Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Gigantism in unique biogenic magnetite at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum

Dirk Schumann, Timothy D. Raub, Robert E. Kopp, Jean-Luc Guerquin-Kern, Ting-Di Wu, Isabelle Rouiller, Aleksey V. Smirnov, S. Kelly Sears, Uwe Lücken, Sonia M. Tikoo, Reinhard Hesse, Joseph L. Kirschvink, and Hojatollah Vali
  1. aDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montréal, QC, Canada H3A 2A7;
  2. bFacility for Electron Microscopy Research, and
  3. gDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, 3640 University Street, Montréal, QC, Canada H3A 2B2;
  4. cDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, MC 170-25 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125;
  5. dDepartment of Geosciences and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, 210 Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544;
  6. eImagerie Intégrative de la Molécule à l'Organisme, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 759, Institut Curie, 91405 Orsay, France;
  7. fLaboratoire de Microscopie Ionique, Institut Curie, 91405 Orsay, France;
  8. hDepartment of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931-1295; and
  9. iNanobiology Marketing, FEI Company, Eindhoven, 5600KA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS November 18, 2008 105 (46) 17648-17653; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803634105
Dirk Schumann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy D. Raub
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Kopp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Luc Guerquin-Kern
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ting-Di Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Rouiller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aleksey V. Smirnov
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Kelly Sears
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Lücken
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonia M. Tikoo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reinhard Hesse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph L. Kirschvink
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hojatollah Vali
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: vali@eps.mcgill.ca
  1. Edited by James Zachos, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, and accepted by the Editorial Board August 29, 2008 (received for review April 15, 2008)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We report the discovery of exceptionally large biogenic magnetite crystals in clay-rich sediments spanning the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) in a borehole at Ancora, NJ. Aside from previously described abundant bacterial magnetofossils, electron microscopy reveals novel spearhead-like and spindle-like magnetite up to 4 μm long and hexaoctahedral prisms up to 1.4 μm long. Similar to magnetite produced by magnetotactic bacteria, these single-crystal particles exhibit chemical composition, lattice perfection, and oxygen isotopes consistent with an aquatic origin. Electron holography indicates single-domain magnetization despite their large crystal size. We suggest that the development of a thick suboxic zone with high iron bioavailability—a product of dramatic changes in weathering and sedimentation patterns driven by severe global warming—drove diversification of magnetite-forming organisms, likely including eukaryotes.

  • biomineralization
  • electron microscopy
  • magnetofossil

Magnetofossils, geologically preserved magnetic particles produced most abundantly by magnetotactic bacteria, are recognized by distinctive physical and chemical traits and provide a record of past microbial ecosystems (1–3). Two recent papers (4, 5) report an extraordinary magnetofossil “Lagerstätte” in lowermost Eocene kaolinite-rich clay sediments deposited at subtropical paleolatitude in the Atlantic Coastal Plain of New Jersey. The sediments were deposited ≈55.6 million years ago during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), an ≈100- to 200-ky interval of ≈5–9°C abrupt global warming (5, 6). Kopp et al. (4) and Lippert and Zachos (5) use ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectroscopy (7), other rock magnetic methods, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of magnetic separates to characterize sediments from boreholes at Ancora (ODP Leg 174AX) (Fig. 1) and Wilson Lake, NJ, respectively. These sediments contain abundant, ≈40- to 300-nm cuboidal, elongate-prismatic, and bullet-shaped magnetofossils, sometimes arranged in short chains, resembling crystals in living magnetotactic bacteria (4, 5). Despite scarcity of intact magnetofossil chains, the asymmetry ratios of the FMR spectra reflect a profusion of elongate SD crystals and/or chains [FMR and Rock Magnetic Properties in supporting information (SI) Text]. It is not obvious whether the unusual abundance of magnetofossils reflects extraordinarily favorable preservation conditions or whether ecological changes enhanced growth of magnetotactic bacteria. Here we address both conundrums by reporting the discovery from these same sediments of exceptionally large and novel biogenic magnetite crystals unlike any previously reported from living organisms or from sediments.

Results and Discussion

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and TEM.

SEM and TEM analysis of the magnetic extracts reveals the presence of two large and previously unknown types of magnetofossils and uniquely large exemplars of a more common morphology. The first type of particle has a spearhead-like shape with flattened, bilateral symmetry (Fig. 2 A–C). These particles were possibly disaggregated from originally agglutinated, remarkable cellular armor (Fig. S1 and Movie S1). Their morphology can be described by a geometric three-axis coordinate system (Fig. 2D) that is not coincident with the crystallographic system. Length (axis 1) ranges from 2.0 to 3.8 μm, width (axis 2) ranges from 1.0 to 1.4 μm, and thickness (axis 3) ranges from 0.65 to 0.7 μm. The apex sector is characterized by well pronounced crystal faces resembling a six-sided pyramid-like structure.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Lithological profile of late Paleocene and early Eocene strata of ODP Leg 174AX, Ancora, NJ, plotted together with the fine quartz sand fraction, δ13Cinorganic, and FMR parameter α. The profile shows the abundance of different types of magnetite particles at examined sample horizons [lithological information from Miller et al. (37)]. Fine quartz sand fraction and δ13Cinorganic are from Kent et al. (38). FMR parameter α were taken from Kopp et al. (4).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

SEM images and drawings showing the morphological features of the spearhead-like magnetite particles. (A and B) SEM images of spearhead-like magnetite particles with pronounced growth steps in the stalk and lower part and well developed crystal faces near the spearhead tip. (C) SEM image of the spearhead-like particle reveals bilateral symmetry. Note abundant conventional magnetofossils surrounding the gigantic spearhead-like particles. (D) Models of idealized crystal habits of the spearhead-like particle shown in A constructed on the basis of the lattice fringe data obtained by HRTEM. These models show the top view (I), lateral view (II), back view (III), and front view (IV).

High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) of whole particles and of an ultrathin section prepared by focused ion beam (FIB) milling reveals that the spearhead-like particles are single, defect-free crystals of magnetite (i.e., magnetofossils) (Fig. 3 and Fig. S2 b and c). The {111} lattice fringes have a d-spacing of 0.48 nm and are nearly parallel to the long axis (axis 1) of the particle (Fig. 3B and Fig. S2c). Another set of lattice fringes with d-spacing of 0.296 nm are almost parallel to less-pronounced crystal faces at the tip (Fig. 3B) and tail sections of the particle and correspond to {220} fringes. HRTEM images show sets of lattice fringes with d-spacing of 0.25 nm parallel to four pyramidal sides that correspond to the {311} family of magnetite. The middle and “stalk” sectors of some particles show circumferential steps on the crystal surfaces (Fig. 2 A, B, and D I and II) indicating ontogenetic crystal growth from “stalk” toward crystal “tip” (Fig. 4). These steps, ranging from 10 to 29 nm, are pronounced in some particles. Numerous crystal fragments show parting along a {220} plane (Fig. S3), consistent with rare observations of large, untwined magnetite crystals under stress (8). Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy shows chemical composition consistent with magnetite (Fig. S4).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Low-resolution TEM image of a random projection of a spearhead-like particle (A) and a HRTEM image (B) of the tip of the same crystal showing one set of {111} lattice fringes parallel to the long axis of the crystal. High-resolution images of the tip area also reveal the presence of {220} crystal faces.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Allometry of the spearhead-like particles. Variance in stalk width and spearhead width are both ≈3.6% of those respective means. Variance in spearhead length, by contrast, is >15% of mean spearhead length, suggesting that spearhead-like particles continue to grow lengthwise after they reach a (perhaps itinerantly) maximum width and maintain a constant proportion between stalk and spearhead. This allometry is consistent with the sense of elongation required by assumed epitactic growth forming the tipward-convex, surface “step” features on both stalk and spearheads.

Whereas the dimensions of the spearhead-like particles are outside the SSD range for magnetite parallelepipeds (Fig. 5), electron holographic analysis reveals a uniform, centrally symmetric magnetization with electromagnetic field lines emerging at the tip of the particle (Fig. 6). Although the appearance of SD structure might reflect a metastable state imparted during the magnetic concentration process, we hypothesize that the crystal morphology could stabilize the SD state by inhibiting the development of “flower structures.”

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Domain-stability diagram of the upper limit for SD magnetization calculated from micromagnetic models of prismatic magnetite crystals (39). Interaction effects and chain arrangements increase this upper size limit, and shape anisotropy stabilizes SD behavior for any given maximum crystal size. The largest magnetosome crystals yet observed from living bacteria are indicated: the largest cuboidal particles from strain Itaipu-1 (40) and the largest hexaoctahedral prisms and bullet particles from the Ammersee and Moorsee, respectively (9). The large, unusual PETM magnetofossils of elongate hexaoctahedral and spindle-like morphologies are mostly stable single domain (SSD) or metastable single domain (MSD). We hypothesize that unusual crystal-tip truncations of these forms impede development of the metastable flower-like structure magnetization. Spearhead-like magnetite crystals are of a size that should be multidomain, attesting to the likelihood of their nonmagnetotactic biological function. Other considerations suggest that these crystal forms may have been used for protection by iron-biomineralizing eukaryotes.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Contour images obtained from the magnetic contribution to the holographic phase for the spearhead-like magnetite particles. (A) Center-symmetric, uniform-magnetized particle. (B) Electromagnetic field lines emerging from the tip of the same particle.

The second novel crystal morphology observed in these samples is spindle-like and tapered at each end (Fig. 7). This type of particle has a width of 0.5 μm and a length of up to 3.3 μm. Both ends of the particle exhibit well pronounced crystal faces resembling a six-sided trapezohedron. The third crystal habit is an extremely long, defect-free hexaoctahedral crystal with well developed crystal faces and a length-to-width ratio as high as ≈10 (Figs. 5 and 8). Lattice-fringe images and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analyses (Fig. S4) of both the second and third types of particle also suggest chemical composition and structure consistent with magnetite. Their size and shape imply that these crystals lie within the SD (SSD) stability field of magnetite (Fig. 5). Crystal type three appears to be similar to elongate hexaoctahedral magnetosome crystals described from living bacteria and magnetofossils but stretched up to ≈1.4 μm in length. By contrast, the largest such crystals described from bacteria of Quaternary Bahamian sediments are ≈170 nm long (9), and the longest magnetofossil reported previously is ≈580 nm in length (M. W. Hounslow, personal communication). Unlike most bacterial magnetite, however, these particles have been observed not in chains, but rather in isolation or in aggregates of originally isolated crystals (Fig. 8A and Fig. S2a).

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

SEM images show tapered, spindle-like magnetite particles with well developed crystal faces. The crystal morphology suggests a six-sided trapezohedron habit (Inset in B).

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

TEM images show an overview (A) and lattice fringes (B) of elongated hexaoctahedral magnetite particles. The lattice-fringe image (B) of the tip of an individual crystal (Inset) shows two sets of defect-free {111} lattice fringes with d-spacings of 0.48 nm.

Oxygen Isotopes.

To constrain the crystallization temperature of the spearhead-like particles, we measured the oxygen isotopic composition of individual crystals using NanoSIMS (Fig. 9). The primary goal of this analysis was to assess whether the particles could have been formed at the low temperatures necessary for a biogenic origin. Assuming that the magnetic particles were formed at low temperature in equilibrium with calcite produced by benthic foraminifera, we used the calcite–water fractionation equation of O'Neil et al. (10) and the bacterial magnetite–water fractionation of Mandernack et al. (11) to derive a calcite–magnetite fractionation equation and estimate a paleotemperature of magnetite formation (Table S1). Benthic foraminifera of the taxa Cibicidoides from the PETM interval at Wilson Lake, NJ, have a δ18OVPDB of approximately −3.0‰ (12). By coupling carbonate and magnetite isotopic measurements (Table S1) we calculated a 1-standard deviation (σ) temperature range of −5° to 34°C. Owing to the imprecision of current measurement techniques, we are unable to improve upon prior benthic temperature estimates, but our calculated 1σ temperature range (−5° to 34°C) is consistent with previous estimates from carbonate oxygen isotopes and from the TEX-86 organic biomarker proxy (24–34°C) (12). Our mean δ18OVSMOW estimate of −1.2‰ is distinct from that of metamorphic magnetite (approximately +15‰) in regional highlands at Franklin Furnace and Sterling Hill, NJ (13).

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Images of a spearhead-like particle prepared by focused ion beam milling. False-color NanoSIMS images of the 16O− (A), 18O− (B), and FeO− (C) composition of one of the spearhead-like magnetite particles milled in half by the FIB. Bright colors (white or yellow) indicate higher amounts of the measured oxygen isotopes or iron oxide. The SEM image (D) shows the copper grid with two spearhead-like particles mounted with tungsten to the grid. The analyses were performed on the particle outlined by the circle.

Speculation on Origin and Function.

Owing to the cubic crystal symmetry of magnetite, abiogenic magnetite formed at high temperature most commonly exhibits octahedral morphology. Unusual asymmetric habits and whiskers have been reported from exsolution processes, crystallization in anisotropic environments such as lava flows (14), and high-temperature, vapor-phase crystallization (15). Low-temperature anisotropic morphologies, however, are known only from biologically controlled systems (16). Magnetite biomineralization was originally discovered in chiton teeth (17), where magnetite provides a hard mineral for scraping limestone. It has subsequently been found in magnetotactic bacteria (18), algae (19), honey bees, homing pigeons, fish, and even the human brain (20). In all these latter cases, the morphology, size, structural arrangement, and even the magnetic sensory function resemble closely those of particles produced by magnetotactic bacteria that may show isometric cubooctahedral and elongate hexaoctahedral habits, as well as irregular and elongate bullet, tooth, and arrowhead-like shapes.

Because the spearhead- and spindle-like particles exhibit a complex, nonequidimensional, anisotropic morphology and low-temperature isotopic composition, an abiogenic origin is unlikely. Allometric inferences bolster the case for biogenicity (Fig. 4). Variation of both stalk width and spearhead width of spearhead-like particles spans only ≈3.6% of the mean values for those measures. Spearhead-length variance, by contrast, exceeds 15% of mean spearhead length. Uniform three-dimensional growth, even at different rates along long and short axes, could not produce this asymmetric size variance. This pattern would be produced, however, if the spearhead-like particles continued to grow lengthwise after reaching a (possibly itinerant) maximum width, with constant proportion of stalk and spearhead widths. Such allometric growth is also consistent with the sense of elongation required by assumed epitactic growth forming the tipward-convex, surface “step” features on both stalk and spearheads (Fig. 2 A and B).

Because the size of these crystals is the same as or exceeds the size of most bacteria, they are likely the products of eukaryotes. The single-crystal particles identified here have dimensions in the realm of skeletal elements, such as silica in diatoms and radiolaria, carbonate or silica in sponge spicules, or iron phosphates in holothurian spicules (21), although they are chemically and morphologically dissimilar in detail from any modern or other fossil analogues (Paleontology Searching for Modern Analogues in SI Text). We are unaware of any other biogenic structure of these sizes and shapes. The biological function of these new magnetite particles is uncertain; the organisms that formed them could have used the particles for their magnetic properties or, as in chiton teeth (17), for their hardness. A few apparently intact, tip-outward assemblages of the spearhead-like particles (Fig. S1 and Movie S1), and the inference of shear-induced parting of individual spearhead crystals (Fig. S3), suggest that these forms may have served a structural purpose, perhaps as protective armor surrounding an ≈5- to 10-μm cell.

Environmental Implications.

The abundance of fossil magnetotactic bacteria on the Atlantic Coastal Plain during the PETM (4, 5) could be explained by enhanced production, enhanced preservation, or both. The presence of novel, large, presumably eukaryotic magnetofossils argues that changes in growth conditions are a major part of the explanation. Considering that bacterial magnetofossils are also present (although less abundant) and well preserved in the sediments below and above the PETM clay (Fig. S5) as well as in a sand lens within PETM clay (4), the presence of these new forms in the PETM clay is unlikely to be a preservation artifact. There is also no evidence for extensive dissolution of magnetofossils, similar to that observed in some marine sediments, within or outside of the PETM (3). No modern or other fossil analogs of the organisms that formed the giant magnetofossils have yet been found (Paleontology Searching for Modern Analogues in SI Text).

Together with the bacterial magnetofossils, the presence of these new magnetite forms suggests that global warming at the PETM drove locally dramatic changes in the biogeochemical cycling of iron, resulting in an enlarged, meter-scale suboxic zone (22, 23). Just as the ready availability of iron sulfide at hydrothermal vents has permitted the evolution of animals using magnetic iron sulfides to construct protective structures (24), the high availability of iron in a thick suboxic zone may have fostered the growth, and perhaps evolutionary radiation, of magnetotactic and other iron-biomineralizing organisms.

Several lines of evidence suggest a global trend toward enhanced surface productivity during the PETM. Apectodinium, a dinoflagellate taxa that has a heterotrophic motile stage believed to be associated with higher productivity, spreads globally from a low-latitude source during the PETM (25). Bathyal sediments from several sites in the Tethys, Atlantic, and Southern Oceans show an increase in biogenic barium, a tracer of organic matter export from surface to deep water (26, 27). [On the other hand, nanofossils from bathyal sediments in the central Pacific indicate a transition from a late-Paleocene oligotrophic environment to a highly stressed, presumably severely nutrient-limited environment during the PETM (28).]

At Wilson Lake, consistent with enhanced nutrient delivery to the coastal plain, oligotrophic nanofossil taxa are replaced with mesotrophic taxa for the entire duration of the PETM (28). Notably, the Apectodinium acme occurs during the onset of the carbon isotopic excursion, the first ≈15% of the ≈16-m interval recording the carbon isotope excursion (29). A short-lived spike in organic carbon content (to ≈0.8 wt%) occurs near the end of this interval, followed by a dip to near-zero organic carbon comparable in duration to the Apectodinium acme, which is in turn followed by a return to the relatively low late Paleocene organic carbon levels of ≈0.4 wt% (5).

Although magnetotactic bacteria can thrive in the meter-scales oxic–anoxic transition zones of eutrophic water columns (e.g., refs. 30 and 31), such environments are not ideal for the preservation of magnetofossils. The organic-rich sediments deposited under such conditions promote reductive dissolution (1, 31). In contrast, suboxic but organic-lean sediments provide ideal conditions for both the growth and preservation of magnetofossils.

Possible analog environments, combining high surface productivity with low-organic carbon density sediments and meter-scale sedimentary suboxic zones (32), are provided by tropical shelves fed by energetic river systems, such as the Amazon (33). Because of intense tropical weathering, the supply of reactive iron in such settings is approximately double that of temperate deltaic environments (34). Physical reworking, which facilitates the reoxidation of iron and thereby enhances its effective supply as an oxidant, also plays an important role in establishing a thick suboxic zone. During the PETM, similar dynamics may have developed in an Appalachian-fed deltaic system along the Atlantic Coastal Plain of New Jersey, although the energy level of the delta need not have been as great as that of tropical systems, given evidence for a low supply of terrestrial organic carbon (12) and thus reduced oxidant demand. In addition to the sedimentary and nanofossil evidence for enhanced runoff discharge to the New Jersey continental shelf (12, 29), this analog is also consistent with the intense weathering conditions that promote kaolinite development (35). Abrupt establishment of such an environment indicates the power of a ≈5–9°C global warming event to reshape sedimentary and biological processes.

Methods

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analysis.

Magnetic separates were extracted (2) from 15 samples of the Ancora drillcore (ODP Leg 174AX) ranging from 165.20 m to 173.15 m in depth (Fig. 1). The separates were transferred onto 300-mesh Cu TEM grids with carbon support film and studied by using either the JEOL JEM-2000FX TEM at 80 kV or the JEOL-JEM 2100F FE-TEM at 200 kV, the latter equipped with an Oxford INCA microanalytical system, and a Hitachi S-4700 FE-STEM at accelerating voltages ranging from 2 to 5 kV and an emission current of 15 μA.

FIB Milling.

Three spearhead-like magnetite particles were separated from the magnetic extract by using a microsampling device in a Hitachi FB-2000A FIB system and mounted on a half-circular copper grid for ion milling. One particle was ion-milled to a thickness of ≈100 nm for lattice-fringe imaging and selected-area electron diffraction. Two other particles were milled from one side to create a smooth surface for oxygen isotopic analyses.

Elemental Mapping (O, Fe) and Oxygen Isotope (18O, 16O) Analysis by Nanosecondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (NanoSIMS).

Oxygen isotopic ratios were measured by using a NanoSIMS-50 microprobe (Cameca) at an operating current of ≈1 pA. Ion images for 16O− and 18O−, as well as for FeO− (for monitoring Fe distribution), were generated by using an image definition of 128 × 128 pixels while a Cs+ beam was scanned over a field of view of 5 μm × 5 μm. The images acquired through NanoSIMS analysis for 16O− and for 18O− were used to calculate the isotopic ratio of 18O/16O pixel-to-pixel. To provide precise measurement of the isotopic ratio of 18O/16O on the magnetite crystal, a long acquisition time was used. This was achieved by acquiring 95 frames with a dwell time of 3 ms per pixel for each frame. The total counting time per pixel was 60–75 ms. The acquired image series was then processed by using ImageJ, a public domain Java Image processing program. For each frame, a new image representing the ratio of 18O to 16O for each pixel was generated by dividing the image of 18O− to the one of 16O−. During this operation, all of the 16O− images were corrected with the dead-time loss (44 ns) of the detection system owing to the high ion intensity for this major isotope. SIMS analysis generally requires the use of a reference standard for quantitative measurement. In this analysis, we used the surface oxide on the copper mounting grid as a reference. Owing to the limited number of measurements, there is a wide range of isotopic variation. The relative error for a single measurement is 0.58% (or 5.8‰). To achieve a precision of 1‰, 30 measurements for a total time of 8–9 h would be required.

Off-Axis Electron Holography.

Off-axis electron holography was performed in a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 X-Twin TEM at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The electron holograms were obtained at a biprism voltage of 105 V by using the Lorentz lens and recorded with a Gatan Ultrascan 1000 CCD camera at the nominal microscope magnification of ×1,500. The contour images of the magnetic contribution to the holographic phase were obtained according to the procedure of Midgley (36).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge comments from Boswell Wing, Adam Maloof, Nicholas Swanson-Hysell, and Harunur Rashid and technical assistance from Jeannie Mui. We are grateful to the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which improved the final version of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies to the Centre for Biorecognition and Biosensors (H.V.) and the NASA Exobiology program (J.L.K.). Samples were provided by the Ocean Drilling Program, which is sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation and by participating countries under management of Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Inc.

Footnotes

  • 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vali{at}eps.mcgill.ca
  • Author contributions: D.S. and H.V. designed research; D.S., J.-L.G.-K., T.-D.W., I.R., S.K.S., U.L., and H.V. performed research; D.S., T.D.R., R.E.K., I.R., A.V.S., S.M.T., R.H., J.L.K., and H.V. analyzed data; and D.S., T.D.R., R.E.K., S.M.T., J.L.K., and H.V. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. J.Z. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

  • See Commentary on page 17595.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0803634105/DCSupplemental.

  • © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kopp RE,
    2. Kirschvink JL
    (2008) The identification and biogeochemical interpretation of fossil magnetotactic bacteria. Earth Sci Rev 86:42–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Petersen N,
    2. von Dobeneck T,
    3. Vali H
    (1986) Fossil bacterial magnetite in deep-sea sediments from the South-Atlantic Ocean. Nature 320:611–615.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Vali H,
    2. Kirschvink JL
    (1989) Magnetofossil dissolution in a paleomagnetically unstable deep-sea sediment. Nature 339:203–206.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Kopp RE,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Paleoceanography, Magnetofossil spike during the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum: Ferromagnetic resonance, rock magnetic, and electron microscopy evidence from Ancora, New Jersey, United States. doi: 10.1029/2007PA001473.
  5. ↵
    1. Lippert PC,
    2. Zachos JC
    (2007) A biogenic origin for anomalous fine-grained magnetic material at the Paleocene–Eocene boundary at Wilson Lake, New Jersey. Paleoceanography, doi: 10.1029/2007PA001471.
  6. ↵
    1. Bowen GJ,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Eocene hyperthermal event offers insight into greenhouse warming. Trans Am Geophys Union 87:165–169.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Kopp RE,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Chains, clumps, and strings: Magnetofossil taphonomy with ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 247:10–25.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Greig JW,
    2. Merwin HE,
    3. Posnjak E
    (1936) Separation planes in magnetite. Am Mineral 21:504–510.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Frankel RB,
    2. Blakemore RP
    1. Vali H,
    2. Kirschvink JL
    (1990) in Iron Biominerals, eds Frankel RB, Blakemore RP (Plenum, New York), pp 97–115.
  10. ↵
    1. O'Neil JR,
    2. Clayton RN,
    3. Mayeda TK
    (1969) Oxygen isotope fractionation in divalent metal carbonates. J Chem Phys 51:5547–5558.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Mandernack KW,
    2. Bazylinski DA,
    3. Shanks WC,
    4. Bullen TD
    (1999) Oxygen and iron isotope studies of magnetite produced by magnetotactic bacteria. Science 285:1892–1896.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Zachos JC,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Extreme warming of mid-latitude coastal ocean during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Inferences from TEX86 and isotope data. Geology 34:737–740.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Johnson CA,
    2. Skinner BJ
    (2003) Geochemistry of the furnace magnetite bed, Franklin, New Jersey, and the relationship between stratiform iron oxide ores and stratiform zinc oxide-silicate ores in the new Jersey Highlands. Econ Geol Bull Soc 98:837–854.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Ma C,
    2. Rossman GR,
    3. Miller JA
    (2007) The origin of color in “fire” obsidian. Can Mineral 45:551–557.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Bradley JP,
    2. Harvey RP,
    3. McSween HY
    (1996) Magnetite whiskers and platelets in the ALH84001 Martian meteorite: Evidence of vapor phase growth. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:5149–5155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Mann S,
    2. Sparks NHC,
    3. Blakemore RP
    (1987) Structure, morphology and crystal-growth of anisotropic magnetite crystals in magnetotactic bacteria. Proc R Soc London B 231:477–487.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Lowenstam HA
    (1962) Magnetite in denticle capping in recent chitons (Polyplacophora) Geol Soc Am Bull 73:435–438.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Blakemore R
    (1975) Magnetotactic Bacteria. Science 190:377–379.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. de Araujo FFT,
    2. Pires MA,
    3. Frankel RB,
    4. Bicudo CEM
    (1986) Magnetite and magnetotaxis in algae. Biophys J 50:375–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Bäuerlein E
    1. Kirschvink JL,
    2. Hagadorn JW
    (2000) in The Biomineralisation of Nano- and Micro-Structures, ed Bäuerlein E (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany), pp 139–150.
  21. ↵
    1. Lowenstam HA
    (1989) Spicular morphology and mineralogy in some Pyuridae (Ascidiacea) Bull Mar Sci 45:243–252.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Dickens GR,
    2. Francis JM
    (2004) Comment on “A case for a comet impact trigger for the Paleocene/Eocene thermal maximum and carbon isotope excursion.”. Earth Planet Sci Lett 217:197–200.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Dickens GR
    (2008) Palaeoclimate: The riddle of the clays. Nat Geosci 1:86–88.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Suzuki Y,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Sclerite formation in the hydrothermal-vent “scaly-foot” gastropod—possible control of iron sulfide biomineralization by the animal. Earth Planet Sci Lett 242:39–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Crouch EM,
    2. et al.
    (2001) Global dinoflagellate event associated with the late Paleocene thermal maximum. Geology 29:315–318.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Schmitz B,
    2. Charisi SD,
    3. Thompson EI,
    4. Speijer RP
    (1997) Barium, SiO2 (excess), and P2O5 as proxies of biological productivity in the Middle East during the Palaeocene and the latest Palaeocene benthic extinction event. Terra Nova 9:95–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Bains S,
    2. Norris RD,
    3. Corfield RM,
    4. Faul KL
    (2000) Termination of global warmth at the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary through productivity feedback. Nature 407:171–174.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Gibbs SJ,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Shelf and open-ocean calcareous phytoplankton assemblages across the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum: Implications for global productivity gradients. Geology 34:233–236.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Sluijs A,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Environmental precursors to rapid light carbon injection at the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary. Nature 450:1218–1221.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Simmons SL,
    2. et al.
    (2004) Spatiotemporal distribution of marine magnetotactic bacteria in a seasonally stratified coastal salt pond. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6230–6239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Kim BY,
    2. Kodama KP,
    3. Moeller RE
    (2005) Bacterial magnetite produced in water column dominates lake sediment mineral magnetism: Lake Ely, USA. Geophys J Int 163:26–37.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Aller RC,
    2. Blair NE
    (2006) Carbon remineralization in the Amazon-Guianas tropical mobile mudbelt: A sedimentary incinerator. Cont Shelf Res 26:2241–2259.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Aller RC
    (1998) Mobile deltaic and continental shelf muds as suboxic, fluidized bed reactors. Mar Chem 61:143–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Aller RC,
    2. Hannides A,
    3. Heilbrun C,
    4. Panzeca C
    (2004) Coupling of early diagenetic processes and sedimentary dynamics in tropical shelf environments: The Gulf of Papua deltaic complex. Cont Shelf Res 24:2455–2486.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Gibson TG,
    2. Bybell LM,
    3. Mason DB
    (2000) Stratigraphic and climatic implications of clay mineral changes around the Paleocene/Eocene boundary of the northeastern US margin. Sediment Geol 134:65–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Midgley PA
    (2001) An introduction to off-axis electron holography. Micron 32:167–184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Miller KG,
    2. et al.
    1. Miller KG,
    2. et al.
    (1999) in Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, ed Miller KG, et al. (Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, TX), pp 1–65.
  38. ↵
    1. Kent DV,
    2. et al.
    (2003) A case for a comet impact trigger for the Paleocene/Eocene thermal maximum and carbon isotope excursion. Earth Planet Sci Lett 211:13–26.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Muxworthy AR,
    2. Williams W
    (2006) J Geophys Res Solid Earth, Critical single-domain/multidomain grain sizes in noninteracting and interacting elongated magnetite particles: Implications for magnetosomes. doi: 10.1029/2006JB004588, 111, p B12S12.
  40. ↵
    1. Spring S,
    2. et al.
    (1998) Phylogenetic affiliation and ultrastructure of uncultured magnetic bacteria with unusually large magnetosomes. Arch Microbiol 169:136–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gigantism in unique biogenic magnetite at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Gigantism in unique biogenic magnetite at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum
Dirk Schumann, Timothy D. Raub, Robert E. Kopp, Jean-Luc Guerquin-Kern, Ting-Di Wu, Isabelle Rouiller, Aleksey V. Smirnov, S. Kelly Sears, Uwe Lücken, Sonia M. Tikoo, Reinhard Hesse, Joseph L. Kirschvink, Hojatollah Vali
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2008, 105 (46) 17648-17653; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803634105

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Gigantism in unique biogenic magnetite at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum
Dirk Schumann, Timothy D. Raub, Robert E. Kopp, Jean-Luc Guerquin-Kern, Ting-Di Wu, Isabelle Rouiller, Aleksey V. Smirnov, S. Kelly Sears, Uwe Lücken, Sonia M. Tikoo, Reinhard Hesse, Joseph L. Kirschvink, Hojatollah Vali
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2008, 105 (46) 17648-17653; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803634105
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Geology

Related Articles

  • Big discovery for biogenic magnetite
    - Nov 13, 2008
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 105 (46)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Indus River.
Lockdowns and snow melt in South Asia
Relatively clean snow and ice in the Indus River Basin during the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced meltwater in 2020, compared with the 20-year average.
Image credit: Pixabay/Abdullah_Shakoor.
Water ice clouds on modern Mars.
Greenhouse warming of early Mars
Atmospheric and climate conditions could have created a cloud greenhouse effect to warm Mars and support liquid surface water.
Image credit: NASA/JPL/MSSS.
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19.
Risk of indoor aerosol transmission
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19 that goes beyond the six-foot social distancing guideline.
Image credit: Pixabay/Matryx.
People work in rice paddies.
Inner Workings: Keeping arsenic out of rice
Interventions include using rice husks, manipulating paddy water and soil, and genetic changes that could stop arsenic from reaching the grain.
Image credit: Angelia Seyfferth.
Aerial view of modern wastewater treatment plants with aeration tanks and clarification tanks.
News Feature: Microbes for better sewage treatment
Going beyond conventional approaches, researchers are using carefully cultured bacterial communities to improve sewage treatment.
Image credit: Shutterstock/chekart.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.