Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Scaling and efficiency determine the irreversible evolution of a market

F. Baldovin and A. L. Stella
PNAS December 11, 2007 104 (50) 19741-19744; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706046104
F. Baldovin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: baldovin@pd.infn.it stella@pd.infn.it
A. L. Stella
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: baldovin@pd.infn.it stella@pd.infn.it
  1. Edited by Leo P. Kadanoff, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved October 29, 2007 (received for review July 4, 2007)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In setting up a stochastic description of the time evolution of a financial index, the challenge consists in devising a model compatible with all stylized facts emerging from the analysis of financial time series and providing a reliable basis for simulating such series. Based on constraints imposed by market efficiency and on an inhomogeneous-time generalization of standard simple scaling, we propose an analytical model which accounts simultaneously for empirical results like the linear decorrelation of successive returns, the power law dependence on time of the volatility autocorrelation function, and the multiscaling associated to this dependence. In addition, our approach gives a justification and a quantitative assessment of the irreversible character of the index dynamics. This irreversibility enters as a key ingredient in a novel simulation strategy of index evolution which demonstrates the predictive potential of the model.

  • complex systems
  • finance
  • stochastic processes

For over a century, it has been recognized (1) that the unpredictable time evolution of a financial index is inherently a stochastic process. However, despite many efforts (2–11), a unified framework for simultaneously understanding empirical facts (12–19), such as the non-Gaussian form and multiscaling in time of the distribution of returns, the linear decorrelation of successive returns, and volatility clustering, has been elusive. This situation occurs in many natural phenomena, when strong correlations determine various forms of anomalous scaling (20–27). Here, by employing mathematical tools at the basis of a generalization of the central limit theorem to strongly correlated variables (28), we propose a model of index evolution and a corresponding simulation strategy which account for all robust features revealed by the empirical analysis.

Let S(t) be the value of a given asset at time t. The logarithmic return over the interval [t, t + T] is defined as r(t, T) ≡ ln S(t + T) − ln S(t), where t = 0, 1, … and T = 1, 2, …, in some unit (e.g., day). From a sufficiently long historical series, one can sample the empirical probability density function (PDF) of r over a time T, p̄T (r), and the joint PDF of two successive returns r 1 ≡ r(t, T) and r 2 ≡ r(t + T, T), denoted by p̄ 2T (2)(r 1, r 2). This joint PDF contains the information on the correlation between r 1 and r 2 in the sampling. A well established property (13–16) is that, if T is longer than tens of minutes, the linear correlation vanishes: ∫p̄ 2T (2)(r 1, r 2)r 1 r 2 dr 1 dr 2 ≡ 〈r 1 r 2〉p̄2T (2) = 0. This is a consequence of the efficiency of the market (3), which quickly suppresses any arbitrage opportunity. Another remarkable feature is that, within specific T ranges, p̄T approximately assumes a simple scaling form Embedded Image where ḡ and D̄ are the scaling function and exponent, respectively. Eq. 1 manifests self-similarity, a symmetry often met in natural phenomena (20–23, 27): plots of T D̄ p̄T vs. r/T D̄ for different T values collapse onto the same curve representing ḡ. We verify the scaling ansatz in Eq. 1 for the Dow Jones Industrial (DJI) index using a dataset of more than one century (1900–2005) of daily closures. This index is paradigmatic of market behavior and the considerable number of data reduces sampling fluctuations substantially. In Fig. 1 the collapse of the empty symbols is rather satisfactory (the explanation of the meaning of the full symbols in Fig. 1 is given below). The scaling function in Eq. 1 is non-Gaussian (2, 12–17). Although linear correlations vanish, in the T range considered ḡ is determined by the strong nonlinear correlations of the returns. Only for T > τc (with τc of the order of the year) successive index returns become independent and p̄T turns Gaussian in force of the central limit theorem (29).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Data collapse for p̄T (r) (T measured in days) sampled from a record of ≈2.7 × 104 DJI daily closures (open symbols). The average daily trend of the order of 10−4 has been subtracted. The collapse analysis furnishes the scaling function ḡ reported as the full line and the scaling exponent D̄ ≃ 1/2 (see also Fig. 3 and SI Text ). Filled symbols report the data collapse for the results of a single simulation of the DJI history.

Results and Discussion

Our first goal is to establish up to what extent the assumption of simple scaling in Eq. 1 does constrain the structure of the joint PDF p̄ 2T (2). One must of course have Embedded Image Indeed, the first line of Eqs. 2 follows from r(t, 2T) = r 1 + r 2. Furthermore, because the joint PDF p̄ 2T (2) is sampled from a sequence of time-translated intervals of duration 2T along the historical series, both the first and the second halves of all such intervals provide an adequate sampling basis for p̄T . This justifies the second and third lines of Eqs. 2. At this point, we notice that the property 〈r 1 r 2〉p̄2T (2) = 0 implies that 〈r 2〉p̄ 2T = 〈(r 1 + r 2)2〉p̄2T (2) = 2〈r 2〉p̄T. In force of Eq. 1 , 〈r 2〉p̄T ∼ T 2D̄. Hence, we obtain 2T 2D̄ = (2T)2D̄, i.e., D̄ = 1/2. Remarkably, for all developed market indices, 〈r 2〉p̄T is found to scale consistently with a D̄ pretty close to 1/2 (30).

By switching to Fourier space in Eq. 2 , the notion of a generalized product operation allows to identify a solution for p̄ 2T (2) in terms of p̄T alone. Although the ordinary multiplication of characteristic functions (i.e., Fourier transforms) of Gaussian PDFs would yield trivially the correct p̄ 2T (2) in the case of independent successive returns (29), the generalized product is used here to take into account strong nonlinear correlations consistently with the anomalous scaling they determine [see supporting information (SI) Text ] and can be seen to be at the basis of a central limit theorem (28). Our solution is strongly supported by the remarkable consistency with the numerical results and by the analogy with the independent case. In Fig. 2 we compare the PDF of the return r 2 conditioned to a given absolute value of the return r 1, as obtained through our solution (continuous lines), with the empirically sampled one (symbols). The agreement does not involve fitting parameters, because D̄ and those entering the assumed analytical form of ḡ are already fixed in Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Conditional probabilities of daily returns r 2 for different values of r 1. Empty symbols refer to the DJI data. The continuous curves are the predictions of our theory for p̄ 2T (2)(r 2‖r 1|) ≡ [p̄ 2T (2)(r 1,r 2) + p̄ 2T (2) (−r 1,r 2)]/∫[p̄ 2T (2)(r 1,r 2)+ p̄ 2T (2)(−r 1,r 2)]dr 2. The absolute value of r1 is introduced for reducing sample fluctuations.

At this point, we must take into account that the simple scaling ansatz in Eq. 1 is only approximately valid (7). Indeed, a consequence of Eq. 1 is 〈|r|q〉p̄T ∼ TqD̄ , which we exploited above for q = 2. However, a careful analysis reveals that the qth moment exponent deviates from the linear behavior qD̄ ≃ q/2 for q ≳ 3 (open circles in Fig. 3). Like the linear behavior with slope 1/2 observed for low-order moments, this multiscaling effect is common to most indices (30). To explain this feature, we have to investigate the relation between the empirical p̄T and the stochastic process generating the time series. If PDFs like p̄T and p̄ 2T (2) were directly describing such a process, this would be with stationary increments. This assumption is legitimate only for sufficiently long times, larger than τc. Below, we identify in the interplay between scaling and nonstationarity a precise mechanism accounting for the robust features of p̄T detected for T ≪ τc, including its multiscaling.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Scaling exponent of the qth moment of p̄T . Open (filled) circles refer to the DJI data (simulation) of Fig. 1. The dashed line is q/2. Multiscaling is due to the deviation of D̄(q) from a constant value. The full line reports the time-averaged asymptotic (τc ≫ 1) theoretical prediction based on Eq. 5 .

Let us indicate by pt,T and p t,2T (2) the ensemble PDF's corresponding to p̄T and p̄ 2T (2), respectively. The additional dependence on t, the initial time of the interval [t, t + T], shows that we do not assume stationarity for these PDF's. We postulate that, within specific T ranges (e.g., the one in Fig. 1), p 0,T obeys a simple scaling like that in Eq. 1 , but possibly with a D and a g different from D̄ and ḡ, respectively. One then realizes that this scaling and the linear decorrelation of returns impose on p t,2T (2) constraints analogous to those for p̄ 2T (2) in Eq. 2 , except for the third one, which now reads Embedded Image This last condition tells us that, as a consequence of the nonlinear correlations, the effective time span of the marginal PDF obtained by integrating p 0,2T (2) in r 1 must be renormalized by a factor a. This factor is determined again by consistency of the second moments scaling properties, as above. Since now 〈|r|2〉p0,T ∼ T2D , one gets from Eq. 3 a = (22D − 1)1/2D. So, D ≠ 1/2 implies a ≠ 1, and thus nonstationarity and irreversibility of the process. Similar functional relations hold for the PDFs of the magnetization of critical spin models upon doubling the system size and can be explained in that context by the renormalization group theory (27). Our generalized multiplication of characteristic functions allows us to express p t,2T (2) in terms of pt,T and to establish the time-inhomogeneous scaling property Embedded Image It remains now to make explicit the link between the p values and the sampled p̄, and to determine D. By construction, p̄T is a t average of pt,T . Because the time inhomogeneity of pt,T must cross over into homogeneity for t exceeding τc, we expect the following approximation Embedded Image to hold. Indeed, the history over which p̄T is sampled is much longer than τc and allows in principle also an indirect sampling of pt,T if we simply assume p t+τc,T(r) = pt,T (r).

Despite the fact that Eq. 4 implies a simple scaling exponent D for p 0,T, Eq. 5 leads to the remarkable property that, independently of D, the low-q moments of p̄T approximately scale with exponent q/2 as soon as τc ≫ 1. Moreover, if D < 1/2, p̄T displays a multiscaling of the same type as that found empirically: D̄(q) < 1/2 for the high-order moments. The matching of the theoretical predictions for the multiscaling of p̄T on the basis of Eq. 5 with the empirical results is a first way of identifying D. For the DJI, in Fig. 3 we show that with D = 0.24 this matching is very satisfactory. The scaling functions of p 0,T and p̄T can also be shown to be simply related, once D is known. We notice that the observed multiscaling features of financial indices, which inspired multiplicative cascade models (8, 19) in analogy with turbulence (20, 21), are explained here in terms of an additive process possessing the time-inhomogeneous scaling (Eq. 4 ).

The introduction of autoregressive schemes like ARCH (5) marked an advance in econometrics and financial analysis (6, 9), and, more generally, in the theory of stochastic processes. In an autoregressive simulation, a number of parameters weighting the influence of the past history on the PDF of the following return must be fixed through some optimization procedure. By our approach, a generalization of p t,2T (2) to the case of n consecutive intervals can be fully expressed just in terms of p t,T and D. This is obtained by taking the inverse Fourier transform of our solution for the characteristic function of the joint PDF (see SI Text ). In this way, we can precisely calculate the PDF that rules the extraction of the ith return, r i, giving us as conditioning inputs the previous m ones, r i−m, …, r i−1. Consistently with our schematization in Eq. 5 , the existence of exogenous factors acting on the market can be taken into account by resetting the width of the marginal PDFs with an (average) periodicity equal to τc (see SI Text ). The results for a single simulation with m = 100, τc = 500, and D = 0.24 are illustrated by the filled symbols in Figs. 1 and 3. The coincidence of the scaling properties observed for the DJI with those of our simulation furnish a second strong indication of the validity of our approach and of the estimation of D.

The correctness of the value of D can be further checked by considering the volatility autocorrelation function at time separation τ (Fig. 4). A well established fact (12–16, 19) is its power law decay c(τ) ≈ τ−β for τ < τc, with β ≃ 0.2 for the DJI. This behavior is not reproduced by routine simulation methods in quantitative finance like GARCH (6) and requires the introduction of more sophisticated, fractional integration techniques (9). The full characterization of the joint PDF of n-consecutive returns allows us to obtain a model expression for c(τ), which again takes into account the nonstationarity of the process (see SI Text ). Such an expression behaves asymptotically as a power of τ with an exponent depending on D [c(τ) is constant for D = 1/2 and decays for D < 1/2]. In particular, with D = 0.24 both the model asymptotic expression and the results of our simulation procedure furnish a nice agreement with the exponent β ≃ 0.2 observed for the DJI index (Fig. 4). Thus, the algebraic volatility autocorrelation function decay is reproduced by our scheme and provides a second criterion to fix consistently the anomalous scaling exponent D.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Volatility autocorrelation at time separation τ (in days), c(τ) ≡ (Σt=0 tmax |r(t, 1)‖r(t + τ, 1)|− Σt=0 tmax |r(t, 1)| Σt=0 tmax |r(t + τ, 1)|/t max)/Σt=0 tmax |r(t, 1)|2−[Σt=0 tmax |r(t, 1)|]2/t max where t max + τ − 1 is the total length of the time series. Symbols are as in Fig. 3. The simulation here is precisely the same we refer to in Figs. 1 and 3. The full line gives the slope of the time-averaged asymptotic (τc ≫ 1, τ ≲ τc) model prediction for the volatility autocorrelation, superimposed to the data (see SI Text ).

Our approach is based on two postulates: inhomogeneous-time scaling and the vanishing of linear return correlations. These symmetries lead, in an unambiguous, deductive manner, to a model for the underlying stochastic process determining market evolution. Of course, the results follow only when the postulates are valid and we have shown that within specific time-ranges the consequences of these postulates are in remarkable agreement with the data. Major advances in understanding critical phenomena worked in a similar vein decades ago (20), when the scaling assumptions allowed to establish links between seemingly disparate phenomena and put the basis for the development of renormalization group theory (27). So far, the coexistence of anomalous scaling with the requirement of absence of linear correlation imposed by economic principles has been regarded as an outstanding open problem in the theory of stochastic processes. We believe that our solution could be relevant for developments in this field, as well as for describing scaling behaviors of other complex systems (20–26).

Acknowledgments

We thank J. R. Banavar for useful suggestions and encouragement.

Footnotes

  • *To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: baldovin{at}pd.infn.it or stella{at}pd.infn.it
  • Author contributions: F.B. and A.L.S. designed research; F.B. and A.L.S. performed research; F.B. and A.L.S. analyzed data; and F.B. and A.L.S. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0706046104/DC1.

  • © 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bachelier L
    (1900) Ann Sci Ecole Norm Sup 17:21–86.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Mandelbrot BB
    (1963) J Business 36:394–419.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Fama EF
    (1970) Journal of Finance 25:383–417.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Black F ,
    2. Scholes M
    (1973) J Polit Econ 81:637–654.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Engle R
    (1983) J Money, Credit and Banking 15:286–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Bollerslev T
    (1986) J Econometrics 31:307–327.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Vassilicos JC ,
    2. Demos A ,
    3. Tata F
    1. Crilly AJ ,
    2. Earnshaw RA ,
    3. Jones H
    (1993) in Applications of Fractals and Chaos, eds Crilly AJ , Earnshaw RA , Jones H (Springer, Berlin), pp 249–265.
  8. ↵
    1. Mandelbrot BB ,
    2. Fisher AJ ,
    3. Calvet LE
    (1997) Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, 1164.
  9. ↵
    1. Andersen TG ,
    2. Bollerslev T
    (1997) J Empirical Finance 4:115–158.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Lux T ,
    2. Marchesi M
    (1999) Nature 397:498–500.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. LeBaron B
    (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7201–7206.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Mantegna RN ,
    2. Stanley HE
    (1995) Nature 376:46–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Mantegna RN ,
    2. Stanley HE
    (2000) An Introduction to Econophysics (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
  14. ↵
    1. Bouchaud J-P ,
    2. Potters M
    (2000) Theory of Financial Risks (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
  15. ↵
    1. Cont R
    (2001) Quant Finance 1:223–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Cont R
    1. Lutton E ,
    2. Levy Véhel J
    (2005) in Fractals in Engineering, eds Lutton E , Levy Véhel J (Springer–Verlag, New York).
  17. ↵
    1. Stanley HE ,
    2. Amaral LAN ,
    3. Buldyrev SV ,
    4. Gopikrishnan P ,
    5. Plerou V ,
    6. Salinger MA
    (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2561–2565.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Yamasaki K ,
    2. Muchnik L ,
    3. Havlin S ,
    4. Bunde A ,
    5. Stanley HE
    (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9424–9428.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Lux T
    1. Cioffi-Revilla C
    (2006) in Power Laws in the Social Sciences, ed Cioffi-Revilla C (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
  20. ↵
    1. Kadanoff LP
    (2005) Statistical Physics: Statics, Dynamics and Renormalization (World Scientific, Singapore).
  21. ↵
    1. Kadanoff LP
    (2001) Physics Today 54:34–39.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Sethna JP ,
    2. Dahmen KA ,
    3. Myers CR
    (2001) Nature 410:242–250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Bouchaud JP ,
    2. Georges A
    (1990) Phys Rep 195:127.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Lu ET ,
    2. Hamilton RJ ,
    3. McTiernan JM ,
    4. Bromond KR
    (1993) Astrophys J 412:841–852.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Scholz CH
    (2002) The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting (Cambridge Univ Press, New York).
  26. ↵
    1. Kiyono K ,
    2. Struzik ZR ,
    3. Aoyagi N ,
    4. Togo F ,
    5. Yamamoto Y
    (2005) Phys Rev Lett 95:058101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Jona-Lasinio G
    (2001) Phys Rep 352:439–458.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Baldovin F ,
    2. Stella AL
    (2007) Phys Rev E 75:020101(R)-1–020101(R)-4.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Gnedenko BV ,
    2. Kolmogorov AN
    (1954) Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).
  30. ↵
    1. Di Matteo T ,
    2. Aste T ,
    3. Dacorogna MM
    (2005) J Bank Fin 29:827–851.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Scaling and efficiency determine the irreversible evolution of a market
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Scaling and efficiency determine the irreversible evolution of a market
F. Baldovin, A. L. Stella
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2007, 104 (50) 19741-19744; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706046104

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Scaling and efficiency determine the irreversible evolution of a market
F. Baldovin, A. L. Stella
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2007, 104 (50) 19741-19744; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706046104
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 104 (50)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490