Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Commentary

Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all

Robert J. Sternberg
PNAS May 13, 2008 105 (19) 6791-6792; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803396105
Robert J. Sternberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: robert.sternberg@tufts.edu

Related Articles

  • Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory
    - Apr 28, 2008
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Almost 40 years ago, Jensen (1) claimed that, when all is said and done, there is not much one can do to raise people's IQs. Over the years, there have been various attempts to do so, which generally have yielded somewhat ambiguous results (2). Even successful attempts (3) have typically involved training people on the same kinds of items on which they would be tested, so that it was not clear whether the training was generalizable, rather than merely a result of practice effects on particular item types (4).

Further complicating the picture have been studies showing that IQ tends to be fairly highly heritable, with most reliable estimates ranging from ≈0.5 to 0.8 (5). More recently, heritability has been found to vary both with age, with IQ becoming more highly heritable in later years (6), and with social class, with IQ more highly heritable in higher social classes (7). Although heritability does not imply the fixedness of a trait (e.g., height is highly heritable but also modifiable), the mixed results of training studies have been taken to be consistent with the notion that IQ is relatively fixed.

IQ may be viewed as a composite comprising multiple elements: In many theories of intelligence, a distinction is made between fluid and crystallized intelligence (8). Fluid intelligence comprises the set of abilities involved in coping with novel environments and especially in abstract reasoning; crystallized intelligence is the product of the application of these processes. Fluid intelligence is often measured by tests such as figural analogy, classification, and matrix problems, whereas crystallized intelligence is measured by tests of vocabulary and general information (9).

Increasing Fluid Intelligence

In this issue of PNAS, Jaeggi et al. (10) have made an important contribution to the literature by showing that (i) fluid intelligence is trainable to a significant and meaningful degree; (ii) the training is subject to dosage effects, with more training leading to greater gains; (iii) the effect occurs across the spectrum of abilities, although it is larger toward the lower end of the spectrum; and (iv) the effect can be obtained by training on problems that, at least superficially, do not resemble those on the fluid-ability tests. Their study therefore seems, in some measure, to resolve the debate over whether fluid intelligence is, in at least some meaningful measure, trainable.

Given these positive results, a reader might wonder why it has taken nearly 40 years to show training effects. Why the wait? The reason is, in large measure, that recent cognitive-based theories of intelligence have provided new insights into just what kind of training would be successful. It is only in fairly recent years, relative to the age of the field, that so-called “working memory” has come to be viewed as a key determiner of fluid intelligence (11). Working memory is usually viewed as that part of long-term memory that is available for active information processing, including placement of information into and retrieval of information out of storage. Tasks such as backward digit span and the n-back task used in this study are good measures of working memory (12). So the basic idea in Jaeggi et al.'s study (10) is that one can use modern cognitive theory to serve as a basis for training, which should then produce a training regimen that will make a meaningful difference. This idea proved to be correct.

Fluid intelligence is trainable to a significant and meaningful degree.

Jaeggi et al.'s article (10) is important to the field of intelligence because it shows that training can improve fluid intelligence, can do so across intelligence levels, and can do so in a theory-based way. To the extent that past investigators failed to obtain such robust results, it appears to be because they failed to use the cognitive–theoretical basis that served as the basis for training in Jaeggi et al.'s study. These results have important educational-policy implications, because they suggest that the results of conventional tests of intellectual abilities and aptitudes provide indices that may be dynamic rather than static and modifiable rather than fixed. Most researchers have viewed intelligence as largely fixed (13), although others have argued strongly for its modifiability (14). The latter are shown to be justified in their beliefs.

Further Research

There will be a need for follow-up on these interesting results because of several limitations of Jaeggi et al.'s study (10), none of them calling into question the obtained results. Eight are of some concern.

First, with regard to the main independent variable, there was only one training task in the study, so it is unclear to what extent the results can be generalized to other working-memory tasks. It would be important to show that the results are really about working memory rather than some peculiarity of the particular training task.

Second, with regard to the main dependent variable, there was only one kind of fluid-ability test, geometric matrix problems from various tests of the kind found in the Raven Progressive Matrices (15) and similar tests. It would be important to show that the results generalize to other fluid-ability tasks rather than being peculiar to this kind of task. Matrix problems are generally considered to be an excellent measure of fluid intelligence (16), but they do place a particularly great demand on working memory. At the same time, fluid-ability tests tend to be highly correlated with each other (17), so generalization would appear likely. Whether generalization extends beyond the matrix tests to other kinds of cognitive tests, such as of spatial, numerical, or other abilities, remains to be seen.

Third, it is important to remember that the fluid-ability tests, although the dependent variables in Jaeggi et al.'s study (10), were originally intended to be independent variables in predicting meaningful behavior in the real world (18). Such behavior would include, among other things, educational and occupational achievement. Tests of intelligence have also been shown to have implications for other kinds of success, including even health-related behavior (19). So it would be useful to show that the training transfers to success in meaningful behaviors that extend beyond the realm of psychometric testing.

Fourth, Jaeggi et al. (10) mention that, with training, the value of fluid intelligence for predicting performance on other tasks can change. It would be important to show that the predictive power of the fluid-ability tests, after training, is at least as high as or possibly even higher than it was before training took place.

Fifth, as Jaeggi et al. (10) recognize, their study does not address whether the training is durable over extended periods of time. Too often increases of intelligence obtained through training programs have proved to be fleeting (20). Future work would need to assess durability over varying periods of extended time.

Sixth, the control group in Jaeggi et al.'s study (10) had no alternative task, which can lead readers to query whether a placebo treatment in an additional control group might have led to a stronger comparison. In future work, one would want to include a training alternative that teaches something expected not to be relevant to performance on the fluid-ability tests.

Seventh, because there is only one study, there is a great need for replication. In single studies, one can never be sure whether there are aspects of the design or procedure that lead to results that later prove not to be replicable.

Finally, the effects need to be examined on a much wider range of ability levels and, in general, of types of participants than were tested in this study. The subjects were all recruited from the University of Bern community, which is likely to be a rather selective sample of individuals not typical of the population either of Switzerland or, more generally, of developed countries or certainly the world. It would be particularly important to test elderly people, who are at risk for loss of fluid ability. The sample was also relatively small (n = 70).

None of these criticisms detracts from the central importance of the results of Jaeggi et al.'s study (10). On the contrary, they suggest that their study should and probably will be the first in a long series instigated by this pioneering research.

Footnotes

  • *E-mail: robert.sternberg{at}tufts.edu
  • Author contributions: R.J.S. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 6829.

  • © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
View Abstract

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jensen AR
    (1969) How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Edu Rev 39:1–123.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Detterman DK,
    2. Sternberg RJ
    , eds (1982) How and How Much Can Intelligence Be Increased? (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).
  3. ↵
    1. Kramer AF,
    2. Willis SL
    (2002) Enhancing the cognitive vitality of older adults. Curr Directions Psychol Sci 11:173–177.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Detterman DK,
    2. Sternberg RJ
    , eds (1993) Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction (Ablex, Norwood, NJ).
  5. ↵
    1. Plomin R
    (2004) Nature and Nurture: An Introduction to Human Behavioral Genetics (Wadsworth, Thousand Oaks, CA).
  6. ↵
    1. Plomin R,
    2. DeFries JC,
    3. McClearn GE,
    4. McGuffin P
    (2008) Behavioral Genetics (Worth, New York), 5th Ed.
  7. ↵
    1. Turkheimer E,
    2. Haley A,
    3. D'Onofrio B,
    4. Waldron M,
    5. Gottesman II
    (2003) Socioeconomic status modifies her-itability of IQ in young children. Psychol Sci 14:623–628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Carroll JB
    (1993) Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies (Cambridge Univ Press, New York).
  9. ↵
    1. Mackintosh N
    (1998) IQ and Human Intelligence (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
  10. ↵
    1. Jaeggi SM,
    2. Buschkuehl M,
    3. Jonides J,
    4. Perrig WJ
    (2008) Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:6829–6833.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Engle RW,
    2. Tuholski SW,
    3. Laughlin JE,
    4. Conway ARA
    (1999) Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. J Exp Psychol General 128:309–331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kane MJ,
    2. Engle RW
    (2002) The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonom Bull Rev 9:637–671.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Jensen AR
    (1998) The G Factor (Praeger, Westport, CT).
  14. ↵
    1. Feuerstein R
    (1980) Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability (University Park Press, Baltimore, MD).
  15. ↵
    1. Raven J,
    2. Raven JC,
    3. Court JH
    (2003) Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 1: General Overview (Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio, TX).
  16. ↵
    1. Anastasi A,
    2. Urbina S
    (1997) Psychological Testing (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 7th Ed.
  17. ↵
    1. Cattell RB
    (1971) Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).
  18. ↵
    1. Binet A,
    2. Simon T
    1. Kite ES
    (1916) in The Development of Intelligence in Children, trans Kite ES (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD).
  19. ↵
    1. Gottfredson LS,
    2. Deary IJ
    (2004) Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why? Curr Directions Psychol Sci 13:1–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Spitz HH
    (1992) Does the Carolina Abecedarian Early Intervention Project prevent sociocultural mental retardation? Intelligence 16:225–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all
Robert J. Sternberg
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2008, 105 (19) 6791-6792; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803396105

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all
Robert J. Sternberg
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2008, 105 (19) 6791-6792; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803396105
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 105 (19)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Increasing Fluid Intelligence
    • Further Research
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Large piece of gold
News Feature: Tracing gold's cosmic origins
Astronomers thought they’d finally figured out where gold and other heavy elements in the universe came from. In light of recent results, they’re not so sure.
Image credit: Science Source/Tom McHugh.
Dancers in red dresses
Journal Club: Friends appear to share patterns of brain activity
Researchers are still trying to understand what causes this strong correlation between neural and social networks.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Yeongsik Im.
Yellow emoticons
Learning the language of facial expressions
Aleix Martinez explains why facial expressions often are not accurate indicators of emotion.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490