Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Directed evolution of mammalian paraoxonases PON1 and PON3 for bacterial expression and catalytic specialization

Amir Aharoni, Leonid Gaidukov, Shai Yagur, Lilly Toker, Israel Silman, and Dan S. Tawfik
PNAS January 13, 2004 101 (2) 482-487; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2536901100
Amir Aharoni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonid Gaidukov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shai Yagur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lilly Toker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Israel Silman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan S. Tawfik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Communicated by Michael Sela, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, October 24, 2003 (received for review August 24, 2003)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Serum paraoxonases (PONs) are a group of enzymes that play a key role in organophosphate (OP) detoxification and in prevention of atherosclerosis. However, their structure and mechanism of action are poorly understood. PONs seem like jacks-of-all-trades, acting on a very wide range of substrates, most of which are of no physiological relevance. Family shuffling and screening lead to the first PON variants that express in a soluble and active form in Escherichia coli. We describe variants with kinetic parameters similar to those reported for PONs purified from sera and others that show dramatically increased activities. In particular, we have evolved PON1 variants with OP-hydrolyzing activities 40-fold higher than wild type and a specificity switch of >2,000-fold, producing PONs specialized for OP rather than ester hydrolysis. Analysis of the newly evolved variants provides insights into the evolutionary relationships between different family members.

The paraoxonases (PONs) are a family of closely related enzymes, which include PON1, PON2, and PON3 and share 60–70% nucleic acid identity. The two PON1 isoenzymes Q and R are by far the most investigated family members. They are calcium-dependent hydrolases that catalyze the hydrolysis of a broad range of esters and lactones (1, 2). PON1s also catalyze, albeit at much lower rates, the hydrolysis and thereby inactivation of various organophosphates (OPs), including the nerve agents sarin and soman (3). Initial interest in PONs was, therefore, toxicological. In addition, PON1 is involved in drug metabolism and is being used for drug inactivation (1, 4). In recent years, it has become apparent that PONs play an important role in the prevention of atherosclerosis. PON1 and PON3 reside in the cholesterol-carrying particles high-density lipoprotein (HDL, “good” cholesterol). The levels of PON1 in the blood and its catalytic proficiency appear to have a major impact on the individual's susceptibility to pollutants and insecticides and to atherosclerosis (5). Furthermore, mice lacking the PON1 gene are highly susceptible to atherosclerosis and to OP poisoning (6). In vitro assays show that PON1 inhibits the oxidation of lipids in low-density lipoprotein (LDL, “bad” cholesterol), thereby reducing the level of oxidized lipid forms involved in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis (7–9). Because atherosclerosis is the underlying cause of ≈50% of all deaths in Western societies, and because nerve gases are both a terrorist threat and a nonconventional military weapon, PONs are currently the subject of intensive research.

Despite many efforts, the structure and mechanism of action of PONs are still enigmatic. First, PONs hydrolyze a broad repertoire of substrates, ranging from phosphotriesters to esters (of carboxylic acids) and lactones (1, 2). Roles in the hydrolysis of platelet-activating factor (10) and of l-homocysteine thiolactone (L-HcyT, a known risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease) (2) and in reduction of lipid peroxides (9) have also been suggested. However, these activities of PON1 are orders of magnitude lower than with its well characterized substrates. For example, hydrolysis of L-HcyT is 2,800–25,000 times lower than hydrolysis of phenylacetate, depending on the enzyme preparation (2, 11). Such low and varying activities may be due to miniscule amounts of contaminating enzymes. Indeed, a recent article argues that platelet-activating factor hydrolysis is due to the presence of low levels of platelet-activating factor acetyl hydrolase (12). PON3's low level in the high-density lipoprotein (≈50-fold lower than PON1) hinders its purification and detailed characterization. PON3s were only recently purified and characterized from human and rabbit sera (13, 14). They were found to hydrolyze a wide variety of esters and lactones but not paraoxon. PON3 appears to exhibit enhanced ability to protect low-density lipoprotein against oxidation relative to PON1, suggesting a key role in prevention of atherosclerosis (13).

Access to recombinant PONs would afford several benefits. It would greatly facilitate their structural and functional characterization and permit examination of their weak, yet potentially most biologically relevant, activities, in the complete absence of other serum enzymes. PONs constitute a mystery: the best known substrates (e.g., phenylacetate and dihydrocoumarin) are man-made and have no known physiological relevance, whereas the enzymes perform very poorly with substrates of potential biological significance, such as L-HcyT and oxidized lipid esters. Nor is PON1 a highly effective phosphotriesterase. Its catalytic specificity (k cat/K M) for paraoxon is >200-fold lower than for phenylacetate and needs to be significantly improved for effective treatment of OP detoxification (15). PONs therefore constitute an intriguing target for engineering aimed at improving catalytic efficiency and specificity. Perhaps these “enzymes of many substrates” could be compelled to “specialize” for both practical applications and mechanistic studies. Such engineering entirely depends on the ability to amply express and screen many thousands of variants. It was shown, however, that PON1 could not be functionally expressed in Escherichia coli, presumably because of aggregation and the absence of glycosylation (16, 17).

Directed evolution is a powerful tool for reshaping functional and structural features of proteins, including their solubility (18) and their enzymatic proficiency and specificity (19, 20). Here we report application of directed evolution in achieving functional expression of PON1 and PON3 in E. coli at >20 mg/liter culture and a dramatic increase in their hydrolytic proficiency toward the fluorogenic OP substrate 7-O-diethylphosphoryl-3-cyano-7-hydroxycoumarin (DEPCyC).

Materials and Methods

Further experimental details are provided as Supporting Materials and Methods, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site.

Cloning of PON Genes and Construction of Gene Libraries. Plasmids containing the HuPON1 and HuPON3 genes (14) were used as templates for PCR amplification. The genes for MoPON1, MoPON3, and RatPON1 were amplified from mouse and rat liver cDNA (Clontech). RabPON1 and RabPON3 were amplified from cDNA prepared from fresh liver of New Zealand rabbits. All genes were cloned into pET32b(+) (Novagen). Primers used for amplification are listed in Table 4, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site. For the construction of PON1 and PON3 libraries by DNA shuffling, the PON genes were individually amplified, mixed in equal amounts, digested, and shuffled as described (21). The resulting PON1 and PON3 gene libraries were recloned into pET32b and transformed into DH5α cells. DH5α colonies (>5 × 104) were combined, and the plasmid DNA was extracted. Randomly mutagenized PCR libraries were derived from highly soluble rePON1 variant G3C9 genes by using wobble-base PCR (22). Third-generation shuffling and randomly mutagenized PON1 libraries were cloned into a pET32 vector from which the Trx fusion protein and peptide tags had been truncated (pET32-tr).

Screening Procedures. Libraries were transformed into origamiB (DE3, Novagen) cells and grown and replicated with velvet cloth for the esterase screening. A layer of soft agar (0.5%) in activity buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8/1 mM CaCl2) supplemented with 0.3 mM 2-naphthylacetate (2NA) and 1.3 mg/ml Fast Red was added (23). Colonies that turned red first were picked from the replica plate. For the OP screen, a layer of soft agar (0.5%) supplemented with 40 μM fluorogenic substrate DEPCyC (for synthesis, see Fig. 4, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site) was added to the original plates. Highly fluorescent colonies were picked directly from the original plate. Positive colonies were used to inoculate 500 μl of LB media in a 96-deep-well plate and grown overnight at 30°C. Plates were duplicated, lysed with BugBuster (Novagen), and screened for 2NA, paraoxon, and DepCyC hydrolysis in 96-well plates. The activity of the best 20 clones was verified, and their plasmid was extracted and used as a template for subsequent rounds of reshuffling.

Expression and Purification of the rePON Variants. Typically, 1 liter of LB medium was inoculated and grown overnight at 30°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended, and disrupted by sonication. Ammonium sulfate was added to the lysate to 55% (wt/vol). The precipitate was dissolved and dialyzed against activity buffer and then chromatographed on a NiNTA column followed by a High Trap Q column (Pharmacia). Fractions were analyzed for paraoxonase activity and purity (by SDS/PAGE), pooled, dialyzed, and concentrated. For purification of rePON1 (without the Trx and affinity tags), the dialyzed ammonium sulfate precipitate was chromatographed on High Trap Q as above, followed by ceramic hydroxyapatite column (Type 1, Bio-Rad).

Enzymes Kinetics. A range of enzyme concentrations (0.005–4 μM) and substrate concentrations was applied (from 0.3 × K M up to 2–3 × K M). Product formation was monitored spectrophotometerically in 96-well plates with 200-μl reaction volumes. Kinetic parameters were determined by fitting the data directly to the Michaelis–Menten {V o = k cat[E]0[S]0/([S]0 + K M)} and competitive inhibition {V o = V max[S]0/([S]0 + K M(1 + [I]/K i)} models. Background hydrolysis of paraoxon, p-nitrophenylacetate, and L-HcyT and DEPCyC were subtracted from enzyme kinetic experiments.

Results and Discussion

Family DNA Shuffling and Screening. The wild-type PON1 genes, human (R-form; Hu), mouse (Mo), rat (Rat), and rabbit (Rab) (79–93% nucleic acid sequence identity), and wild-type PON3 genes Hu, Mo, and Rab (81–87% identity), were cloned into an expression vector encoding the PON genes fused to thioredoxin by a peptide linker. Fusion to thioredoxin slightly increased the solubility of PONs (24) and permitted detection of trace activities in lysates of Mo-, Rat-, and Rab-PON1. To achieve efficient expression in E. coli and increase the specific activity of PON toward different substrates, we used family DNA shuffling followed by screening for different activities. DNA shuffling of families of homologous genes has proven a powerful technique for directed evolution of enzymes with specific functions (21, 25). We created two separate libraries by DNA shuffling, a PON1 library derived from shuffling of four wild-type PON1 genes and a PON3 library derived from three wild-type PON3 genes. The libraries were transformed to E. coli. Sequencing of five randomly chosen clones from each library indicated >10 crossovers per gene with almost even distribution of the parental genes (Fig. 5, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The libraries were screened on agar plates for esterase activity by using 2NA and an azo dye (Fast Red) that reacts with the released 2-naphthol to generate an insoluble red product (23); 103 to 104 individual agar colonies were screened in each round. Typically, 200–500 clones exhibiting the highest rate of color formation were picked from a replica plate and grown in liquid medium; the crude cell lysate was assayed spectrophotometrically for the hydrolysis of various substrates, including paraoxon and 2NA. The 20 best clones were subcloned and used as templates for further rounds of DNA shuffling and screening.

Directed Evolution of PON1 for E. coli Expression. After three rounds of shuffling and screening, improved clones of PON1 were isolated. The crude lysates of these clones exhibited ≈20-fold higher rates with both 2-NA and paraoxon. Further analysis indicated increased levels of soluble, active enzyme rather than increased specific activity. The best first-generation variants were expressed fused to thioredoxin tag (trx-rePON1 variants G1A5 and G1C4) and exhibited a 3- to 6-fold increase in the amount of soluble protein relative to trx-RabPON1. The best clones from the second round of evolution (G2D6 and G2E6) exhibited a 14- to 18-fold increase (Fig. 1). We then recloned the second-generation library to an expression vector without the fusion protein (thioredoxin) and linker peptide, retaining the unmodified, 355-aa PON1 proteins (rePON1). Screening of this library generated variants G3C9 and G3H8, which yielded ≈12 mg/liter culture of pure, active, unmodified PON1 (Fig. 6, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). These newly evolved variants stand in clear contrast to the unmodified wild-type PON1s, including RabPON1, that yield no soluble expression without the thioredoxin tag.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Directed evolution of PON1 for soluble expression in E. coli. (A) Paraoxonase activity of PON1 variants in the crude E. coli lysate calculated per milligram of E. coli cells. Activity is shown for the wild-type trx-HuPON1 (nil), trx-RabPON1, trx-rePON1 variants G1A5 and G1C4 from the first round and G2D6 and G2E6 from the second round, and rePON1 variant G3C9 (devoid of all tags) from the third round of evolution. (B) SDS/PAGE (12%) of the crude cell lysates as numbered in A.

The sequences of the selected variants reveal that, as early as the first round of evolution, convergence to the RabPON1 gene has occurred, with relatively small contributions from the other three parental genes (Fig. 7A, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The convergence toward RabPON1 is not surprising, given that the wild-type RabPON1 was the only wild-type PON1 that, after fusion to thioredoxin, expressed measurable amounts of soluble enzyme in E. coli (Fig. 1). It may be related to the higher stability of serum RabPON1 (certainly relative to HuPON1) and its higher affinity for calcium (26). In all selected variants, position 192 is a lysine as in the rabbit wild-type sequence. This position is either an argininine or asparagine in the human R/Q PON1 isoenzymes, of which the R form exhibits ≈8-fold higher catalytic activity (27). Lysine is probably equivalent to arginine, hence the resemblance of the rate parameters of the new variants to the R form human PON1 (Table 1). Eight conserved mutations were identified in all the selected variants, located in only two regions, residues 126–142 and 301–343 (Fig. 8, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The mutations in the first region are I126T, M130L, K137S, and L142V, and in the second region the mutations are A301G, A320V, M341L, and V343I. All the mutations are quite subtle, and half are from one hydrophobic amino acid to another (M130L, L142V, M341L, and V343I). The two mutated regions in the newly evolved PON1s may be involved in correct folding of PON1 and in its oligomeric packing. It has been suggested that exposed hydrophobic surfaces of PON1 are involved in its oligomerization and aggregation (17). These putative hydrophobic surfaces may also lead to aggregation of wild-type PON1s when expressed in E. coli. Subtle mutations in these exposed hydrophobic surfaces may have prevented misfolding and formation of high-order aggregates and thereby facilitated soluble expression.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Kinetic parameters and E. coli expression levels of the newly evolved rePON1 variants

Selected PON1 variants were purified, and their kinetic parameters were determined (Table 1 and Fig. 9, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). Little variation occurs in the catalytic parameters for paraoxon and phenylacetate hydrolysis between variants of the first, second, or third generations. Other substrates (2NA and dihydrocoumarin) show the same trend (Table 5, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). This suggests that the increased catalytic activity in the isolated clones is mainly due to increased protein solubility and that the enzymatic properties of PON1 were not significantly altered. Detailed kinetic parameters for wild-type RabPON1 (to which the newly evolved clones are most homologous) are not available. However, serum Rab-PON1 and serum HuPON1 display very similar rates (26), and the newly evolved rePON1s do exhibit kinetic parameters similar to serum HuPON1 (Table 1). The substrate specificity of serum RabPON1 has also been determined (13), and our rePON1s appear quite similar (Table 6, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). Other key properties of PON1 seem to be retained in the newly evolved variants. Like HuPON1 (17), rePON1s appear to be in monomer–dimer equilibrium in the presence of 0.6 mM C12-maltoside, as analyzed by gel filtration (data not shown).

Homocysteine Thiolactonase Activity of rePON1 and Exclusion of Multiple Sites of Hydrolytic Activity. A recent and intriguing finding regarding PON1 is its putative ability to hydrolyze L-HcyT, which is a major risk factor in atherosclerosis (2, 11). We measured such activity in both trx-reRabPON1 and in the newly evolved variants (e.g., G1A5 and G3H8; Table 5 and Fig. 10, which are published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The K M measured for L-HcyT hydrolysis (≈19 mM) is in good agreement with the K M for serum HuPON1 (23 mM) (2).

The substrate specificity of PON1 is unusually broad; its catalytic efficiencies span five orders of magnitude between the best substrate known (phenylacetate) and L-HcyT (k cat/K M of 106 to 10 s–1 M–1). To establish that the various catalytic activities all occur at the same active site, we used the competitive inhibitor 2-hydroxyquinoline (11). Despite the vast differences in k cat and K M values, the inhibition constants for phenylacetate, paraoxon, and L-HcyT hydrolysis were found to be 3–11 μM (Table 7 and Fig. 11, which are published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). These values agree with the inhibition constant of ≈5 μM measured for hydrolysis of phenylacetate by serum HuPON1 (11). The close similarity of the inhibition constants above is strong evidence that all three substrates are hydrolyzed at the same active site; however, the complete proof can come only from deciphering the enzyme structure and catalytic mechanism.

Newly Evolved PON3 Variants (rePON3). Relative to PON1, little is known about PON3. Because of its low level in the serum (≈50-fold lower than PON1), PON3 was only recently purified and characterized (13, 14), and it was not expressed in heterologous expression systems. The specific kinetic parameters of serum PON3 have not been determined, but relative activities of various substrates of RabPON3 are available (13).

Unlike wild-type PON1, we found that wild-type genes of both rabbit and mouse PON3, when fused to thioredoxin, could be expressed in E. coli at reasonable levels (4–6 mg/liter) and appear to be stable and active. The serum-purified and E. coli-expressed PON3s show the same pattern of specificity with dihydrocoumarin (a lactone substrate) and the ester substrates phenyl and naphthyl acetate (Table 8, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). However, we have observed very weak paraoxonase activity with both mouse and rabbit PON3. Activity was very low (<0.1% of that of PON1) and exhibited a prolonged lag (≈30 min) in onset (hysteresis). These two factors may account for the earlier reports of no paraoxonase activity in the serum-purified RabPON3 (13, 14). Thus, the enzymatic properties of RabPON3 are not significantly altered on fusion to thioredoxin and expression in E. coli, and the detailed kinetic parameters obtained here are, in general, relevant to wild-type PON3s.

Wild-type PON3s exhibit 100- to 1,000-fold lower rates of ester and phosphotriester hydrolysis than PON1, although lactonase activities of the two enzymes are similar (13, 14). Their sequences are ≈65% identical at the amino acid level. We were interested to see how far the two enzymes had diverged and whether, under directed selection pressure, they might reconverge to exhibit similar, if not identical, phenotypes. Indeed, three rounds of shuffling and screening of wild-type PON3 genes yielded clones with greatly increased rates of both ester and phosphotriester hydrolysis. Comparison of selected variants from the three rounds of evolution (Table 2) indicated that the evolutionary process was directed primarily toward an increase in the catalytic efficiency of PON3 (see also Table 9, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). After the first round, a mild improvement in catalytic efficiency is observed (Table 2, variants G1A7 and G1B11). After the second round of evolution, one clone was isolated (G2C2) that exhibits (relative to wild-type RabPON3) 62- and 23-fold higher activity for paraoxon and 2NA hydrolysis, respectively. After the third round of evolution, three clones were isolated (G3A5, G3G3, and G3H9) that exhibit an overall improvement of up to 240-fold in paraoxonase activity. Thus, although wild-type PON3s exhibit almost no paraoxonase activity, shuffled variants of the same genes exhibit paraoxonase activity only 60-fold lower than PON1. However, no further improvement in 2NA activity was observed with these clones (Fig. 2 and Table 2). A 4- to 7-fold increase in the expression level of PON3s was also observed after three rounds of evolution (Table 9). Like PON1, the newly evolved PON3 could be expressed and purified (by adding a C-terminal 6×His tag; rePON3 variant G3H9) without the thioredoxin fusion protein, and its catalytic parameters were similar to those of trx-rePON3.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Improvements in catalytic specificity (k cat/K M) toward various substrates of variants of trx-rePON3 from the different rounds of evolution (with respect to wild-type trx-RabPON3). G1A7 and G1B11 are first-generation variants, G2C2 is a second-generation variant, and G3A5, G3G3, and G3H9 are third-generation variants. The kinetic parameters are presented in Tables 2 and 9.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of the newly evolved rePON3 variants

Kinetic parameters for other ester and lactone substrates (Table 9) revealed that the improvements in the catalytic efficiency can be divided into two groups. For the first group, which includes 2NA, phenylacetate, dihydrocoumarin, and L-HcyT, the increase in k cat/K M values for the third-generation variants is 2- to 20-fold (relative to the wild-type trx-reRabPON3). The second group includes paraoxon and p-nitrophenylacetate, for which the third-generation variants exhibit k cat/K M values up to 240-fold higher than wild-type PON3 (Fig. 2). Thus, the activity toward p-nitrophenylacetate co-evolved with that of paraoxon, whereas all the other substrates show a much milder improvement. In our view, this does not indicate the existence of two catalytic sites or subsites. Rather, the common feature of p-nitrophenylacetate and paraoxon is the p-nitrophenol-leaving group. The coevolution of the two substrates suggests that hydrolysis of both carboxy- and phosphoesters occurs by means of the same mechanism and at the same site.

Sequence analysis of the selected rePON3 variants indicates that the parental genes are evenly represented in variants of the first round of evolution (Fig. 7B). Alignment of variants from the second and third rounds of evolution reveals that, although the sequence similarity between the selected clones is very low, the RabPON3 gene is mildly overrepresented relative to the HuPON3 and MoPON3 genes. These subtle patterns of convergence in the sequences of the selected PON3 are in contrast to the clear convergence of the PON1 newly evolved variants. They show that many routes exist by which the enzymatic activity of PON3 can be increased.

Newly Evolved OP-Selective rePON1 Variants. Gene libraries of the highly soluble rePON1 variant G3C9 were prepared by random mutagenesis by using the wobble-base PCR method with either dPTP or 8-oxo-dGTP nucleoside analogs (22). The number of mutations per gene was adjusted by varying the concentration of dNTP analogs and the number of PCR cycles. Five libraries were generated: two dPTP libraries with 98% transitions, an average of 5–14 mutations per gene, and 20% to 6% residual activity in the pools of genes, respectively; and three 8-oxo-dGTP libraries with an average of 85% transversions, 3–10 mutations per gene, and 13% to 7% residual activity. In addition to the plate screen for 2NA hydrolysis described above, the libraries were directly screened on agar plates (with no need for replication) for the hydrolysis of a newly synthesized fluorogenic OP substrate, DEPCyC (Fig. 4). This substrate, which is a close homologue of the insecticide coumaphos previously used for the directed evolution of a bacterial phosphotriesterase (28, 29), exhibits higher fluorescence at a more convenient wavelength. Screening of ≈103 to 104 colonies from each library with 2NA yielded variants with mildly improved activity against OP substrates. The best variants were reshuffled and screened directly with DEPCyC, yielding a highly improved variant, reG3C9.49, that carried four mutations: G19R, S193P, N287D, and V346A. The V346A mutation appeared in other improved variants, suggesting its primary role in the enhancement of DEPCyC-hydrolyzing activity. The first-generation 8-oxo-dGTP libraries were also screened directly with DEPCyC to yield another highly improved variant, reG3C9.10, which contained two mutations, L69V and E218D. The two clones were purified and analyzed in detail (Fig. 3 and Table 3). The mutations affected the specific activity toward DEPCyC and phenylacetate, whereas the expression level of the two selected variants was not altered. Both variants exhibited a ≈40-fold increase in catalytic proficiency (k cat/K M) toward DEPCyC compared with wild-type PON1 (and its recombinant variant G3C9), and a simultaneous 50-fold reduction in catalytic proficiency toward phenylacetate. The change in the catalytic efficiencies resulted primarily from changes in k cat values for both substrates. Both variants showed a similarly reduced activity with other esters (e.g., 2NA) and mildly improved activity with another OP substrate (paraoxon; data not shown).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Michaelis–Menten plots for the hydrolysis of DEPCyC (A) and phenylacetate (B) by rePON1 variant G3C9 and its variant G3C9.49 that displays greatly enhanced OP-hydrolyzing activity. Enzyme concentrations are 7.5 × 10–8 M and 5.6 × 10–9 Min A and 5.2 × 10–9 M and 3.4 × 10–7 Min B for G3C9 and G3C9.49, respectively. The kinetic parameters derived from the fits are presented in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3. Kinetic parameters for variants of rePON1 selected from random mutagenesis libraries for OP hydrolysis

Conclusions and Implications

The outcome of the in vitro evolutionary process described above is a range of recombinant PON variants with a broad range of enzymatic properties. Expression of these variants in E. coli clearly demonstrates that, in contrast to previous findings (16), glycosylation is not an absolute requirement for the stability or enzymatic functions of PON1 and PON3. Expression in E. coli provides an ample source of PON1 and PON3 free from other serum proteins and will facilitate mechanistic and structural characterization of these important enzymes. We were already able to establish unequivocally that homocysteine lactonase activity, which is probably the weakest activity ascribed to the serum-purified enzyme (2, 11) (≈105-fold weaker than its activity toward phenylacetate), takes place at the same catalytic site at which paraoxon and phenylacetate hydrolysis occur.

PON1 and PON3 (as well as PON2) are members of the same gene family, but what caused an ancestral PON gene to duplicate and diverge in the course of natural evolution is not known (30). It is also unclear whether PON3 specializes in an activity that PON1 lacks or vice versa. Here we show that their responses to in vitro selection pressure toward higher paraoxonase and esterase activity are quite different. PON1 evolved to higher solubility, whereas its enzymatic properties seemed to have remained the same. In contrast, PON3 evolved primarily to higher catalytic efficiency; wild-type PON3s have almost no paraoxonase activity, but shuffled variants of the same genes exhibit paraoxonase activity only 60-fold lower than that of PON1. The sequence variations observed for PON1 and PON3 during the directed evolutionary process are also markedly different: whereas the newly evolved PON3 genes show considerable divergence, PON1 rapidly converged toward the rabbit sequence that seems to encode the most soluble and stable PON1. This example shows how closely related genes can behave very differently under the same selection pressure. The outcome of this directed selection pressure also indicates that, despite their divergence in natural evolution, PON1 and PON3 remain very close, not only in sequence but also in active-site structure and catalytic mechanism. This closeness is best exemplified by the rapid regain of paraoxonase activity in PON3 after the selection pressure.

Random mutagenesis and direct selection for OP hydrolysis led to >40-fold improvement in the catalytic proficiency of PON1 toward the phosphotriester DEPCyC (Table 3). This increase was accompanied by a >2,000-fold shift in specificity that was not selected for. Wild-type PON1 is essentially an esterase with very weak phosphotriesterase activity (k cat/K M for phenylacetate is 220- to 480-fold higher than for paraoxon or DEPCyC). The directly evolved variants were converted into a phosphotriesterase with weak esterase activity (k cat/K M for DEPCyC is 10-fold higher than for phenylacetate). Also notable is the exceptionally subtle nature of mutations that lead to the shift in specificity and the fact that mutations at two different locations (V346A in reG3C9.49 vs. L69V and E218D in reG3C9.10) produce the same shift. Finally, the demonstration that PONs are amenable to the powerful tool of directed evolution opens new prospects for improving their phosphotriesterase activity toward other hazardous OPs and toward catalytic activities related to the prevention of atherosclerosis.

Acknowledgments

Plasmids containing the HuPON1 and HuPON3 genes were kindly provided by Srinivasa T. Reddy University of California, Los Angeles. This research was supported by research grants from the Israel Science Foundation, the Ernest Nathan Fund and the Dolfi and Lola Ebner Center for Biomedical Research. I.S. was supported by U.S. Army Grant RMCC DAMD17-02-1-0675 and the Benoziyo Center for Neurosciences, A.A. was supported by a Pacific Theatres Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship. D.S.T. is an incumbent of the Elaine Blond Career Development Chair, and I.S. is the Bernstein-Mason Professor of Neurochemistry.

Footnotes

  • ↵ ‡ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tawfik{at}weizmann.ac.il.

  • Abbreviations: PON, paraoxonase; OP, organophosphate; DEPCyC, 7-O-diethylphosphoryl-3-cyano-7-hydroxycoumarin; 2NA, 2-naphthylacetate; L-HcyT, l-homocysteine thiolactone.

  • Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. AY499188–AY499199).

  • Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences

References

  1. ↵
    La Du, B. N., Aviram, M., Billecke, S., Navab, M., Primo-Parmo, S., Sorenson, R. C. & Standiford, J. J. (1999) Chem. Biol. Interact. 119–120 , 379–388.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Jakubowski, H. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275 , 3957–3962. pmid:10660550
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Davies, H. G., Richter, R. J., Keifer, M., Broomfield, C. A., Sowalla, J. & Furlong, C. E. (1996) Nat. Genet. 14 , 334–336. pmid:8896566
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Biggadike, K., Angell, R. M., Burgess, C. M., Farrell, R. M., Hancock, A. P., Harker, A. J., Irving, W. R., Ioannou, C., Procopiou, P. A., Shaw, R. E., et al. (2000) J. Med. Chem. 43 , 19–21. pmid:10633034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Smolen, A., Eckerson, H., Gan, K., Hailat, N. & La Du, B. (1991) Drug Metab. Dispos. 19 , 107–112. pmid:1673383
    OpenUrlAbstract
  6. ↵
    Shih, D. M., Gu, L. J., Xia, Y. R., Navab, M., Li, W. F., Hama, S., Castellani, L. W., Furlong, C. E., Costa, L. G., Fogelman, A. M. & Lusis, A. J. (1998) Nature 394 , 284–287. pmid:9685159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Lusis, A. J. (2000) Nature 407 , 233–241. pmid:11001066
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. Ahmed, Z., Ravandi, A., Maguire, G. F., Emili, A., Draganov, D., La Du, B. N., Kuksis, A. & Connelly, P. W. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276 , 24473–24481. pmid:11320081
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Aviram, M., Rosenblat, M., Bisgaier, C. L., Newton, R. S., Primo-Parmo, S. L. & La Du, B. N. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101 , 1581–1590. pmid:9541487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Rodrigo, L., Mackness, B., Durrington, P. N., Hernandez, A. & Mackness, M. I. (2001) Biochem. J. 354 , 1–7. pmid:11171072
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Billecke, S., Draganov, D., Counsell, R., Stetson, P., Watson, C. & La Du, B. N. (2000) Drug Metab. Dispos. 28 , 1335–1342. pmid:11038162
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Marathe, G., Zimmerman, G. & McIntyre, T. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278 , 3937–3947. pmid:12466264
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Draganov, D. I., Stetson, P. L., Watson, C. E., Billecke, S. S. & La Du, B. N. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275 , 33435–33442. pmid:10931838
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Reddy, S. T., Wadleigh, D. J., Grijalva, V., Ng, C., Hama, S., Gangopadhyay, A., Shih, D. M., Lusis, A. J., Navab, M. & Fogelman, A. M. (2001) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 21 , 542–547. pmid:11304470
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Josse, D., Lockridge, O., Xie, W. H., Bartels, F., Schopfer, L. M. & Masson, P. (2001) J. Appl. Toxicol. 21 , S7–S11. pmid:11920913
  16. ↵
    Brushia, R. J., Forte, T. M., Oda, M. N., La Du, B. & Bielicki, J. K. (2001) J. Lipid Res. 42 , 951–958. pmid:11369803
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Josse, D., Ebel, C., Stroebel, D., Fontaine, A., Borges, F., Echalier, A., Baud, D., Renault, F., le Maire, M., Chabrieres, E. & Masson, P. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277 , 33386–33397. pmid:12080042
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Waldo, G. S. (2003) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 7 , 33–38. pmid:12547424
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Farinas, E. T., Bulter, T. & Arnold, F. H. (2001) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12 , 545–551. pmid:11849936
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Tao, H. & Cornish, V. W. (2002) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6 , 858–864. pmid:12470742
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Abecassis, V., Pompon, D. & Truan, G. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28 , E88. pmid:11024190
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Zaccolo, M., Williams, D. M., Brown, D. M. & Gherardi, E. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 255 , 589–603. pmid:8568899
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Khalameyzer, V., Fischer, I., Bornscheuer, U. & Altenbuchner, J. (1999) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65 , 477–482. pmid:9925571
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Hammarstrom, M., Hellgren, N., van Den Berg, S., Berglund, H. & Hard, T. (2002) Protein Sci. 11 , 313–321. pmid:11790841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Crameri, A., Raillard, S. A., Bermudez, E. & Stemmer, W. P. (1998) Nature 391 , 288–291. pmid:9440693
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Kuo, C. L. & La Du, B. N. (1995) Drug Metab. Dispos. 23 , 935–944. pmid:8565784
    OpenUrlAbstract
  27. ↵
    Li, W. F., Costa, L. G., Richter, R. J., Hagen, T., Shih, D. M., Tward, A., Lusis, A. J. & Furlong, C. E. (2000) Pharmacogenetics 10 , 767–779. pmid:11191881
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Harcourt, R. L., Horne, I., Sutherland, T. D., Hammock, B. D., Russell, R. J. & Oakeshott, J. G. (2002) Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 34 , 263–268. pmid:11940156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Yang, H., Carr, P. D., McLoughlin, S. Y., Liu, J. W., Horne, I., Qiu, X., Jeffries, C. M., Russell, R. J., Oakeshott, J. G. & Ollis, D. L. (2003) Protein Eng. 16 , 135–145. pmid:12676982
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Primo-Parmo, S. L., Sorenson, R. C., Teiber, J. & La Du, B. N. (1996) Genomics 33 , 498–507. pmid:8661009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Josse, D., Xie, W. H., Renault, F., Rochu, D., Schopfer, L. M., Masson, P. & Lockridge, O. (1999) Biochemistry 38 , 2816–2825. pmid:10052953
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Directed evolution of mammalian paraoxonases PON1 and PON3 for bacterial expression and catalytic specialization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Directed evolution of mammalian paraoxonases PON1 and PON3 for bacterial expression and catalytic specialization
Amir Aharoni, Leonid Gaidukov, Shai Yagur, Lilly Toker, Israel Silman, Dan S. Tawfik
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2004, 101 (2) 482-487; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2536901100

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Directed evolution of mammalian paraoxonases PON1 and PON3 for bacterial expression and catalytic specialization
Amir Aharoni, Leonid Gaidukov, Shai Yagur, Lilly Toker, Israel Silman, Dan S. Tawfik
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2004, 101 (2) 482-487; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2536901100
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Conclusions and Implications
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

Biological Sciences

  • Structural basis for activity of TRIC counter-ion channels in calcium release
  • PGC1A regulates the IRS1:IRS2 ratio during fasting to influence hepatic metabolism downstream of insulin
  • Altered neural odometry in the vertical dimension
Show more

Biochemistry

  • Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
  • Peptidic degron for IMiD-induced degradation of heterologous proteins
  • Structure-based development of new RAS-effector inhibitors from a combination of active and inactive RAS-binding compounds
Show more

Related Content

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Host modification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal induces a phenotypic switch in bacterial symbionts
  • The Paraoxonase Gene Cluster Protects Against Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation
  • Identification of Critical Paraoxonase 1 Residues Involved in High Density Lipoprotein Interaction
  • The Evolutionary Origins of Detoxifying Enzymes: THE MAMMALIAN SERUM PARAOXONASES (PONs) RELATE TO BACTERIAL HOMOSERINE LACTONASES
  • Paraoxonase-1 Suppresses Experimental Colitis via the Inhibition of IFN-{gamma} Production from CD4 T Cells
  • Aspirin Hydrolysis in Plasma Is a Variable Function of Butyrylcholinesterase and Platelet-activating Factor Acetylhydrolase 1b2 (PAFAH1b2)
  • Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution: Parallel Evolution of Paraoxonases from Quorum-quenching Lactonases
  • Paraoxonases as Potential Antibiofilm Agents: Their Relationship with Quorum-Sensing Signals in Gram-Negative Bacteria
  • One Enzyme, Two Functions: PON2 PREVENTS MITOCHONDRIAL SUPEROXIDE FORMATION AND APOPTOSIS INDEPENDENT FROM ITS LACTONASE ACTIVITY
  • Integrated Bioprocessing for the pH-Dependent Production of 4-Valerolactone from Levulinate in Pseudomonas putida KT2440
  • A Novel Thermostable Arylesterase from the Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus P1: Purification, Characterization, and Expression
  • Localization and characterization of the novel protein encoded by C20orf3
  • HDL subfraction distribution of paraoxonase-1 and its relevance to enzyme activity and resistance to oxidative stress
  • HDL Oxidation Compromises its Influence on Paraoxonase-1 Secretion and its Capacity to Modulate Enzyme Activity
  • Structural and Mutational Analyses of Drp35 from Staphylococcus aureus: A POSSIBLE MECHANISM FOR ITS LACTONASE ACTIVITY
  • Phospholipase Action of Platelet-activating Factor Acetylhydrolase, but Not Paraoxonase-1, on Long Fatty Acyl Chain Phospholipid Hydroperoxides
  • The 192R/Q polymorphs of serum paraoxonase PON1 differ in HDL binding, lipolactonase stimulation, and cholesterol efflux
  • The Histidine 115-Histidine 134 Dyad Mediates the Lactonase Activity of Mammalian Serum Paraoxonases
  • The Catalytic Histidine Dyad of High Density Lipoprotein-associated Serum Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) Is Essential for PON1-mediated Inhibition of Low Density Lipoprotein Oxidation and Stimulation of Macrophage Cholesterol Efflux
  • DNA shuffling as a tool for protein crystallization
  • Genetic and environmental factors modulating serum concentrations and activities of the antioxidant enzyme paraoxonase-1
  • Scopus (214)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490