New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers
-
Edited by William J. Baumol, New York University, New York, NY, and approved September 17, 2004 (received for review May 25, 2004)

Abstract
We introduce a general framework for modeling functionally diverse problem-solving agents. In this framework, problem-solving agents possess representations of problems and algorithms that they use to locate solutions. We use this framework to establish a result relevant to group composition. We find that when selecting a problem-solving team from a diverse population of intelligent agents, a team of randomly selected agents outperforms a team comprised of the best-performing agents. This result relies on the intuition that, as the initial pool of problem solvers becomes large, the best-performing agents necessarily become similar in the space of problem solvers. Their relatively greater ability is more than offset by their lack of problem-solving diversity.
Footnotes
-
↵ § To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: luhong{at}umich.edu.
-
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
-
↵ ∥ In another set of computational experiments where a different problem was being solved, we consider agents with the same heuristics but whose perspectives vary. Similar results were found {Hong, L. & Page, S. E. (2002) Working paper, Diversity and Optimality [Loyola University (Chicago) and Univ. of Michigan (Ann Arbor)]}.
-
↵ ** Mathematically, the expected diversity of two randomly selected agents equals 11/12 = 0.9183333.
-
↵ †† Hong, L. & Page, S. E. (2002) Working paper, Diversity and Optimality [Loyola Univ. (Chicago) and Univ. of Michigan (Ann Arbor)].
- Copyright © 2004, The National Academy of Sciences
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
More Articles of This Classification
Social Sciences
Related Content
- No related articles found.
Cited by...
- How intermittent breaks in interaction improve collective intelligence
- Skill networks and measures of complex human capital
- Emergence of a global science-business initiative for ocean stewardship
- Opinion: Telepresence is a potentially transformative tool for field science
- Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder
- National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity
- Toward a sustainable biomedical research enterprise: Finding consensus and implementing recommendations
- Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles
- On the value of portfolio diversity in heart, lung, and blood research
- On the Value of Portfolio Diversity in Heart, Lung, and Blood Research
- Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild
- Emergence of segregation in evolving social networks
- Synchronicity, instant messaging, and performance among financial traders
- Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals
- Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows
- Power, Safety, and Learning in Racially Diverse Groups
- Making the Difference: Applying a Logic of Diversity