Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Meiosis in living color: Fluorescence-based tetrad analysis in Arabidopsis

R. Scott Hawley
PNAS March 6, 2007 104 (10) 3673-3674; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700276104
R. Scott Hawley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In the process of meiosis, a diploid cell produces four haploid gametes, each of which carries but one copy of each chromosome. Before the two meiotic divisions, each set of homologs is composed of two fully replicated chromosomes, and thus four chromatids. At the first meiotic division, one homolog (composed of two sister chromatids) is segregated into each of the two daughter cells. The second meiotic division then separates the two chromatids comprising each chromosome. Unfortunately, the very purpose of meiosis, distributing the four chromatids into four gametes, creates a problem for greedy geneticists who would like to be able to recover all four of the original chromatids! In this issue of PNAS, Francis et al. provide an elegant and efficient solution to this problem in Arabidopsis thaliana (1).

The need to recover all four chromatids can be seen by considering the case where a pair of homologous chromosomes undergoes a single recombination (or cross-over) event. Because each such event involves only two of the four chromatids, only half of the four products of meiosis will carry a recombined chromosome. The other two products of meiosis will carry chromatids that are unrecombined and could have arisen from a meiosis in which no cross-over event had occurred at all! This problem only gets worse if two or more cross-overs occur per chromosome arm. Thus, recovering just one of the four products of meiosis often tells us very little about the number of exchanges that actually took place before the meiotic division.

There are algebraic approaches to solving this problem (2), but the best solution is to recover all four products of meiosis using a technique known as tetrad analysis (3). Tetrad analysis not only greatly facilitates genetic mapping but provides clear information on the number and distribution of exchanges. This issue is of special importance when one is concerned about phenomena such as cross-over interference, the process that regulates the spacing of exchanges along the length of meiotic chromosomes. Most critically, tetrad analysis allows a meiotic biologist to study a phenomenon known as gene conversion, where a DNA sequence from one homolog is replaced by corresponding sequence from the other homolog (converting a copy of allele “a” into allele “A”). The demonstration of gene conversion by Mitchell (4), and its association with sites of genetic recombination (5, 6), was critical to the development of modern molecular models of recombination (7–12). Unfortunately, until quite recently, tetrad analysis was possible only in a small number of unicellular systems, and thus geneticists have long hoped for a simple system for tetrad analysis in a multicellular eukaryote.

Francis et al. (1) report the development of exactly such a system of tetrad analysis in A. thaliana. The work expands upon the discovery of a mutant called quartet (qrt1) that causes the four products produced by each pollen meiosis to remain attached to each other, making tetrad analysis possible (13–15). Studies using this mutant have mapped the centromeres genetically in this organism and provided a thorough understanding of recombination in Arabidopsis (16, 17). However, as useful as having all four products of meiosis wrapped in a little floral box might be, one is still left with the problem of how to genotype the four spores (14). Ideally, one wants to be able to determine the genotype of each spore by just looking at it. Francis et al. achieve this goal by creating a large number of precisely mapped transgene constructs in the qrt1 mutant background (1). Each of these constructs encodes one of three fluorescent proteins (red, yellow, or cyan) under control of a pollen-specific promoter. Each insertion was mapped precisely onto the Arabidopsis genome sequence, and the authors used only those insertions that map in intergenic regions, noting that “it is important that disruption of genes by the marker does not confound the results.”

Fig. 1 provides a dramatic demonstration of the power of this technique. Look first at Fig. 1 Top, which shows the segregation of two linked insertions in a plant heterozygous for constructs encoding the red and cyan fluorescent proteins. In this case, the two transgene insertions are located on the same homolog, and so segregation without recombination between these markers yields a tetrad with two pink pollen grains and two colorless pollen grains. As described in the figure legend, the Top Right image displays the results of a single cross-over between these two insertions. Thus, this simple color-based assay allows one to quickly measure the frequency of recombination between two linked sites in either wild-type or meiotic mutant-bearing plants by a simple color-based assay of the pollen. As shown in Fig. 1 Middle, this method also allows the use of three linked insertions to measure the frequency of crossing over in two adjacent intervals, and the frequency of double cross-over events (the latter metric being crucial to any study of cross-over interference).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Visualizing meiotic recombination. The segregation of genes encoding different colors of fluorescent proteins enables the detection of recombination events in pollen tetrads produced by Arabidopsis qrt1 mutants. Plants heterozygous for genes encoding red and cyan fluorescent proteins arrayed on the same chromosome in cis (Top Left) shed tetrads with two pollen grains expressing both red and cyan protein (pink after digitally merging images taken using the appropriate filters). Single cross-overs between the markers (Top Right) can be visualized as tetrads with a cyan, a red, a pink, and a nonfluorescent pollen grain (the nonfluorescent grain shows minor background signal). Using three different fluorescent proteins, cyan, yellow, and red, arrayed in cis (Middle Left) allows the detection of double cross-overs (Middle Right), in this case, a four-chromatid double cross-over results in a tetrad with a cyan, a yellow, and cyan (light blue), a red, and a red and yellow (orange) pollen grain. Finally, heterozygous plants with one fluorescent allele and one nonfluorescent mutant allele of yellow fluorescent protein (Bottom Left) can be used to detect gene conversion events (Bottom Right). The tetrads in this figure were digitally positioned for ease of comparison. [I am indebted to Luke Berchowitz and Gregory P. Copenhaver (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC) for providing this figure.]

Finally, Fig. 1 Bottom beautifully displays its utility in measuring gene conversion. Heterozygous plants with one fluorescent allele and one nonfluorescent mutant allele of yellow fluorescent protein (Fig. 1 Bottom Left) can be used to detect gene conversion events (Fig. 1 Bottom Right). Until this paper, the frequency of such conversions had been sufficiently low as to escape detection (15). However, using this system, the authors were able to demonstrate six cases of gene conversion among 4,033 tetrads for a frequency of 1/336. As pointed out by the authors, this appears to be the first unambiguous observation of meiotic gene conversion in Arabidopsis using tetrad analysis.

The utility of this advance lies not only in its ability to properly measure exchange (both frequency and distribution) and gene conversion but also in the fact that the assay is rapid, inexpensive, and can be done in essentially isogenic lines. The authors could not be more correct in noting that “experiments that would have been difficult in the past because of laborious crossing schemes can now be done with relative ease.” Such an advance is all of the more critical because it comes at a time when the meiotic recombination studies are flourishing in this system (18–20), cytological analysis of Arabidopsis meiosis has been greatly improved (21), and new meiotic mutants are being rapidly discovered in this system (22–25).

The best solution is to recover all four products of meiosis using a technique known as tetrad analysis.

Specifically, the development of this efficient methodology for tetrad analysis will greatly facilitate the analysis of meiotic recombination in two critical ways. First, it will provide a straightforward means for identifying those gene conversion events that are associated with recombination. The ability to isolate these events and to analyze their structure has proven critical to the analysis of recombination-defective mutants in both yeast (9) and Drosophila (26, 27). As pointed out above, this analysis is critical to determining the actual mechanism of recombination used by a given organism. The two organisms, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces pombe, for which we do understand how crossing over occurs, employ quite different mechanisms of meiotic recombination (12)! The ability to identify convertants easily in Arabidopsis will provide the important opportunity to determine which, if indeed either, of the two yeast paradigms is conserved in higher organisms. Second, the technique reported here will allow us to address the mechanisms that control the distribution of meiotic exchange in higher eukaryotes, and most importantly address the mechanism of cross-over interference (19). The technique presented by Francis et al. (1) will facilitate the identification of mutants defective in the maintenance of interference and in other mechanisms that control cross-over distribution. These mutants will provide the keys required to understand the mechanisms by which exchange distribution is controlled.

In summary, the fusion of a rapid and efficient method for recombinational analysis (including gene conversion), cytological methods that allow the study of the later stages of meiotic prophase and two meiotic divisions, and an ever-growing arsenal of meiotic mutants combine together to establish Arabidopsis as a premiere system in which to analyze meiotic biology, and in living color to boot!

Footnotes

  • ‡E-mail: rsh{at}stowers-institute.org
  • Author contributions: R.S.H. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 3913.

  • © 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Francis KE ,
    2. Lam SY ,
    3. Harrison BD ,
    4. Bey AL ,
    5. Berchowitz LE ,
    6. Copenhaver GP
    (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3913–3918.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Weinstein A
    (1932) Proc Sixth Intl Congress Genet 2:206–208.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Hawley RS ,
    2. Walker MY
    (2003) Advanced Genetic Analysis (Blackwell, Malden, MA).
  4. ↵
    1. Mitchell MB
    (1955) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 41:215–220.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Hurst DD ,
    2. Fogel S ,
    3. Mortimer RK
    (1972) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:101–105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Stadler DR ,
    2. Towe AM
    (1971) Genetics 68:401–413.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Paques F ,
    2. Haber JE
    (1999) Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:349–404.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Meselson M ,
    2. Radding CM
    (1975) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:358–361.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Szostak JW ,
    2. Orr-Weaver TL ,
    3. Rothstein RJ ,
    4. Stahl FW
    (1983) Cell 33:25–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cromie GA ,
    2. Hyppa RW ,
    3. Taylor AF ,
    4. Zakharyevich K ,
    5. Hunter N ,
    6. Smith GR
    (2006) Cell 127:1167–1178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Neale MJ ,
    2. Keeney S
    (2006) Nature 442:153–158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Bishop DK
    (2006) Cell 127:1095–1097.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Preuss D ,
    2. Rhee SY ,
    3. Davis RW
    (1994) Science 264:1458–1460.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Copenhaver GP ,
    2. Keith KC ,
    3. Preuss D
    (2000) Plant Physiol 124:7–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Copenhaver GP ,
    2. Browne WE ,
    3. Preuss D
    (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:247–252.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Lam SY ,
    2. Horn SR ,
    3. Radford SJ ,
    4. Housworth EA ,
    5. Stahl FW ,
    6. Copenhaver GP
    (2005) Genetics 170:807–812.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Copenhaver GP ,
    2. Housworth EA ,
    3. Stahl FW
    (2002) Genetics 160:1631–1639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Jones GH ,
    2. Franklin FC
    (2006) Cell 126:246–248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Mezard C ,
    2. Vignard J ,
    3. Drouaud J ,
    4. Mercier R
    (2007) Trends Genet 23:91–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Mercier R ,
    2. Jolivet S ,
    3. Vezon D ,
    4. Huppe E ,
    5. Chelysheva L ,
    6. Giovanni M ,
    7. Nogue F ,
    8. Doutriaux MP ,
    9. Horlow C ,
    10. Grelon M ,
    11. et al.
    (2005) Curr Biol 15:692–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Jones GH ,
    2. Armstrong SJ ,
    3. Caryl AP ,
    4. Franklin FC
    (2003) Chromosome Res 11:205–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Franklin FC ,
    2. Higgins JD ,
    3. Sanchez-Moran E ,
    4. Armstrong SJ ,
    5. Osman KE ,
    6. Jackson N ,
    7. Jones GH
    (2006) Biochem Soc Trans 34:542–544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Higgins JD ,
    2. Sanchez-Moran E ,
    3. Armstrong SJ ,
    4. Jones GH ,
    5. Franklin FC
    (2005) Genes Dev 19:2488–2500.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Mercier R ,
    2. Armstrong SJ ,
    3. Horlow C ,
    4. Jackson NP ,
    5. Makaroff CA ,
    6. Vezon D ,
    7. Pelletier G ,
    8. Jones GH ,
    9. Franklin FC
    (2003) Development (Cambridge, UK) 130:3309–3318.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Stacey NJ ,
    2. Kuromori T ,
    3. Azumi Y ,
    4. Roberts G ,
    5. Breuer C ,
    6. Wada T ,
    7. Maxwell A ,
    8. Roberts K ,
    9. Sugimoto-Shirasu K
    (2006) Plant J 48:206–216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Carpenter AT
    (1982) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:5961–5965.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Blanton HL ,
    2. Radford SJ ,
    3. McMahan S ,
    4. Kearney HM ,
    5. Ibrahim JG ,
    6. Sekelsky J
    (2005) PLoS Genet 1:e40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Meiosis in living color: Fluorescence-based tetrad analysis in Arabidopsis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Meiosis in living color: Fluorescence-based tetrad analysis in Arabidopsis
R. Scott Hawley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2007, 104 (10) 3673-3674; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700276104

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Meiosis in living color: Fluorescence-based tetrad analysis in Arabidopsis
R. Scott Hawley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2007, 104 (10) 3673-3674; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700276104
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

  • Solution to the 50-year-old Okazaki-fragment problem
  • Musical pleasure and musical emotions
  • Species coexistence through competition and rapid evolution
Show more

Related Content

  • Pollen tetrad-based visual assay for meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Exploiting Spore-Autonomous Fluorescent Protein Expression to Quantify Meiotic Chromosome Behaviors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Scopus (3)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490