Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Autoantibodies to myelin basic protein catalyze site-specific degradation of their antigen

Natalia A. Ponomarenko, Oxana M. Durova, Ivan I. Vorobiev, Alexey A. Belogurov Jr., Inna N. Kurkova, Alexander G. Petrenko, Georgy B. Telegin, Sergey V. Suchkov, Sergey L. Kiselev, Maria A. Lagarkova, Vadim M. Govorun, Marina V. Serebryakova, Bérangère Avalle, Pete Tornatore, Alexander Karavanov, Herbert C. Morse III, Daniel Thomas, Alain Friboulet, and Alexander G. Gabibov
  1. aShemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 16/10, Miklukho-Maklaya Street, Moscow 117997, Russia; bVladimirsky Moscow Region Clinical Institute, Ministery of Health, 61/2, Shchepkina Street, Moscow 129110, Russia; cDepartment of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobievi Gory, Moscow 119899, Russia; dPushchino Branch of the Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino 142290, Russia; eInstitute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5, Vavilova Street, Moscow 119334, Russia; fProteome Center of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 10 Pogodinskaya Street, Moscow 119832, Russia; gCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 6022, Compiègne Technological University, BP 20529 Compiègne Cedex 60205, France; hCiphergen Biosystems, Inc., 6611 Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, CA 94555; and kLaboratory of Immunopathology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5640 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS January 10, 2006 103 (2) 281-286; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509849103
Natalia A. Ponomarenko
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oxana M. Durova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan I. Vorobiev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexey A. Belogurov Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inna N. Kurkova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander G. Petrenko
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgy B. Telegin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergey V. Suchkov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergey L. Kiselev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria A. Lagarkova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vadim M. Govorun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marina V. Serebryakova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bérangère Avalle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pete Tornatore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Karavanov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Herbert C. Morse III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Thomas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Friboulet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander G. Gabibov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Communicated by Joseph Schlessinger, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, November 14, 2005 (received for review October 11, 2005)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Autoantibody-mediated tissue destruction is among the main features of organ-specific autoimmunity. This report describes “an antibody enzyme” (abzyme) contribution to the site-specific degradation of a neural antigen. We detected proteolytic activity toward myelin basic protein (MBP) in the fraction of antibodies purified from the sera of humans with multiple sclerosis (MS) and mice with induced experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Chromatography and zymography data demonstrated that the proteolytic activity of this preparation was exclusively associated with the antibodies. No activity was found in the IgG fraction of healthy donors. The human and murine abzymes efficiently cleaved MBP but not other protein substrates tested. The sites of MBP cleavage determined by mass spectrometry were localized within immunodominant regions of MBP. The abzymes could also cleave recombinant substrates containing encephalytogenic MBP85-101 peptide. An established MS therapeutic Copaxone appeared to be a specific abzyme inhibitor. Thus, the discovered epitope-specific antibody-mediated degradation of MBP suggests a mechanistic explanation of the slow development of neurodegeneration associated with MS.

  • catalytic antibodies
  • Copaxone
  • multiple sclerosis
  • surface enhanced laser desorption ionization
  • experimental allergic encephalomyelitis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune neurodegenerative disease leading to destruction of the myelin sheath that ultimately affects the ability of nerves to conduct electrical impulses (1). A poor understanding of the etiology of MS has complicated the development of effective therapeutics (2). Despite strong evidence for the contribution of T cell responses to manifestations of autoimmunity in the central nervous system (CNS) of patients with MS (3, 4), recent findings encouraged investigators to search also for B cell-mediated contributions to the MS pathogenesis (5, 6).

Ample data indicate that a significant portion of MS cases is characterized by the presence in the blood of autoantibodies against myelin protein components (7, 8). Moreover, high-resolution microscopic analysis detected myelin-specific autoantibodies in the regions of demyelination plaques in human MS and a MS-like disease of marmosets, suggesting their direct contribution to myelin destruction (9). Although the mechanism of the autoantibody role in MS pathogenesis is unknown (2), autoantibodies to myelin basic protein (MBP) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) were proposed as biomarkers for clinical prognosis of MS (10). Similar immunoglobulins were also found in mice with induced experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), which is an animal model of MS (11). In this report, we present the evidence that anti-MBP autoantibodies of MS patients and EAE mice exhibit site-specific proteolytic cleavage of the MBP molecule that may contribute to pathological destruction of the myelin sheath.

Materials and Methods

Patients and Healthy Donors. Frozen serum samples were obtained from the Vladimirsky Moscow Region Clinical Institute. Autoantibody purification and characterization were done from the serum of 24 MS patients who had not been treated with steroids or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The MS diagnosis was confirmed and expanded disability status scale values were calculated according to C. Poser classification (12) of disease progression by using clinical, immunological, and MRI data analysis. The sera from three patients with a high degree of the catalytic activity, and expanded disability status scale were used for kinetic and mass spectrometric analysis. Data presented for one of these patients. Blood samples of 20 healthy volunteers were used as control. An informed consent was obtained from each person as approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Vladimirsky Moscow Region Clinical Institute in accordance with the regulations of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Statistical analysis was performed according to SPSS13 software.

EAE Induction in SJL and C57BL/6 Mice. The animal work was performed in the Pushchino branch of the Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, in accordance with the regulations of the Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health Animal Welfare Insurance Reactivation no. A5230-01, duration August 14, 2000, to Aug. 31, 2005. All work was accomplished under the supervision of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (U.S.) and using the Regulations of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. SPF female SJL mice, 6 to 8 weeks old, were immunized according to the established protocol (13) with bovine MBP injected at 50 μg per mouse in complete Freund's adjuvant containing 2 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis. SPF female C57BL/6 mice, 6 to 8 weeks old, were immunized according to the established protocol (14) with recombinant extracellular domain of MOG injected at 100 μg per mouse in complete Freund's adjuvant containing 0.5 mg/ml M. tuberculosis. Between 14 and 28 days after a second immunization, mice with pronounced clinical symptoms were euthanized and their sera were collected for later experiments.

Antibody Purification. IgG from sera of humans and mice were purified essentially as described in refs. 15 and 16. IgGs were further separated by the antigen affinity chromatography on a column with MBP immobilized on NHS-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia), and their purity was assessed by electrophoresis followed by silver staining. Fab fragments were prepared as described in ref. 12 by using papain immobilized on NHS-Sepharose.

MBP Preparations. MBP was prepared from bovine brain according to ref. 12, the obtained protein was purified by reverse-phase HPLC on column C4 10/250 (Mashery-Nagel, Germany). MBP was phosphorylated by PKC as described in ref. 17 and according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Synthesis, Cloning, Expression, and Purification of ED-MOG and Trx-Fused MBP Peptides. A DNA fragment corresponding to extracellular Ig-like domain of MOG were amplified by PCR with specific primers 5′GAGGAAGCCATGGCAGGGCAGTTCAGAGTGATA3′ and 5′AGAGGAGAGATCTTCTACTTTCAATTCCATTGC3′ by using human genomic DNA as the initial template. To obtain pET32CH vector, the coding sequence of the c-myc epitope was added to pET32b+ plasmid (Novagen) by using BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites for unambiguous identification of recombinant proteins by monoclonal anti-c-myc Ab. The NcoI-BglII PCR product was cloned into pET32CH by using NcoI and BamHI restriction sites. The expression product of this plasmid that contained Trx fused to MOG1-117 (Trx-MOG) was used for cleavage analysis. The NcoI-XhoI insert of the construct was finally recloned into pET22b+ vector (Novagen) by corresponding restriction sites. Recombinant protein coded by this construct named MOG was used for immunization.

Twelve DNA fragments encoding human MBP peptides (for details, see Fig. 4) were prepared by PCR with four overlapping oligonucleotides for each other and were ligated to DNA fragment corresponding to linker (SGGGG)3S. The final PCR products were cloned in-frame into pET32CH plasmid by using NcoI and BamHI restriction sites. The expression products of these plasmids that contained Trx fused to MBP peptides were used for cleavage analysis. The plasmid encoding Trx with linker (SGGGG)3S was designed for control.

The soluble recombinant His-tagged proteins were obtained by Escherichia coli expression and isolated by sorption on Talon SuperFlow (BD Biosciences) column, followed by cation exchange chromatography on Mono S column (Amersham Pharmacia) at pH 5.0 and subsequent size exclusion chromatography on Superdex 75 GL 10/300 column (Amersham Pharmacia) in 150 mM NH4HCO3 buffer.

Antibody-Mediated Proteolysis. Antibodies (0.1-1 μg) were incubated at 37°C for 14 h in the final volume of 12.5 μl PBS and 0.02% NaN3 containing 1-2 μg MBP. The samples were mixed with Laemmli's buffer. The extent of MBP degradation was visualized by SDS/PAGE in Tris-glycine and Tricine buffer systems.

For the reverse-phase HPLC-MS analysis of MBP degradation products, antibodies (1 μg) were incubated at 37°C for 24 h in the final volume of 0.1 ml PBS/0.02% NaN3 containing 30 μg MBP. The reaction was stopped by adding 10% trifluoroacetic acid up to pH 2.5. A 70-μl aliquot was applied to 4.0/150 C4 column (Waters). The fractions, corresponding to major absorbance peaks, were collected and lyophilized. The samples were further redissolved in 20 μl of 50% CH3CN/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid anda7 μl aliquot of each sample was applied to H4 Protein Chip (Ciphergen). The rest was analyzed by tricine-SDS/PAGE. Surface enhanced laser desorption ionization (SELDI) analysis was performed according to the chip manufacturer's protocol.

Enzyme Kinetics Assays. MBP (11 μM) was incubated at 37°C with antibodies (67 nM) in 1.2 ml of PBS/0.02% NaN3. One hundred-microliter aliquots were taken at the indicated time, and the reaction was stopped by adding 10% trifluoroacetic acid. The samples were further chromatographed on column C4 4.0/150 (Waters). The amount of noncleaved MBP was calculated by absorbance monitoring at 280 nm. The Michaelis constant and effective catalytic constant were determined according to the Michaelis-Menten equation by using Enzyme Kinetics module 1.1 for sigmaplot software (SPSS). Discrimination of inhibition modes and calculation of inhibition constants were performed with the same software.

Alternatively, the antibodies were mixed with H-Pro-Phe-Arg-MCA or H-Ala-Ala-Phe-MCA (0.625-100 μM) in TBS/0.1% NaN3/10 mM CaCl2. Sixty-microliter samples were transferred into wells of a black PVC plate. The plate was incubated for 1-10 hat +37°C. The fluorescence intensity was measured with 2-min intervals by Tecan Genius (Tecan, Salzburg, Austria).

Size Exclusion Chromatography. Size exclusion chromatography of the purified IgG from the MS patient was performed in 6 M urea/50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8.0 or in 100 mM Gly-HCl, pH 2.6 on Superose 6 10/300 column (Amersham Pharmacia). In case of separation in urea, the antibodies were denatured by adding solid guanidinium chloride up to 6 M immediately before applying to the column. The fractions, corresponding to the main 150-kDa peak, were renatured either by extensive dialysis (urea chromatography) or by addition of 1 M Tris (acidic chromatography).

Inhibition by Species-Specific Anti-IgG Antibodies. Purified human or murine antibodies were batch-incubated with immobilized anti-human or anti-mouse IgG (IMTEK Bio, Moscow) for 1 h at room temperature essentially as described in refs. 15 and 16. The supernatants and resin-bound fractions were further analyzed for the MBP degrading activity as described above.

Zymography. One hundred nanograms of the assayed antibody was separated on the 5-20% gradient SDS/PAGE containing 30 μg/ml of the fluorescent substrate BSA-FITC, synthesized as described in ref. 15 in the separating gel. After being washed in 2.5% Triton X-100, the gels were incubated for 72 h in 50 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.6)/10 mM CaCl2/0.1% NaN3 solution at 37°C in the dark and visualized by ChemiImager apparatus (Alpha Innotech) by using midrange UV transillumination and a 540-nm light filter.

Immunohistochemistry. Rats, ≈1 month of age, were euthanized by CO2 inhalation. The brains were removed, embedded in the tissue-freezing medium (Leica Instruments), and frozen in isopentane cooled with liquid nitrogen to -140°C. The sections were cut at 10 μm and fixed for 10 min in 100% acetone at -20°C. The fixed sections were blocked for 1 h in PBS/0.1% Tween-20/5% FBS/2% goat serum, followed by the incubation with the purified mouse SJL and human antibody diluted 1:2 and MAB 382 (Chemicon) diluted 1:10 in PBS/0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were washed three times with PBS-Tween-20 and incubated with Alexa Fluor 546- or Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes) and FITC-conjugated goat anti-human antibody (IMTEK) diluted 1:500.

Western Blotting. Western blots of total rat brain tissue separated in 15% SDS/PAGE lots were incubated with human-, mouse MBP-binding antibody and MAB 382 followed by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) development. For the MBP degradation analysis, samples were prepared as described above and separated on 16.5% T, 0.6% C tricine-PAGE. Western blots were incubated with MAB 382 and MAB 387 in dilutions 1:2,000 and 1:500, respectively, and visualized by ECL.

MBP Structural Analysis. SELDI analysis of MBP cleavage was performed by NP20 and H4 ProteinChips and ProteinChip Reader PBS IIc (Ciphergen), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Microsequencing of MBP hydrolysis products was done by a QSTAR mass spectrometer (Ciphergen).

Inhibition Analysis. Aliquots of tested protease inhibitors were mixed with either antibody (30 nM) or bovine trypsin (0.1 nM), and MBP (4 μM) in TBS/0.1% NaN3/10 mM CaCl2. The samples were incubated for 16 h at 37°C and analyzed on 15% SDS/PAGE. The gels were stained by Coomassie and analyzed by densitometry with totallab 2.01 software (Nonlinear Dynamics, Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.).

Results

Anti-MBP Antibodies in the Serum of MS Patients and EAE Mice. We detected autoantibodies to MBP in the serum of 20 of 24 MS patients under study by ELISA with purified MBP (18).

We further tested whether the anti-MBP antibodies present in the sera of the MS patients and EAE mice could interact with natively folded MBP in brain tissue. Antigen affinity-purified anti-MBP antibodies from humans and mice were used for immunohistochemical analysis in frozen rat brain sections. The specific staining pattern for these two antibodies were basically identical to that seen with a reference monoclonal anti-MBP antibody. Therefore, at least some of the MBP epitopes in native myelin structures are accessible to these antibodies (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

IgGs of MS patient and EAE mice react with MBP in rat brain sections. (A) Western blotting of purified MBP (m) and rat brain tissue homogenate (h) with antigen affinity-purified IgG from a MS patient, a EAE SJL mouse, and with MAB382. (B) Schematic myelin distribution in a rat brain section. (C) Wright's stain of the rat brain section chosen for analysis. D-H were taken from the indicated areas. (D-F) Double-label immunofluorescence of mouse anti-MBP monoclonal antibody MAB382 and catalytic IgG from MS patient. (D) MAB382 (Alexa 546, red). (E) MS (FITC, green). (F) Merge of D and E.(G and H) Immunofluorescence of MAB382 and IgG from EAE SJL mouse on serial sections. (G) MAB382 (Alexa 546, red). (H) IgG from EAE mouse (Alexa 488, green).

Proteolytic Activity of Purified Anti-MBP Antibodies. We noted augmented levels of the proteolytic activity in IgG fractions of the sera of MBP seropositive MS patients compared to IgGs of healthy donors (15), and, therefore, we hypothesized that autoantibodies toward MBP possessed the antigen-specific proteolytic activity. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the proteolytic activity of the autoantibodies isolated from 24 clinically definite MS patients. Incubation of the autoantibodies with purified MBP, followed by the SDS electrophoresis analysis, revealed significant degradation of the protein. The sera from healthy donors were catalytically inactive. Importantly, the level of the proteolytic activity correlated with the expanded disability status scale range of the patients (r 2 = 0.85, P < 0.001 by Spearman rank correlation) (18).

The proteolytic activity toward MBP was also detected in the antibodies isolated from the serum of SJL and C57BL/6 mice induced to develop EAE, an animal model of MS. Both human and murine autoantibodies appeared specifically to cleave MBP (Fig. 2A ), but they did not exert any detectable proteolytic activity toward recombinant extracellular domain of MOG (Fig. 2B ).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

MBP degradation by purified autoantibodies. MBP affinity-purified antibodies from sera of the MS patient and EAE SJL and EAE C57BL/6 mice were incubated with purified MBP (A) and MOG (B) followed by SDS/PAGE analysis and Coomassie staining. IgG mbp+, MBP-binding antibodies. IgG heavy chains, light chains, and noncleaved MBP bands are marked as Hc, Lc, and MBP, respectively. (C) The MBP autoantibodies were separated by 5-20% gradient SDS/PAGE with FITC-BSA fluorescent substrate impregnated in the separating gel. After electrophoresis, proteins were in-gel renatured by Triton X-100 washes. Proteolytic degradation was visualized by fluorescence intensity increase, seen as bright bands on the dark background. Bovine trypsin (10 and 30 pg) was used as a positive control. IgG mbp+, MBP-binding antibodies; mbp-, antibodies not bound to the MBP-affinity column. (D) MBP degradation by the purified Fab fragment derived from the whole IgG of the MS patient visualized by SDS/PAGE.

Control experiments were performed to demonstrate that the proteolytic activity of the autoantibodies was intrinsic and did not reflect protease contamination. The MBP-specific proteolytic activity coeluted with IgG fraction isolated by size-exclusion chromatography under denaturing conditions (data not shown). When the autoantibodies were separated by SDS gel electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions and further analyzed by zymography, the proteolytic activity was detected only in the IgG band (Fig. 2C ). The purified Fab fragments of the autoantibodies also retained the proteolytic activity (Fig. 2D ). Finally, the proteolytic activity of the MBP-specific IgG fractions could be eliminated by adsorption on immobilized anti-human or anti-mouse Ig, respectively (data not shown). Altogether, these data demonstrated that the proteolytic activity of this preparation was associated with the antibodies and ruled out the involvement of any protease contaminant.

In the assay using highly purified bovine MBP or Pro-Phe-Arg-MCA peptide as a substrate, Michaelis-like kinetics for autoantibody-mediated proteolysis were observed. We obtained the estimates of k cat/K m = 1.1·103 M-1 sec-1 (human), 3.0·103 M-1·sec-1 (mouse) and k cat/K m = 0.75·103 M-1·sec-1 (human), 3.9·103 M-1·sec-1 (mouse) for MBP and peptide, respectively, assuming that all of the assayed IgG molecules were catalytically active (Fig. 6, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The range of catalytic efficiency of the autoantibodies was lower than in the case of sequence-specific proteases; e.g., the catalytic efficiency of bovine enterokinase was 7.1·105 M-1·sec-1 for its natural protein substrate trypsinogen (19). However, the calculated velocities of catalysis by the MBP autoantibodies are among the highest values reported for the antibody catalysis (16, 20-23) and, therefore, sufficient for their pathological effects during the slow development of neurodegeneration in the course of MS progression.

Substrate Specificity of the MBP Cleavage by Autoantibodies. To identify major sites of autoantibody-mediated proteolysis in the MBP molecule, we analyzed peptide cleavage products by a combination of reverse-phase chromatography (RP-HPLC), tricine-SDS electrophoresis, Western blot analysis, and mass-spectrometry (Fig. 3 A and B ; see also Fig. 7, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The resulting data revealed the presence of six sites of preferential proteolysis; all of them were located after Arg or Lys (Fig. 3C ). Cleavage at these sites occurred at a similar rate as determined by 32P-MBP degradation analysis (Fig. 3D ). Interestingly, most of the sites (5 of 6) of the cleavage were located within the immunodominant regions of MBP (Fig. 3C , marked by yellow (24); two of them falling inside the sequence fragment spanning from the 86 to 98 residues (Fig. 3C , marked by the red box) that proved to be a specific inducer of EAE in SJL mice (25).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Analysis of major MBP cleavage products. Reverse-phase HPLC-MS analysis of major MBP cleavage products. Column eluate fractions, corresponding to dominant chromatography peaks (A), were collected, freeze dried, redissolved, and applied to SELDI H4 chip and tricine-SDS/PAGE (B). Gel was stained by Sypro Orange. Peptides, unambiguously identified by SELDI and clearly seen in corresponding gel lanes, are indicated. (C) Schematic description of the preferential antibody cleavage sites in the MBP sequence. Sequence fragments identical to the immunodominant MBP-derived peptides (12-31, 82-98, 110-128, and 144-169) are shown in yellow rectangles, and the encephalitogenic peptide region (86-98) is marked by the red box. (D) 32P-MBP degradation by autoantibodies. Autoradiography of 32P-phosphorylated MBP hydrolysis by proteolytic mouse (EAE SJL) and human (MS) IgG. Line M, molecular mass markers (range 2.5-16.9 kDa, Amersham Pharmacia).

To test the abzyme specificity toward distinct MBP fragments, 12 recombinant fusion proteins of Trx with the C-terminally fused MBP peptides were designed (Fig. 4). The products of hydrolysis were analyzed by SDS electrophoresis (Fig. 8) and by mass spectrometry. Only two recombinant substrates (Fig. 4B , 7 and 8) containing encephalitogenic MBP85-101 peptide were readily hydrolyzed by the anti-MBP autoantibodies from MS patients and C57BL/6 mice with induced EAE. Fusion proteins (1 and 3-12) were cleaved by autoantibodies isolated from SJL mice with induced EAE. In all cases, recombinant substrates were cleaved only at preferential sites inside the MBP fragment, leaving the Trx part undegraded (Fig. 8). In contrast, limited proteolysis of these substrates with enterokinase and trypsin (Fig. 8) resulted in a cleavage pattern with multiple products, indicating an efficient Trx cleavage. These data further confirmed the substrate specificity of the antibody and its profound difference from trypsin, a common protease that cleaves at basic residues.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

The specificity of the anti-MBP antibodies toward recombinant substrates. Schematic description of the designed fusion proteins (A) Identification of the cleavage sites of Trx-MBP fusion proteins and nonmodified Trx generated by anti-MBP antibodies: SJL mice with EAE (white boxes), MS patient (red boxes), and C57BL/6 mice with EAE (blue boxes) (B). Data obtained by mass-spectrometry analysis and gel electrophoresis of degradation products (Fig. 8, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site).

Inhibition Analysis of Antibody-Mediated MBP Cleavage. Recently, the antibody-antigen interaction was shown to trigger the peroxidation pathway (23) that might mediate oxidative antigen degradation. To test the possibility of autoantibody-mediated MBP proteolysis via the peroxidation pathway, we performed the cleavage reactions under nonoxigenic conditions by using inhibitors to block H2O2 generation by IgG.

At the IC50 inhibitor concentration (26) and even 10 times higher, they displayed no significant effect on autoantibody-mediated MBP and fused peptide proteolysis (Fig. 9, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). Similarly, no effect was observed under oxygen-free conditions (26). Thus, the cleavage of MBP by the autoantibodies is not caused by the autoantibody-mediated peroxide formation.

The chemical mechanism of the antibody proteolytic activity was further probed with a set of known protease inhibitors. Degradation of MBP (Table 1) and Pro-Phe-Arg-MCA peptide was irreversibly inhibited by the Ser- and His-reactive covalent inhibitors 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF), N-α-tosyl-l-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK), and N-α-tosyl-l-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TLCK), whereas reversible inhibitors of serine proteases, leupeptin, antipain, and chymostatin, were relatively ineffective. Interestingly, the catalytic activity was not affected by equimolar concentrations of aprotinin, a tight-binding inhibitor of trypsin-like proteases. It was not inhibited at all by bestatin, E-64, N-ethylmaleimide, pepstatin, and EDTA, specific inhibitors of aminopeptidases, cysteine, aspartic, and metalloproteases, respectively. We may conclude that the comparable inhibition rates of the autoantibody and trypsin activity (Table 2, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site) with AEBSF, TLCK, and TPCK are indicative of a similar general structure of their active sites, in particular, the presence of a nucleophilic Ser-His pair. At the same time, the observed differences in the inhibition patterns for the autoantibody and trypsin may reflect the lack of the evolutionarily related similarities between the surface shapes of their active sites.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Inhibition of MBP-cleaving activity

We also tested whether the autoantibody catalytic activity could be affected by glatiramer acetate (Copaxone). This substance is an effective and a specific anti-MS drug reducing the relapse rate in MS patients (27). Although the precise mechanism of this drug still remains unknown, it appears to act against the immunodominant epitope of MBP by T cell receptor antagonism and by blocking the corresponding MHC complex (28). Our tests revealed that Copaxone effectively inhibited the MBP degradation catalyzed either by human or murine IgG, but it had no effect on the trypsin cleavage of MBP (Fig. 5). By the ELISA assay, we also showed that Copaxone effectively competed with catalytic IgG for MBP binding, indicating the mechanism of its inhibitory effect. Thus, the autoantibody inhibition with Copaxone establishes a potential link of anti-MBP autoantibodies with the etiology of MS.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Proteolytic activity of the MS patient and EAE mice antibodies is inhibited by glatiramer acetate (Copaxone). Purified MBP was incubated with either trypsin or IgGs of human (MS) or mouse (EAE) and a variable concentration of glatiramer acetate (Copaxone). The proteolytic activity was calculated as the ratio of degraded and nondegraded MBP measured by the densitometry of Coomassie-stained gel.

Discussion

Autoantibody mediated tissue destruction is among the main features of organ-specific autoimmunity (29). Since the original discovery of catalytic antibodies (30-32), ample data established their contribution to pathological effects in disease (33) as well as their possible biomedical applications (23, 34). It was shown that elevated levels of the autoantibody catalytic activity correlated with an autoimmune response in human and mice models (16, 21, 35). Moreover, data from several laboratories indicate that autoantibodies can readily penetrate the blood-brain barrier (36-39).

We detected the intrinsic proteolytic activity of anti-MBP autoantibodies purified from sera of MS patients. IgGs of healthy donors did not show such an activity. Multiple control experiments established that the proteolytic activity was a property of the autoantibody rather than an indicator of the contaminant protease presence. Although the antibody proteolytic activity was significantly lower than that of common proteases, it was fairly high as compared to other catalytic antibodies. The activity was quite specific toward MBP; several other proteins were resistant to cleavage. Analysis of the sites of MBP cleavage suggested that the antibody preferentially cleaved at basic residues. However, the cleavage efficiency was also defined by the surrounding sequence and probably reflected the necessity of initial antibody recognition of a particular epitope. The epitope specificity of isolated abzymes was shown by using a set of designed recombinant substrates. Antibodies isolated from MS patients and C57BL/6 mice with EAE induced by MOG revealed strong cleavage specificity inside encephalitogenic MBP85-101 peptide. Additional cleavage sites were revealed by antibodies from SJL mice with MBP-induced EAE. This observation may be attributed to the induction of the broad catalytic antibody repertoire in the latter example. In contrast, proteolysis with trypsin did not show any preferential specificity to MBP.

Our finding that anti-MBP autoantibodies possess the intrinsic proteolytic activity specifically directed toward MBP suggests that the anti-MBP autoantibodies can recognize and destroy myelin structures by MBP cleavage. This concept would provide a mechanistic explanation of their role in pathological destruction of the myelin sheath observed in MS. The postulated importance of the autoantibody catalytic property is supported by observation of a similar activity detected in the antibodies of mice with EAE, an established animal model of MS.

We have also noted a correlation between the autoantibody catalytic activity and expanded disability status scale parameter (18). Thus, the level of catalytic antibodies in serum may provide a clinically important marker for disease progression. The inhibition of the anti-MBP catalytic antibody with Copaxone also correlates with the proposed role of their proteolytic activity in the slow progression of the disease. A search for other effective inhibitors of anti-MBP catalytic antibodies therefore may provide a previously uncharacterized approach for developing an effective treatment of MS.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ciphergen, Inc. (The ProteinChip Company) for valuable help in SELDI analysis, Teva for Copaxone samples, and Prof. Vladimir Skulachev for valuable discussion on the initial stage of this project. This work was supported, in part, by Biotechnology Engagement Program Grant 37 (to H.C.M. and A.G.G.), Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (to H.C.M. and A.G.G.), European Union International Cooperation-COPERNICUS Program Grant IC15 CT96-0909 (to A.F. and A.G.G.), International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Grant CRP/RUS04-03 (to A.G.G.), Scientific Russian Schools Program Grant 1800.2003.4 (to A.G.G.), Program on Fundamental Medicine of the Russian Academy of Sciences Grant (to A.G.G.), and Russian Foundation of Basic Research Grant 03-04-48836-a (to N.A.P.).

Footnotes

  • ↵ l To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gabibov{at}ibch.ru.

  • ↵ i Deceased April 23, 2004.

  • ↵ j Deceased January 24, 2005.

  • Author contributions: N.A.P. and A.G.G. designed research; O.M.D., I.I.V., A.A.B., I.N.K., M.A.L., V.M.G., M.V.S., P.T., and A.K. performed research; A.A.B., G.B.T., and M.A.L. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; N.A.P., I.I.V., A.A.B., A.G.P., S.V.S., S.L.K., V.M.G., B.A., A.K., H.C.M., D.T., and A.F. analyzed data; and A.G.P., H.C.M., and A.G.G. wrote the paper.

  • Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

  • Abbreviations: MBP, myelin basic protein; MOG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MS, multiple sclerosis; SELDI, surface enhanced laser desorption ionization.

  • Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

  • Copyright © 2006, The National Academy of Sciences

References

  1. ↵
    Schwartz, R. S. (1993) in Fundamental Immunology, ed. Paul, W. E. (Raven, New York), pp. 1033-1097.
  2. ↵
    Hafler, D. A. (2004) J. Clin. Invest. 113 , 788-794. pmid:15067307
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Hofstetter, H. H., Sewell, D. L., Liu, F., Sandor, M., Forsthuber, T., Lehmann, P. V. & Fabry, Z. (2003) J. Neuroimmunol. 134 , 25-34. pmid:12507769
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Hohlfeld, R. & Wekerle, H. (2001) Curr. Opin. Neurol. 14 , 299-304. pmid:11371751
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Archelos, J. J., Storch, M. K. & Hartung, H. P. (2000) Ann. Neurol. 47 , 694-706. pmid:10852535
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Correale, J. & de los Milagros Bassani Molinas, M. (2002) J. Neurol. 249 , 375-389. pmid:11967640
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Chamczuk, A. J., Ursell, M., O'Connor, P., Jackowski, G. & Moscarello, M. A. (2002) J. Immunol. Methods 262 , 21-27. pmid:11983216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Reindl, M., Linington, C., Brehm, U., Egg, R., Dilitz, E., Deisenhammer, F., Poewe, W. & Berger, T. (1999) Brain 122 , 2047-2056. pmid:10545390
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Genain, C. P., Cannella, B., Hauser, S. L. & Raine, C. S. (1999) Nat. Med. 5 , 170-175. pmid:9930864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Berger, T., Rubner, P., Schautzer, F., Egg, R., Ulmer, H., Mayringer, I., Dilitz, E., Deisenhammer, F. & Reindl, M. (2003) N. Engl. J. Med. 349 , 139-145. pmid:12853586
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Fritz, R. B., Chou, C. H. & McFarlin, D. E. (1983) J. Immunol. 130 , 191-194. pmid:6183347
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    Poser, C. M. & Brinar, V. V. (2001) Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 103 , 1-11. pmid:11311469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Miller, S. D. & Karpus, J. W. (1996) in Current Protocols in Immunology, ed. Coligan, J. E. (Wiley, New York), Vol. 3, pp. Unit 15.1.1-15.1.13.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Oliver, A. R., Lyon, G. M. & Ruddle, N. H. (2003) J. Immunol. 171 , 462-468. pmid:12817031
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Ponomarenko, N. A., Durova, O. M., Vorobiev, I. I., Aleksandrova, E. S., Telegin, G. B., Chamborant, O. G., Sidorik, L. L., Suchkov, S. V., Alekberova, Z. S., Gnuchev, N. V. & Gabibov, A. G. (2002) J. Immunol. Methods 269 , 197-211. pmid:12379362
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Shuster, A. M., Gololobov, G. V., Kvashuk, O. A., Bogomolova, A. E., Smirnov, I. V. & Gabibov, A. G. (1992) Science 256 , 665-667. pmid:1585181
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Kishimoto, A., Nishiyama, K., Nakanishi, H., Uratsuji, Y., Nomura, H., Takeyama, Y. & Nishizuka, Y. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260 , 12492-12499. pmid:2413024
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Ponomarenko, N. A., Durova, O. M., Vorobiev, I. I., Belogurov, A. A., Telegin, G. B., Suchkov, S. V., Misikov, V. K., Morse, H. C., III, & Gabibov, A. G. (November 4, 2005) Immunol. Lett., doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2005.10.006.
  19. ↵
    Lu, D., Yuan, X., Zheng, X. & Sadler, J. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272 , 31293-31300. pmid:9395456
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Gololobov, G. V., Chernova, E. A., Schourov, D. V., Smirnov, I. V., Kudelina, I. A. & Gabibov, A. G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 , 254-257. pmid:7816827
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Paul, S., Volle, D. J., Beach, C. M., Johnson, D. R., Powell, M. J. & Massey, R. J. (1989) Science 244 , 1158-1162. pmid:2727702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. Pillet, D., Paon, M., Vorobiev, I. I., Gabibov, A. G., Thomas, D. & Friboulet, A. (2002) J. Immunol. Methods 269 , 5-12. pmid:12379348
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Wentworth, P., Jr., McDunn, J. E., Wentworth, A. D., Takeuchi, C., Nieva, J., Jones, T., Bautista, C., Ruedi, J. M., Gutierrez, A., Janda, K. D., et al. (2002) Science 298 , 2195-2199. pmid:12434011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Sospedra, M. & Martin, R. (2005) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23 , 683-747. pmid:15771584
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Sakai, K., Zamvil, S. S., Mitchell, D. J., Lim, M., Rothbard, J. B. & Steinman, L. (1988) J. Neuroimmunol. 19 , 21-32. pmid:2456304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Oyanagui, Y., Taniguchi, M., Iwata, M. & Murakami, M. (2003) Life Sci. 73 , 1333-1346. pmid:12850247
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Arnon, R. & Sela, M. (2003) J. Mol. Recognit. 16 , 412-421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Aharoni, R., Teitelbaum, D., Arnon, R. & Sela, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 , 634-639. pmid:9892685
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Viau, M. & Zouali, M. (2005) Clin. Immunol. 114 , 17-26. pmid:15596405
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Lerner, R. A., Benkovic, S. J. & Schultz, P. G. (1991) Science 252 , 659-667. pmid:2024118
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. Raso, V. & Stollar, B. D. (1975) Biochemistry 14 , 591-599. pmid:234248
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Tramontano, A., Janda, K. D. & Lerner, R. A. (1986) Science 234 , 1566-1570. pmid:3787261
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Lacroix-Desmazes, S., Bayry, J., Misra, N., Horn, M. P., Villard, S., Pashov, A., Stieltjes, N., d'Oiron, R., Saint-Remy, J. M., Hoebeke, J., et al. (2002) N. Engl. J. Med. 346 , 662-667. pmid:11870243
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Mets, B., Winger, G., Cabrera, C., Seo, S., Jamdar, S., Yang, G., Zhao, K., Briscoe, R. J., Almonte, R., Woods, J. H. & Landry, D. W. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 , 10176-10181. pmid:9707620
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Tawfik, D. S., Chap, R., Green, B. S., Sela, M. & Eshhar, Z. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 , 2145-2149. pmid:7892238
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Friden, P. M., Walus, L. R., Watson, P., Doctrow, S. R., Kozarich, J. W., Backman, C., Bergman, H., Hoffer, B., Bloom, F. & Granholm, A. C. (1993) Science 259 , 373-377. pmid:8420006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. Merkler, D., Oertle, T., Buss, A., Pinschewer, D. D., Schnell, L., Bareyre, F. M., Kerschensteiner, M., Buddeberg, B. S. & Schwab, M. E. (2003) FASEB J. 17 , 2275-2277. pmid:14563689
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. Tsukada, N., Tanaka, Y., Miyagi, K., Yanagisawa, N. & Okano, A. (1989) J. Neuroimmunol. 24 , 41-46. pmid:2478577
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Yednock, T. A., Cannon, C., Fritz, L. C., Sanchez-Madrid, F., Steinman, L. & Karin, N. (1992) Nature 356 , 63-66. pmid:1538783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Autoantibodies to myelin basic protein catalyze site-specific degradation of their antigen
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Autoantibodies to myelin basic protein catalyze site-specific degradation of their antigen
Natalia A. Ponomarenko, Oxana M. Durova, Ivan I. Vorobiev, Alexey A. Belogurov, Inna N. Kurkova, Alexander G. Petrenko, Georgy B. Telegin, Sergey V. Suchkov, Sergey L. Kiselev, Maria A. Lagarkova, Vadim M. Govorun, Marina V. Serebryakova, Bérangère Avalle, Pete Tornatore, Alexander Karavanov, Herbert C. Morse, Daniel Thomas, Alain Friboulet, Alexander G. Gabibov
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2006, 103 (2) 281-286; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509849103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Autoantibodies to myelin basic protein catalyze site-specific degradation of their antigen
Natalia A. Ponomarenko, Oxana M. Durova, Ivan I. Vorobiev, Alexey A. Belogurov, Inna N. Kurkova, Alexander G. Petrenko, Georgy B. Telegin, Sergey V. Suchkov, Sergey L. Kiselev, Maria A. Lagarkova, Vadim M. Govorun, Marina V. Serebryakova, Bérangère Avalle, Pete Tornatore, Alexander Karavanov, Herbert C. Morse, Daniel Thomas, Alain Friboulet, Alexander G. Gabibov
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2006, 103 (2) 281-286; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509849103
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: 103 (2)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490