Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Copper-free click chemistry for dynamic in vivo imaging

Jeremy M. Baskin, Jennifer A. Prescher, Scott T. Laughlin, Nicholas J. Agard, Pamela V. Chang, Isaac A. Miller, Anderson Lo, Julian A. Codelli, and Carolyn R. Bertozzi
PNAS October 23, 2007 104 (43) 16793-16797; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707090104
Jeremy M. Baskin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer A. Prescher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott T. Laughlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas J. Agard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela V. Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isaac A. Miller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anderson Lo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian A. Codelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn R. Bertozzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Nicholas J. Turro, Columbia University, New York, NY, and approved September 7, 2007 (received for review July 27, 2007)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & SI

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Design and synthesis of Cu-free click chemistry reagents. (A) The copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition. (B) The Cu-free click reaction of azides and DIFOs. (C) (i) Sodium hydride, allyl bromide, 52%. (ii) Pyridinium chlorochromate, 91%. (iii) Lithium hexamethyldisilazide (LHMDS), chlorotriethylsilane (TESCl), 91%. (iv) Selectfluor, 95%. (v–vii). Cat. LHMDS, 95%. (viii) Potassium hexamethyldisilazide (KHMDS), TESCl, 97%. (ix) Selectfluor, 74%. (x) Cat. RuCl3, NaIO4, 96%. (xi) KHMDS, N-phenylbis(trifluoromethanesulfonamide), 46%. (xii) Lithium diisopropylamide, 11%. (D) Derivatives of DIFO and a linear alkyne (alk) containing Alexa Fluor 488, Alexa Fluor 568, or biotin.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Comparison of Cu-free click chemistry with existing bioorthogonal ligations. (A) Reactions of 10 ng of azidohomoalanine-labeled DHFR with 25 μM DIFO-488 or alk-488 were allowed to proceed for the time indicated. Reactions with alk-488 were performed as described in ref. 26. A negative control reaction (−) using 10 ng of azide-free DHFR was allowed to proceed for 60 min. (B) Schematic for metabolic labeling and detection of cell-surface glycans using Ac4ManNAz and DIFO-based reagents. (C and D) Flow cytometry plots of labeling experiment described in B using Jurkat cells. (C) Cells were labeled for 1 h with 100 μM biotinylated derivatives of a phosphine (Staudinger ligation) (20), a nonfluorinated cyclooctyne (strain-promoted cycloaddition) (14), and DIFO (Cu-free click chemistry). In all cases, control cells (incubated in azido sugar-free medium but carried through an identical labeling procedure) displayed mean fluorescence intensity (MFI, arbitrary units) values < 20. (D) Cells were labeled for 1 h with 10 nM–100 μM DIFO-biotin. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicate experiments. Solid line, + Ac4ManNAz; dashed line, − Ac4ManNAz.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Time-lapse imaging of glycan trafficking using an Alexa Fluor 488 derivative of DIFO. (A–H) CHO cells were incubated with 100 μM Ac4ManNAz (A–D) or 100 μM Ac4ManNAc as a negative control (E–H) for 3 days and subsequently labeled with 100 μM DIFO-488 at 37°C for 1 min. (I–N) Time-lapse imaging of a single cell from the previous experiment over 1 h at 25°C (I–M, Ac4ManNAz; N, Ac4ManNAc).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Multicolor, dynamic imaging of glycan trafficking using Alexa Fluor derivatives of DIFO. CHO cells were grown for 2 days in 100 μM Ac4ManNAz (A–E) or 100 μM Ac4ManNAc (data not shown) and labeled for 1 h at 37°C with 10 μM DIFO-488 (t = 0 h, A and B). The cells were returned to medium supplemented with the appropriate sugar for 23 h and then labeled for 1 h at 37°C with 10 μM DIFO-568 (t = 24 h, C–E). Labeling in the Golgi apparatus and endosomes (filled arrowheads) and lysosomes (open arrowheads) was confirmed in colocalization experiments with known markers (SI Fig. 9).

Data supplements

  • Baskin et al. 10.1073/pnas.0707090104.

    Supporting Information

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    SI Scheme 1
    SI Scheme 2
    SI Scheme 3
    SI Figure 5
    SI Figure 6
    SI Figure 7
    SI Figure 8
    SI Materials and Methods
    SI Figure 9
    SI Figure 10
    SI Figure 11
    SI Figure 12




    Fig. 5. Structural determination of monofluoroketone 10b. (a) Decomposition reaction of 10b to yield bicyclic acetal 11. (b) ORTEP diagram of 11 at 50% probability.





    Fig. 6. Analytical HPLC trace of purified DIFO-488. Method: 0% to 50% B from 0-40 min, 50% to 100% B from 40-50 min. Solvent A: water + 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid; solvent B: acetonitrile + 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid.





    Fig. 7. Analytical HPLC trace of purified DIFO-FLAG. Method: 0% to 50% B from 0-40 min, 50% to 100% B from 40-50 min. Solvent A: water + 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid; solvent B: acetonitrile + 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid.





    Fig. 8. Proton NMR spectrum of purified DIFO-biotin. Solvent: CD3OD, 500 MHz.





    Fig. 9. Kinetic data for the reaction of 1 with benzyl azide. Substrates were dissolved separately in CD3CN and mixed in a 1:1 ratio at a final concentration of 18 mM. Percentage conversion was monitored by 1H-NMR. The second-order rate constant for the reaction was determined by plotting 1/[benzyl azide] versus time and analysis by linear regression. The second-order rate constant corresponds to the determined slope. Error bars represent standard deviations from three replicate experiments.





    Fig. 10. Silver stain of DHFR labeling experiments. Azido-DHFR (all lanes except right-most) or DHFR (-), ~10 ng per reaction, was labeled with DIFO-488 (Upper) or alk-488 and appropriate reagents (Cu-catalyzed) (Lower). Reactions were allowed to progress for the number of minutes indicated (60 min for -) and then quenched with 2-azidoethanol and urea. After gel electrophoresis and fluorescence measurement (Fig. 2A), the gels were stained for protein content by using silver stain (Bio-Rad).





    Fig. 11. Labeling of live CHO cells with DIFO-Alexa Fluor conjugates. CHO cells were incubated for 2 days in media containing 100 mM Ac4ManNAz (a-c, g-i, m-u, and y-dd) or Ac4ManNAc (d-f, j-l, and v-x). (a-f) The cells were labeled at 4°C for 1 h with 100 mM DIFO-488 (a and d), DIFO-568 (b and e), or DIFO-647 (c and f), and then Hoechst 33342 dye (dark blue). (g-l) The cells were labeled at 37°C for 1 h with 10 mM DIFO-488 (g and j), DIFO-568 (h and k), or DIFO-647 (i and l), and then Hoechst 33342 dye (dark blue). (m-dd) The cells were labeled at 37°C for 1 h with 10 mM DIFO-488 (m-aa) or 10 mM alk-488, 1 mM Tris-carboxyethylphosphine, 100 mM TBTA, and 1 mM CuSO4 (bb-dd), then Hoechst 33342 dye, and BODIPY ceramide TR (m-o), Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated human transferrin (p-r), LysoTracker Red (s-v), or 0.33 mg/ml propidium iodide (v-dd).





    Fig. 12. In vivo labeling of glycans with DIFO. Mice were injected with Ac4ManNAz (300 mg·kg-1 in 70% DMSO, +) or vehicle (70% DMSO, -) once daily for 7 days. On the 8th day, DIFO-FLAG (0.16 mmol·kg-1 in 70% DMSO) was injected. After 3 h, the animals were killed, and the splenocytes were isolated, treated with FITC-anti-FLAG antibody, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Each diamond represents a sample of splenocytes from one mouse, and the dashed line represents the average MFI value for the population of identically treated mice.





    Scheme 1. Synthesis of DIFO (1), part I. 1,5-cyclooctanediol is monosubstituted with an allyl group (7), and the remaining alcohol is oxidized to the corresponding ketone (8). A fluorine atom is installed using Selectfluor from the silyl enol ether (9), generating two diastereomeric silyl enol ethers (10a and 10b). As monofluoroketone 10b will be carried on, 10a can be epimerized to a separable mixture of 10a and 10b. NaH, sodium hydride; PCC, pyridinium chlorochromate; LHMDS, lithium hexamethyldisilazide; Et3SiCl, chlorotriethylsilane.





    Scheme 2. Synthesis of DIFO (1), part II. From monofluoroketone 10b, fluoro silyl enol ether 12 is formed under kinetic enolization conditions, followed by fluorination to yield difluoroketone 13. Oxidation of the allyl group to the corresponding carboxylic acid (14), followed by generation (15) and elimination (1) of a vinyl triflate, yielded DIFO (1). KHMDS, potassium hexamethyldisilazide; Tf2NPh, N-phenylbis(trifluoromethanesulfonamide); LDA, lithium diisopropylamide.





    Scheme 3. Synthesis of derivatives of DIFO containing fluorophores (DIFO-488, DIFO-568, and DIFO-647), biotin (DIFO-biotin), and the FLAG peptide (DIFO-FLAG). For the Alexa Fluor and biotin derivatives, DIFO was converted to the pentafluorophenyl ester (DIFO-PFP), which then was coupled to the appropriate amino derivative. In the case of DIFO-FLAG, DIFO-PFP was coupled to an amino-maleimide linker (17) to generate DIFO-maleimide (5f), which was coupled to a fully deprotected, soluble cysteine-terminated FLAG peptide. PFP-TFA, pentafluorophenyltrifluoroacetate; DIEA, N,N-diisopropylethylamine; DMF, dimethylformamide.





    SI Materials and Methods

    All chemical reagents were of analytical grade, obtained from commercial suppliers, and used without further purification unless otherwise noted. With the exception of reactions performed in aqueous media, all reaction vessels were flame-dried before use. Reactions were performed in an N2 atmosphere, except in the case of reactions performed in aqueous media, and liquid reagents were added with a syringe unless otherwise noted. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was distilled under N2 from Na/benzophenone immediately before use, and CH2Cl2 was distilled from CaH2 immediately before use. Flash chromatography was carried out with Merck 60 230-400 mesh silica gel according to the procedure described by Still (1). Reactions and chromatography fractions were analyzed with Analtech 250-mm silica gel G plates and visualized by staining with ceric ammonium molybdate, anisaldehyde, or by absorbance of UV light at 245 nm. Organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, and solvents were removed with a rotary evaporator at reduced pressure (20 torr), unless otherwise noted. Unless otherwise noted, 1H-, 13C-, and 19F-NMR spectra were obtained with 300 MHz or 400 MHz Bruker spectrometers. Chemical shifts are reported in d ppm referenced to the solvent peak for 1H and 13C and relative to CFCl3 for 19F. Coupling constants (J) are reported in Hz. Low- and high-resolution fast-atom bombardment (FAB), and electron impact (EI) mass spectra were obtained at the University of California Berkeley Mass Spectrometry Facility, and FT-ICR mass spectra were obtained at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Mass Spectrometry Facility at University of California Berkeley. Reversed-phase HPLC was performed by using a Rainin Dynamax SD-200 HPLC system with 210-nm detection on a Microsorb C18 analytical or preparative column.

    Dulbecco's PBS, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-anti-FLAG, and BSA were purchased from Sigma. RPMI medium 1640 was obtained from Invitrogen Life Technologies, Inc., and FBS was purchased from HyClone Laboratory. FITC-conjugated mouse IgG1 isotype control was obtained from BD PharMingen. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer using a 488-nm argon laser. At least 104 cells were analyzed for each sample. Cell viability was ascertained by gating the samples on the basis of forward scatter (to sort by size) and side scatter (to sort by granularity). The average fluorescence intensity was calculated from each of three replicate experiments to obtain a representative value in arbitrary units. For all flow cytometry experiments, data points were collected in triplicate and are representative of at least three separate experiments.

    Synthetic Procedures

    The synthesis of DIFO (1) was carried out as outlined in SI Schemes 1 and 2. Various derivatives of DIFO containing fluorophores (DIFO-488, DIFO-568, and DIFO-647), biotin (DIFO-biotin), and the FLAG peptide (DIFO-FLAG) were synthesized as outlined in SI Scheme 3.

    Monoallylated Cyclooctanediol (7). To a solution of cis-1,5-cyclooctanediol (50.0 g, 347 mmol) in DMF (800 ml) at 0°C was added NaH (60% dispersion in mineral oil, 15.3 g, 381 mmol). The suspension was stirred for 1 h at 0°C, and allyl bromide (29.3 ml, 347 mmol) then was added to the reaction vessel by using a syringe pump over 1 h at 0°C. The reaction was warmed to room temperature overnight while stirring, and the reaction mixture then was quenched with water (800 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ether (5 ´ 400 ml), and the combined organic fractions were washed with water (3 ´500 ml) and brine (1 ´ 300 ml) and then dried over MgSO4. Chromatography of the crude product (8:1 to 2:1 hexanes/EtOAc) yielded a clear oil (33.2 g, 52%, Rf = 0.30 in 2:1 hexanes/EtOAc). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): d 1.48 (m, 2H), 1.62 (m, 4H), 1.86 (m, 6H), 3.40 (t, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 3.80 (t, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 3.95 (d, 2H, J = 5.6 Hz), 5.15 (d, 1H, J = 10.0 Hz), 5.26 (dd, 1H, J = 1.2, 17.2 Hz), and 5.90 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d 20.6, 32.7, 36.3, 69.1, 71.6, 78.6, 116.4, and 135.3. FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C11H21O2+ [M+H]+: 185.1542; found: 185.1544.

    Allylated Cyclooctanone (8). To a stirring solution of alcohol 7 (33.2 g, 180 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (650 ml) at room temperature was added pyridinium chlorochromate (54.4 g, 252 mmol) over 2 h, 6.8 g every 15 min. After an additional 30 min of stirring, the reaction mixture was concentrated on a rotary evaporator, and the product was purified directly by column chromatography (8:1 to 3:1 hexanes/EtOAc) to yield a clear oil (30.0 g, 91%, Rf = 0.30 in 5:1 hexanes/EtOAc). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): d 1.63-1.90 (m, 6H), 2.04 (m, 2H), 2.28 (m, 2H), 2.55 (m, 2H), 3.16 (tt, 1H, J = 2.8, 8.6 Hz), 3.89 (d, 1H, J = 5.2 Hz), 5.13 (d, 2H, J = 10.4 Hz), 5.22 (dd, 1H, J = 1.2, 17.2 Hz), 5.85 (ddd, 1H, J = 5.6, 10.4, 22.2 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d 22.9, 33.7, 42.3, 69.5, 77.6, 116.7, 135.0, and 216.5. FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C11H19O2+ [M+H]+: 183.1385; found: 183.1380.

    Silyl Enol Ether (9). To a stirring solution of lithium hexamethyldisilazide (LHMDS, 181 ml, 181 mmol, 1.00 M solution in THF) in THF (750 ml) at -78°C was added a solution of ketone 8 (30.0 g, 165 mmol) in THF (40 ml) over 1 h using a syringe pump. After an additional 20 min of stirring at -78°C, chlorotriethylsilane (31.8 ml, 189 mmol) was added. The solution was stirred at -78°C for 10 min, removed from the cold bath, warmed to room temperature with a water bath, and stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated on a rotary evaporator, and the crude product was purified directly by column chromatography (100% hexanes to 25:1 hexanes/EtOAc) to yield a clear oil (44.2 g, 91%, Rf = 0.70 in 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): d 0.67 (q, 6H, J = 8.0 Hz), 0.98 (t, 9H, J = 8.0 Hz), 1.52 (m, 2H), 1.70-2.01 (m, 5H), 2.13 (m, 2H), 2.26 (m, 1H), 3.40 (m, 1H), 3.95 (m, 2H), 4.76 (dd, 1H, J = 7.2, 9.2 Hz), 5.14 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6, 10.4 Hz), 5.26 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8, 15.4 Hz), and 5.91 (ddd, 1H, J = 5.4, 10.6, 22.6 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d 5.0, 6.7, 22.4, 24.5, 31.8, 33.7, 36.2, 69.2, 79.9, 104.3, 116.3, 135.5, and 152.7. Calculated for C17H33O2Si+ [M+H]+: 297.2250; found: 297.2246.

    Monofluoroketones (10a and 10b). To a stirring solution of Selectfluor (63.4 g, 179 mmol) in DMF (150 ml) at 0°C was added a solution of silyl enol ether 9 (44.2 g, 149 mmol) DMF (180 ml) via an addition funnel over 30 min. The reaction was allowed to slowly warm to room temperature while stirring over 30 min, and then it was quenched with water (350 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ether (4 ´ 350 ml), and the combined organic extracts were washed with water (3 ´300 ml) and brine (1 ´ 200 ml). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (10:1 to 5:1 hexanes/EtOAc) to yield two diastereomers, both clear oils [10a (cis), 19.5 g, 65%, Rf = 0.40 in 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc and 10b (trans), 9.10 g, 30%, Rf = 0.20 in 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc]. Relative stereochemistry was assigned upon determination of the x-ray crystal structure of 11, a decomposition product of 10b (SI Fig. 5).

    10a (trans): 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 1.59 (m, 1H), 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.90 (m, 1H), 2.02 (m, 1H), 2.16-2.42 (m, 3H), 2.88 (m, 1H), 3.26 (m, 1H), 3.91 (m, 2H), 4.92 (ddd, 1H, J = 2.6, 6.4, 50.4 Hz), 5.16 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6, 10.4 Hz), 5.25 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6, 17.2 Hz), and 5.91 (ddd, 1H, J = 5.2, 10.4, 22.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d 20.1 (d, J = 5 Hz), 27.2 (d, J = 3 Hz), 30.7 (d, J = 21 Hz), 33.4, 40.2, 69.4, 77.5, 95.8 (d, J = 185 Hz), and 116.8, 134.8, 213.5 (d, J = 24 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): d -189.1 (app t, J = 43 Hz) FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C11H18FO2+ [M+H]+: 201.1291; found: 201.1291.

    10b (trans): 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 1.62-1.91 (m, 4H), 1.93-2.11 (m, 3H), 2.27-2.55 (m, 3H), 3.35 (m, 1H), 3.92 (m, 2H), 4.99 (ddd, 1H, J = 3.4, 6.8, 48.0 Hz), 5.15 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6, 10.4 Hz), 5.24 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8, 17.2 Hz), and 5.91 (ddd, 1H, J = 5.6, 10.8, 22.8 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d 22.2, 26.6 (d, J = 22 Hz), 27.0 (d, J = 4 Hz), 31.7, 38.5, 69.5, 76.0, 93.9 (d, J = 184 Hz), and 116.8, 134.9, 210.3 (d, J = 17 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): d -188.0 (app t, J = 41 Hz) FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C11H18FO2+ [M+H]+: 201.1291; found: 201.1286.

    Monofluoroketone (10b, trans). To a stirring solution of compound 10a (26.5 g, 132 mmol) in THF (300 ml) at 0°C was added KHMDS (2.64 ml, 1.32 mmol, 0.500 M solution in toluene). After 1 h, the reaction mixture was concentrated on a rotary evaporator and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (10:1 to 5:1 hexanes:EtOAc) to yield two diastereomers, both clear oils (10a, 14.4 g, 54%, and 10b, 11.8 g, 45%).

    Fluorinated Silyl Enol Ether (12). To a stirring solution of potassium hexamethyldisilazide (KHMDS, 225 ml, 113 mmol, 0.500 M solution in toluene) in THF (800 ml) at -78°C was added a solution of ketone 10b (18.8 g, 93.9 mmol) in THF (40 ml) dropwise, using a syringe pump, over 2 h. After an additional 30 min of stirring at -78°C, chlorotriethylsilane (20.5 ml, 122 mmol) was added. The solution was stirred at -78°C for 30 min, removed from the cold bath, and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was concentrated on a rotary evaporator, and the crude product was purified directly by column chromatography (100% hexanes to 25:1 hexanes/EtOAc) to yield a clear oil (28.7 g, 97% as a 5:1 mixture of desired:undesired regioisomers, Rf = 0.70 in 9:1 hexanes/EtOAc). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): d 0.67 (q, 6H, J = 8.0 Hz), 0.97 (t, 9H, J = 8.0 Hz), 1.50-1.91 (m, 5H), 2.02-2.13 (m, 2H), 2.14-2.30 (m, 2H), 2.27-2.55 (m, 1H), 3.43 (m, 1H), 3.96 (m, 2H), 5.15 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6, 10.4 Hz), 5.27 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6, 17.2 Hz), and 5.91 (ddd, 1H, J = 5.2, 10.4, 22.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d 5.2, 6.7, 24.5 (d, J = 3 Hz), 24.5 (d, J = 27 Hz), 31.2, 32.9, 33.5 (d, J = 2 Hz), 69.3, 79.0, 104.3, 116.4, 128.6 (d, J = 81 Hz), and 135.2, 144.2 (d, J = 239 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): d -129.5 (dd, J = 21, 28 Hz).

    Allylated Difluoroketone (13). To a stirring solution of Selectfluor (35.8 g, 101 mmol) in DMF (100 ml) was slowly added a solution of silyl enol ether 12 (24.4 g, 77.7 mmol) in DMF (180 ml) over 30 min using an addition funnel, at 0°C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature, and, after 2 h of additional stirring, the reaction mixture was quenched with water (100 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ether (4 ´ 200 ml), and the combined organic extracts were washed with water (3 ´200 ml) and brine (1 ´ 100 ml) and then dried over MgSO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (11:1 to 6:1 hexanes/EtOAc) to yield a clear oil (12.5 g, 74%, Rf = 0.60 in 4:1 hexanes/EtOAc). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 1.65-1.93 (m, 5H), 2.04-2.20 (m, 2H), 2.27-2.47 (m, 1H), 2.48-2.61 (m, 1H), 2.75-2.85 (m, 1H), 3.35 (m, 1H), 3.92 (dt, 2H, J = 1.4, 5.7 Hz), 5.17 (dd, 1H, J = 1.4, 10.4 Hz), 5.25 (dd, 1H, J = 1.5, 17.4 Hz), and 5.91 (ddd, 1H, J = 5.6, 10.8, 22.8 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d 21.0, 25.9 (t, J = 6 Hz), 31.0 (t, J = 25 Hz), 31.4, 38.0, 69.4, 75.9, 116.9, 118.5 (t, J = 250 Hz), and 134.7, 203.4 (t, J = 28 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): d -105.0 (app q, J = 244 Hz) FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C11H17F2O2+ [M+H]+: 219.1197; found: 219.1223.

    Difluoroketone Carboxylic Acid (14). To a stirring solution of alkene 13 (4.90 g, 22.5 mmol) in CCl4 (45 ml), CH3CN (45 ml), and H2O (68 ml) at 0°C in a three-necked flask equipped with an overhead stirrer was added NaIO4 (19.3 g, 90.0 mmol) and RuCl3·H2O (117 mg, 0.563 mmol). After 10 min of vigorous stirring at 0°C, the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature. After an additional 2.5 h of vigorous stirring of the suspension at room temperature, the reaction mixture was concentrated on a rotary evaporator and diluted with 1 M HCl (200 ml) and brine (200 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (7 ´ 200 ml) and dried extensively over MgSO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (4:1 to 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc, with 1% acetic acid) to yield a clear oil, which turned to a white solid upon storage at -20°C overnight (5.10 g, 96%, Rf = 0.30 in 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc with 1% acetic acid). 1H-NMR (CD3CN, 400 MHz): 1.62-1.97 (m, 5H), 1.98-2.20 (m, 2H), 2.27-2.42 (m, 1H), 2.53 (m, 1H), 2.72 (m, 1H), 3.35 (tt, 1H, J = 3.6, 7.6 Hz), and 3.99 (s, 2H). 13C-NMR (CD3CN, 100 MHz): d 22.1, 26.4 (t, J = 6 Hz), 31.0 (t, J = 25 Hz), 31.5, 38.4, 66.2, 78.6, 119.8 (t, J = 248 Hz), and 172.2, 204.2 (t, J = 28 Hz). 19F-NMR (CD3CN, 376 MHz): d -105.9 (app t, J = 15 Hz) FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C10H15F2O4+ [M+H]+: 237.0938; found: 237.0934.

    Vinyl Triflate (15). To a solution of KHMDS (106 ml, 52.9 mmol, 0.500 M solution in toluene) in THF (700 ml) was added a solution of ketone 14 (6.10 g, 25.8 mmol) in THF (20 ml) at -78°C dropwise over 20 min. After an additional 1 h of stirring at -78°C, a solution of N-phenyl-bis(trifluoromethylsulfonamide) (Tf2NPh, 18.9 g, 52.9 mmol) in THF (40 ml) was added and the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature. After 30 min, the reaction mixture was concentrated on a rotary evaporator, and the crude product was diluted with CH2Cl2 (200 ml), 1 M HCl (200 ml), and brine (200 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (5 ´ 150 ml) and dried extensively with MgSO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (4:1 to 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc with 1% acetic acid) to yield the desired product (4.50 g, 47%, Rf = 0.35 in 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc with 1% acetic acid) as a colorless oil. 1H-NMR (CD3CN, 400 MHz): d 1.74 (m, 1H), 1.92 (m, 3H), 2.21-2.43 (m, 2H), 2.58-2.74 (m, 2H), 3.59 (tt, 1H, J = 4.0, 7.8 Hz), 4.04 (d, 2H, J = 1.6 Hz), and 6.35 (td, 1H, J = 2.8, 9.6 Hz). 13C-NMR (CD3CN, 100 MHz): d 19.8, 26.4 (t, J = 2 Hz), 31.7, 32.1 (t, J = 25 Hz), 66.4, 77.6, 119.8 (t, J = 237 Hz), 130.6 (t, J = 5 Hz), and 143.0 (t, J = 29 Hz), 172.2. 19F-NMR (CD3CN, 376 MHz): d -74.4 (s, 3F), -89.2 (dd, 2F, J = 30, 273 Hz), and -92.6 (dd, 2F, J = 30, 273 Hz). FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C11H13F5O6SLi+ [M+H]+: 375.0513; found: 375.0509.

    DIFO (1). To a solution of diisopropylamine (10.1 ml, 71.3 mmol) in THF (86 ml) at -78°C was added nBuLi (23.8 ml, 59.4 mmol, from a 2.5 M solution in hexanes) dropwise and stirred at -78°C for 45 min. In a separate flask, a solution of vinyl triflate 15 (7.31 g, 19.8 mmol) in THF (400 ml) was prepared and kept at -15°C by using a MeOH/ice bath. LDA was added to this solution dropwise, via syringe pump, at the rate of 1.0 equivalent (~40 ml of the solution prepared above) per 30 min, with vigorous stirring, until 2.5 equivalents of LDA was added. Note that the color of the solution turned from clear to yellow to amber. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of 10 ml of saturated ammonium chloride solution, and then the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. To the residue was added CH2Cl2 (100 ml), 1 M HCl (50 ml), and brine (50 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (5 ´ 40 ml) and washed extensively with MgSO4. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (4:1 to 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc with 1% acetic acid) to yield the desired product (466 mg, 11%, Rf = 0.35 in 1:1 hexanes/EtOAc with 1% acetic acid) as a colorless oil. 1H-NMR (CD3CN, 400 MHz): d 1.94 (m, 1H), 2.07 (m, 1H), 2.11-2.33 (m, 3H), 2.41 (m, 1H), 2.52 (m, 2H), 3.55 (app t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), and 4.05 (s, 2H). 13C-NMR (CD3CN, 100 MHz): d 17.6, 34.4 (d, J = 6 Hz), 39.2, 43.2 (t, J = 28 Hz), 66.5, 84.4, 85.2 (dd, J = 48, 43 Hz), 113.9 (t, J = 11 Hz), 120.5 (t, J = 233 Hz), and 172.2. 19F-NMR (CD3CN, 376 MHz): d -86.6 (dddt, J = 259.0, 26.0, 12.8, 6.0 Hz, 1F), -88.6 (dm, J = 260.9 Hz, 1F). FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C10H12F2O3Li+ [M+H] +: 225.0915; found: 225.0912.

    General Procedure for Synthesis of Conjugates of DIFO (5a-f). The pentafluorophenyl ester of DIFO (16) was prepared as follows and used immediately. DIFO (1, 1.0 equivalent) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (final concentration of 0.1-0.2 M) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (2.0 equivalents) was added. The solution was cooled to 0°C and pentafluorophenyltrifluoroacetate (1.05 equivalents) was added dropwise. After 1 h, the solvent and residual pentafluorophenol was removed on a rotary evaporator. The crude product was either used immediately or quickly purified by column chromatography (Rf = 0.3 in 9:1 hexanes:ethyl acetate) and then used immediately. 1H-NMR (CD3CN, 400 MHz): d 1.99 (m, 1H), 2.09 (m, 1H), 2.15-2.35 (m, 3H), 2.43 (m, 1H), 2.54 (m, 2H), 3.63 (app t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), and 4.53 (s, 2H). 19F-NMR (CD3CN, 376 MHz): d -86.6 (dddt, J = 259.0, 26.0, 12.8, 6.0 Hz, 1F), -88.6 (dm, J = 260.9 Hz, 1F), -153.6 (d, J = 19 Hz, 2F), -159.2 (t, 21 Hz, 1F), and -163.6 (dd, J = 17, 4 Hz, 2F).

    Synthesis of Alexa Fluor Derivatives (5a, DIFO-488; 5d, DIFO-568; 5e, DIFO-647; 6a, Alk-488). To a solution of the appropriate Alexa Fluor cadaverine (1.0 equivalent) in DMF (final concentration of 0.2 M) was added a solution of the pentafluorophenyl ester of DIFO (16) or 4-pentynoic acid (2.0 equivalents) and then N,N-diisopropylethylamine (5.0 equivalents). The solution was stirred at room temperature overnight in the dark, and then the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator. The residue was dissolved in water or 9:1 water:acetonitrile, purified by reversed-phase HPLC using water and acetonitrile, and lyophilized to a fine powder.

    DIFO-488, FT-ICR-MS: Calculated for C36H36F2N4O12S2+ [M+]: 818.1739; found: 818.1725.

    DIFO-568, FT-ICR-MS: Calculated for C48H52F2N4O12S2+ [M+]: 978.2986; found: 978.2971.

    DIFO-647, FT-ICR-MS: Found: 1142.3509.

    Alk-488, FT-ICR-MS: Calculated for C31H30N4O11S2+ [M+]: 698.1352; found: 698.1318.

    DIFO-biotin (5b). To a solution of biotin-PEG-amine (2) (15 mg, 0.034 mmol) in DMF (0.5 ml) was added a solution of pentafluorophenyl ester 16 (13 mg, 0.034 mmol) in DMF (1.0 ml) and then N,N-diisopropylethylamine (9.0 ml, 0.051 mmol). The solution was stirred overnight at room temperature, the DMF was removed on a rotary evaporator, and the residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (100% CH2Cl2 to 9:1 CH2Cl2:MeOH) to yield 19 mg (87%) of a clear oil (Rf in 9:1 CH2Cl2:MeOH = 0.40). 1H-NMR (MeOD, 500 MHz): d 1.43 (m, 2H), 1.55-1.70 (m, 3H), 1.71-1.83 (m, 5H), 1.95 (m, 1H), 2.07-2.35 (m, 4H), 2.18 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 2.43 (m, 1H), 2.52 (m, 2H), 2.70 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (dd, J = 12.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (m, 1H), 3.26 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.34 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.53 (m, 5H), 3.59 (m, 4H), 3.64 (m, 4H), 3.95 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 2H), 4.30 (dd, J = 7.5, 4.5 Hz, 1H), and 4.49 (dd, J = 7.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H). 13C-NMR (MeOD, 125 MHz): d 18.2, 27.4, 30.0, 30.3, 30.9, 35.3 (d, J = 6 Hz), 37.4, 38.3 (d, J = 4 Hz), 40.3, 41.6, 44.2 (t, J = 28 Hz), 57.5, 62.1, 63.9, 69.4, 70.4, 70.8, 71.8, 72.0, 72.1, 85.2, 86.4 (dd, J = 48, 42 Hz), 113.9 (t, J = 11 Hz), 120.5 (t, J = 234 Hz), and 166.6, 172.9, 176.5. 19F-NMR (MeOD, 376 MHz): d -88.0 (dddt, J = 266.5, 26.3, 12.4, 6.0 Hz, 1F), and -90.0 (dm, J = 259.4 Hz, 1F). FAB-HRMS: Calculated for C30H48F2N4O7SLi+ [M+H]+: 653.3372; found: 653.3379.

    Maleimide-amine (17). A dry 500-ml round-bottom flask was charged with maleimide (3.12 g, 32.2 mmol) and triphenylphosphine (8.29 g, 31.6 mmol) and then THF (150 ml). N-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)ethanolamine (5.00 ml, 29.3 mmol) and diisopropylazidodicarboxylate (6.80 ml, 35.1 mmol) were added in succession. The flask was stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere overnight, the reaction mixture was concentrated on a rotary evaporator, and the crude product was filtered through a plug of silica gel by using a 2:1 mixture of hexanes:ethyl acetate as the eluent. The crude product was dissolved in 100 ml of a 60:35:5 mixture of CH2Cl2:trifluoroacetic acid:water and stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (50 ml) and water (50 ml), transferred to a separatory funnel, and the organic layer was extracted with water (3 ´ 25 ml). The combined aqueous layers were washed with CH2Cl2 (3 ´ 50 ml) and concentrated on a rotary evaporator to yield the desired product (7.51 g, 96%) as a yellow oil. 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): d 1.76 (app quintet, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.76 (m, 2H), 3.45 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 7.02 (s, 2H), and 7.79 (br s, 3H). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): d 26.7, 34.6, 37.0, 115.6 (q, J = 290 Hz), 134.7, and 158.9 (q, J = 36 Hz), 171.3. 19F-NMR (DMSO-d6, 376 MHz): d -73.9.

    DIFO-Maleimide (5f). To a solution of maleimide-amine 17 (74 mg, 0.27 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 ml) was added N,N-diisopropylethylamine (160 ml, 0.91 mmol). The solution was cooled to 0°C, and then a solution of pentafluorophenyl ester 16 (97 mg, 0.23 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 ml) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h, the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator, and the residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (2:1 to 1:3 hexanes:ethyl acetate) to yield 62 mg (76%) of a clear oil (Rf = 0.20 in 1:1 hexanes:ethyl acetate). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): d 1.81 (app q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.05-2.31 (m, 5H), 2.48 (m, 2H), 2.60 (m, 1H), 3.26 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.55 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.95 (dd, J = 20.5, 15.0 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (s, 2H), and 7.12 (br s, 1H). 19F-NMR (CD3CN, 376 MHz): d -86.6 (dddt, J = 266.5, 26.3, 12.4, 6.0 Hz, 1F), -88.5 (dm, J = 259.4 Hz, 1F).

    DIFO-FLAG (5c). Cysteine-modified FLAG peptide (FLAG-C, H2N-DYKDDDDKC-CO2H) was synthesized by using established automated protocols on a Perkin-Elmer ABI 431 A peptide synthesizer using fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc)-Cys(Trt)-Wang resin (Novabiochem). The peptide was cleaved by using a solution of trifluoroacetic acid:triisopropylsilane:water (95:2.5:2.5), precipitated with ether, and the crude product was dried and used without further purification. To a solution of FLAG-C (214 mg, 0.192 mmol) in 1 ml of water was added a solution of DIFO-maleimide (5f, 62 mg, 0.175 mmol) in 1 ml of DMF at 0°C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stir overnight. The solvents were removed on a rotary evaporator, and the residue was purified by reversed-phase HPLC (5% to 40% acetonitrile in water over 60 min, product eluting at 30-35 min) and lyophilized to yield 125 mg (49%) of a white solid. MALDI-TOF: Calculated [M+H]+: 1470.5540; found: 1470.5526.

    Kinetic Evaluation of the [3 + 2] Cycloaddition of DIFO and Benzyl Azide

    Stock solutions of DIFO (1, 20 mM) and benzyl azide (200 mM) were made in CD3CN. An NMR tube was charged with 450 ml of the solution of 1, and, immediately before lowering into the NMR magnet, 50 ml of the benzyl azide solution, and the reaction was monitored over time by using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. The kinetic data were derived by monitoring the change in integration of resonances corresponding to the benzylic protons in benzyl azide (d~4.4 ppm) compared to the corresponding resonances of the triazole products (d ~5.5 to 5.7 ppm).

    The second-order rate constant for the reaction was determined by plotting 1/[benzyl azide] versus time, followed by subsequent analysis by linear regression (SI Fig. 9). The second-order rate constant (k, M-1·s-1) corresponds to the determined slope. Error bars represent standard deviations from three replicate experiments.

    Mice and Animal Protocol

    B6D2F1 mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. All animals were housed and monitored at the Northwest Animal Facility (Berkeley, CA), and experiments were performed according to guidelines established by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California, Berkeley (protocols R234-0503B, -0505B, -0606B, and -0607B).

    General Protocol for Compound Administration

    For in vivo metabolic labeling experiments, mice were administered daily doses of Ac4ManNAz (300 mg/kg in ~150 ml of 70% DMSO, from a stock solution of 50 mg/ml) i.p. for 7 days as previously described (3). Sixteen to 24 h after the final azido sugar bolus, mice were injected i.p. with DIFO-FLAG (5c, 0.16 mmol kg-1 in 70% DMSO) or vehicle (70% DMSO). After 3 h, the mice were killed, and organs were harvested.

    Detection of Splenocyte Cell Surface FLAG Epitopes After in Vivo Ligation

    To determine the extent of ligation of azides with DIFO-FLAG in vivo, splenocytes from B6D2F1 mice treated with the appropriate combination of Ac4ManNAz, DIFO-FLAG, or vehicle (70% DMSO), as described above, were isolated and probed for the presence of cell-surface FLAG epitopes by using a flow cytometry assay. Briefly, splenocytes from one spleen were suspended in RPMI medium 1640 and distributed among wells of a 96-well V-bottom tissue culture plate (three wells per treatment, ~5 ´ 105 cells per well). The cells were pelleted, rinsed with labeling buffer (PBS, pH 7.4 containing 1% FBS), and incubated with a FITC-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody (1:900 dilution) in labeling buffer for 30 min on ice. All cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.

    1. Still WC, Kahn M, Mitra A (1978) J Org Chem 43:2923-2925.

    2. Vocadlo DJ, Hang HC, Kim EJ, Hanover JA, Bertozzi CR (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9116-9121.

    3. Prescher JA, Dube DH, Bertozzi CR (2004) Nature 430:873-877.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Copper-free click chemistry for dynamic in vivo imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Copper-free click chemistry for dynamic in vivo imaging
Jeremy M. Baskin, Jennifer A. Prescher, Scott T. Laughlin, Nicholas J. Agard, Pamela V. Chang, Isaac A. Miller, Anderson Lo, Julian A. Codelli, Carolyn R. Bertozzi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2007, 104 (43) 16793-16797; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707090104

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Copper-free click chemistry for dynamic in vivo imaging
Jeremy M. Baskin, Jennifer A. Prescher, Scott T. Laughlin, Nicholas J. Agard, Pamela V. Chang, Isaac A. Miller, Anderson Lo, Julian A. Codelli, Carolyn R. Bertozzi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2007, 104 (43) 16793-16797; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707090104
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

Physical Sciences

  • Deep elastic strain engineering of bandgap through machine learning
  • Single-molecule excitation–emission spectroscopy
  • Microscopic description of acid–base equilibrium
Show more

Chemistry

  • Single-molecule excitation–emission spectroscopy
  • Microscopic description of acid–base equilibrium
  • Zn-dependent bifunctional proteases are responsible for leader peptide processing of class III lanthipeptides
Show more

Biological Sciences

  • Single-molecule excitation–emission spectroscopy
  • Microscopic description of acid–base equilibrium
  • Zn-dependent bifunctional proteases are responsible for leader peptide processing of class III lanthipeptides
Show more

Cell Biology

  • PGC1A regulates the IRS1:IRS2 ratio during fasting to influence hepatic metabolism downstream of insulin
  • Imbalanced nucleocytoskeletal connections create common polarity defects in progeria and physiological aging
  • Small molecule ISRIB suppresses the integrated stress response within a defined window of activation
Show more

Related Content

  • In This Issue
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • DNA-linked inhibitor antibody assay (DIANA) as a new method for screening influenza neuraminidase inhibitors
  • Fluorescent imaging of protein myristoylation during cellular differentiation and development
  • Artemisinin activity-based probes identify multiple molecular targets within the asexual stage of the malaria parasites Plasmodium falciparum 3D7
  • Tracking the Subcellular Fate of 20(S)-Hydroxycholesterol with Click Chemistry Reveals a Transport Pathway to the Golgi
  • Genetically encoding phenyl azide chemistry: new uses and ideas for classical biochemistry
  • Abnormal accumulation and recycling of glycoproteins visualized in Niemann-Pick type C cells using the chemical reporter strategy
  • Mutant methionyl-tRNA synthetase from bacteria enables site-selective N-terminal labeling of proteins expressed in mammalian cells
  • Reactive polymer enables efficient in vivo bioorthogonal chemistry
  • Dynamic metabolic labeling of DNA in vivo with arabinosyl nucleosides
  • Targeted Identification of Metastasis-associated Cell-surface Sialoglycoproteins in Prostate Cancer
  • Second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes for in vivo imaging
  • Visualizing enveloping layer glycans during zebrafish early embryogenesis
  • Tandem fluorescence imaging of dynamic S-acylation and protein turnover
  • Profile of Carolyn Bertozzi
  • Copper-free click chemistry in living animals
  • Transduction of Redox Signaling by Electrophile-Protein Reactions
  • Identification and Quantitation of Newly Synthesized Proteins in Escherichia coli by Enrichment of Azidohomoalanine-labeled Peptides with Diagonal Chromatography
  • Imaging the glycome
  • In Vivo Imaging of Membrane-Associated Glycans in Developing Zebrafish
  • Scopus (1012)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490