Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Perspective

An emerging movement ecology paradigm

Ran Nathan
PNAS December 9, 2008 105 (49) 19050-19051; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808918105
Ran Nathan
The Movement Ecology Laboratory, Department of Evolution, Systematics, and Ecology, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rnathan@cc.huji.ac.il
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Movement of individual organisms, one of the most fundamental features of life on Earth, is a crucial component of almost any ecological and evolutionary process, including major problems associated with habitat fragmentation, climate change, biological invasions, and the spread of pests and diseases. The rich variety of movement modes seen among microorganisms, plants, and animals has fascinated mankind since time immemorial. The prophet Jeremiah (7th century B.C.), for instance, described the temporal consistency in migratory patterns of birds, and Aristotle (4th century B.C.) searched for common features unifying animal movements (see ref. 1).

Modern movement research, however, is characterized by a broad range of specialized scientific approaches, each developed to explore a different type of movement carried out by a specific group of organisms (2). Beyond this separation across movement types and taxonomic (or functional) groups, movement research divides into four different “paradigms,” the random, biomechanical, cognitive, and optimality approaches (1), which are loosely linked to each other. Although movement research is extensive and is growing rapidly (2), specialization has its cost: measurement and analysis tools are repeatedly reinvented, and lessons learned from one line of research often do not affect others. Most importantly, we lacked a cohesive framework that would serve as a unifying theme for developing a general theory of organism movement.

This Special Feature lays the foundation for “movement ecology” as a unifying paradigm for studying all types of movement involving all organisms. The term movement ecology has been used occasionally in the literature [as of August 2008, a search of movement ecology in the title, abstract, or keywords in the ISI Web of Knowledge database (http://apps.isiknowledge.com) yielded 18 publications, the first of which was published in 1976], chiefly referring to ecological interactions associated with animal movement. However, the movement ecology concept underlying this Special Feature is markedly different. It refers to a proposed scientific paradigm that places movement itself as the focal theme, and, by providing a unifying framework and common tools, it aims at promoting the development of an integrative theory of organism movement for better understanding the causes, mechanisms, patterns, and consequences of all movement phenomena.

This Special Feature is based on an international project held at the Institute for Advanced Studies (IAS) in Jerusalem from 2006 to 2007 (3). Three of the 12 contributions, presenting a general conceptual framework (1), a literature review (2), and a framework for generating and analyzing movement paths (4), are direct products of this IAS project. Three other contributions are coauthored by IAS group members; they illustrate applications of the proposed conceptual framework for seed dispersal (5), foraging and other movements of elephants (6), and dispersal of lynx (7). The remaining six contributions were solicited from other research groups to broaden the scope of this collection. These include a theoretical paper on the link between foraging behavior and the statistical properties of movement paths (8) and five empirical studies on dispersal of plants (9) and butterflies (10), navigation of salmon and sea turtles (11), migration of vultures (12), and dispersal, foraging, and other movements of elks (13). Holyoak et al. (2) estimate that over the last decade (1997–2006) ≈26,000 papers referred to movement. Because of this extremely broad scope of movement ecology, the fairly diverse coverage of movement types and taxonomic groups in this Special Feature is inevitably incomplete. To foster integration, the authors were requested to place their works in the context of the proposed unifying theme (1) and discuss the pros and cons of this approach.

The general framework introduced by Nathan et al. (1) asserts that four basic components are needed to describe the mechanisms underlying movement of all kinds: the organism's internal state, which defines its intrinsic motivation to move; the motion and navigation capacities representing, respectively, the organism's basic ability to move and affect where and when to move; and the broad range of external factors affecting movement. At first glance, this framework appears to be primarily applicable to self-propelled sentient animals, for which the internal motivation to move and the ability to actively move while making decisions in response to information about the environment are comprehensible. However, two studies in this Special Feature (5, 9) apply this framework to investigate the movement of passively transported organisms that lack a central nervous system, such as plants.

Damschen et al. (9) provide the most fundamental application of movement ecology for studying plant community dynamics, classifying plant species according to a single categorical parameter depicting the dispersal mode. Such simplifications are often compulsory because urgent conservation concerns preclude detailed investigations of dispersal mechanisms for many species. Interestingly, the predicted effects of fragmentation on community dynamics were supported for bird-dispersed species that were studied in detail in this system, but not for wind-dispersed and “unassisted” species, for which dispersal has not yet been investigated. Wright et al. (5) parameterize a mechanistic wind dispersal model for two tropical tree species, interpreting the movement ecology from an evolutionary context. Importantly, they found that surrogates of seed fate (the potential fitness consequences of dispersal) vary in a complex manner with respect to atmospheric conditions (external factors), seed terminal velocity (motion capacity), and the timing of seed release (navigation capacity).

Linking Processes to Patterns and the Importance of Scale

The general challenge of identifying the mechanisms underlying ecological patterns (14) is particularly relevant for movement research: we need to identify phases of specific activity modes in observed movement paths (1, 4) and reveal the underlying mechanisms from their statistical properties. This Special Feature illustrates two complementary ways to address this challenge. The first, applied here to animals (4) and plants (5), explicitly depicts the underlying mechanisms and associate potential determinants of movement processes with the resulting patterns. The second takes the opposite approach: from patterns to processes. Bartumeus and Levin (8) quantify intermittency in movement patterns of animals that search, suggesting that the switch between scanning and reorientation could infer, for example, the effects of limited perception and/or a patchy environmental structure. Wittemyer et al. (6) use time-series techniques to infer about basic movement phases and formulate hypotheses about the major links, such as those between risk (human hunting) aversion, social dominance, and seasonal dynamics of the resources, that underlie elephant movements.

A major challenge in movement research is to explicitly link the statistical properties of movement patterns to specific internal traits and/or behaviors. Movement ecology facilitates this integration (1). The theoretical guidelines provided by Getz and Saltz (4) and Bartumeus and Levin (8) must be complemented by empirical studies that delve more deeply into the mechanistic determinants of movement. Lohmann et al. (11) suggest a novel hypothesis of how salmon and sea turtles navigate long distances back to their spawning grounds in essentially featureless oceanic landscapes. Ovaskainen et al. (10) apply the harmonic radar technique to quantify small-scale movements of butterflies originating from populations in continuous landscapes in China and Estonia and from fragmented landscapes in Finland. Significant differences in small-scale movements were found only between butterflies from old and newly established populations in Finland, suggesting that variation in motion capacity or internal state makes butterflies from newly established populations more mobile. Mandel et al. (12) analyze the effects of atmospheric factors and topography on migratory flights of vultures, emphasizing their dependence on high turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) conditions in the atmospheric boundary layer. High TKE was also critical for long-distance wind dispersal of tree seeds (5).

A related key challenge in ecological research, identifying the key processes shaping patterns at different spatial and temporal scales (14), was emphasized in many contributions to this Special Feature. Lohmann et al. (11) suggest scale-dependent navigation in salmon and sea turtles, in which geomagnetic and olfactory imprints of the natal areas guide a phase of large-scale navigation by the Earth's magnetic field, followed by small-scale navigation governed by chemical gradients to specific destinations. Fryxell et al.'s (13) analysis of elk movements across five orders of magnitude in time (minutes to years) and space (meters to hundreds of kilometers) provides one of the most comprehensive investigations of movement at multiple spatiotemporal scales. They show that elk switch among two or more movement modes at each spatiotemporal scale examined. They stress the challenge of elucidating the basic components of the movement ecology framework and their interactions to fully understand the observed movement patterns.

The Role of Movement in Determining Ecological and Evolutionary Processes

As emphasized in Damschen et al. (9), movement plays an important, but not exclusive, role in determining ecological and evolutionary patterns. However, we should remain mindful of Daniel Janzen's assertion (as quoted in ref. 3) that “an awful lot of biologists conveniently trim [movement] out of their way of thinking to make their problems simpler”. Progress in movement ecology requires that studies of populations, communities, and ecosystems will consider movement explicitly. However, movement research needs to consider constraints and tradeoffs associated with other life history traits and should elucidate how premovement and postmovement processes such as fecundity and establishment interact with movement to shape ecological processes and patterns. Revilla and Wiegand (7) illustrate an application of the movement ecology framework to elucidate the role of dispersal in the dynamics of lynx populations in spatially structured landscapes. They propose that between-patch movement and within-patch demography cannot be considered as separate entities, because birth–death processes affect the movement behavior of individuals and vice versa.

Potential Future Directions

Introducing new concepts into any discipline is frequently met with resistance, as part of refining and clarifying emerging paradigms (15). This Special Feature aims at gearing up this process for movement ecology. There is a growing recognition of the need to understand and predict movement processes driving biological invasions, the spread of pests and diseases, and the persistence of local populations and entire species in light of ongoing global environmental changes. Combined with drastic improvements in our ability to track and analyze movement, it is hoped that movement ecology will pave the way for developing a unified theory of organismal movement. Although this Special Feature provides only a taste of a much broader scientific enterprise (2), we hope it will help accelerate scientific progress in solving our most urgent ecological problems, in further elucidating the research questions addressed here and other important issues such as collective movements of groups, large-scale connectivity, and movements of microorganisms and humans.

Acknowledgments

I thank the Institute for Advanced Studies in Jerusalem for hosting and sponsoring our group, and all group members, visitors, students, Special Feature authors, reviewers, and editors Jim Brown and David Stopak for their help, insight, and inspiration.

Footnotes

  • ↵1E-mail: rnathan{at}cc.huji.ac.il
  • Author contributions: R.N. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Nathan R,
    2. et al.
    (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19052–19059.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Holyoak M,
    2. Casagrandi R,
    3. Nathan R,
    4. Revilla E,
    5. Spiegel O
    (2008) Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19060–19065.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Holden C
    (2006) Inching toward movement ecology. Science 313:779–782.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Getz WM,
    2. Saltz D
    (2008) A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19066–19071.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Wright SJ,
    2. et al.
    (2008) Understanding strategies for seed dispersal by wind under contrasting atmospheric conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19084–19089.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Wittemyer G,
    2. Polansky L,
    3. Douglas-Hamilton I,
    4. Getz WM
    (2008) Disentangling the effects of forage, social rank, and risk on movement autocorrelation of elephants using Fourier and wavelet analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19108–19113.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Revilla E,
    2. Wiegand T
    (2008) Individual movement behavior, matrix heterogeneity, and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19120–19125.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Bartumeus F,
    2. Levin SA
    (2008) Fractal reorientation clocks: Linking animal behavior to statistical patterns of search. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19072–19077.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Damschen EI,
    2. et al.
    (2008) The movement ecology and dynamics of plant communities in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19078–19083.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Ovaskainen O,
    2. et al.
    (2008) Tracking butterfly movements with harmonic radar reveals an effect of population age on movement distance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19090–19095.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Lohmann KJ,
    2. Putnam NF,
    3. Lohmann CMF
    (2008) Geomagnetic imprinting: A unifying hypothesis of long-distance natal homing in salmon and sea turtles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19096–19101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Mandel JT,
    2. Bildstein KL,
    3. Bohrer G,
    4. Winkler DW
    (2008) The movement ecology of migration in turkey vultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19102–19107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Fryxell JM,
    2. et al.
    (2008) Multiple movement modes by large herbivores at multiple spatio-temporal scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19114–19119.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Levin SA
    (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Graham MH,
    2. Dayton PK
    (2002) On the evolution of ecological ideas: Paradigms and scientific progress. Ecology 83:1481–1489.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An emerging movement ecology paradigm
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
An emerging movement ecology paradigm
Ran Nathan
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2008, 105 (49) 19050-19051; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808918105

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
An emerging movement ecology paradigm
Ran Nathan
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2008, 105 (49) 19050-19051; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808918105
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 105 (49)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Linking Processes to Patterns and the Importance of Scale
    • The Role of Movement in Determining Ecological and Evolutionary Processes
    • Potential Future Directions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490