Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Breakdown of the Stokes–Einstein relation in supercooled water

Pradeep Kumar
PNAS August 29, 2006 103 (35) 12955-12956; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605880103
Pradeep Kumar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Almost everyone would agree that water is probably the most important liquid for life, but few fully appreciate that water is also the most puzzling among the liquids. Water is anomalous in many ways compared with simple liquids. One of the most well known anomalies is the decrease of density of water upon cooling below 4°C. Other anomalies of water include the increase of specific heat and compressibility upon cooling.

Apart from the thermodynamic anomalies, the dynamics of water also displays surprising properties, such as the increase of diffusivity and decrease of viscosity upon compression (1) and a breakdown of the Stokes–Einstein (SE) relation (2) in supercooled water. The SE relation is a hydrodynamic equation relating the diffusivity, D, the temperature, T, and relaxation time, τ (assuming that τ is proportional to the viscosity). Specifically, it states that D is proportional to T and inversely proportional to the relaxation time τ. Hence, the product Dτ/T should be temperature independent. This important hydrodynamic relation is obeyed by many liquids (3, 4) at relatively high temperatures, but it usually fails to describe the dynamics in supercooled states. Breakdown of the SE relation has also been seen in simple liquids near the glass transition (3–6). It was hypothesized that the presence of large dynamic heterogeneities might cause the breakdown of SE relation (7, 8). Dynamic heterogeneities in liquids are the consequence of highly mobile molecules forming a cluster and moving cooperatively. The size of these spatially heterogeneous dynamical regions increases as the temperature is decreased. Dynamic heterogeneities facilitate diffusion (and local strucutral relaxation) but do not facilitate the relaxation of the entire system. Hence, the large size of these dynamic heterogeneities should “decouple” diffusion and relaxation so Dτ/T is no longer a constant. The presence of dynamic heterogeneities in supercooled liquids has been verified by both experiments (6, 9) and computer simulations (10). In molecular liquids as well as in colloidal suspensions, the glass transition is followed by a sharp growth in dynamic heterogeneities (6, 9). Hence, it is common to assume that SE breakdown is related to glass transition because the sizes of dynamic heterogeneities grows sharply near the glass transition (3, 4, 8, 11, 12).

In this issue of PNAS, the work by Chen et al. (13) on water confined in nanopores sheds light on the long standing issue of decoupling of diffusion and structural relaxation in supercooled water. They measure the diffusivity D by NMR experiments and the relaxation time τ by neutron scattering experiments for temperatures down to −83°C or 190 K. Confinement prevents the freezing of water below the bulk homogeneous nucleation temperature of −38°C. Chen et al. find that the product Dτ/T is a constant at higher temperatures but increases sharply at low temperatures, signaling the breakdown of the SE relation. They further find that the breakdown of the SE relation occurs well above water's glass transition temperature (13). Hence, their experiments call out for a scenario different from that believed for simple colloidal suspensions and liquids. A possible clue for this new scenario arises from the fact that Chen et al. discover that the SE relation breaks down at the same temperature where the behavior of the dynamics of water changes from non-Arrhenius at high temperatures to Arrhenius at low temperatures, which is estimated to be ≈136 K (14).

One possible interpretation of the breakdown of SE relation in supercooled water consistent with experimental results (15) is the presence of a hypothesized liquid–liquid critical point (16, 17) in the deep supercooled region of water. The liquid–liquid critical point gives rise to a Widom line T W(P) (see Fig. 1), the locus of the correlation length maxima, which emanates from the liquid–liquid critical point and extends into the one-phase region (18–20). When water is cooled along a constant pressure path below the critical point, it changes from a predominance of a “local high-density liquid (HDL) structure” to a predominance of a “local low-density liquid (LDL) structure” upon crossing the Widom line. Two consequences of this interpretation are as follows.

  1. The dynamics in the HDL-like region above T W(P) is expected to be non-Arrhenius, whereas the dynamics in LDL-like region is expected to be Arrhenius. These expectation are borne out by the experiments (14, 20, 21).

  2. In the HDL-like region diffusion is a cooperative phenomenon but with small length and time scales of dynamic heterogeneities, so we expect the SE relation to hold, whereas in the LDL-like region, emergence of a large, more ordered local structure below T W(P) causes a growth of dynamic heterogeneities. Hence, in the LDL-like region, diffusion would be more cooperative compared with the HDL-like region. Indeed, we find that the size of the dynamic heterogeneities has a sharp increase at T W(P). Fig. 2 shows the formation of clusters by most mobile molecules of water in computer simulations above (Fig. 2 a) and below (Fig. 2 b) T W(P). The size ξ of these dynamic heterogeneities increases as the temperature is lowered and has a sharp increase at the Widom line temperature T W(P), and thus a breakdown of the SE relation.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Low-temperature liquid–liquid critical point C 2 of water and corresponding Widom line. The coexistence line between LDL and HDL is represented by a solid curve, whereas the Widom line T W(P) emanating from the liquid–liquid critical point is represented by a dashed curve. Widom line separates the water with HDL-like feature at high temperature from the LDL-like feature at low temperatures.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Effect on the size of dynamic heterogeneities on crossing the Widom line T W(P). Clusters of 7% most mobile molecules showing the dynamic heterogeneities for T > T W(P) (a) and for T < T W(P) (b). The characteristic size of the dynamic heterogeneities ξ increases sharply upon crossing T W(P) from high temperature side to low temperature side because of the emergence of a locally LDL-like structure.

In summary, the discovery of Chen et al. (13) that the breakdown of the SE relation in supercooled water does not occur near the glass transition temperature raises the question of what causes the SE breakdown in supercooled water. It is possible that the cause is crossing the Widom line, which arises from the liquid–liquid critical point.

Acknowledgments

I thank the National Science Foundation for support.

Footnotes

  • *E-mail: pradeep{at}physics.bu.edu
  • Author contributions: P.K. designed research, performed research, and wrote the paper.

  • Conflict of interest statement, No conflicts declared.

  • See companion article on page 12974.

  • © 2006 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Mishima O. ,
    2. Stanley H. E.
    (1998) Nature 396:329–335.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Einstein A.
    (1956) Investigations on the Theory of Brownian Motion (Dover, New York).
  3. ↵
    1. Cicerone M. T. ,
    2. Blackburn F. R. ,
    3. Ediger M. D.
    (1995) Macromolecules 28:8224–8232.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Jonas J. ,
    2. Akai A.
    (1977) J. Chem. Phys. 66:4946–4950.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Götze W. ,
    2. Sjögren L.
    (1992) Rep. Prog. Phys. 55:241–370.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Berthier L. ,
    2. Biroli G. ,
    3. Bouchaud J.-P. ,
    4. Cipeletti L. ,
    5. El Masri D. ,
    6. L'Hote D. ,
    7. Ladieu D. ,
    8. Pierno M.
    (2005) Science 310:1797–1800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Ediger M. D.
    (2005) Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51:99–128.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Ngai K. L.
    (1999) Philos. Mag. B 79:1783–1797.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Weeks E. R. ,
    2. Crocker J. C. ,
    3. Levitt A. G. ,
    4. Schofield A. ,
    5. Weitz D. A.
    (2000) Science 287:627–630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Donati C. ,
    2. Glotzer S. C. ,
    3. Poole P. H.
    (1999) Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:5064–5067.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Pan A. C. ,
    2. Garrahan J. P. ,
    3. Chandler D.
    (2005) ChemPhysChem 6:1783–1785.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Gilles T. ,
    2. Kivelson D.
    (1995) J. Chem. Phys. 103:3071–3073.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Chen S.-H. ,
    2. Mallamace F. ,
    3. Mou C.-Y. ,
    4. Broccio M. ,
    5. Corsaro C. ,
    6. Faraone A. ,
    7. Liu L.
    (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:12974–12978.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Johari G. P. ,
    2. Astl G. ,
    3. Mayer E.
    (1990) J. Chem. Phys. 92:809–810.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Liu L. ,
    2. Chen S.-H. ,
    3. Faraone A. ,
    4. Yen C.-W. ,
    5. Mou C.-Y.
    (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:117802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mishima O. ,
    2. Stanley H. E.
    (1998) Nature 392:164–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Poole P. H. ,
    2. Sciortino F. ,
    3. Essmann U. ,
    4. Stanley H. E.
    (1992) Nature 360:324–328.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Michels A. ,
    2. Levelt J. M. H. ,
    3. Wolkers G.
    (1958) Physica 24:769–794.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Michels A. ,
    2. Levelt J. M. H. ,
    3. de Graaff W.
    (1958) Physica 24:659–671.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Xu L. ,
    2. Kumar P. ,
    3. Buldyrev S. V. ,
    4. Chen S. H. ,
    5. Poole P. H. ,
    6. Sciortino F. ,
    7. Stanley H. E.
    (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:16558–16562.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Mallamace F. ,
    2. Broccio M. ,
    3. Corsaro C. ,
    4. Faraone A. ,
    5. Wanderlingh U. ,
    6. Liu L. ,
    7. Mou C.-Y. ,
    8. Chen S.-H.
    (2006) J. Chem. Phys. 124:161102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breakdown of the Stokes–Einstein relation in supercooled water
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Breakdown of the Stokes–Einstein relation in supercooled water
Pradeep Kumar
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2006, 103 (35) 12955-12956; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605880103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Breakdown of the Stokes–Einstein relation in supercooled water
Pradeep Kumar
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2006, 103 (35) 12955-12956; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605880103
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (8)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

News Feature: Cities serve as testbeds for evolutionary change
Urban living can pressure flora and fauna to adapt in intriguing ways. Biologists are starting to take advantage of this convenient laboratory of evolution.
Image credit: Kristin Winchell (Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis).
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

  • Squid genomes in a bacterial world
  • Homogeneous catalysis for the nitrogen fuel cycle
  • The future of influenza forecasts
Show more

Related Content

  • The violation of the Stokes–Einstein relation in supercooled water
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Experimental evidence of low-density liquid water upon rapid decompression
  • A tetrahedral entropy for water
  • Relation between the Widom line and the breakdown of the Stokes-Einstein relation in supercooled water
  • Scopus (32)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490