Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Neuroprotection by pharmacologic blockade of the GAPDH death cascade

Makoto R. Hara, Bobby Thomas, Matthew B. Cascio, Byoung-Il Bae, Lynda D. Hester, Valina L. Dawson, Ted M. Dawson, Akira Sawa, and Solomon H. Snyder
  1. Departments of *Neuroscience,
  2. § Psychiatry, and
  3. ‖Pharmacology,
  4. ‡Department of Neurology and Institute for Cell Engineering, and
  5. †Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS March 7, 2006 103 (10) 3887-3889; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511321103
Makoto R. Hara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bobby Thomas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew B. Cascio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Byoung-Il Bae
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynda D. Hester
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valina L. Dawson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ted M. Dawson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akira Sawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ssnyder@jhmi.edu asawa1@jhmi.edu
Solomon H. Snyder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ssnyder@jhmi.edu asawa1@jhmi.edu
  1. Contributed by Solomon H. Snyder, January 4, 2006

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) participates in a cell death cascade wherein a variety of stimuli activate nitric oxide (NO) synthases with NO nitrosylating GAPDH, conferring on it the ability to bind to Siah, an E3-ubiquitin-ligase, whose nuclear localization signal enables the GAPDH/Siah protein complex to translocate to the nucleus where degradation of Siah targets elicits cell death. R-(−)-Deprenyl (deprenyl) ameliorates the progression of disability in early Parkinson’s disease and also has neuroprotective actions. We show that deprenyl and a related agent, TCH346, in subnanomolar concentrations, prevent S-nitrosylation of GAPDH, the binding of GAPDH to Siah, and nuclear translocation of GAPDH. In mice treated with the dopamine neuronal toxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), low doses of deprenyl prevent binding of GAPDH and Siah1 in the dopamine-enriched corpus striatum.

  • nitric oxide
  • apoptosis
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • S-nitrosylation
  • Siah

Efforts to prevent neurodegeneration in disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease, and stroke have proceeded along two pathways. One involves identifying the fundamental molecular causes of these diseases, although even for Huntington’s disease whose molecular causation is established, curative therapy has not followed directly. Alternatively, elucidating mechanisms of cell death may lead to agents that prevent neurodegeneration without knowing the specific disease etiology.

The monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitor, R-(−)-Deprenyl (selegiline, hereafter designated deprenyl) (Fig. 1 a) has been used in the therapy of PD with the initial goal of elevating dopamine levels (1–4). Deprenyl can delay the progression of disability in early Parkinson’s disease, and recent studies also indicated that deprenyl reduces neuronal death in a variety of in vivo and in vitro experimental models. These include death of neuronal cultures induced by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), nitric oxide (NO), or peroxynitrite, as well as in vivo hypoxia models and peripheral or optic nerve crush (5–13). Neuroprotection by deprenyl has been suggested to be independent of MAO-B (14–16). Such a concept has been reinforced by the fact that the deprenyl derivative TCH346 (Fig. 1 a) with no inhibitory action for MAO-B, also displays neuroprotective effects in culture models at concentrations as low as 0.1 pM and in intact animals at oral doses as low as 0.3 μg/kg (17–20).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Deprenyl and TCH346 inhibit S-nitrosylation of GAPDH. (a) Chemical structure of deprenyl and TCH346 (i.e., CGP3466). (b) Deprenyl (DEP) inhibits S-nitrosylation of GAPDH (SNO GAPDH). RAW264.7 cells were untreated, treated with deprenyl (1 nM), treated with LPS and IFN-γ (LPS-IFN), or treated with LPS-IFN and deprenyl for 24 h. (c) TCH346 inhibits S-nitrosylation of GAPDH. RAW264.7 cells were untreated, treated with LPS, or treated with LPS and TCH346 for 24 h.

Recently we described a cell death signaling system whereby cell stressors activate inducible or neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS) with a specific S-nitrosylation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) by NO (21). S-nitrosylation of GAPDH abolishes catalytic activity and confers upon GAPDH the ability to bind to Siah1 (hereafter designated Siah), an E3-ubiquitin-ligase whose nuclear localization signal mediates nuclear translocation of the GAPDH/Siah complex. In the nucleus, GAPDH extends the rapid turnover of Siah, leading to the degradation of selected nuclear targets of Siah and apoptosis. In efforts to identify the target for the neuroprotective actions of TCH346, Waldmeier and colleagues (22) used affinity binding, affinity labeling, and BIAcore technology, and identified GAPDH as its specific target.

We now demonstrate that deprenyl and TCH346 at subnanomolar concentrations prevent the S-nitrosylation of GAPDH, inhibit GAPDH/Siah binding and prevent the nuclear translocation of GAPDH. These actions also occur in intact animals at drug doses as low as 0.01 mg/kg. Thus, the neuroprotective actions of these drugs appear to reflect inhibition of the GAPDH/Siah cell death cascade.

Results and Discussion

In the macrophage cell line RAW264.7, stimulation by LPS and IFN-γ (LPS–IFN), components of endotoxin, provokes a massive activation of inducible NOS with NO formed mediating the cytotoxic actions of macrophages and also eliciting apoptotic cell death of the macrophages themselves (23). In this system, NO S-nitrosylates GAPDH eliciting GAPDH/Siah binding and nuclear translocation of the protein complex, a process blocked by NOS inhibitors (21). We have replicated these findings revealing S-nitrosylation of GAPDH after induction of inducible NOS. At a 1 nM concentration, deprenyl and TCH346 both prevent GAPDH nitrosylation (Fig. 1 b and c).

We directly demonstrate that the binding of GST-tagged Siah to GAPDH in vitro is prevented by deprenyl with as little as 0.01 nM deprenyl eliciting detectable diminution of binding (Fig. 2 a).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Deprenyl and TCH346 inhibit the binding of GAPDH and Siah1. (a) Deprenyl (DEP) inhibits the binding of GAPDH and Siah1 in vitro. GAPDH was preincubated with deprenyl at 0 nM (n = 5), 0.01 nM (n = 2), 0.1 nM (n = 3), or 1 nM (n = 4). GST-Siah1 was added, and binding was assessed by GSH-agarose pull down followed by Western blotting. The graph represents densitometry analysis of Western blotting (error bars indicate SEM; ∗, P < 0.0001; ∗∗, P < 0.00005). (b) Deprenyl inhibits the binding of GAPDH and Siah1. RAW264.7 cells were untreated, treated with deprenyl (1 nM), treated with LPS and IFN-γ (LPS-IFN), or treated with LPS-IFN and deprenyl for 24 h. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with α -Siah1 antibody. (c and d) RAW264.7 cells were treated the same as in b. (c) TCH346 inhibits the binding of GAPDH and Siah1. (d) Deprenyl and TCH346 inhibit the nuclear translocation of GAPDH. Nuclear fractions were analyzed by Western blotting.

We also monitored drug effects upon GAPDH/Siah binding in intact cells. In RAW264.7 cells treatment with LPS-IFN elicits robust binding of GAPDH to Siah (Fig. 2 b and c). At 1 nM, both deprenyl and TCH346 abolish GAPDH/Siah binding.

We wondered whether the prevention of GAPDH S-nitrosylation and binding to Siah by drugs would influence GAPDH nuclear translocation. In RAW264.7 cells 1 nM deprenyl or TCH346 abolish the nuclear translocation of GAPDH after LPS–IFN treatment (Fig. 2 d).

To ascertain the influence of deprenyl upon cell death, we used cerebellar granule cells (Fig. 3). Etoposide reduces cell viability by 70% associated with profound augmentation of Siah levels and with nuclear translocation of GAPDH. Treatment with deprenyl abolishes the Siah augmentation and the nuclear translocation of GAPDH and markedly reduces cell death.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Deprenyl prevents apoptotic cell death in cerebellar granule neurons. Etoposide (100 μM) was added to primary cerebellar granule neuron cultures 4–5 days after plating. Cytotoxicity was monitored 20 h after the addition of etoposide. Deprenyl (DEP) exerts cytoprotective effects (P < 0.01), whereas tranylcypromine, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor that lacks GAPDH binding properties, is ineffective. The extent of cell death parallels increased levels of Siah1 and nuclear GAPDH.

To determine whether deprenyl actions in intact animals involve the GAPDH/Siah system, we used an animal model of PD in which the dopamine neuronal toxin MPTP destroys dopamine neurons (24). MPTP treatment markedly augments levels of S-nitrosylated GAPDH in the brain (Fig. 4 a). MPTP also leads to GAPDH/Siah binding complexes in the corpus striatum, the locus of the highest dopamine terminal density (Fig. 4 b). Treatment with 0.01 mg/kg deprenyl markedly reduces GAPDH/Siah binding in the striatum.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Deprenyl inhibits the binding of GAPDH and Siah1 in MPTP-treated mice. (a) S-nitrosylation of GAPDH (SNO GAPDH) in MPTP-treated mouse brain. Mice were treated as described in Materials and Methods, and the brain lysate was subjected to the biotin switch assay. (b) Deprenyl (DEP) inhibits the binding of GAPDH and Siah1 in MPTP treated mouse striatum. Mice were treated as described in Materials and Methods. Striatum region was dissected, and its lysate was used for coimmunoprecipitation assay.

In summary, our findings provide compelling evidence that the neuroprotective actions of deprenyl and TCH346 reflect their preventing GAPDH/Siah binding and the nuclear translocation of GAPDH. It appears that the initial action of the drugs is to bind to GAPDH, as Waldmeier and colleagues (22) directly demonstrated binding of TCH346 to GAPDH. Such binding would inhibit S-nitrosylation of GAPDH and its binding to Siah. Recently, Youdim and colleagues (25, 26) observed that rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor used in the therapy of PD, is also neuroprotective in multiple animal models and prevents the nuclear translocation of GAPDH.

Although the principal focus for the therapeutic actions of deprenyl has been PD, deprenyl and related drugs might be useful in other neuronal conditions as well as non-nervous system conditions, because the GAPDH/Siah cascade appears fairly universal (21, 27–29). Thus, a wide range of stressors in diverse cell lines elicits nuclear translocation of GAPDH, with antisense to GAPDH preventing nuclear translocation and cell death. The most investigated GAPDH systems involve apoptotic death. Whether GAPDH plays a role in necrosis or in nonapoptotic programmed cell death is unclear.

In addition to the therapeutic relevance of our findings, evidence that cytoprotective actions of these drugs involve blockade of the GAPDH/Siah system provides support for the concept that the GAPDH/Siah signaling cascade is an important component of cell death.

Materials and Methods

Biochemistry

GST-tagged proteins were prepared according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Amersham Pharmacia) and purified through glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia). Five hundred nanograms of GAPDH from human erythrocytes (Sigma) were preincubated with deprenyl or TCH346 in 1 ml of binding buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4/150 mM NaCl/0.2 mg/ml BSA) at 4°C overnight. Five micrograms of GST or GST-Siah1 was added and incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Twenty microliters of 50% glutathione-Sepharose was added to the mixture and incubated for 1 h at 4°C. The beads were washed four times with 1 ml of washing buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4/150 mM NaCl/0.1 mg/ml BSA/0.1% Chaps), separated by SDS/PAGE, and analyzed by Western blotting. Coimmunoprecipitation with an anti-Siah1 antibody was performed as described (21). Subcellular fractionation was performed as described (27). The S-nitrosylation biotin switch assay was performed as described (30).

Cell Culture and Cytotoxicity

RAW264.7 macrophages were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS and 2 mM l-glutamine at 37°C with a 5% CO2 atmosphere in a humidified incubator. To stimulate macrophages, LPS (1 μg/ml) with or without IFN-γ (10 ng/ml) was added to medium. Primary cerebellar granule cells were prepared from 6- to 7-day-old rats and were cultured in DMEM plus 10% FBS. Four to five days after plating, 100 μM etoposide was added to induce cell death. Deprenyl (10 or 100 μM) or tranylcypromine (100 μM) were added twice directly to cultured media, 7 h before and immediately after the etoposide addition. The viability of primary neurons was monitored by MAP2 staining as described (27).

Animals and Treatment

All experiments were approved and conformed to the guidelines set by the Institutional Animal Care Committee. Eight-week-old male CD1 mice (The Jackson Laboratory) were used. Two groups of treatment schedules were followed in our studies. In one group, mice received four i.p. injections of MPTP-HCl (20 mg/kg of free base; Sigma) in saline at 2-h intervals and were killed after 48 h (n = 5). The second group received four i.p. injections of MPTP-HCl (20 mg/kg of free base) at 2 h intervals on the first day, and 24 h after the first dose of MPTP, they received four i.p. injections of deprenyl (0.01 mg/kg; Sigma) in saline at 2 h intervals and were killed at 24 h after the first dose of deprenyl (n = 5). Control mice received saline only.

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Ziegler and Y. Lema for organizing the manuscript; A. S. Huang, S. K. Tankou, and M. D. Kornberg for discussion and technical assistance; and Dr. P. C. Waldmeier (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) for providing TCH346. This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grants DA-00266, Research Scientist Award DA-00074 (to S.H.S.), MH-069853 (to A.S.), and grants from National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, The Stanley Foundation, Hereditary Disease Foundation, and S-R Foundation (to A.S.), as well as National Institutes of Health Grant NS-38377 (to T.M.D. and V.L.D.).

Footnotes

  • ¶To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: ssnyder{at}jhmi.edu or asawa1{at}jhmi.edu
  • Author contributions: M.R.H., A.S., and S.H.S. designed research; M.R.H., B.T., M.B.C., B.-I.B., and L.D.H. performed research; M.R.H., V.L.D., T.M.D., A.S., and S.H.S. analyzed data; and M.R.H., A.S., and S.H.S. wrote the paper.

  • Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

  • Abbreviations:
    PD,
    Parkinson’s disease;
    MPTP,
    1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine;
    NOS,
    nitric oxide synthase.
  • © 2006 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kofman O. S.
    (1993) N. Engl. J. Med 328:1715, pmid:8487839.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. The Parkinson Study Group
    (1989) N. Engl. J. Med 321:1364–1371, pmid:2509910.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Correspondences to The Parkinson Study Group
    (1990) N. Engl. J. Med 322:1526–1528, pmid:2110624.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. The Parkinson Study Group
    (1993) N. Engl. J. Med 328:176–183, pmid:8417384.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Paterson I. A. ,
    2. Barber A. J. ,
    3. Gelowitz D. L. ,
    4. Voll C.
    (1997) Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 21:181–186, pmid:9062941.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Buys Y. M. ,
    2. Trope G. E. ,
    3. Tatton W. G.
    (1995) Curr. Eye Res 14:119–126, pmid:7768105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Knollema S. ,
    2. Aukema W. ,
    3. Hom H. ,
    4. Korf J. ,
    5. ter Horst G. J.
    (1995) Stroke 26:1883–1887, pmid:7570743.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Lahtinen H. ,
    2. Koistinaho J. ,
    3. Kauppinen R. ,
    4. Haapalinna A. ,
    5. Keinanen R. ,
    6. Sivenius J.
    (1997) Brain Res 757:260–267, pmid:9200755.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ravikumar R. ,
    2. Lakshmana M. K. ,
    3. Rao B. S. ,
    4. Meti B. L. ,
    5. Bindu P. N. ,
    6. Raju T. R.
    (1998) Exp. Neurol 149:123–129, pmid:9454621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Salo P. T. ,
    2. Tatton W. G.
    (1992) J. Neurosci. Res 31:394–400, pmid:1374134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Maruyama W. ,
    2. Takahashi T. ,
    3. Naoi M.
    (1998) J. Neurochem 70:2510–2515, pmid:9603216.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Tatton W. G. ,
    2. Greenwood C. E.
    (1991) J. Neurosci. Res 30:666–672, pmid:1686284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Tatton W. G. ,
    2. Chalmers-Redman R. M. ,
    3. Elstner M. ,
    4. Leesch W. ,
    5. Jagodzinski F. B. ,
    6. Stupak D. P. ,
    7. Sugrue M. M. ,
    8. Tatton N. A.
    (2000) J. Neural Transm. Suppl 60:77–100, pmid:11205159.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Ansari K. S. ,
    2. Yu P. H. ,
    3. Kruck T. P. ,
    4. Tatton W. G.
    (1993) J. Neurosci 13:4042–4053, pmid:8366359.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. ↵
    1. Finnegan K. T. ,
    2. Skratt J. J. ,
    3. Irwin I. ,
    4. DeLanney L. E. ,
    5. Langston J. W.
    (1990) Eur. J. Pharmacol 184:119–126, pmid:2120076.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Tatton W. G. ,
    2. Chalmers-Redman R. M.
    (1996) Neurology 47:S171–S183, pmid:8959986.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Waldmeier P. C. ,
    2. Boulton A. A. ,
    3. Cools A. R. ,
    4. Kato A. C. ,
    5. Tatton W. G.
    (2000) J. Neural Transm. Suppl 60:197–214, pmid:11205140.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Sagot Y. ,
    2. Toni N. ,
    3. Perrelet D. ,
    4. Lurot S. ,
    5. King B. ,
    6. Rixner H. ,
    7. Mattenberger L. ,
    8. Waldmeier P. C. ,
    9. Kato A. C.
    (2000) Br. J. Pharmacol 131:721–728, pmid:11030721.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Andringa G. ,
    2. van Oosten R. V. ,
    3. Unger W. ,
    4. Hafmans T. G. ,
    5. Veening J. ,
    6. Stoof J. C. ,
    7. Cools A. R.
    (2000) Eur. J. Neurosci 12:3033–3043, pmid:10971644.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Carlile G. W. ,
    2. Chalmers-Redman R. M. ,
    3. Tatton N. A. ,
    4. Pong A. ,
    5. Borden K. E. ,
    6. Tatton W. G.
    (2000) Mol. Pharmacol 57:2–12, pmid:10617673.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Hara M. R. ,
    2. Agrawal N. ,
    3. Kim S. F. ,
    4. Cascio M. B. ,
    5. Fujimuro M. ,
    6. Ozeki Y. ,
    7. Takahashi M. ,
    8. Cheah J. H. ,
    9. Tankou S. K. ,
    10. Hester L. D. ,
    11. et al.
    (2005) Nat. Cell Biol 7:665–674, pmid:15951807.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Kragten E. ,
    2. Lalande I. ,
    3. Zimmermann K. ,
    4. Roggo S. ,
    5. Schindler P. ,
    6. Muller D. ,
    7. van Oostrum J. ,
    8. Waldmeier P. ,
    9. Furst P.
    (1998) J. Biol. Chem 273:5821–5828, pmid:9488718.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Eu J. P. ,
    2. Liu L. ,
    3. Zeng M. ,
    4. Stamler J. S.
    (2000) Biochemistry 39:1040–1047, pmid:10653649.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Mandir A. S. ,
    2. Simbulan-Rosenthal C. M. ,
    3. Poitras M. F. ,
    4. Lumpkin J. R. ,
    5. Dawson V. L. ,
    6. Smulson M. E. ,
    7. Dawson T. M.
    (2002) J. Neurochem 83:186–192, pmid:12358742.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Mandel S. ,
    2. Weinreb O. ,
    3. Amit T. ,
    4. Youdim M. B.
    (2005) Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev 48:379–387, pmid:15850677.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Maruyama W. ,
    2. Akao Y. ,
    3. Youdim M. B. ,
    4. Davis B. A. ,
    5. Naoi M.
    (2001) J. Neurochem 78:727–735, pmid:11520893.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Sawa A. ,
    2. Khan A. A. ,
    3. Hester L. D. ,
    4. Snyder S. H.
    (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:11669–11674, pmid:9326668.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Chuang D. M. ,
    2. Hough C. ,
    3. Senatorov V. V.
    (2005) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol 45:269–290, pmid:15822178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Sirover M. A.
    (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1432:159–184, pmid:10407139.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Jaffrey S. R. ,
    2. Erdjument-Bromage H. ,
    3. Ferris C. D. ,
    4. Tempst P. ,
    5. Snyder S. H.
    (2001) Nat. Cell Biol 3:193–197, pmid:11175752.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neuroprotection by pharmacologic blockade of the GAPDH death cascade
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Neuroprotection by pharmacologic blockade of the GAPDH death cascade
Makoto R. Hara, Bobby Thomas, Matthew B. Cascio, Byoung-Il Bae, Lynda D. Hester, Valina L. Dawson, Ted M. Dawson, Akira Sawa, Solomon H. Snyder
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2006, 103 (10) 3887-3889; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0511321103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Neuroprotection by pharmacologic blockade of the GAPDH death cascade
Makoto R. Hara, Bobby Thomas, Matthew B. Cascio, Byoung-Il Bae, Lynda D. Hester, Valina L. Dawson, Ted M. Dawson, Akira Sawa, Solomon H. Snyder
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2006, 103 (10) 3887-3889; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0511321103
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Related Article

  • In This Issue
    - Mar 07, 2006
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: 103 (10)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Horse fossil
Mounted horseback riding in ancient China
A study uncovers early evidence of equestrianism in ancient China.
Image credit: Jian Ma.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490