Mauger, S., Jaillon, O., Malarme, K., Weissenbach, J., Ehrlich, S. D. & Sorokin, A. (2001) Genome Res. 11, 731-753.pmid:11337471
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    A mechanism of covalent substrate binding in the x-ray structure of subunit K of the Escherichia coli dihydroxyacetone kinase
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    A mechanism of covalent substrate binding in the x-ray structure of subunit K of the Escherichia coli dihydroxyacetone kinase
    Christian Siebold, Luis Fernando García-Alles, Bernhard Erni, Ulrich Baumann
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2003, 100 (14) 8188-8192; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0932787100

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    A mechanism of covalent substrate binding in the x-ray structure of subunit K of the Escherichia coli dihydroxyacetone kinase
    Christian Siebold, Luis Fernando García-Alles, Bernhard Erni, Ulrich Baumann
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2003, 100 (14) 8188-8192; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0932787100
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 100 (14)
    Table of Contents

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Materials and Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Surgeons hands during surgery
    Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
    Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
    Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
    Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
    Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
    Image credit: Witsawat.S.
    Double helix
    Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
    Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
    Image credit: Nathan Devery.
    Steamboat Geyser eruption.
    Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
    Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
    Listen
    Past PodcastsSubscribe
    Multi-color molecular model
    Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
    A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
    Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
    • List of Issues

    PNAS Portals

    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science
    • Teaching Resources

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Librarians
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490