Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

High-amylose wheat generated by RNA interference improves indices of large-bowel health in rats

Ahmed Regina, Anthony Bird, David Topping, Sarah Bowden, Judy Freeman, Tina Barsby, Behjat Kosar-Hashemi, Zhongyi Li, Sadequr Rahman, and Matthew Morell
PNAS March 7, 2006 103 (10) 3546-3551; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510737103
Ahmed Regina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Bird
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Topping
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Bowden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judy Freeman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Barsby
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Behjat Kosar-Hashemi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhongyi Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sadequr Rahman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Morell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: matthew.morell@csiro.au
  1. Communicated by William James Peacock, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra, Australia, December 14, 2005 (received for review October 4, 2005)

Related Article

  • In This Issue
    - Mar 07, 2006
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & SI

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Immunodetection of SBEII isoforms in wheat endosperm. Segregation of SBEIIa (a) and SBEIIb (b) expression in three developing endosperms from the T2 wheat hp-SBEIIa transgenic line 087 (lanes 2–4) and five developing endosperms from the T2 hp-SBEIIa transgenic line 104 (lanes 5–9), as shown by immunoblotting using anti-SBEIIa and -SBEIIb antibodies, respectively. Lane 1 is nontransformed NB1. Segregation of SBEIIb (c) and SBEIIa (d) expression in five developing endosperms from the T2 wheat hp-SBEIIb transgenic line 008 (lanes 1–5) and four developing endosperms from the T2 hp-SBEIIb transgenic line 009 (lanes 6–9), as shown by immunoblotting using anti-SBEIIb and -SBEIIa antibodies, respectively. Lane 10 is nontransformed NB1.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Scanning electron micrographs of isolated starch granules. NB1 (nontransformed control wheat) (a), 087 (hp-SBEIIa wheat) (b), and 008 (hp-SBEIIb wheat) (c).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Size distribution analysis of wheat endosperm starch. Sepharose CL 2B gel chromatogram of undebranched starch from transgenic lines 008 (hp-SBEIIb wheat) (a) and 087 (hp-SBEIIa wheat) (b). The starch content of fractions was assayed by using a starch assay kit (Sigma). Amylopectin (first peak) and amylose (second peak) content estimated by this method as a percentage of total starch is shown on respective graphs.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Chain length distribution analysis of wheat endosperm starch by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis. Chain length profile of debranched starches from wheat transgenic lines was compared with that of nontransformed control NB1. The percentage of total mass of individual oligosaccharides from starch from NB1 is subtracted from the corresponding values from starches from transgenic lines. Samples are hp-SBE IIa line, 085 (◇), and hp-SBE IIb line, 008 (■).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Starch characteristics of wheat transgenic lines of SBEII

    Line identificationEnzyme targetedBirefringence*
    Amylose content estimated iodometrically,* %Amylose content determined by SEC, %100 grain weight,*, † gStarch content,* %
    Nil, %Partial, %Full, %
    NB1Nontransformed1.63.594.931.825.53.852.0
    087SBEIIa94.64.01.588.574.43.843.4
    008SBEIIb0.65.2194.127.332.83.650.3
    LSD (5%)—9.023.39.97.7NDNS4.9
    • ND, not determined. NS, not significant.

    • ↵*Mean of three replicates.

    • ↵ †Dry weight of 100 kernels.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Large-bowel digesta wet and dry weight of rats consuming experimental diets

    Low-amylose wheatHigh-amylose wheat
    Cecum
        Wet weight, g1.47 (0.12)* 3.14 (0.34)*
        Dry weight, g0.33 (0.03)* 0.67 (0.10)*
    Proximal colon
        Wet weight, g0.29 (0.12)0.48 (0.09)
        Dry weight, g0.06 (0.03)0.11 (0.02)
    Distal colon
        Wet weight, g0.83 (0.17)1.10 (0.08)
        Dry weight, g0.30 (0.08)0.35 (0.04)
    • All values are shown as the mean and SE (in parentheses) of six animals. Values in a row with like symbols are significantly different.

    • ↵*, P < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Cecal digesta pH and SCFA concentrations of rats consuming experimental diets

    DietpHSCFA concentration, mmol/kg
    AcetatePropionateButyrateTotal
    Low-amylose wheat6.23 (0.05)* 38.6 (1.9)11.9 (1.7)25.8 (3.3)79.6 (3.1)
    High-amylose wheat5.90 (0.14)* 43.6 (7.8)15.8 (3.1)23.0 (2.5)84.1 (8.6)
    • All values are shown as the mean and SE (in parentheses) of six animals. Values in any column with like symbols are significantly different.

    • ↵*, P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Cecal SCFA pools of rats consuming experimental diets

    DietSCFA pools, μmol
    AcetatePropionateButyrateTotal
    Low-amylose wheat44 (4)* 14 (2) † 31 (6) ‡ 88 (10)*
    High-amylose wheat106 (18)* 38 (7) † 57 (8) ‡ 202 (25)*
    • All values are shown as the mean and SE (in parentheses) of six animals. Values in any column with like symbols are significantly different.

    • ↵*, P < 0.01;

    • ↵ †, P < 0.02;

    • ↵ ‡, P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Formulation and chemical composition of the experimental diets

    IngredientLow-amylose wheat, g/kg of dietHigh-amylose wheat, g/kg of diet
    Casein11372
    Sucrose116120
    Safflower oil4438
    Wheat bran12165
    Low-amylose wheat flour481
    High-amylose wheat flour576
    Maize starch* 8386
    Vitamin premix † 89
    Mineral premix † 2930
    Choline22
    l-cysteine22
    As analyzed, % of dry matter
        Total starch42.641.9
        Protein20.421.6
        Lipid11.58.0
        Fiber (as nonstarch polysaccharide)7.88.7
    • *Conventional (low-amylose) starch (3401C) (Penford Australia Lane Cove, New South Wales, Australia).

    • †Pharmamix P169 (Propharma Australia Dandenong, Victoria, Australia), which contained, per kg of mix, 1.5 g of retinyl acetate, 25 mg of cholecalciferol, 20 g of α-tocopherol, 2 g of riboflavin, 7.5 mg of cyanocobalamin, 5.6 g of Ca pantothenate, 50 mg of biotin, 10 g of nicotinamide, 1 g of menadione, 50 g of FeSO4·7H2O, 10 g of MnO2, 50 g of ZnO, 5 g of CuSO4·7H2O, 0.25 g of CoSO4, 0.5 g of KI, 0.1 g of Na2SeO4, and 31 g of antioxidant (Oxicap E2; Novus Nutrition, Melbourne, Australia).

Data supplements

  • Regina et al. 10.1073/pnas.0510737103.

    Supporting Information

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    Supporting Figure 5
    Supporting Figure 6
    Supporting Figure 7
    Supporting Text




    Supporting Figure 5

    Fig. 5. Schematic representation of the hp-SBEIIa construct generated for wheat and barley transformation. Fragment I is comprised of sequence from nucleotide positions 96-635 of wheat SBEIIa cDNA (GenBank accession no. Y11282) corresponding to exons 1, 2, and 3 of the wheat SBEIIa gene, wSBEII-DA1 (1), fragment II is comprised of sequence corresponding to intron 3 of wSBEII-DA1 and fragment 3 the same sequence as in fragment I but in the antisense orientation. For the hp-SBEIIb construct, fragment I is comprised of a sequence from nucleotide positions 77-604 of wheat SBEIIb cDNA (A.R., unpublished work) corresponding to exons 1, 2, and 3 of wheat SBEIIb gene, wSBEII-DB1 (A.R., unpublished work), fragment II is comprised of sequence corresponding to intron 3 of wSBEII-DB1, and fragment III the same sequence as fragment I but in the antisense orientation.

    1. Rahman, S., Regina, A., Li, Z., Mukai, Y., Yamamoto, M., Kosar-Hashemi, B., Abrahams, S. & Morell, M. K. (2001) Plant Physiol. 125, 1314-1324.





    Supporting Figure 6

    Fig. 6. Identity of (a) wheat SBEIIa cDNA to hp-SBEIIa sequence and (b) wheat SBEIIb cDNA to hp-SBEIIa sequence generated by the software COMPARE of the GCG package. Regions of 21 bp identity are shown as vertical lines.





    Supporting Figure 7

    Fig. 7. Northern blot analysis of the expression of SBEIIa and SBEIIb mRNA in wheat transgenic lines. A shows Northern blotting of RNA extracted from endosperm 15 days post-anthesis from the SBEIIa transgenic line, 069 (lane 1), and the SBEIIb transgenic line, 008 (lane 2), probed with SBEIIa-specific probe targeting exons 1, 2, and 3 of the SBEIIa gene. A positive hybridization signal was observed in line 008 and not in line 069. B shows Northern blotting of mRNA extracted from the SBEIIa transgenic line, 069 (lane 1), and the SBEIIb transgenic line, 008 (lane 2), probed with SBEIIb specific probe targeting the exons1, 2, and 3 of SBEIIb gene. Only the line 069 showed positive hybridization signal using this probe.





    Supporting Text

    Wheat Transformation Vector. For the SBEIIa construct, three fragments of DNA containing sequence from the wheat SBEIIa gene, wSBEII- DA1 (GenBank accession no. AF338431) were amplified by PCR. These are fragment I, comprising the sequence from nucleotide positions 96-635 of wheat SBEIIa cDNA (GenBank accession no. Y11282) corresponding to exons 1, 2, and 3 of wSBEII-DA1 with the EcoRI and KpnI restriction sites on either side; fragment II, amplified from wSBEII-DA1, comprising the sequence from nucleotide positions 2220-2731, corresponding to the intron 3 region with the KpnI and SacI restriction sites on either side; and fragment III, comprising the same sequence as fragment I but with flanking restriction enzymes SacI and BamHI. For the SBEIIb construct, three fragments of DNA from the wheat SBEIIb gene, wSBEII-DB1 (1), were amplified by PCR. These are fragment I, comprising the sequence from the nucleotide position 77-604 of wheat SBEIIb cDNA (1) corresponding to exons 1, 2, and 3 of wSBEII-DB1, with the EcoR1 and KpnI restriction sites on either side; fragment II, amplified from wSBEII-DB1 comprising the sequence from nucleotide positions 1770-2364 corresponding to the intron 3 region with the KpnI and SacI restriction sites on either side; and fragment III, comprising the same sequence as fragment I but with flanking restriction sites SacI and BamHI. Fragments I, II, and III of each construct were then ligated so that the sequence of fragment III was ligated to fragment II in the antisense orientation relative to fragment I. The respective ligated sequence was introduced into an intermediate vector pDV03000 containing a high-molecular-weight glutenin (HMWG) promoter sequence from wheat and the terminator sequence of nopaline synthase (nos3') gene from Agrobacterium to generate SBEIIa (pDV03-IIa) and SBEIIb (pDV03-IIb) intermediate vectors. Each of the expression cassettes was then cut out from pDV03-IIa and pDV03-IIb with the restriction enzyme XhoI and inserted into the binary transformation vectors pGB53 and pBIOS340 to generate hp-SBEIIa and hp-SBEIIb constructs. pGB53 was created from pSB11 by the introduction of the gene encoding asulam resistance (su1) driven by the rice actin promoter, leaving a unique XhoI site adjacent to the right T-DNA border for the introduction of a gene of interest. Similarly, pBIOS340 was created from pSB1 by the introduction of an npt II gene encoding kanamycin and geneticin resistance, driven by the rice actin promoter, again leaving a unique XhoI site adjacent to the right border.

    Extraction of Starch. The endosperm half of a single grain was crushed gently and soaked in 1 ml of deionized water at 4°C overnight. The softened endosperm tissues were ground with a small plastic pestle, removing the ball of gluten while grinding. Crude starch was recovered by passing the suspension through a 65-mm nylon mesh. After centrifugation for 3 min at 13,000 ´ g at room temperature, the supernatant was removed. The sedimented starch was washed three times with distilled water and once with acetone, each time vortexing thoroughly, centrifuging at 13, 000 ´ g for 3 min and removing the supernatant. Starch thus purified was dried at room temperature overnight.

     

    Estimation of Amylose Content by Sepharose CL-2B Gel Filtration. In this method, the starch molecules are separated by the Sepharose CL-2B column based on their molecular weight. The separated fractions of starch were assayed by using the Starch Assay Kit (Sigma). Approximately 10 mg of starch was dissolved in 3.0 ml of 1 M NaOH (degassed) by incubation at 37°C for 30 min. The starch solution was centrifuged for 15 min to spin down the undissolved components. The supernatant was loaded onto a Sepharose CL-2B column at a pump speed of 1 ml/min. The column was run by using 10 mM NaOH buffer. Fifty fractions were collected in 10-ml tubes with 2.5 ml per tube. The pH of fractions 9-50 was adjusted to 4.5 with 35 ml of 1 M HCl. An aliquot (250 ml) of the starch sample was transferred into an Eppendorf tube followed by the addition of 250 ml of starch reagent (starch assay kit, Sigma). Along with the starch samples, four different controls were also set up: (i) a starch assay reagent blank containing only starch reagent (250 ml) and water (250 ml), (ii) a glucose assay reagent blank containing only 500 ml of water, (iii) a sample blank containing only 250 ml of starch sample and 250 ml of water, and (iv) a sample test containing only 250 ml of starch reagent and 250 ml of starch sample. The starch samples and the controls were incubated at 60°C for 60 min. After incubation, 200 ml each of the samples and the controls was transferred to a new Eppendorf tube followed by addition of 1 ml of glucose reagent (starch assay kit, Sigma) and incubation at 37°C for 30 min. The absorbance of the samples and controls was read at 340 nm. The quantity of starch (mg) in each fraction was calculated based on the equation given in the kit. The chromatogram reveals two peaks of elution. Amylose content is estimated as a percentage of the total amount of starch within the second peak of elution to the total amount of starch within both the peaks.

    Sampling and Analytical Procedures. Rats were anaesthetized with halothane; the abdominal cavity opened; and cecal and colonic contents collected, weighed, and stored at -20°C until analysis. After removal of digesta, bowel segments were gently blotted dry and tissue weights recorded. The moisture content of cecal and colonic digesta was determined by freeze-drying a portion to constant weight. Digesta and fecal samples were diluted with a specified volume of internal standard (heptanoic acid) for analysis of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) and mixed thoroughly for determination of pH using a standard glass electrode. The slurries were then stored frozen to await further analyses. For analysis of total and major individual SCFA, slurries were thawed, centrifuged, and concentrated by low-temperature vacuum microdistillation for quantification by glc.

    1. Regina, A., Kosar-Hashemi, B., Li, Z., Pedler, A., Mukai, Y., Yamamoto, M., Gale, K., Sharp, P. J., Morell, M. K. & Rahman, S. (2006) Planta 222, 899-909.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High-amylose wheat generated by RNA interference improves indices of large-bowel health in rats
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
High-amylose wheat generated by RNA interference improves indices of large-bowel health in rats
Ahmed Regina, Anthony Bird, David Topping, Sarah Bowden, Judy Freeman, Tina Barsby, Behjat Kosar-Hashemi, Zhongyi Li, Sadequr Rahman, Matthew Morell
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2006, 103 (10) 3546-3551; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0510737103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
High-amylose wheat generated by RNA interference improves indices of large-bowel health in rats
Ahmed Regina, Anthony Bird, David Topping, Sarah Bowden, Judy Freeman, Tina Barsby, Behjat Kosar-Hashemi, Zhongyi Li, Sadequr Rahman, Matthew Morell
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2006, 103 (10) 3546-3551; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0510737103
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: 103 (10)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490