Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Transgenic animal bioreactors: A new line of defense against chemical weapons?

Xiangzhong Yang and Mark G. Carter
PNAS August 28, 2007 104 (35) 13859-13860; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706163104
Xiangzhong Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark G. Carter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Functional transgenesis in laboratory mice was first reported in the early 1980s, when investigators expressed human growth hormone, producing abnormal growth (1). Since that time, innumerable variations in transgene configuration have resulted in greater control over exogenous gene expression levels, timing, tissue/cell type distribution, and gene product localization. Significant progress toward adapting these systems for use in agricultural mammals began a few years after the technology's murine debut, with the production of transgenic rabbits, sheep, pigs (2), goats (3), and cattle (4) expressing exogenous proteins in their milk.

Up to this point, investigators used pronuclear microinjection, the original method developed in mice, to create these transgenic animals. Briefly, fertilized embryos are collected from superovulated donors at the one-cell “zygote” stage before syngamy, the fusion of maternal and paternal pronuclei. Highly purified transgene DNA is injected into one of the two pronuclei, and the injected embryos are allowed to develop in culture. Embryos that survive the process are then transferred into a pseudopregnant recipient uterus for gestation, and live offspring are screened for the presence of the transgene. Although success rates for introducing transgenes in this way vary based on species and transgene DNA construct, they are typically low (usually 1–5% of injected embryos), and other DNA integration strategies, including the use of reverse-transcribed gene transfer in oocytes and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, have been developed to increase efficiency (5).

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is a newer method that has several advantages for genetically cloning valuable transgenic animals, as well as for gene targeting in species for which embryonic stem cells have yet to be isolated, including the ability to perform sequential genetic modifications, targeted DNA insertions, and artificial chromosome transfer using long-term cultured somatic cells. Successful production of live offspring by SCNT was first reported in goats in 1999 (6) and in cattle in 2000 using adult skin fibroblast cells (7). These accomplishments opened new possibilities for biomedical research and for the development of transgenic animals of great value to agriculture and the pharmaceutical industry.

Specifically, the ability to express transgenes in milk-producing animals has resulted in the creation of “bioreactors,” or animals that produce large amounts of a given recombinant protein in their milk, in fully biologically active form through proper posttranslational modification (PTM), for purification and therapeutic use. This approach has been used to produce recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (3, 8), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (9), Ig (10), and lactoferrin (11) in the milk of goats and cows. A recombinant form of human antithrombin III (ATryn) produced in goats is currently approved in Europe (it has passed clinical trials but has not been approved for use in the U.S.) for the prevention of clotting in surgical patients with hereditary antithrombin deficiency. This is the first instance of a transgenically produced drug being approved for use in humans.

The ability to express transgenes in milk-producing animals has resulted in the creation of “bioreactors.”

A Transgenic Strategy to Protect Against Organophosphates

In a recent issue of PNAS, Huang et al. (12) describe the results of an ambitious and highly successful project to produce large amounts of a recombinant human enzyme in the milk of transgenic goats, in an effort to develop a preventative treatment for organophosphate (OP) intoxication. The key findings of this study are as follows:

  1. The human butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) gene, driven by a goat β-casein promoter, can be expressed in transgenic goat's milk at concentrations as high as 5 g/liter.

  2. High expression of recombinant BChE (rBChE) was transmitted to offspring through sexual reproduction and by SCNT.

  3. Kilogram quantities of purified, active rBChE were produced—amounts that demonstrate the feasibility of protecting humans against OP poisoning.

  4. PEGylation of rBChE dimers increased plasma half-life in guinea pigs 7-fold.

  5. rBChE protected guinea pigs against lethal doses of OP nerve agents, resulting in no apparent toxicity.

The authors sought to produce large amounts of recombinant rBChE enzyme, which is normally found in human plasma. BChE has some similarities to the neurotransmitter inhibitor acetylcholinesterase (AChE) that allow BChE to act as a so-called “suicide inhibitor” of toxic OP compounds that would normally irreversibly inhibit AChE. Compounds like Sarin, Soman, and VX are neurotoxic because they deplete AChE, leading to unchecked neurological stimulation by the neurotransmitter acetylcholine.

Boosting plasma BChE levels with recombinant protein, the team reasoned, should scavenge OP molecules in the bloodstream and protect against toxicity. However, the 1:1 stoichiometry involved means that a large amount of rBChE is necessary. The authors report the successful development of a transgenic animal-based strategy to produce large quantities of purified rBChE enzyme for use as a blocker of the toxic effects of various compounds, some of which have been used in military and terrorist actions.

Huang et al. (12) first tested their transgenic construct in mice for protein expression, characterization, and PTMs. Next, they extended this strategy to create transgenic goats, followed by herd expansion through natural breeding or cloning (although some clones have different transgene copy numbers, suggesting mosaic expression of the transgene in different somatic cell populations of the founder transgenic animals) and characterization of the protein for activity, PTM, half-life, etc. They showed that transgenic goats produced the active transgene protein in milk in sufficient quantities for prophylaxis of humans at risk for exposure to OP agents.

Applications and Outlook

One of the most striking aspects of this report is how well rBChE worked in an animal model. PEGylated rBChE protected guinea pigs from any apparent toxicity, even after exposure to multiple lethal doses of VX or Soman. Of course, as with any new drug, there is still a long way to go before it will find its way to human patients. For one thing, it remains to be seen whether elevated plasma BChE levels might pose health risks in humans, and any deliberate testing of efficacy in patients is out of the question. Although this treatment clearly has military applications, one can also imagine civilian use to protect personnel in chemical plants, pesticide applicators, and first responders to disasters and terrorist attacks. It will be interesting to see how the standard pharmaceutical regulatory paradigm will adapt to such treatments, which cannot be fully tested for efficacy. In the end, the quest to create such chemical “antiweapons” may serve to make chemical weapons obsolete, or at least less attractive to those who would use them—a goal worthy of greater support and encouragement.

Footnotes

  • *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: xiangzhong.yang{at}uconn.edu
  • Author contributions: X.Y. and M.G.C. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 13603 in issue 34 of volume 104.

  • © 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Palmiter RD ,
    2. Brinster RL ,
    3. Hammer RE ,
    4. Trumbauer ME ,
    5. Rosenfeld MG ,
    6. Birnberg NC ,
    7. Evans RM
    (1982) Nature 300:611–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Hammer RE ,
    2. Pursel VG ,
    3. Rexroad CE, Jr ,
    4. Wall RJ ,
    5. Bolt DJ ,
    6. Ebert KM ,
    7. Palmiter RD ,
    8. Brinster RL
    (1985) Nature 315:680–683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ebert KM ,
    2. Selgrath JP ,
    3. DiTullio P ,
    4. Denman J ,
    5. Smith TE ,
    6. Memon MA ,
    7. Schindler JE ,
    8. Monastersky GM ,
    9. Vitale JA ,
    10. Gordon K
    (1991) Bio/Technology 9:835–838.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Krimpenfort P ,
    2. Rademakers A ,
    3. Eyestone W ,
    4. van der Schans A ,
    5. van den Broek S ,
    6. Kooiman P ,
    7. Kootwijk E ,
    8. Platenburg G ,
    9. Pieper F ,
    10. Strijker R ,
    11. et al.
    (1991) Bio/Technology 9:844–847.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Robl JM ,
    2. Wang Z ,
    3. Kasinathan P ,
    4. Kuroiwa Y
    (2007) Theriogenology 67:127–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Baguisi A ,
    2. Behboodi E ,
    3. Melican DT ,
    4. Pollock JS ,
    5. Destrempes MM ,
    6. Cammuso C ,
    7. Williams JL ,
    8. Nims SD ,
    9. Porter CA ,
    10. Midura P ,
    11. et al.
    (1999) Nat Biotechnol 17:456–461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kubota C ,
    2. Yamakuchi H ,
    3. Todoroki J ,
    4. Mizoshita K ,
    5. Tabara N ,
    6. Barber M ,
    7. Yang X
    (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:990–995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Shen W ,
    2. Lan G ,
    3. Yang X ,
    4. Li L ,
    5. Min L ,
    6. Yang Z ,
    7. Tian L ,
    8. Wu X ,
    9. Sun Y ,
    10. Chen H ,
    11. et al.
    (2007) Mol Reprod Dev 74:428–434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ko JH ,
    2. Lee CS ,
    3. Kim KH ,
    4. Pang MG ,
    5. Koo JS ,
    6. Fang N ,
    7. Koo DB ,
    8. Oh KB ,
    9. Youn WS ,
    10. Zheng GD ,
    11. et al.
    (2000) Transgenic Res 9:215–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kuroiwa Y ,
    2. Kasinathan P ,
    3. Choi YJ ,
    4. Naeem R ,
    5. Tomizuka K ,
    6. Sullivan EJ ,
    7. Knott JG ,
    8. Duteau A ,
    9. Goldsby RA ,
    10. Osborne BA ,
    11. et al.
    (2002) Nat Biotechnol 20:889–894.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. van Berkel PH ,
    2. Welling MM ,
    3. Geerts M ,
    4. van Veen HA ,
    5. Ravensbergen B ,
    6. Salaheddine M ,
    7. Pauwels EK ,
    8. Pieper F ,
    9. Nuijens JH ,
    10. Nibbering PH
    (2002) Nat Biotechnol 20:484–487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Huang Y-J ,
    2. Huang Y ,
    3. Baldassarre H ,
    4. Wang B ,
    5. Lazaris A ,
    6. Leduc M ,
    7. Bilodeau AS ,
    8. Bellemare A ,
    9. Côté M ,
    10. Herskovits P
    (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13603–13608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transgenic animal bioreactors: A new line of defense against chemical weapons?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Transgenic animal bioreactors: A new line of defense against chemical weapons?
Xiangzhong Yang, Mark G. Carter
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2007, 104 (35) 13859-13860; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706163104

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Transgenic animal bioreactors: A new line of defense against chemical weapons?
Xiangzhong Yang, Mark G. Carter
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2007, 104 (35) 13859-13860; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706163104
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (8)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • A Transgenic Strategy to Protect Against Organophosphates
    • Applications and Outlook
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

News Feature: Cities serve as testbeds for evolutionary change
Urban living can pressure flora and fauna to adapt in intriguing ways. Biologists are starting to take advantage of this convenient laboratory of evolution.
Image credit: Kristin Winchell (Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis).
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

  • Squid genomes in a bacterial world
  • Homogeneous catalysis for the nitrogen fuel cycle
  • The future of influenza forecasts
Show more

Related Content

  • Recombinant human butyrylcholinesterase from milk of transgenic animals to protect against organophosphate poisoning
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Scopus (7)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490