Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Commentary

Enhancing molecular flux through nanopores by means of attractive interactions

John J. Kasianowicz, Tam L. Nguyen, and Vincent M. Stanford
PNAS August 1, 2006 103 (31) 11431-11432; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603951103
John J. Kasianowicz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.kasianowicz@nist.gov
Tam L. Nguyen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent M. Stanford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Related Article

  • Molecular transport through channels and pores: Effects of in-channel interactions and blocking
    - Jul 21, 2006
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The classic experiments by Galvani and colleagues (as discussed by Piccolino in ref. 1) in the 1790s led him to suggest that neural conduction and muscle contraction are governed by a form of electricity. Nearly 100 years later, Santiago Ramon y Cajal’s (2) use of Golgi stains provided stunning images of the complex neural architecture, and hinted at how signals might be propagated along relatively vast distances within the body. In the mid-20th century, electrophysiological experiments on giant squid axons by Hodgkin and Huxley (3) confirmed Galvani’s conjecture; the rapid transmission of information along nerve fibers is indeed electrical. Specifically, the propagation of the action potential in nerve is controlled by the spatial-temporal opening and closing of separate pathways for Na + and K + ions in nerve cell membranes (3–6). By computing the energy for transporting ions across an ultrathin cell membrane (≈4 nm thick) that has a low dielectric constant (ε ∼ 2), it was shown that ion-selective transporters, now known as protein ion channels, are water-filled pores (7). The ability to observe single molecules of excitatory material in artificial cell membranes (8–10) and in frog muscle fibers (11, 12) provided keen insight into the structure–function relationship of ion channels. Channels, and channel-like entities, also facilitate the transport of macromolecules in a wide variety of processes including protein translocation across membranes (13), gene transduction between bacteria, and the transfer of genetic information from some viruses and bacteriophages to cells (14). The theoretical work by Bauer and Nadler (15) in this issue of PNAS brings us one step closer to understanding the mechanisms and advantages of molecular selectivity.

With few exceptions (16), the channel pore diameter and simple chemical binding site stoichiometry (17) are not a sufficient basis for enhanced selective transport. Indeed, potassium channels admit ≈10 4 K + ions for every Na + ion. This remarkable selectivity requires sophisticated physical and chemical machinery with minimal molecular mass; as illustrated in Fig. 1 Left (18). The K + channel barely spans a cell membrane and is much smaller than the channels formed by the bacterial toxins Staphylococcus aureus α-hemolysin (19) (Fig. 1 Center) and Bacillus anthracis protective antigen 63 (PA63; Fig. 1 Right) (20). The various shapes and sizes of ion channels reflect the scope of nanopores used in nature.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Representations of three archetypal protein ion channels. (Left and Center) Crystal structures of a K+ selective ion channel (18) (Left) and the channel formed by S. aureus α-hemolysin (19) (Center). (Right) A model for the channel formed by B. anthracis protective antigen 63 (PA63) (20). Each color denotes a single polypeptide monomer. The bacterial toxin channels are far less selective than the K+ channel. In addition, they only discriminate significantly between cations and anions, e.g., Na+ and Cl− (e.g., ref. 21).

Ignoring molecular-sieving mechanisms, selective transport requires that the diffusing particle bind to the channel. A greater attractive interaction implies a greater mean residence time of the particle inside the pore and seemingly a decrease in particle throughput. In fact, that is the case for an infinitely thin channel. However, Berezhkovskii and Bezrukov (17, 22) demonstrated theoretically that for finite length channels, with potential wells that span the length of the pore, and for diffusive motion of particles, the flux is nonmonotonic in binding energy and can exceed that through a nonbinding channel. Moreover, there is an optimum interaction strength that maximizes the flux. In this analysis, it was assumed that the channel-permeated species are point particles that do not interact with each other. Their findings are in good agreement with experimental studies of a variety of channels that transport specific nucleotides, sugars, and antibiotics (23–26).

Bauer and Nadler (15) developed an analytical theory that also addressed the question of how the binding of particles to a channel could affect their diffusive flow through ion-selective pores. In this model, the idealized particles have finite extent and can interact with each other in blocking the channel. In addition, the attractive potential well spans part or all of the channel length plus the length of a particle and need not be centered at the middle of the channel. As with Berezhkovskii and Bezrukov (17, 22), Bauer and Nadler (15) found that a binding site can increase the flow compared with that in the absence of particle–channel interactions over a range of bulk particle concentrations and well depths. The increase in particle density in the pore caused by the binding site sufficiently offsets the increase in the mean residence time of the particle in the pore because of the attractive potential.

For a binding site that spans part of the pore, Bauer and Nadler (15) discovered that the site’s position qualitatively affects the net flux of particles. Surprisingly, the flow decreases when the binding site is closest to the side of greater particle concentration. Conversely, the flow is enhanced when the site is opposite the entrance with the greater concentration. According to the model, once the particle binds to the pore, it is more likely to exit the pore on that side than to back-diffuse and exit the channel whence it came.

The method of Bauer and Nadler (15) may lead to an even better understanding of other complex transport problems. For example, it was demonstrated that single-stranded DNA can be driven through the α-hemolysin channel (Fig. 1 Center) by an applied electric field (27). For a given length of polynucleotide, the DNA-induced ion current blockade patterns and lifetimes inside the channel depended on the base composition (28), which suggests that intraparticle interactions may also play a role in the dynamics of molecular transport through highly confined spaces.

The key question addressed by Berezhkovskii and Bezrukov (17, 22) and by Bauer and Nadler (15) was whether an attractive site in the pore can enhance particle flow through a selective ion channel. They found that as the strength of binding increases past an optimum value, the enhanced flow decreases. However, maximizing flow may not be the desired outcome for all channel-based transport systems. For example, B. anthracis exerts its lethal action on cells by means of three anthrax toxins [lethal factor (LF), edema factor (EF), and protective antigen 83 (PA83)] that are secreted by the bacterium (29, 30). PA83 binds to cell membranes and is cleaved into two fragments. One of these, PA63, remains bound to the membrane and self-assembles into an ion channel (Fig. 1 Right). LF and EF bind tightly to the PA63 pore (the binding constants are both ≈40 pM) and block the channel conductance (31, 32). Recent experimental evidence suggests that LF might thread through the PA63 channel (refs. 33 and 34, but see also ref. 31). Unlike metabolites that are consumed and that need to be replenished on a moment-to-moment basis, LF and EF are enzymes that are recycled inside the cell. Maximizing their concentration in the cell may not be essential to cause cell death by anthrax infection.

Nanometer-scale pores play many roles in cells and organelles. In some instances, the selective transport of ions or macromolecules is not only important but is also critical to the survival of an organism. For example, a defect in a chloride-selective ion channel is the molecular basis for cystic fibrosis (35). Thus, theories that advance our understanding of the mechanism of ion channel selectivity are and will continue to be of great import.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Standards and Technology Office of Law Enforcement Services.

Footnotes

  • †To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: john.kasianowicz{at}nist.gov
  • Author contributions: J.J.K. T.L.N., and V.M.S. wrote the paper.

  • Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

  • See companion article on page 11446.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Piccolino M.
    (1998) Brain Res. Bull. 46:381–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ramon y Cajal S.
    1. Defelipe J. ,
    2. Jones E. G.
    (1988) in Cajal on the Cerebral Cortex: An Annotated Translation of the Complete Writings, eds Defelipe J. , Jones E. G. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York).
  3. ↵
    1. Hodgkin A. L. ,
    2. Huxley A. F.
    (1952) J. Physiol. (London) 116:449–472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Katz B.
    (1966) Nerve, Muscle, and Synapse (McGraw–Hill, New York).
  5. ↵
    1. Hille B.
    (1992) Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), 2nd Ed..
  6. ↵
    1. Beckstein O. ,
    2. Biggin P. C. ,
    3. Bond P. ,
    4. Bright J. N. ,
    5. Domene C. ,
    6. Grottesi A. ,
    7. Holyoake J. ,
    8. Sansom M. S. P.
    (2003) FEBS Lett. 555:85–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Parsegian V. A.
    (1969) Nature 221:844–846.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Mueller P. ,
    2. Rudin D. O. ,
    3. Tien H. T. ,
    4. Wescott W. C.
    (1962) Nature 194:979–980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Bean R. C. ,
    2. Shepherd W. C. ,
    3. Chan H. ,
    4. Eichner J. T.
    (1969) J. Gen. Physiol. 53:741–757.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Ehrenstein G. ,
    2. Lecar H. ,
    3. Nossal R.
    (1970) J. Gen. Physiol. 55:119–133.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Katz B. ,
    2. Miledi R.
    (1972) J. Physiol. (London) 224:665–699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Neher E. ,
    2. Sakmann B.
    (1976) Nature 260:799–802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Simon S. M. ,
    2. Blobel G.
    (1991) Cell 65:371–380.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Miller R. V.
    (1998) Sci. Am. 278(1):66–71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bauer W. R. ,
    2. Nadler W.
    (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:11446–11451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Finkelstein A. ,
    2. Andersen O. S.
    (1981) J. Membr. Biol. 59:155–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Berezhkovskii A. M. ,
    2. Bezrukov S. M.
    (2005) Biophys. J. 104:L17–L19.
  18. ↵
    1. Doyle D. A. ,
    2. Cabral J. M. ,
    3. Pfuetzner R. A. ,
    4. Kuo A. ,
    5. Gulbis J. M. ,
    6. Cohen S. L. ,
    7. Chait B. T. ,
    8. MacKinnon R.
    (1998) Science 280:69–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Song L. Z. ,
    2. Hobaugh M. R. ,
    3. Shustak C. ,
    4. Cheley S. ,
    5. Bayley H. ,
    6. Gouaux J. E.
    (1996) Science 274:1859–1866.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Nguyen T. L.
    (2004) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 22:253–266.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Merzlyak P. ,
    2. Capistrano M.-F. P. ,
    3. Valeva A. ,
    4. Kasianowicz J. J. ,
    5. Krasilnikov O. V.
    (2005) Biophys. J. 89:3059–3070.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Berezhkovskii A. M. ,
    2. Bezrukov S. M.
    (2005) Chem. Phys. 319:342–349.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Kullman L. ,
    2. Winterhalter M. ,
    3. Bezrukov S. M.
    (2002) Biophys. J. 82:803–812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Rostovtseva T. K. ,
    2. Bezrukov S. M.
    (1998) Biophys. J. 74:2365–2373.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Nestorovich E. M. ,
    2. Danelon C. ,
    3. Winterhalter M. ,
    4. Bezrukov S. M.
    (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:9789–9794.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Schwarz G. ,
    2. Danelon C. ,
    3. Winterhalter M.
    (2003) Biophys. J. 84:2990–2998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Kasianowicz J. J. ,
    2. Brandin E. ,
    3. Branton D. ,
    4. Deamer D. W.
    (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13770–13773.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Kasianowicz J. J. ,
    2. Henrickson S. E. ,
    3. Weetall H. H. ,
    4. Robertson B.
    (2001) Anal. Chem. 73:2268–2272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ascenzi P. ,
    2. Visca P. ,
    3. Ippolito G. ,
    4. Spallarossa A. ,
    5. Bolognesi M. ,
    6. Montecucco C.
    (2002) FEBS Lett. 531:384–388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Wang X.-M. ,
    2. Wattiez R. ,
    3. Mock M. ,
    4. Falmagne P. ,
    5. Ruysschaert J.-M. ,
    6. Cabiaux V.
    (1997) Biochemistry 36:14906–14913.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Panchal R. G. ,
    2. Halverson K. M. ,
    3. Ribot W. ,
    4. Kenny T. ,
    5. Lane D. ,
    6. Abshire T. G. ,
    7. Ezzell J. W. ,
    8. Powell B. ,
    9. Kasianowicz J. J. ,
    10. Bavari S.
    (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280:10834–10839.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Halverson K. M. ,
    2. Panchal R. G. ,
    3. Nguyen T. L. ,
    4. Gussio R. ,
    5. Little S. F. ,
    6. Misakian M. ,
    7. Bavari S. ,
    8. Kasianowicz J. J.
    (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280:34056–34062.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Zhang S. ,
    2. Udho E. ,
    3. Wu Z. ,
    4. Collier R. J. ,
    5. Finkelstein A.
    (2004) Biophys. J. 87:3842–3849.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Krantz B. A. ,
    2. Melnyk R. A. ,
    3. Zhang S. ,
    4. Juris S. J. ,
    5. Lacy D. B. ,
    6. Wu Z. ,
    7. Finkelstein A. ,
    8. Collier R. J.
    (2005) Science 309:777–781.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Welsh M.
    (1995) Sci. Am. 273(6):52–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enhancing molecular flux through nanopores by means of attractive interactions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Enhancing molecular flux through nanopores by means of attractive interactions
John J. Kasianowicz, Tam L. Nguyen, Vincent M. Stanford
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2006, 103 (31) 11431-11432; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603951103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Enhancing molecular flux through nanopores by means of attractive interactions
John J. Kasianowicz, Tam L. Nguyen, Vincent M. Stanford
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2006, 103 (31) 11431-11432; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603951103
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 103 (31)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490