Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Commentary

Inhibitory interneurons and network oscillations

David Dupret, Barty Pleydell-Bouverie, and Jozsef Csicsvari
  1. aMedical Research Council Anatomical Neuropharmacology Unit, and
  2. bDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, United Kingdom

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS November 25, 2008 105 (47) 18079-18080; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810064105
David Dupret
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barty Pleydell-Bouverie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jozsef Csicsvari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jozsef.csicsvari@pharm.ox.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Neuronal networks in the brain oscillate in various frequency bands, and such oscillations can be detected by observing local field potential or EEG activity (1). Oscillations in the gamma frequency band (30–80 Hz) have drawn special attention because of their link to a variety of cognitive processes including sensory binding (2), attention selection (3), and memory (4, 5). Of particular physiological interest are questions of how gamma oscillations are generated and synchronized across brain regions. The study by Middleton et al. in this issue of PNAS (6) provides novel insights into these questions: it identifies 2 subcircuits within the entorhinal cortex (EC) that are capable of generating gamma oscillations at different frequencies. Moreover, it presents data implying that these generators recruit different neuronal pathways in their communication with the hippocampus. Their study points out for the first time the specialized role of inhibitory interneuron types in generating oscillatory patterns at different frequencies. Given that both the hippocampo–EC system and gamma oscillations are linked to memory processing, the temporal interactions between the EC and the hippocampus at these distinct gamma frequencies could be involved in different aspects of mnemonic processes.

The report by Middleton et al. (6) examines the mechanism behind how gamma oscillations are generated in the EC with an emphasis on the effect of the NMDA receptor activation: a key glutamatergic receptor for synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Using an in vitro preparation of the EC, they demonstrate that gamma oscillations slow down when NMDA receptors (NMDARs) are blocked by ketamine (an NMDAR antagonist). They then show that NMDA-dependent (fast, ≈40 Hz) and NMDA-independent (slow, ≈30 Hz) gamma rhythms are generated by functionally distinct subcircuits (Fig. 1). Both subcircuits consist of EC excitatory principal cells and inhibitory interneurons whose reciprocal interactions lead to oscillations. However, Middleton et al. find that these subcircuits include 2 distinct types of interneurons. The interneurons participating in the first subcircuit are the basket cells whose cell bodies are located in the layer II of the EC. NMDAR activation leads to a prominent tonic excitation of these basket cells that interact with principal cells to generate ≈40-Hz gamma rhythm (Fig. 1A). These basket cells, however, have another function: they suppress the activity of interneurons in the second subcircuit. The cell bodies of these latter interneurons are located in layer III of the EC and are called “goblet” cells, newly-discovered by the Middleton et al. study (6). In the absence of NMDAR-mediated excitation in the EC, the decreased spiking activity of the basket interneurons reduces the inhibition they exert on goblet cells. The release of goblet cells from inhibition allows them to participate in the reciprocal interaction with principal cells (Fig. 1B), leading to the generation of the second gamma rhythm at a lower frequency (≈30 Hz). Based on the results of the experiments, a biophysical model was created that confirmed that these 2 types of gamma oscillations can be generated by using the microcircuit architecture described above. Finally, the Middleton et al. study (6) shows that hippocampal regions in vitro have a selective preference for slow or fast gamma oscillations: whereas the CA1 region preferentially oscillates with ≈40-Hz oscillations, the CA3 region prefers slower ≈30-Hz oscillations. Hence NMDA-dependent EC gamma oscillations may preferentially synchronize with the CA1 region, whereas NMDA-independent EC gamma oscillations may recruit coherent oscillations with the CA3 region.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Schematic illustration of the gamma-generating EC microcircuit described in Middleton et al.'s study (6). The circuit is composed of 2 subcircuits: the principal cell (Pc)–basket cell (Bc) and the principal cell–goblet cell (Gc) loops. These 2 subcircuits generate mutually exclusive ≈40- and ≈30-Hz gamma oscillations. (Upper) Illustration of the microcircuit. (Lower) Raster plots illustrate the firing of the different cell types during gamma oscillations. (A) Fast (≈40 Hz) gamma oscillations are generated through the recurrent interactions between basket cells and principal cells. Such interaction requires NMDAR-mediated depolarization of basket cells. Basket cells inhibit goblet cells, preventing the activation of the pyramidal cell–goblet cell loop. (B) Slow (≈30 Hz) gamma oscillations are generated similarly by goblet cells and principal cells. In the absence of NMDAR-mediated excitation, the spiking activity of basket cells is reduced, releasing goblet cells to interact with principal cells.

The surprising finding in the Middleton et al. study (6) is that 2 gamma patterns are generated locally by 2 different types of interneurons. Previous work in vivo has demonstrated that hippocampal GABAergic interneuron types exhibit differentiable firing patterns in relation to network oscillations, indicating that they have specialized roles in controlling various oscillations in the brain (7). Similarly, previous work in vitro has demonstrated that both interneuron—interneuron and pyramidal cell–interneuron interactions can generate the gamma rhythm in the hippocampus, a result predicted by modeling work (8–12). The important finding of Middleton et al.'s study is the demonstration that certain interneurons have a specialized role in generating an oscillation at a certain frequency band. Moreover, their work also highlights that interneuron–interneuron interactions could regulate which rhythm generator subcircuit is activated at a given time. Because gamma patterns described in slice studies have been shown to share the same features as the ones present in vivo (12, 13), Middleton et al.'s study lays the foundation for future work in behaving animals.

In behaving animals, previous work has identified 2 distinct gamma-generating circuits in the hippocampus–EC system: one in the CA3–CA1 regions generating gamma oscillations locally, and another one in dentate gyrus driven by the EC (13). It is quite likely that the mechanisms by which gamma oscillatory patterns are generated in vivo are more complex than have been described so far. More detailed analysis will require simultaneous recordings in different subfields of the hippocampus and the EC to examine the details of gamma synchronization across these regions. Moreover, further investigation is needed to test whether gamma subbands (e.g., ≈30 and ≈40 Hz) exhibit differences in network synchronization and whether 2 distinct gamma patterns occur during in vivo physiological conditions within the EC.

What could be the functional significance of the 2 distinct EC gamma rhythms? Learning and memory are known to emerge from complex interactions among distributed brain networks. As the interface between the hippocampus and the neocortex, the EC occupies a critical gateway for the processing and transfer of information related to episodic and spatial memories. In this context Middleton et al.'s study (6) proposes that NMDAR activation could control the nature of the temporal interaction between the EC and the hippocampus by switching from one gamma pattern to another. Thus, NMDAR activation may govern the proportion by which each pathway is recruited to process information during, for example, the rapid acquisition of new information versus the retrieval of previously learned ones. Indeed, there are both human and animal studies suggesting that gamma oscillations in the hippocampus have such a role in memory processing, particularly in short-term memory (4, 5, 14). Interestingly, gamma oscillations are often nested within slower theta-band (4–12 Hz) oscillations (15). Thus, it has been proposed that memory sequences can be encoded by the firing patterns of cells in successive gamma cycles nested within each theta cycle (16). Recently, it was revealed in the hippocampus of behaving animals that gamma-related firing during theta oscillations can support the formation of such a temporal code (17). However, 2 distinct populations of hippocampal principal cells were differentiated in the CA1 region, representing movement trajectories and places, which each support different types of population codes within a theta cycle. Although the coding of movement trajectories may require the CA3 region (18), location representations could originate directly from the EC (19). Thus, the dual gamma generators described in the EC by Middleton et al. (6) and their differential communication with the CA3 and CA1 regions could support the 2 forms of coding observed.

Hippocampal regions in vitro have a selective preference for slow or fast gamma oscillations.

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Micklem for preparing Fig. 1.

Footnotes

  • 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jozsef.csicsvari{at}pharm.ox.ac.uk
  • Author contributions: D.D., B.P.-B., and J.C. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 18572.

  • © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Buzsaki G,
    2. Draguhn A
    (2004) Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304:1926–1929.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Engel AK,
    2. Fries P,
    3. Singer W
    (2001) Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:704–716.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Fries P,
    2. Neuenschwander S,
    3. Engel AK,
    4. Goebel R,
    5. Singer W
    (2001) Rapid feature selective neuronal synchronization through correlated latency shifting. Nat Neurosci 4:194–200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Howard MW,
    2. et al.
    (2003) Gamma oscillations correlate with working memory load in humans. Cereb Cortex 13:1369–1374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Fuchs EC,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Recruitment of parvalbumin-positive interneurons determines hippocampal function and associated behavior. Neuron 53:591–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Middleton S,
    2. et al.
    (2008) NMDA receptor-dependent switching between different gamma rhythm-generating microcircuits in entorhinal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:18572–18577.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Klausberger T,
    2. Somogyi P
    (2008) Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: The unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science 321:53–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Whittington MA,
    2. Traub RD,
    3. Jefferys JG
    (1995) Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature 373:612–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Traub RD,
    2. Whittington MA,
    3. Stanford IM,
    4. Jefferys JG
    (1996) A mechanism for generation of long-range synchronous fast oscillations in the cortex. Nature 383:621–624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Traub RD,
    2. et al.
    (2000) A model of gamma-frequency network oscillations induced in the rat CA3 region by carbachol in vitro. Eur J Neurosci 12:4093–4106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Borgers C,
    2. Epstein S,
    3. Kopell NJ
    (2005) Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: A computational study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7002–7007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Oren I,
    2. Mann EO,
    3. Paulsen O,
    4. Hajos N
    (2006) Synaptic currents in anatomically identified CA3 neurons during hippocampal gamma oscillations in vitro. J Neurosci 26:9923–9934.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Csicsvari J,
    2. Jamieson B,
    3. Wise KD,
    4. Buzsaki G
    (2003) Mechanisms of gamma oscillations in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. Neuron 37:311–322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Montgomery SM,
    2. Buzsaki G
    (2007) Gamma oscillations dynamically couple hippocampal CA3 and CA1 regions during memory task performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:14495–14500.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Bragin A,
    2. et al.
    (1995) Gamma (40–100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. J Neurosci 15:47–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  16. ↵
    1. Lisman JE,
    2. Idiart MA
    (1995) Storage of 7 +/− 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles. Science 267:1512–1515.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Senior TJ,
    2. Huxter JR,
    3. Allen K,
    4. O'Neill J,
    5. Csicsvari J
    (2008) Gamma oscillatory firing reveals distinct populations of pyramidal cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. J Neurosci 28:2274–2286.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Maurer AP,
    2. Cowen SL,
    3. Burke SN,
    4. Barnes CA,
    5. McNaughton BL
    (2006) Organization of hippocampal cell assemblies based on theta phase precession. Hippocampus 16:785–794.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Brun VH,
    2. et al.
    (2002) Place cells and place recognition maintained by direct entorhinal-hippocampal circuitry. Science 296:2243–2246.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhibitory interneurons and network oscillations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inhibitory interneurons and network oscillations
David Dupret, Barty Pleydell-Bouverie, Jozsef Csicsvari
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2008, 105 (47) 18079-18080; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810064105

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Inhibitory interneurons and network oscillations
David Dupret, Barty Pleydell-Bouverie, Jozsef Csicsvari
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2008, 105 (47) 18079-18080; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810064105
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Related Articles

  • NMDA receptor-dependent switching between different gamma rhythm-generating microcircuits in entorhinal cortex
    - Nov 07, 2008
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 105 (47)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490