Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
Research Article

King penguin population threatened by Southern Ocean warming

Céline Le Bohec, Joël M. Durant, Michel Gauthier-Clerc, Nils C. Stenseth, Young-Hyang Park, Roger Pradel, David Grémillet, Jean-Paul Gendner, and Yvon Le Maho
  1. *Département d'Écologie, Physiologie, et Éthologie, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien (IPHC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unite Mixte de Recherche 7178, 23 rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg Cedex 02, France;
  2. †Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway;
  3. ‡Centre de Recherche de la Tour du Valat, Le Sambuc, 13200 Arles, France;
  4. §Institute of Marine Research, Flødevigen Marine Research Station, N-4817 His, Norway;
  5. ¶Département Milieux et Peuplements Aquatiques, Unité Scientifique du Muséum, 0402/LOCEAN, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), 75231 Paris, France;
  6. ‖Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (CEFE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unite Mixte de Recherche 5175, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 05, France; and
  7. **Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, National Research Foundation/Department of Science and Technology Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS February 19, 2008 105 (7) 2493-2497; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712031105
Céline Le Bohec
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joël M. Durant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Gauthier-Clerc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nils C. Stenseth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Young-Hyang Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Pradel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Grémillet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Paul Gendner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yvon Le Maho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  1. Communicated by Roland Douce, Université de Grenoble, Grenoble, France, December 20, 2007 (received for review October 17, 2007)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Seabirds are sensitive indicators of changes in marine ecosystems and might integrate and/or amplify the effects of climate forcing on lower levels in food chains. Current knowledge on the impact of climate changes on penguins is primarily based on Antarctic birds identified by using flipper bands. Although flipper bands have helped to answer many questions about penguin biology, they were shown in some penguin species to have a detrimental effect. Here, we present for a Subantarctic species, king penguin (Aptenodytes patagonicus), reliable results on the effect of climate on survival and breeding based on unbanded birds but instead marked by subcutaneous electronic tags. We show that warm events negatively affect both breeding success and adult survival of this seabird. However, the observed effect is complex because it affects penguins at several spatio/temporal levels. Breeding reveals an immediate response to forcing during warm phases of El Niño Southern Oscillation affecting food availability close to the colony. Conversely, adult survival decreases with a remote sea-surface temperature forcing (i.e., a 2-year lag warming taking place at the northern boundary of pack ice, their winter foraging place). We suggest that this time lag may be explained by the delay between the recruitment and abundance of their prey, adjusted to the particular 1-year breeding cycle of the king penguin. The derived population dynamic model suggests a 9% decline in adult survival for a 0.26°C warming. Our findings suggest that king penguin populations are at heavy extinction risk under the current global warming predictions.

  • climate changes
  • seabirds
  • time lag
  • unbanded penguins

Predicting the impact of future climate changes on populations and biodiversity is a central issue in the context of global climate warming. It is, thus, crucial to understand how and to what extent organisms are able to cope with climatic variations, especially in polar environments where the effect of climate change is the strongest (1). Still, little is known about the effects of large-scale environmental perturbation on the productivity in the Circumpolar Austral Ocean (2). Most studies are using single weather variables such as sea surface temperature (SST) although the use of “weather packages” (3)[e.g., Southern Oscillation index (SOI)] should be called for (4). For instance, SST is commonly used as a proxy for food abundance and explanatory variable in studies of seabird population dynamic (5–7). Indeed, changes in SST in the Southern Ocean affect both marine productivity (8) and location of oceanographic structures used as feeding grounds (9, 10) by upper trophic-level predators, such as seabirds.

Here, we analyzed the effect of climate on subpolar seabird population by using a unique database on unbanded king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) breeding at the Possession Island in the Crozet Archipelago marked by subcutaneous tags. A major interest of studying king penguins is that their breeding cycle extends over 12 months (11), which means that the birds are still breeding when marine resources are at their minimum and geographically more unpredictable. It is during such critical periods that even small environmental changes might have a serious impact on individual fitness components and ultimately at the population level. King penguins are moreover foraging both locally and remotely (12, 13), in opposition to other Antarctic seabirds (5, 6, 14), which gives a better coverage of the Southern Ocean and a shining example on how top predator populations hinging on this large ocean might be affected by global changes. In addition, the absence of flipper band in our study removes the now well documented cumulative detrimental effect on both Antarctic and Subantarctic penguins' breeding success (15) and survival (16). The environmental conditions affecting the penguin in our study are representative of those affecting the whole population, because ≈2/3 of the world's king penguin population breed on Crozet Archipelago (17). Hence, our long-term monitoring therefore provides a health state of this species.

To understand how stochasticity of the environment affects life-history strategies in populations, a simultaneous exploration of both patterns of variance in adult survival and breeding performances is necessary. According to life-history theory (18), adult survival is the parameter that has the highest elasticity in long-lived species. It is therefore expected to be the life-history trait in which an effect of climatic variability should be least apparent (19) in contrast to breeding parameters. In the context of life-history trade-offs, assuming that long-lived seabirds are unwilling to jeopardize their survival, we predicted that warm events might negatively affect the demographic parameters of upper-level predators, through modifications of food-web processes.

Results

Our time series corresponds to 9 years of data, which enabled us to obtain 6 years of annual breeding success and 8 years of adult survival (see Materials and Methods). Our analyses integrate different explanatory variables [see supporting information (SI) Table 3]. As a large-scale climatic variation index, we used SOI. As a local climate index, we used area-averaged SST and chlorophyll-a concentration [Chla] calculated in the area centered on Crozet Archipelago (43–47°S, 46–56°E), which corresponds to the most productive area of the region. In addition, mean SSTs were calculated every two degrees of latitude in the far-southern sector (48–60°S, 46–56°E), encompassing the southernmost foraging range in the vicinity of the winter pack ice (12). Most appropriate models, as found through Akaike's information criterion (AIC)-based model selection (Tables 1 and 2 and SI Table 4), show a negative effect of warming on both breeding success and survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Results of fitting linear models with binomial distribution to the variation of breeding success of king penguins from Crozet Islands

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Environmental effects on annual adult survival of king penguins from Crozet Islands

Breeding Analyses.

Independently of the timing of breeding, the best models (lowest AIC) predict that the breeding success of king penguin was negatively affected by low values of the annual mean SOI [or a warm phase of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO)] in year t (Table 1). A model with both covariates SOI and [Chla] was preferred for birds breeding early in the season (ΔAIC = 32.38, Table 1). The chance of success in year t of early breeders was therefore positively related to the maximum [Chla] in the Crozet Archipelago sector in year t, whereas that of late breeders tended to be negatively affected by high SST (the previous year) in the same area and by the Polar Front position in year t. Nevertheless, despite the fact that models with the additive effect of SST had the lowest AIC, they did not provide more information than the retained model with the single SOI effect (ΔAIC <2, Table 1).

Survival Analyses.

The overall goodness-of-fit test showed that the general Cormack–Jolly–Seber (CJS) model [pt φ t ] satisfactorily fitted our data (χ2 2 = 0.19, P = 0.91) and was used as a starting point for model selection. We detected no sex influence on the survival probability (SI Table 4). Survival was particularly low in 1999 and 2003 (0.8535, 95% CI = 0.8259–0.8774 and 0.8540, 95% CI = 0.8266–0.8777, respectively). Among the covariates examined (see SI Table 3), annual mean SST 2 years earlier at the latitude 56°S (SSTt − 2 annual/56°S) accounted for most yearly variations in survival (91.65%; Table 2). The constrained models integrating the annual SST at 54°S and 58°S, still with a time-lag of 2 years, were also supported by the data (ΔAICi <2; Table 2). Fewer king penguins survived when SSTs were higher two years earlier in the northern part of the marginal ice zone. The functional dependence between SSTt − 2 and the adult survival probability from the best model is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Effect of sea-surface temperature on the survival of adult king penguins. The probability of annual survival of adult king penguins from Crozet Islands plotted against the sea-surface temperature 2 years earlier at the latitude 56°S (i.e., MIZ). Estimates are from the time-dependent model [pi φ t ]. Bars indicate ± standard error. Plotted curve corresponds to the estimates obtained with the best model [pi φSSTt − 2/56°S].

Discussion

Climate fluctuations have important ecological consequences and influence the population dynamics of long-lived organisms (4). Environmental variables are certainly acting mainly indirectly on reproductive performance and survival of upper-level predators, such as penguins, and might affect the foraging efficiency of individuals through their effect on lower levels of the food web (e.g., refs. 20 and 21). Primary productivity is related to the local environmental conditions (8), such as temperature, wind, rain, snow, and ocean currents, as well as interactions among these. The relationship we found between the breeding success and the SOI (Table 1) might be explained by the fact that a combination of weather features (3) encompassed in a global indice such as SOI might be integrated at the higher trophic level (5). No time lag was found between annual breeding success and environmental parameters (Table 1), certainly because chick food depends mainly on the availability of resources produced close to the colony during the year. During the summer, king penguins are feeding principally on mesopelagic myctophids (22) abundant in the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone (23) [(PFZ) i.e., 49–53° S]. In contrast, the majority of the winter diet is based on demersal onychoteuthid squid and neritic myctophid fish of the shelf waters (24). Myctophids and onychoteuthids feed on the meso- and macroplankton (25) whose fecundity and growth depend on phytoplankton production (26) and, hence, are sensitive to SST variation. Thus, the low breeding success observed in some years (Table 1) might result from the depletion of [Chla] (i.e., from a low phytoplankton production). The growth rate of zooplankton and larvae fishes is also known to be linked to a restricted thermal window, with an adverse effect of abnormally high SST (26). During the summer, an increase of the foraging trip duration of the breeder to reach the PFZ linked to warm events (negative SOI values) might (i) jeopardize the survival of newly hatched chicks and (ii) directly affect the parent's capacity to recover proper fuel reserves after the incubation fast, and it may accordingly choose to abandon reproduction in favor of its own survival (27). During the winter, king penguin's prey fish are found at a much greater depth in the PFZ than in summer (25) and are consequently unavailable for the birds which must therefore find an alternative resource. Accordingly, to feed their chick during winter, breeding penguins forage predominantly on small- and medium-sized juvenile squids spawned the previous spring (24) in the outer shelf, upper slope, and oceanic areas in the close vicinity of Crozet Islands (22). Low [Chla] around Crozet Archipelago, concomitant with negative SOI, might impact the fecundity and the growth of the squids, hence reducing the winter chick provisioning. The cumulative effect of a more distant PFZ location from the colony during the summer may lead to high reproductive failures in that specific year.

We show that the survival of king penguins is reduced when SST was high in the marginal ice zone (MIZ) 2 years earlier (Fig. 1 and Table 2). This reduction can be linked to prey populations at the northern boundary of pack ice. A poor sea ice cover the winter after a year with high SST might negatively affect in cascade each level of the food web (9, 28). Indeed, during the winter, breeding birds leave the PFZ foraging area to spend a substantial proportion of their time at sea below the northern sea ice limit (13) (56–57° S, i.e., MIZ). King penguin diet in this area is still unknown, but a study suggests that they compensate for the limited access to myctophids in winter by shifting their diet to Euphausia superba Krill species (13), on which they might rely to replenish their body fuels in distant areas (22) such as the MIZ. Consequently, 1 year after a warm event, king penguins might increase their energy expenditure for foraging (12) because of the poor prey abundance (krill or myctophid species) in the MIZ at the detriment of their survival the following year. This second-year lag may actually be explained by the delayed effect of costs occurring during the reproductive season (29) adjusted to the particular 1-year breeding cycle of the king penguin. Contrary to life-history theory expectation for a long-lived bird, breeding king penguins therefore seem to shunt efforts toward their offspring rather than for their own survival (see ref. 30).

Altogether, our data analysis, which avoids the bias of flipper banding, demonstrates that high SSTs have a detrimental effect on breeding and/or survival of king penguins. Moreover, we also show that the effect of warming on these two fundamental demographic traits is related to two different oceanographic processes linked to two foraging areas. Breeding success is related, without time lag, to the proximate environmental conditions in the north of the PFZ (at the Polar Front during the summer and over the Crozet shelf during the winter), whereas adult survival is linked, with a 2-year lag, to the winter SST in the remote MIZ. Importantly, and according to life-history theory in long-lived species (18), king penguin populations would not be sustained with a 9% drop in their adult survival such as that we show for an increase of only 0.26°C in SST (Fig. 1). Age might also be an important determinant of individual fitness and might have a potential impact on population growth rates (31, 32). Old birds (33) and first-time breeders (Constraint hypothesis; refs. 34 and 35) might be more sensitive to climatic variation than prime-age adults, as is known, e.g., for large ungulates (see ref. 36). Thus, at more long-term, our cohorts of 10-month-old chicks micro-tagged each year from 1998 will allow us to look at this age-related pattern of survival by analyzing these three groups separately. However, in line with the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-2007 estimation of a linear increasing trend of 0.74°C of global surface temperature during the last century and a further warming of ≈0.2°C per decade for the next two decades (37), the warming of the Southern Ocean certainly represents a major threat for penguins. Some other seabird communities in Antarctica might be affected by such a cascade of effects of Southern Ocean warming.

Materials and Methods

Species and Demographic Survey.

The specificity of the king penguin is that birds do not succeed in carrying out all breeding activities (courtship, egg laying, incubation, and chick fledging) within the summer period. Moreover, birds are not synchronized in their egg-laying date, and the laying period extends over 4 months, i.e., from November to the beginning of March. Two peaks of laying are observed: a first peak of early breeders which corresponds to those birds that did not breed or have failed in their previous breeding season, and a second peak of late breeders corresponding to those birds that have succeeded in fledging a chick during the previous breeding season (11). Such a unique breeding cycle appears to result from time-restricted access to resources, which fluctuate seasonally in abundance (22). Then, the favorable summer season is too short for penguins to complete moulting and breeding and at the same time produce a chick with good prospects of survival (38).

Our study was conducted at the Possession Island (46°25′S, 51°45′E, “La Grande Manchotière” colony) on Crozet Archipelago. From the austral summer 1997/1998 to 1999/2000, 456 king penguins were fitted as breeding birds with electronic tags without any other external mark. Antennas are permanently buried on their usual pathways and connected to a computerized reading system (39). The sequence of signals from the antennas reveals if a bird is entering or leaving the breeding site. This identification system does not require the bird's recapture or visual observation by a human and allows continuous automatic data collection (39). Our analysis excluded animals that had not reached reproductive age. The breeding cycles and parameters of the birds were established by interpreting the movements of the birds between the breeding area and the sea (see ref. 11 for details). Individual laying date and breeding success were recorded each year. Sex specificity is a common source of variation in survival probability of some birds, and it was necessary to determine preliminarily whether we needed to incorporate this variable in our models. The sex of the birds was determined by analyzing the chronology of the sex-specific incubating shifts (27).

Oceanographic Context and Environmental Descriptors.

SI Table 3 summarizes the data used and gives the different periods and time lags considered for each environmental variable.

Monthly SOI, daily SST (°C), and weekly [Chla] (mg.m−3) were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration, and from the sea-viewing wide-field sensor, respectively. First, we extracted the monthly SOI values from August 1991 to October 2005. SOI was used as a proxy of a remote forcing to the local SST. Negative SOI values indicate a warm phase of ENSO (40), which are generally associated in our study area with warm SST anomalies (41). Monthly averages of SST were calculated from July 1995 until January 2006 in an area centered on Crozet Archipelago, bounded by 43–47°S, 46–56°E. This subsector corresponds to the yearly most productive subsector in the Crozet region, shallow shelves and weak currents acting as a retention zone (42), SST in this area might therefore influence the primary productivity. Similar calculations were performed for [Chla] data in this same subsector from September 1997 (first data available in this region) to April 2006. [Chla] is at the basis of food-web setting-up and thus might impact apex predators. Minimum SST, maximum SST, maximum [Chla], and their associated time were determined. Lower SSTs in spring and summer (high photoperiod) in this area might favor phytoplankton bloom, yielding high [Chla]. Moreover, monthly SSTs were calculated from July 1995 until January 2006 at every two latitudes in the area south of Crozet bounded by 48–60°S, 46–56°E, encompassing the southernmost foraging range (12). SST south of Crozet can influence the position of fronts, such as PFZ, and, consequently, the location of the trophic chain. Satellite tracking indicated that king penguins from this colony forage at the PFZ during summer in a sector comprising 48–52°S. In contrast, they cross the northern limit of the light pack ice in winter to forage at farther southern latitudes of 56–62°S (12).

Breeding Analyses.

The breeding success data (range from 0 to 1, obtained from 1998/1999 to 2003/2004) for each individual were analyzed by using a maximum likelihood mixed regression approach (43). Models fitted were linear ones with binomial distribution (i.e., generalized linear models with binomial distribution, using lme4 package for R 2.5.1 statistical program, ref. 44). Fixed effects (environmental variables) and random effects (individual) significance were tested by computing the likelihood ratio statistics on parametric bootstrap generated data (1,000 times) (43). We used ANOVAs to test the significance of adding explanatory variables and an information theoretic approach (45) to choose which of the environmental variables predicted a better breeding success. The most appropriate model was selected by using the AIC.

Adult Survival Analyses.

Data were analyzed in a capture–mark–recapture framework. Using the M-SURGE computer program (46), we estimated survival probabilities of adults from November 1997 to April 2006 (k = 9 occasions) by using the CJS models, which provide unbiased estimators of survival probabilities (47). All adults detected in a given summer had been recorded the previous summer. We therefore considered that the probability of detecting a bird (breeding or nonbreeding) provided it remained alive was equal to 1 (see ref. 48). Consequently, the reliability of survival estimates should be high (47), and this automatic identification system complies with the assumptions of the known-fate model. Winter survival was defined as the probability of survival from summer t (November of year t to May of year t + 1) to summer t + 1 (November of year t + 1 to May of year t + 2). We used the goodness-of-fit tests computed by program U-CARE (49) to check that our most general model fitted the data. Then, we used AIC to select the best model in terms of both parsimony (fewest model parameters) and adequate description of the data. Models with the lowest values of AIC were retained as good candidate models (47). Because AIC values are interpretable only in terms of “relative value,” we relied on AIC weights (w) to select models when the difference between the AIC values of two models was lower than 2 (47). We then modeled the yearly variations in adult survival as a function of covariates that might be relevant to the ecology of king penguins (SI Table 3). To assess the effects of these environmental variables, the amount of variations accounted for covariates, i.e., the direct estimation and quantification of the relative effects of environmental variability on survival (50), was calculated by using an analysis of deviance (R 2; ref. 45), which is defined as [DEV(constant model) − DEV(covariate model))/(DEV(constant model) − DEV(time-dependent model)]. This corresponds to the proportion of explained variance and is comparable to a squared correlation coefficient.

Acknowledgments

We thank I. Durant, F. Roquet, C. Lesage, J.-B. Charrassin, C. Salmon, and V. Viera for their help in analyzing data or their constructive comments on the manuscript; and M. Ballesteros, D. Beaune, C. Bricaud, N. Chatelain, G. Conan, S. Descamps, J. Dutel, C. Gilbert, S. Gravier, A. Hergott, G. Kuntz, N. Lambert, N. Lecomte, J. Legrand, S. Mangin, V. Mosch, S. Quéméneur, A. Simon, E. Taquet, and C. Villemin for their help on field work. This work was supported by the Institut Polaire Français–Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV), the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Programme Zone Atelier de Recherches sur l'Environnement Antarctique et Subantarctique, and grants from the Institut de France and the Fondaton des Treilles (to C.L.B.) and from the Norwegian Research Council through the Marine Diversity Management (MaDiMa) project (to J.M.D.)

Footnotes

  • ††To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yvon.lemaho{at}c-strasbourg.fr
  • Author contributions: C.L.B., M.G.-C., J.-P.G., and Y.L.M. designed research; C.L.B., M.G.-C., J.-P.G., and Y.L.M. performed research; C.L.B., J.M.D., Y.-H.P., and R.P. analyzed data; and C.L.B., J.M.D., M.G.-C., N.C.S., Y.-H.P., D.G., and Y.L.M. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0712031105/DC1.

  • © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

References

  1. ↵
    1. Clarke A ,
    2. Harris CM
    (2003) Polar Marine Ecosystems: Major Threats and Future Change (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
  2. ↵
    1. McMahon CR ,
    2. Burton HR
    (2005) Climate change and seal survival: Evidence for environmentally mediated changes in elephant seal, Mirounga leonina, pup survival. Proc R Soc London Ser B 272:923–928.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Stenseth NC ,
    2. et al.
    (2003) Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices, the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Niño Southern Oscillation and beyond. Proc R Soc London Ser B 270:2087–2096.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Stenseth NC ,
    2. et al.
    (2002) Ecological effects of climate fluctuations. Science 297:1292–1296.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Croxall JP ,
    2. Trathan PN ,
    3. Murphy EJ
    (2002) Environmental change and Antarctic seabirds populations. Science 297:1510–1514.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Barbraud C ,
    2. Weimerskirch H
    (2001) Emperor penguins and climate change. Nature 411:183–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Veit RR ,
    2. McGowan JA ,
    3. Ainley DG ,
    4. Wahls TR ,
    5. Pyle P
    (1997) Apex marine predator declines ninety percent in association with changing oceanic climate. Glob Change Biol 2:23–28.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Gregg WW ,
    2. Conkright ME ,
    3. Ginoux P ,
    4. O'Reilly JE ,
    5. Casey NW
    (2003) Ocean primary production and climate: Global decadal changes. Geophys Res Lett 30:1809.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Nicol S ,
    2. et al.
    (2000) Ocean circulation off east Antarctica affects ecosystem structure and sea ice extent. Nature 406:504–507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Moore JK ,
    2. Abbott MR ,
    3. Richman J
    (1999) Location and dynamics of the Antarctic Polar Front from satellite sea surface temperature data. Geophys Res Lett 104:3059–3073.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Descamps S ,
    2. Gauthier-Clerc M ,
    3. Gendner J-P ,
    4. Le Maho Y
    (2002) The annual breeding cycle of unbanded king penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus on Possession Island (Crozet) Avian Sci 2:87–98.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Charrassin J-B ,
    2. Bost CA
    (2001) Utilisation of the oceanic habitat by king penguins over the annual cycle. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 221:285–297.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Bost CA ,
    2. Charrassin J-B ,
    3. Clerquin Y ,
    4. Ropert-Coudert Y ,
    5. Le Maho Y
    (2004) Exploitation of distant marginal ice zones by king penguins during winter. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 283:293–297.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Jenouvrier S ,
    2. Barbraud C ,
    3. Weimerskirch H
    (2006) Sea ice affects the population dynamics of Adélie penguins in Terre Adélie. Polar Biol 29:413–423.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Gauthier-Clerc M ,
    2. et al.
    (2004) Long-term effects of flipper bands on penguins. Proc R Soc London Ser B 271:S423–S426.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Dugger KM ,
    2. Ballard G ,
    3. Ainley DG ,
    4. Barton KJ
    (2006) Effect of flipper-bands on the foraging behavior and survival of Adélie Penguins in the southern Ross Sea. Auk 123:858–869.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Guinet C ,
    2. Jouventin P ,
    3. Malacamp J
    (1995) Satellite remote sensing in monitoring change of seabirds: Use of SPOT Image in King Penguin population increase at Ile aux Cochons, Crozet Archipelago. Polar Biol 15:511–515.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Stearns SC
    (1992) The Evolution of Life Histories (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford).
  19. ↵
    1. Gaillard J-M ,
    2. Yoccoz NG
    (2003) Temporal variation in survival of mammals: A case of environmental canalization? Ecology 84:3294–3306.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Durant JM ,
    2. et al.
    1. Stenseth NC ,
    2. Ottersen G ,
    3. Hurrell JW ,
    4. Belgrano A
    (2004) in Marine Ecosystems and Climate Variation: The North Atlantic, Marine birds and climate fluctuations in the North Atlantic, eds Stenseth NC , Ottersen G , Hurrell JW , Belgrano A (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford), pp 95–105.
  21. ↵
    1. Durant JM ,
    2. Anker-Nilssen T ,
    3. Stenseth NC
    (2006) Ocean climate prior to breeding affects the duration of the nestling period in the Atlantic puffin. Biol Lett 2:628–631.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Cherel Y ,
    2. Verdon C ,
    3. Ridoux V
    (1993) Seasonal importance of oceanic myctophids in king penguin diet at Crozet Island. Polar Biol 13:355–357.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Duhamel G ,
    2. Koubbi P ,
    3. Ravier C
    (2000) Day and night mesopelagic fish assemblages off the Kerguelen Islands (Southern Ocean) Polar Biol 23:106–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Cherel Y ,
    2. Weimerskirch H
    (1999) Spawning cycle of onychoteuthid squids in the southern Indian Ocean: New information from seabird predators. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:93–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Koslov AN ,
    2. Tarverdiyevma I
    (1989) Feeding of different species of Myctophidae in different parts of the Southem Ocean. J Ichthyol 29:160–167.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Richardson AJ ,
    2. Verheye HM
    (1998) The relative importance of food and temperature to copepod egg production and somatic growth in the southern Benguela upwelling system. J Mar Sci 55:803–807.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Gauthier-Clerc M ,
    2. Le Maho Y ,
    3. Clerquin Y ,
    4. Bost C-A ,
    5. Handrich Y
    (2002) Seabird reproduction in an unpredictable environment: how king penguins provide their young chicks with food. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 237:291–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Fraser WR ,
    2. Hofmann EE
    (2003) A predator's perspective on causal links between climate change, physical forcing and ecosystem response. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 265:1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Williams TD
    (1995) The Penguins (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford).
  30. ↵
    1. Olsson O ,
    2. van der Jeugd HP
    (2002) Survival in king penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus: temporal and sex-specific effects of environmental variability. Oecologia 132:509–516.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Charlesworth B
    (1994) Evolution in age-structured populations (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), 2nd Ed.
  32. ↵
    1. Caswell H
    (2001) Matrix Population Models (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA).
  33. ↵
    1. Williams GT
    (1966) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Forslund P ,
    2. Pärt T
    (1995) Age and reproduction in birds-hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol Evol 10:374–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Martin K
    (1995) Patterns and mechanisms for age-dependent reproduction and survival in birds. Am Zool 35:340–348.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Gaillard J-M ,
    2. Festa-Bianchet M ,
    3. Yoccoz NG ,
    4. Loison A ,
    5. Toïgo C
    (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. IPCC
    Climate Change 2007. The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (WG I, 2007, available from www.ipcc.ch).
  38. ↵
    1. Weimerskirch H ,
    2. Stahl J-C ,
    3. Jouventin P
    (1992) The breeding biology and population dynamics of King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus on the Crozet Islands. Ibis 134:107–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Gendner J-P ,
    2. Gauthier-Clerc M ,
    3. Le Bohec C ,
    4. Descamps S ,
    5. Le Maho Y
    (2005) A new application for transponders in studying of penguins. J Field Ornitho 76:138–142.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Deser C ,
    2. Wallace JM
    (1987) El Niño events and their relation to the southern oscillation: 1925–1986. Geophys Res Lett 92:14189–14196.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Park Y-H ,
    2. Roquet F ,
    3. Vivier F
    (2004) Quasi-stationary ENSO wave signals versus the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave scenario. Geophys Res Lett 31:L09315.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Perissinotto R ,
    2. Duncombe Rae CM
    (1990) Occurrence of anti-cyclonic eddies on the Prince Edward Plateau (Southern Ocean): Effects on phytoplankton biomass and production. Deep Sea Res 37:777–793.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Pinheiro JC ,
    2. Bates DM
    (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S, S-PLUS (Springer, New York).
  44. ↵
    1. Bates D ,
    2. Sarkar D
    (2006) lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. (R package version 0.9975-10). Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/lme4.html . Accessed January 25, 2007.
  45. ↵
    1. Burnham KP ,
    2. Anderson DR
    (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference (Springer, New York).
  46. ↵
    1. Choquet R ,
    2. Reboulet A-M ,
    3. Pradel R ,
    4. Gimenez O ,
    5. Lebreton J-D
    (2004) M-SURGE: New software specifically designed for multistate capture-recapture models. Anim Biodiv Cons 27:207–215.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Lebreton J-D ,
    2. Burnham KP ,
    3. Clobert J ,
    4. Anderson DR
    (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: A unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Le Bohec C ,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Population dynamics in a long-lived seabird I: Impact of breeding activity on survival and breeding probability in unbanded king penguins. J Anim Ecol 76:1149–1160.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Choquet R ,
    2. Reboulet A-M ,
    3. Lebreton J-D ,
    4. Gimenez O ,
    5. Pradel R
    (2005) U-Care 2.2 (Utilities-Capture-Recapture) User's Manual, Available at: www.cefe.cnrs.fr/BIOM/PDF/Choquet-USER%20MANUAL%20U-CARE%202.2.pdf/ . Accessed January 25, 2007.
  50. ↵
    1. Gaillard JM ,
    2. et al.
    (1997) Early survival in roe deer: Causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations. Oecologia 112:502–513.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
King penguin population threatened by Southern Ocean warming
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
King penguin population threatened by Southern Ocean warming
Céline Le Bohec, Joël M. Durant, Michel Gauthier-Clerc, Nils C. Stenseth, Young-Hyang Park, Roger Pradel, David Grémillet, Jean-Paul Gendner, Yvon Le Maho
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2008, 105 (7) 2493-2497; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0712031105

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
King penguin population threatened by Southern Ocean warming
Céline Le Bohec, Joël M. Durant, Michel Gauthier-Clerc, Nils C. Stenseth, Young-Hyang Park, Roger Pradel, David Grémillet, Jean-Paul Gendner, Yvon Le Maho
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2008, 105 (7) 2493-2497; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0712031105
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 105 (7)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Protective infrastructure along the San Francisco Bay shoreline.
Economic impact of sea level rise protection
Infrastructure built to protect cities from flooding can increase economic damages elsewhere.
Image credit: Michelle A. Hummel.
Venus.
Abiotic source of phosphine on Venus
Phosphine in the Venusian atmosphere can be explained without biogenic sources and is consistent with ongoing volcanism on Venus.
Image credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA.
Coronavirus.
Estimating true number of COVID-19 infections
A study finds underreporting of COVID-19 cases in the United States and that the United States is likely far from achieving herd immunity through infection alone.
Image credit: Pixabay/geralt.
Three test tubes with lethal doses of heroin, carfentanil, and fentanyl.
Inner Workings: Vaccines aim to fight drugs of abuse
Researchers hope vaccines can serve as a key tool for addressing the opioid epidemic. The first clinical trials are underway, though big challenges remain.
Image credit: United States Drug Enforcement Administration.
Factories belch pollution into a hazy sky as the sun peaks out from behind the clouds.
Journal Club: How to incorporate changing human behaviors into planetary models
Eyeing the effects of the Anthropocene, researchers offer a novel framework to identify and combine models from across the physical and social sciences.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Victor Lauer.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.