New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
 Agricultural Sciences
 Anthropology
 Applied Biological Sciences
 Biochemistry
 Biophysics and Computational Biology
 Cell Biology
 Developmental Biology
 Ecology
 Environmental Sciences
 Evolution
 Genetics
 Immunology and Inflammation
 Medical Sciences
 Microbiology
 Neuroscience
 Pharmacology
 Physiology
 Plant Biology
 Population Biology
 Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
 Sustainability Science
 Systems Biology
Continuum percolation of carbon nanotubes in polymeric and colloidal media

Edited by Ann Sastry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and accepted by the Editorial Board March 20, 2008 (received for review December 5, 2007)
This article has a correction. Please see:
Abstract
We apply continuum connectedness percolation theory to realistic carbon nanotube systems and predict how bending flexibility, length polydispersity, and attractive interactions between them influence the percolation threshold, demonstrating that it can be used as a predictive tool for designing nanotubebased composite materials. We argue that the host matrix in which the nanotubes are dispersed controls this threshold through the interactions it induces between them during processing and through the degree of connectedness that must be set by the tunneling distance of electrons, at least in the context of conductivity percolation. This provides routes to manipulate the percolation threshold and the level of conductivity in the final product. We find that the percolation threshold of carbon nanotubes is very sensitive to the degree of connectedness, to the presence of small quantities of longer rods, and to very weak attractive interactions between them. Bending flexibility or tortuosity, on the other hand, has only a fairly weak impact on the percolation threshold.
The physics of networks of electrically conducting carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in polymeric and in colloidal media has attracted much attention lately because of potential technological applications of CNT/polymer nanocomposites (1–5). The control over the formation of networks of such in some sense connected CNTs during the processing of the nanocomposite, which may include solventbased as well as solventfree but fluid (melt) stages, plays a key role in producing unique mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of the final solid composite material (6). Of particular interest here is the socalled percolation threshold (PT), i.e., the minimal loading of CNTs required to form a network or cluster that spans the whole system (the “percolation network”) (7, 8). This critical loading as well as the physical properties of the CNT/polymer composite at concentrations beyond the PT depend on the polymeric matrix material and on the microscopic structure of the percolating network, the formation of which is influenced by the matrix material. Indeed, the polymer matrix has a strong impact on the interactions between the CNTs during processing but also on the conductive properties of the network after that because the CNTs turn out not to actually touch each other in the final product (1, 6). It stands to reason that a rational design of CNT/polymer nanocomposites should benefit from a deeper theoretical understanding of the combined influence of the polymer matrix and the detailed characteristics of the CNTs on the formation of a percolating network, one that arguably remains quite incomplete notwithstanding many decades of intensive research (1).
From a technological point of view, the central issue is to produce a nanocomposite with a controllable conductivity and as low as possible a loading of CNTs (6). Many factors, including the mean aspect ratio, the length polydispersity, the bending flexibility and tortuosity of the CNTs, as well as interactions between them and the polymer matrix, potentially affect the PT that has to be achieved in the liquid state before the structure freezes upon solidification of the polymeric host material. As is well known, the PT of conductive filler particles decreases in inverse proportion to their aspect ratio, a rule of thumb that is generally valid for elongated and flat particles alike (9, 10). Recent experiments on the percolation of singlewalled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) in aqueous dispersions (11, 12) have also shown that a remarkable lowering of the PT can be achieved by making use of weak attractive interactions between the SWNTs (11).
As already advertised, a comprehensive picture of the influence of the material parameters on the PT of CNT dispersions and composites remains elusive. In an attempt to come to a more realistic description, we focus attention on the effects of nonideality characteristic of real CNTs and apply the continuum percolation theory of physical clusters to elongated particles in an effective medium. The effective medium describes the presence of the host material, e.g., a polymer melt or an aqueous dispersion containing depletants such as surfactant micelles or polymer latex particles (11, 12).
By making use of a formal correspondence between continuum percolation theory and statistical theories of the structure of fluids, which for rodlike particles have reached a high level of sophistication (13–19), we are able to quite straightforwardly predict the effects of different kinds of nonideality on the PT of CNTs, including hardcore interactions, flexibility, length polydispersity, and (in principle) any mediuminduced attractive interaction or “stickiness.” It is important to point out that the strength of the attractive interaction between the CNTs can be tuned, e.g., by the choice of host material, allowing one to manipulate the percolation of CNTs. The formalism that applies here provides a way to obtain analytical predictions in a field where guiding principles are hard to come by.
Our calculations show that the PT of CNTs is quite sensitive to the cluster (or connectedness) definition, and we settle the issue of how precisely polydispersity impacts upon it (10, 20): we find that long rods contribute more to the PT than short ones do, and that a length polydispersity therefore lowers the PT. This nonintuitive result is due to translation–rotation coupling of the rods. Rod flexibility, on the other hand, raises the PT, albeit by only a modest amount. By contrast, even very weak attractive interactions, caused, e.g., by the presence of the matrix material (21), significantly lower the PT, although we cannot rule out the existence of a regime outside the range of validity of our approach, where attraction might do the opposite (22). We confirm earlier speculation that there are two different regimes with a different local structure depending on the strength of the attractive interactions (11, 23), but in addition we make plausible the existence of two additional regimes at higher interaction strengths where the percolating network is either built up from nanotube bundles or is kinetically frozen and no longer in equilibrium.
Finally, we make connection between geometrical and electrical percolation by considering the tunneling of charge carriers (electrons) between the CNTs. We argue that any sensible cluster definition must be related to the tunneling distance, which depends on a combination of the nanotube and matrix material properties. A quasiclassical estimate of this length predicts it to increase with the dielectric constant of the host medium, implying that by using a host medium with a higher dielectric constant, one effectively decreases the potential barrier between adjacent nanotubes, producing an increase of the local conductivity of the composite and, through an increase in the effective connectedness of the CNTs, a decrease of the PT. It seems that the concept of connectedness percolation is not merely of theoretical interest but actually represents a useful toolbox that can assist in selecting routes on how to decrease the PT and/or increase conductivity levels by appropriate choice of polymeric matrix that regulates the strength of the attractive interactions as well as the charge transport between the nanotubes in them.
Continuum percolation was studied first for fluids of ideal (fully penetrable) particles and particles interacting by a harshly repulsive potential (Fig. 1 b), and extensive literature on these models is available (10, 20, 24, 25). A formal analysis due to Hill (26), later extended by Coniglio (27), that considers the distribution of physical clusters in an equilibrium system of interacting particles is based on the pair connectedness analogue of the well known Ornstein–Zernike (OZ) equation of the liquid state theory of isotropic fluids. For monodisperse, rigid rods in the isotropic phase this equation reads (20, 27, 28) where ρ denotes the mean number density of the nanotubes, i ≡ (r _{i}, u _{i}) their generalized coordinates with r _{i} and u _{i} the positional and angular degrees of freedom of test rod i = 1, 2, C ^{+}(1, 2) the socalled direct pair connectedness function of two test rods with coordinates 1 and 2, and P(1, 2) the pair connectedness function that describes the structure of the clusters. C ^{+} (1, 2) measures shortrange correlations (27), while P(1, 2) is defined such that ρ^{2} P(1, 2)d1d2/(4π)^{2} represents the probability of simultaneously finding a rod in a generalized volume d1 at 1 and another one in d2 at 2, provided they are part of the same cluster. Whether two particles belong to the same cluster depends on how a cluster is defined. Usually, two neighboring particles are considered “bound” if their mutual separation is less than a certain value called the “connectedness” or “overlap” criterion.
Within the secondvirial approximation, we have for the direct connectedness function C ^{+}(1, 2) = f ^{+}(1, 2) (20, 27–29), where f ^{+}(1, 2) = exp[−βu ^{+}(1, 2)] is the Mayer function of the particles that belong to the same cluster and interact through the potential u ^{+} and β^{−1} = k _{B} T is the thermal energy with k _{B} Boltzmann's constant and T the absolute temperature. We let u ^{+} → ∞ for forbidden configurations and for configurations that do not meet the overlap criterion (27). The secondvirial approximation is exact in the limit of infinite aspect ratios of the nanotubes, at least if they interact through a shortranged, harshly repulsive potential (18), and is equivalent to a random phase approximation (30). Hence, rod–rod correlations are accounted for to all orders in the density albeit only linear graphs in a diagrammatic expansion are retained (30). It should be considered qualitative for L/D ≳ 20 and quantitative for L/D ≳ 100 for rods of length L and diameter D (18).
With this closure, Eq. 1 can be solved for P(1, 2). This is most conveniently done in Fourier space, albeit due to translation–rotation coupling this is still no trivial matter (13, 15, 17, 19). Fortunately, we can make use of methodology developed in the context of liquidstate theory because there is a direct correspondence between (i) the pair connectedness function, P, and the total correlation function, h, (ii) the direct pair connectedness function, C ^{+}, and the direct correlation function, C, and (iii) the mean cluster size, S, and the structure factor at zero wavevector k, lim_{k→0} S(k) (27). In short, connectedness percolation theory can be mapped onto liquidstate theory by putting P → h, C ^{+} → C, and S → lim_{k→0} S(k).
The structure factor of rodlike particles has been calculated for various kinds of situation (13, 15–17, 19, 30), implying that we can directly obtain the corresponding cluster sizes for those cases. It is useful to note that explicitly dealing with the twobody OZ equation can be avoided by making use of the static form of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem that connects twobody correlators to the response of the singleparticle density distribution to an external field (28). This produces an integral equation that for isotropic fluids can be solved exactly in Fourier space to give S(k) = 1 + ρ〈〈h̃(k, u, u′)〉〉′ = 1/[1 − ρ〈〈C̃(k, u, u′)〉〉′]. Here, u and u′ are the unit vectors in the direction of the main axes of the rods, the brackets 〈 … 〉 ≡ (4π)^{−1} ∫ d u (…) denote an orientational averaging with a similar prescription for the primed variables, and the tildes indicate a spatial Fourier transform, () ≡ ∫ d r exp[−i k · r] (…).
The mean cluster size is related to the pair connectedness function through S = lim_{k→0} [1 + ρ〈〈P̃(k, u, u′)〉〉′], with P̃ the spatial Fourier transform of P(1, 2) (27). So, by invoking the correspondence between liquidstate and connectedness percolation theory, we immediately find S = lim_{k→0} 1/[1 − ρ〈〈f̃ ^{+}(k, u, u′)〉〉′] within the secondvirial approximation. At the PT the cluster size diverges, S → ∞, allowing us to calculate the volume fraction φ_{p} at which this happens, where f̃ ^{+} is the Fourier transform of the connectedness Mayer function and V _{rod} is the volume of a rod. Although superficially simple, Eq. 2 is actually a nontrivial result because of the effect of translation–rotation coupling on the longrange correlations between the rods.
Keeping only the leadingorder term in the aspect ratio L/D ≫ 1,
For ideal rods ε′ = 0, so φ_{p} = ½Δ/L in the longrod limit L/Δ ≫ 1, whereas for hard rods ε′ → ∞, giving in the same limit φ_{p} = ½(D/L)(1/(
In reality, SWNTs are not monodisperse, nor are they infinitely rigid or even straight. By again exploiting the relation between connectedness percolation theory and the statistical theory of rod fluids (13, 15, 19), we can directly establish how length polydispersity and bending flexibility modify the results obtained for hard rods. The structure factor of polydisperse hard rods was calculated by one of us with the help of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem (15), and from that we obtain in a similar manner as sketched above for the monodisperse case a PT that obeys where 〈L〉_{w} ≡ ∫ dLL ^{2} P(L)/∫ dLLP(L) is the weight average of the nanotube lengths given their distribution function P(L), again a result of translation–rotation coupling. Eq. 3 settles an earlier discussion on the type of average to be taken, i.e., number versus weight average (10, 15, 20). This remarkably simple result can in principle also be obtained by solving the multicomponent OZ equations in the zerowavevector limit, but even for the simplified case of a bidisperse system consisting of rods of two different lengths this proves to be not so straightforward (15).
We conclude that a polydispersity in the nanotube lengths lowers the PT at equal average length because longer rods are weighed more heavily than shorter ones. Indeed, if P(L) were, say, a Gaussian with mean L̄ and variance σ^{2}, then 〈L〉_{w} ∼ L̄ + (σ^{2}/L̄) > L̄ for all 0 < σ^{2} ≪ L̄ ^{2}. The effect is actually quite strong, as we show in Fig. 2 for the simplified case of a bidisperse system consisting of rods of equal diameter but different length. The figure shows that adding quite small quantities of longer CNTs can dramatically lower the PT.
To investigate the influence of a finite bending flexibility on the PT, we make use of the statistical theory for fluids of slightly flexible hard rods (30), worked out in detail for rods in the nematic liquidcrystalline phase (19). Within the wormlike chain model near the rod limit, corrections because of a finite bending rigidity enter the description by renormalizing the direct correlation function C. We find that to first order in L/p ≪ 1, where p is the persistence length of the rods, only that part of the direct correlation function that describes the hardcore interactions is affected by bending fluctuations, at least in the relevant limit k → 0. The Mayer function Boltzmann averaged over weak bending fluctuations becomes slightly smaller than that of rigid rods by a relative amount of order L/p ≪ 1. Applying the same recipe as before then gives φ_{p} = ½ D/L(
The question arises what happens in the other limit, when L ≫ p and the cylinders become so flexible that they fold back on themselves. If p/D ≫ 1, they are locally rigid and may be considered “semiflexible.” Once more making use of the formal correspondence of the statistical theory of fluids and percolation theory (20, 27), we deduce that for semiflexible chains, i.e., in the limits L/p ≫ 1 and p/Δ ≫ 1, the PT must obey φ_{p} ≈ ½ D/L(1/(
We now turn to the case where perfectly rigid cylinders not only interact sterically but in addition attract each other mutually. This attraction or stickiness may be due to, e.g., van der Waals and structural interactions (in the melt) and/or depletion interactions (in solution) (21). The functional form of the attractive interaction is likely to be algebraic (for van der Waals and depletion interactions) or exponential (for hydrophobic interactions), but more complex mediuminduced potentials may also arise (21). Fortunately, the spatial integrals of the Mayer function we consider here turn out quite insensitive to the precise form of the interaction potential (13), so a simplified potential will do. Here, we focus on the square welltype of “sticky” potential analyzed by one of us in a different context (13). For sticky hard rods, we presume the connectedness potential u ^{+} between two rods to consist of the hardcore repulsive (u ^{+} → ∞) and a shortrange attractive part (u ^{+} < 0). We suppose that two neighboring rods are part of the same cluster if their shortest centerlinetocenterline distance does not exceed Δ = D + σ, where σ is the range of the attractive potential, to reduce the number of free parameters in the theory to an absolute minimum. As in the case of hard rods u ^{+} → ∞ if the rods overlap or if they are not connected. See also Fig. 1 c.
For separations in the range D ≤ r ≤ Δ, we choose for the sticky potential one proportional to the overlap area. This gives βu
^{+} = −((Δ/D) − 1) εsin γ^{−1} for skewed configurations with γ > (D/L)
Inserting this potential in Eq. 2 gives for the PT of the sticky nanotubes an expression of the following form in the limit of long aspect ratios L/D ⩾ L/Δ ≫ 1, with a term stemming from parallelrod configurations and from skewed ones. Eqs. 4 – 6 generalize an earlier result of Poulin and coworkers (11) deduced from excludedvolume considerations for the specific case Δ = 2D, apart from an erroneous numerical prefactor that we have now corrected. Note that we presume the secondvirial approximation to hold, an presumption that for large enough values of the stickiness parameter ε breaks down (13). (See also the discussion below.)
The dependence of the PT of nanotubes on their stickiness is shown in Fig. 3 a for the realistic case of L/D = 1,000 (11), and for different connectedness criteria. From Fig. 3 a we see that the critical volume fraction decreases with increasing values of Δ, as one would expect. The dependence on Δ is strong, in fact more so for sticky rods than for hard ones, a conclusion that has farreaching consequences because it is a parameter that can in principle be tuned experimentally (see below). This finding also implies that the value of the PT must depend on the way it is measured, because different physical quantities probed to establish the PT are sensitive to particle separations. Finally, we see that attractive interactions between nanotubes can lower the PT quite substantially. With an increase in stickiness of the nanotubes, the PT first decreases linearly with ε to suddenly drop exponentially for stronger interactions. Hence, by optimizing the stickiness of the rods by an appropriate choice of polymer matrix, a significant reduction of the PT may be achieved.
The existence of two percolation regimes evident from Fig. 3 is a result of the predominance of entropically favored skewed rod configurations for weak interactions, i.e., when ε
We are now in a position to compare our results with the experimental data of Poulin and coworkers (11). In their experiments, the nanotubes attract each other by means of depletioninduced attractive interactions, where spherical micelles of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) act as depletants. The relation between the stickiness of the nanotubes, ε, and the depletant volume fraction, φ_{m}, can be established by using the dependence of the depletion potential u
^{+} = −ΠV
_{overlap} on the osmotic pressure, Π, and the overlap of the excluded volumes between rods and micelles, V
_{overlap}, at close separations between the rods (21). To lowest order in the volume fraction of micelles, Π = β^{−1}φ_{m}/
A moot point that needs discussion is the validity of the secondvirial approximation for sticky rods. At the level of the thirdvirial approximation, we have , where g ^{+} ≡ f ^{+} * f ^{+} is a (spatial) convolution of two connectedness Mayer functions (20). The secondvirial approximation breaks down when the dimensionless quantity equals unity, where we insert the secondvirial prediction we have , showing that in that regime the secondvirial approximation is indeed not valid unless Δ → D. Where precisely the secondvirial approximation breaks down depends on ε, L, D, and Δ, and is indicated in Fig. 3 a.
When τ ≳ 1 we expect the percolation network to be built up not from individual nanotubes but from nanotube bundles, which are known to form as a result of the strongly anisotropic nature of the attractive interactions between them (13, 43). These bundles (shown in Fig. 4 c) have a smaller effective aspect ratio than the individual rods, so one would surmise that the PT then increases again with increasing (but still very weak) attraction. This would explain the simulation results of Grujicic et al. (22). With further increase of the stickiness, nonequilibrium aggregation and the formation of kinetically frozen structures is likely to occur (illustrated in Fig. 4 d), not dissimilar to that found in dispersions of spherical particles such as carbon black (44). The PT of fractal aggregates is very much lower than that of the individual particles, suggesting that a significant lowering of the PT of CNTs should be possible under conditions of strong attractive interactions, i.e., out of equilibrium. It is not clear, however, whether these two regimes are experimentally accessible because strongly interacting CNTs are not easily dispersed in a liquid medium.
We end our analysis with a discussion of the connectedness criterion associated with the distance Δ, a phenomenological parameter in the theory. We put forward that when applying the theory to experimental situations, the choice of this parameter is dictated by other physical phenomena in the CNT/polymer composite, e.g., the way the PT is measured. The usual requirement for CNT/polymer composites is good electrical properties, although in general connectedness percolation does not necessary mean electrical percolation. To have good conductive properties the underlying percolation network has to be conductive but, as already alluded to, nanotubes in a composite do not appear touch each other (1, 45). Hence, the conductivity of the percolation network in the final solid product must be determined by the tunneling of the charge carriers (electrons) from one nanotube to another, and therefore by the typical some average distance of closest separation between the nanotubes in the composite (11). (See Fig. 5.) The corresponding local conductivity because of tunneling is σ = σ_{0}exp [−r/ξ], where ξ is the characteristic tunneling distance and σ_{0} some constant (31, 46). One way to relate the connectedness percolation theory to electrical percolation is to choose the connectedness criterion Δ − D ≈ ξ, which would guarantee the underlying percolation network in the polymer composite to be conductive (42, 47).
There is no universally valid theory of electron transport in CNTs/polymer composites (45). Indeed, it is a formidable quantummechanical problem that, in principle, should be solved from firstprinciples calculations. The tunneling distance will be determined by factors such as the structure of the energy levels of the electronic states in two adjacent nanotubes immersed in the polymer matrix, the contact potential barrier, and the electrostatic charging energies of the nanotube and the polymer (48). To get an order of magnitude estimate for ξ and its functional dependence on a single material parameter of the polymer matrix, the dielectric constant, we ignore all this and consider a scaling law based on the timeindependent Schrödinger equation, telling us that ξ ≈ /
We insert for E_{f} the estimated Fermi energy of an electron on a bare SWNT, E_{f} ≈ −3 eV (48). For E_{e} , we presume the Born energy of an electron in a dielectric matrix to be the relevant energy scale, implying E_{e} ≈ k _{B} Tl _{B}/2Λ with l _{B} the Bjerrum length and Λ the thermal wavelength of the spatially delocalized electron in the matrix (21). The Bjerrum length measures the distance at which the Coulomb energy of two unit charges equals the thermal energy and scales with the inverse of the dielectric constant of the polymer matrix. We deduce from this functional dependence that in a more polarizable medium, i.e., with a higher dielectric constant, the tunneling distance should be larger and therefore the percolation threshold lower. Of course, the dependence of ξ on the dielectric constant cannot be very strong because E_{f}  ≫ E_{e} , but because the PT of sticky rods is very sensitive to the value of Δ, the impact of the polarity of the medium could still be appreciable. For a typical polymer matrix the relative dielectric constant is about 3, giving ξ ≈ 0.1 nm, consistent with estimates suggesting that the typical distance between two nanotubes should to be less than a nanometer or so to get reasonable conductance (31, 35, 49). This distance suggests that for SWNTs in a polymer matrix Δ/D ≈ 1.1.
In conclusion, we put forward that connectedness percolation theory can be a useful predictive tool in the rational design of conductive, nanotubebased composite materials. Indeed, according to our calculations, the choice of host material influences the interaction range and strength as well as the degree of connectedness of the nanotubes during the fluid stages of the processing, opening up ways to manipulate the percolation threshold of the composite. We have been able to calculate the functional dependence of the PT in realistic systems on nonidealities such as flexibility, length polydispersity, and mediuminduced attractive interactions. Increasing the attraction between the nanotubes or the length polydispersity can significantly lower the percolation threshold, and a finite bending flexibility or tortuosity should increase it, albeit only weakly so. This finding implies that the nanotubes need not be perfectly straight or monodisperse to be useful as a conductive filler. It appears that in a host medium with higher dielectric constant the tunneling distance should be larger, resulting in a lower PT and a higher local conductivity of the composite, suggesting that one has some control over the level of conductivity in the final CNT/polymer composite. Finally, our predictions are based on the tacit assumption that equilibrium is reached during processing, which need not be the case. At present, very little seems to be known about the time scales required to reach equilibrium, an interesting and important topic in its own right.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge illuminating discussions with Professors Isaac Balberg, Nadia Grossiord, MarieClaire Hermant, Cor Koning, Thijs Michels, Mark Miller, Philippe Poulin, and Tanja Schilling.
Footnotes
 *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: a.v.kyrylyuk{at}uu.nl

Author contributions: A.V.K. and P.v.d.S. designed research, performed research, and wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. A.S. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
 © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
References
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Polizu S ,
 Savadogo O ,
 Poulin P ,
 Yahia L
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Dresselhaus MS ,
 Dresselhaus G ,
 Avouris P

↵
 Torquato S

↵
 Stauffer D ,
 Aharony A
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Vigolo B ,
 Coulon C ,
 Maugey M ,
 Zakri C ,
 Poulin P
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Grosberg AY ,
 Khokhlov AR

↵
 van der Schoot P
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Israelachvili JN
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Hansen JP ,
 McDonald IR
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Berhan L ,
 Sastry AM
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Hu T ,
 Shklovskii BI

↵
 Sichel EK ,
 Gittleman JI ,
 Sheng P
 Sichel EK
 ↵
 ↵

↵
 Meier JG ,
 Mani JW ,
 Klüppel M
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
You May Also be Interested in
More Articles of This Classification
Physical Sciences
Related Content
Cited by...
 No citing articles found.