Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Commentary

Vesicle reuse revisited

David Zenisek
  1. Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS May 24, 2005 102 (21) 7407-7408; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502910102
David Zenisek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Neurons communicate at the synapse by releasing neurotransmitter from synaptic vesicles. After exocytosis, synaptic vesicle membrane and protein are locally recycled for reuse in the presynaptic terminal. The mechanisms involved in the recycling of synaptic vesicle material have yet to be fully resolved (reviewed in ref. 1). The traditional model of vesicle recycling posits that vesicles merge with the plasma membrane and then are later retrieved in perisynaptic regions by endocytosis (2–4). A second model, often referred to as “kiss-and-run” (5), suggests that neurotransmitter is released through a fusion pore that allows the vesicle to release neurotransmitter while retaining its protein and/or lipid (6). By refilling with neurotransmitter, vesicles formed in this manner could potentially become rapidly available for reuse. Evidence for rapid reuse of synaptic vesicles has been found in rat hippocampal neurons (7, 8), yet the contribution of this mechanism to pool recycling remains debated. The work by Li et al. (9) in a recent issue of PNAS introduced new tools and new data to this debate.

thy-1 SynaptopHluorin Mice: A New Tool for Visualizing Synaptic Transmission

Li et al. (9) develop a new tool for neurobiologists to exploit in their study of synaptic transmission. The authors make use of synaptopHluorin (10), a synaptic vesicle protein (synaptobrevin) that has been concatenated with a pH-sensitive GFP on its luminal side. pHluorin exhibits minimal fluorescence under acidic conditions and because secretory vesicles maintain an acidic interior, exocytosis of vesicles carrying synaptopHluorin is indicated by an abrupt brightening in fluorescence, and the retrieval of vesicle constituents is indicated by a dimming in the emission signal as newly formed organelles acidify (11). This technique for visualizing exocytosis, first developed by Miesenbock and colleagues (10), has been used by neurobiologists to study properties of exocytosis and endocytosis in cultured neurons (11, 12). Previous studies have transiently overexpressed synaptopHluorins in primary cell cultures; however, the method is cumbersome and offers little or no opportunity for selective label of a given cell type. The methodological advance by Li et al. is the generation of 12 lines of transgenic mice in which synaptopHluorin expression in the brain is driven by the thy-1 promoter. The thy-1 promoter has previously been shown to drive expression of GFP variants into different subsets of neurons. Despite the variability in expression pattern from line to line, the pattern itself apparently depends on either the transgene chromosomal insertion site and/or transgene copy number and thus is heritable (13). Previous characterization of the behavior of the thy-1 promoter by Feng et al. (13) indicates that each of the 12 mouse lines is expected to express synaptopHluorin in a unique subset of neurons.

The mice generated by Li et al. (9) should prove useful for a variety of applications for neuroscientists interested in various aspects of synaptic transmission and neuronal signaling. For example, by selecting mice with synaptopHluorin expression in particular neuronal cell types of interest, one now has an easier way to distinguish and visualize exocytosis in particular classes of neurons in culture. The authors take advantage of this feature using two of their lines, one which expresses synaptopHluorin mostly in excitatory neurons of the hippocampus and another that specifically targets inhibitory neurons for expression. Because inhibitory and excitatory neurons are not readily distinguishable in tissue culture, the authors were more easily able to study vesicle reuse independently in inhibitory and excitatory neurons.

The utility of labeling a subset of neurons is not limited to studies in tissue culture. Li et al. (9) demonstrate this by visualizing stimulus-evoked exocytosis in inhibitory neurons in hippocampal slice cultures. These mice may also prove useful for in vivo imaging of synaptic transmission. Recently, mice expressing synaptopHluorin in olfactory receptor neurons were used to visualize odorant-evoked synaptic release in vivo (14). The thy1-synaptopHluorin mice should enable researchers to extend in vivo imaging to neurons, for which specific promoters have not been found. Moreover, given advances in imaging technologies, it is not unreasonable to speculate that these mice could be used to visualize synaptic activity near the surface of the brain not only in anesthetized living mice but also in awake behaving mice (15) or even at synapses deep within the brain (16).

Revisiting Rapid Vesicle Reuse in Hippocampal Neurons

The work of Li et al. (9) also adds new information to the debate over what happens to newly recycled vesicles after exocytosis. After exocytosis, a vesicle's membrane and protein are retrieved for reuse at the synapse. After retrieval, synaptic vesicles are reacidified by a V-type ATPase, which can be blocked by bafilomycin. By adding bafilomycin, vesicles containing synaptopHluorin are prevented from acidifying and thus remain bright even after endocytosis, enabling the measurement of exocytosis independently of endocytosis. The authors used this technique, first developed by Sankaranarayanan and Ryan (17), to determine whether vesicle protein (and by extension vesicles themselves) used during one stimulus are preferentially reused when the neuron is challenged by a second stimulus. Because synaptopHluorin molecules exposed to the surface during the first stimulus are prevented from reacidifying, a second stimulus in the presence of bafilomycin would be expected to produce a smaller increase in fluorescence during the second depolarization if vesicles are reused. Instead, Li et al. find that the second response is exactly the same size as the first, indicating that different vesicles undergo exocytosis during the second stimulus. The results were the same for both inhibitory synapses and excitatory synapses.

No evidence for preferential recycling of recently endocytosed vesicles was found.

The results by Li et al. (9) agree well with an earlier study by Fernandez-Alfonso and Ryan (12), who used similar techniques, in which they found no evidence for preferential recycling of recently endocytosed vesicles at physiological temperatures. These two studies stand in direct contrast with other work in hippocampal synapses (7, 8), which concluded that a subset of vesicles undergo kiss-and-run and are preferentially reused rather than being returned to the general recycling pool. It is not yet clear how to reconcile the differences between these results, but several differences in the methodologies used are notable. First, as mentioned by Li et al., the assays for exocytosis are considerably different. Studies advocating a role for vesicle reuse have used styryl dyes (7, 8, 18), whereas evidence against such a mechanism comes from studies using alkaline trapping of synaptopHluorin-labeled vesicles. Styryl dyes, such as FM1–43, are environmentally sensitive fluorescent dyes, which are fluorescent in lipid but nonfluorescent in aqueous solution, and which reversibly intercalate into exposed membrane but cannot cross the bilayer. Hence, synaptic vesicles, whose membrane inner leaflets can be stained with the dyes by endocytosis, release the dyes during exocytosis when the inner surface becomes exposed to the outside of the cell and the dye desorbs from the membrane into the surrounding aqueous solution (19). Thus, synaptopHluorin fluorescence reports deacidification through the release of protons from the vesicle, whereas FM1–43 destaining results from a combination of desorption and diffusion. Moreover, in addition to being found in organelles, synaptopHluorin and styryl dyes are likely found in other organelles. FM1–43 will label any endocytic membrane, not just synaptic vesicle membrane. Conversely, synaptopHluorin localizes to peptide containing secretory granules (20) and endosomes (21) in some cell lines and could get localized to organelles other than synaptic vesicles in neurons. If any of these organelles labeled by FM1–43 or synaptopHluorin undergo stimulus-dependent exocytosis, it could confound the results.

Second, the stimuli used to release neurotransmitter differ between studies. As mentioned by Li et al. (9), much of the evidence for reuse comes from exocytosis driven by sucrose release, which works by a mechanism that is not completely understood. Nonetheless, results consistent with vesicle reuse have also been shown for electrical stimulation (7, 8). It should be noted, however, that the stimulus frequencies and durations used differ somewhat in the different studies.

Lastly, by necessity, alkaline trapping experiments are performed in the presence of bafilomycin. Although there are no apparent effects of bafilomycin on FM1–43 release kinetics in hippocampal neurons when stimulated at 10 Hz (17, 22), it remains possible that bafilomycin may have subtle effects at other stimulus frequencies. Could any of these differences account for the disparate results or could there be some other explanation? It appears that more work will have to be done before this debate can be resolved.

Acknowledgments

I thank C. Grabner for comments on the text. This work was supported by grants from the Kinship, McKnight, and Dana Foundations and by National Institutes of Health Grant EY014990.

Footnotes

  • ↵ * E-mail: david.zenisek{at}yale.edu.

  • See companion article on page 6131 in issue 17 of volume 102.

  • Copyright © 2005, The National Academy of Sciences

References

  1. ↵
    An, S. & Zenisek, D. (2004) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 , 522–530. pmid:15464884
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Heuser, J. E. & Reese, T. S. (1973) J. Cell Biol. 57 , 315–344. pmid:4348786
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. Heuser, J. (1989) Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 13 , 1063–1076. pmid:2576862
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Cremona, O. & De Camilli, P. (1997) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7 , 323–330. pmid:9232811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Fesce, R., Grohovaz, F., Valtorta, F. & Meldolesi, J. (1994) Trends Cell Biol. 4 , 1–4. pmid:14731821
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Meldolesi, J. & Ceccarelli, B. (1981) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 296 , 55–65. pmid:6121347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Pyle, J. L., Kavalali, E. T., Piedras-Renteria, E. S. & Tsien, R. W. (2000) Neuron 28 , 221–231. pmid:11086996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Aravanis, A. M., Pyle, J. L. & Tsien, R. W. (2003) Nature 423 , 643–647. pmid:12789339
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Li, Z., Burrone, J., Tyler, W. J., Hartman, K. N., Albeanu, D. F. & Murthy, V. N. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 , 6131–6136. pmid:15837917
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Miesenbock, G., De Angelis, D. A. & Rothman, J. E. (1998) Nature 394 , 192–195. pmid:9671304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Sankaranarayanan, S. & Ryan, T. A. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2 , 197–204. pmid:10783237
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Fernandez-Alfonso, T. & Ryan, T. A. (2004) Neuron 41 , 943–953. pmid:15046726
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Feng, G., Mellor, R. H., Bernstein, M., Keller-Peck, C., Nguyen, Q. T., Wallace, M., Nerbonne, J. M., Lichtman, J. W. & Sanes, J. R. (2000) Neuron 28 , 41–51. pmid:11086982
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Bozza, T., McGann, J. P., Mombaerts, P. & Wachowiak, M. (2004) Neuron 42 , 9–21. pmid:15066261
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Helmchen, F., Fee, M. S., Tank, D. W. & Denk, W. (2001) Neuron 31 , 903–912. pmid:11580892
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Levene, M. J., Dombeck, D. A., Kasischke, K. A., Molloy, R. P. & Webb, W. W. (2004) J. Neurophysiol. 91 , 1908–1912. pmid:14668300
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Sankaranarayanan, S. & Ryan, T. A. (2001) Nat. Neurosci. 4 , 129–136. pmid:11175872
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Richards, D. A., Guatimosim, C. & Betz, W. J. (2000) Neuron 27 , 551–559. pmid:11055437
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Betz, W. J., Mao, F. & Smith, C. B. (1996) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6 , 365–371. pmid:8794083
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Tsuboi, T. & Rutter, G. A. (2003) Curr. Biol. 13 , 563–567. pmid:12676086
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Machen, T. E., Leigh, M. J., Taylor, C., Kimura, T., Asano, S. & Moore, H. P. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. 285 , C205–C214.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Zhou, Q., Petersen, C. C. & Nicoll, R. A. (2000) J. Physiol. 525 , 195–206. pmid:10811737
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vesicle reuse revisited
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Vesicle reuse revisited
David Zenisek
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2005, 102 (21) 7407-7408; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502910102

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Vesicle reuse revisited
David Zenisek
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2005, 102 (21) 7407-7408; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502910102
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Related Article

  • Synaptic vesicle recycling studied in transgenic mice expressing synaptopHluorin
    - Apr 18, 2005
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: 102 (21)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • thy-1 SynaptopHluorin Mice: A New Tool for Visualizing Synaptic Transmission
    • Revisiting Rapid Vesicle Reuse in Hippocampal Neurons
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490