Alexis Noel and David Hu describe the unusual properties of a cat's tongue.
New Research In
Physical Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
-
Contributed by John P. Grotzinger, April 14, 2009 (received for review February 6, 2009)
Abstract
The ≈3,450-million-year-old Strelley Pool Formation in Western Australia contains a reef-like assembly of laminated sedimentary accretion structures (stromatolites) that have macroscale characteristics suggestive of biological influence. However, direct microscale evidence of biology—namely, organic microbial remains or biosedimentary fabrics—has to date eluded discovery in the extensively-recrystallized rocks. Recently-identified outcrops with relatively good textural preservation record microscale evidence of primary sedimentary processes, including some that indicate probable microbial mat formation. Furthermore, we find relict fabrics and organic layers that covary with stromatolite morphology, linking morphologic diversity to changes in sedimentation, seafloor mineral precipitation, and inferred microbial mat development. Thus, the most direct and compelling signatures of life in the Strelley Pool Formation are those observed at the microscopic scale. By examining spatiotemporal changes in microscale characteristics it is possible not only to recognize the presence of probable microbial mats during stromatolite development, but also to infer aspects of the biological inputs to stromatolite morphogenesis. The persistence of an inferred biological signal through changing environmental circumstances and stromatolite types indicates that benthic microbial populations adapted to shifting environmental conditions in early oceans.
Analysis of Earth's earliest sedimentary record is crucial for understanding the early evolution of life on Earth. Stromatolites—internally-laminated, macroscopic sedimentary structures, commonly of biological origin—form the dominant part of Earth's early fossil record (1) and so provide a potentially important source of information about early life. However, stromatolites are shaped by a complex interaction of physical, chemical, and biological processes, and identifying unambiguous signatures of life from the preserved morphology of the structures can be extremely difficult (2⇓–4). Ideally, textural or microstructural evidence of microbial mats is needed in addition to morphological and contextual clues to unravel processes of stromatolite formation and gain direct evidence of the activities of benthic microbial communities (5, 6). To date, however, the search for such clues in the oldest known stromatolites has been frustrated by diagenetic alteration, particularly recrystallization: a diagenetic process that commonly affects the chemical (precipitated) sediments with which stromatolites are often associated.
A possible biomediated origin was previously suggested for some of Earth's oldest stromatolites, in the 3.43-Ga Strelley Pool Formation, based on their morphology (1), morphological associations and the spatiotemporal distribution of stromatolites in a reef-like palaeoenvironment (7⇓–9). However, microfossils, microbial sedimentary fabrics, and organic materials have not been identified to date. Putative microfossils and organic materials have been identified in Early Archaean rocks (10⇓⇓⇓–14), but others have proposed that those are abiotic structures shaped by hydrothermal processes and composed of mantle-derived carbon (e.g., ref. 15).
Recent mapping of the Strelley Pool Formation identified several well-preserved outcrops in which relict (bio)sedimentary fabrics and carbonaceous materials could be detected and mapped within and among a variety of stromatolite forms. Here, we analyze sedimentary fabrics within the context of different stromatolites and compare them with better-preserved Proterozoic examples to gain detailed, direct microscale evidence of the physical, chemical, and biological processes that contributed to stromatolite growth in the Strelley Pool Formation.
Geologic Setting
The Strelley Pool Formation is a ≈30 to 400-m-thick sedimentary rock unit deposited on the Pilbara Craton between 3.43 billion and 3.35 billion years ago. Outcrops of the formation extend across >180 km (ref. 16 and references therein), but the reef-like carbonate platform buildup identified previously (7) is limited to ≈10 km of outcrop in the southwestern Panorama Greenstone Belt (Fig. S1). In that area, the formation can be divided into 4 stratigraphic units: a basal rocky coastline conglomerate (member 1), the stromatolitic carbonate platform member (member 2; further subdivided into 3 beds, each capped by a layer of large, acicular crystal pseudomorphs), a stromatolitic chert member (member 3), and a chert + volcaniclastic member (member 4). Member 2 is the focus of the present study. The principal facies of member 2 consist of: (i) 6 morphologically-distinct types of stromatolites, (ii) acicular crystal pseudomorphs that were probably originally aragonite (1), (iii) flat laminites, and (iv) flat pebble intraclast conglomerates. The lithology of all member 2 facies consists of dolostone and chert (7, 8).
Sample Selection and Context
In the present study we examine fabrics of coniform and domical stromatolites from the lower 2 beds of the platform carbonate (member 2). Two outcrops provide exceptional fabric preservation and exposure of those beds. The first is a ≈150-m-long section on southern Anchor Ridge (Fig. S1), exposing on-platform sections of bed 1 (with encrusting/domical laminites) and bed 2 (with 3 coniform stromatolite types: cuspate swales, egg carton laminites, and small conical/crested laminites). The second outcrop is on southern Trendall Ridge (Fig. S1), where abundant large complex cone (LCC) stromatolites formed on a paleotopographic high, possibly a rimmed platform margin. The Trendall and Anchor Ridge outcrops were mapped in detail and samples were collected for slabbing, polishing, and thin sectioning. Thin section microscopy and Raman spectroscopy were used to identify and analyze the fabric components, and X-ray fluorescence element imaging (acquired with a Horiba XGT-5000 X-ray analytical microscope) was used to assist in the detection of relict fabrics by mapping major and minor element distribution.
Encrusting/Domical Stromatolites
Encrusting/domical stromatolites are abundant in bed 1 of member 2 throughout the study area (7, 8). They consist of adjacent (abutting) or laterally linked pseudocolumns of domical laminae (Fig. S2). The domical laminae typically initiate on a topographic feature such as a boulder, intraclast, or small mound. In some places, the domes expand radially and coalesce with each successive layer (as in Fig. S2), whereas in other places the domical laminae maintain constant dimensions through successive layers.
Here, we focus on a particularly well-preserved outcrop of domical stromatolites that formed on the platform interior, where bed 1 is ≈2 m thick and directly overlies altered volcanic rocks of the Mount Ada Basalt. Stromatolites initiated within 20–50 cm of the lower contact, upon surfaces defined by minor topographic irregularities associated with a flat pebble intraclast conglomerate. Several additional surfaces of stromatolite initiation occur higher in the bed. The bed thins rapidly to the north where it onlaps a paleo-high and becomes thicker toward the south before thinning again because of underlying paleotopographic relief.
Sedimentary Fabrics.
Sedimentary fabrics change systematically from base to top of the stromatolite pseudocolumns. The lower parts consist of irregularly-laminated dolomite and chert with discontinuous layers of carbonaceous material and chert-filled laminoid fenestrae (Figs. 1 and 2D). The dolomite and chert are recrystallized, but variations in recrystallized texture hint at relict clastic and precipitated sedimentary fabrics. Although sedimentary grains are not preserved, the dolomite crystal size variations in many laminae resemble clastic sedimentary textures, and the laminae themselves have millimeter-scale irregularities and discontinuities like those associated with the trapping and binding of fine-grained particles in younger and better-preserved stromatolites (17). Other laminae display faint “palisade” fabrics, consisting of submillimeter acicular crystals arranged perpendicular to the laminae, that indicate in situ precipitation and growth of crystals at the sediment–water interface (4). Chert-filled laminoid fenestrae (a type of primary or penecontemporaneous open space structure; ref. 18) are a major part of the fabric in the lower strata. The fact that they were once open spaces is indicated by the void-fill pattern of chalcedony and megaquartz within the structures (Fig. 1 B and C). Fenestrae are commonly associated with microbial mats in peritidal settings, where they often form by degassing of decaying organic material and/or drying out of the surface of microbial mats, resulting in shrinkage, lifting, and separation of the mats from the sediment surface (ref. 18 and references therein).
Fig. 1.
Encrusting/domical stromatolite fabrics. (A) Polished slab, showing irregular wrinkly laminar fabric consisting of dolomite (D), chert (C), and organic laminae (OM). Note organic layers on upper sides of flat pebble intraclast conglomerate (Cg, outlined in dotted red line) piled against upper right of stromatolite. (B) Chert-filled fenestra surrounded by D2 dolomite are shown. Transmitted plane polarized light. (C) Detail of cavity fill chert with chalcedony at margins and megaquartz at the center. Transmitted cross polarized light. (D) Composite X-ray fluorescence map of Ca (blue) and Fe (pink). The brighter pink areas highlight the greater Fe content of D3 dolomite compared with D1 and D2 in the surrounding dolomite (blue) laminae. The black areas in the rock fabric represent silica. (Scale bar: 0.5 cm.) (E) Detail of intraclast conglomerate from upper right corner of the sample shown in A. Red arrows point to white rims surrounding the clasts and organic material. The rims consist of D3 dolomite overgrowths (inner) and isopachous chert rims (outer). (F) Schematic illustration of the relationship between clasts, organic deposits, dolomite overgrowths and chert in the intraclast conglomerate shown in E.
The fabric becomes more regularly laminated up section through the stromatolites, with fewer fenestrae (Fig. 2) and increasing palisade fabrics. In the upper strata, the abundance of palisade fabrics and large acicular crystal pseudomorphs increases dramatically (Fig. 3 and Fig. S 3 c, e, and f). Approximately 2 m below the upper contact of the bed, the stromatolites give way to a thick (≈2 m) bed of densely-packed acicular crystal pseudomorphs (Fig. S3 a, b, and d).
Fig. 2.
Fabrics in lower to middle strata of encrusting/domical stromatolites at Anchor Ridge. (A) Polished slab showing edge of domical stromatolite with organic laminae and variable recrystallization. Note laminae become thinner toward margin, as shown by the dotted white lines and large arrows oriented normal to the paleosurface of the stromatolite. As a result, the cusp and dome geometry do not change significantly through successive layers. g, inferred clastic or grainy fabric; p, relict palisades (precipitated) fabric; o, organic laminae. (B) Polished slab showing detail of inferred relict clastic texture with organic laminae (black layers) and dolomite laminae with minor chert (gray layers). (C) Polished slab showing detail of inferred clastic texture with organic laminae (black layers) and incipient domical structures. (D) Polished slab showing detail of irregular laminoid fabric with organic laminae, chert-filled fenestrae and inferred relict grainy texture. (Scale bars: ≈1 cm.)
Fig. 3.
Images showing the vertical trend in fabrics and parallel change in laminar architecture through the encrusting/domical stromatolites. (A) Outcrop exposure showing part of 2 broad domical stromatolites and the cuspate depression in between. The lower strata show irregularly laminated fabrics with inferred clastic textures; laminae thin toward the margins and laminar geometry does not change significantly through successive layers. The abundance of precipitated textures (palisades, acicular crystal psedudomorphs) increases in the upper strata, where laminae maintain thickness laterally and the laminar geometry changes with each successive layer. Consequently, the cusp infills and the domes coalesce. Scale increments on card = 1 cm. (B) Polished slab showing acicular crystal pseudomorphs from strata ≈30 cm above the top of the photo in A. (C) Polished slab showing palisaded layer among irregular lamination. (D) Polished slab showing irregular lamination with organic layers (black laminae).
Dolomite Laminae.
Under the microscope, 3 main types of dolomite are observed (Fig. S4). D1, the most common type, consists of approximately equigranular, anhedral crystals in a sutured mosaic, consistent with moderate to advanced dolomite recrystallization. D2 consists of very fine-grained (≈2 μm) dolomite and is locally abundant around the margins of larger dolomite crystals and at the contacts between chert and dolomite laminae. D3 consists of equigranular, euhedral dolomite rhombs, or partial rhombs, with crystal growth zones (Fig. S4b). D3 crystals typically occur as overgrowths at the margins of dolomite laminae where they protrude into chert-filled fenestrae or laminae. X-ray fluorescence element maps highlight the higher iron content of D3 compared with the surrounding dolomite (Fig. 1D). The preservation of growth zones indicate that D3 dolomite has not been overprinted by later diagenetic recrystallization, and there is no indication of major replacement of a noncarbonate phase.
Chert Laminae.
The chert laminae consist mainly of an equigranular mosaic of interlocking microcrystalline to mesocrystalline-quartz crystals with undulose extinction and crenulated crystal boundaries. Laminoid fenestrae in the lower parts of bed 1 have wall-coating isopachous silica cements and radial-fibrous chalcedony, surrounding a central infilling of anhedral megaquartz (Fig. 1 B and C). A few inclusions of carbonaceous material, calcite, and dolomite are present.
The observed features in the chert are consistent with either: (i) selective replacement of a laminated, nonsilica precursor (most likely carbonate or organic material), or (ii) early diagenetic alteration of sedimentary silica laminae. It is worth noting that the observed chert fabrics do not provide unequivocal evidence that a nonsilica precursor has been replaced. Early burial diagenesis of sedimentary (nonskeletal) silica involves dissolution–reprecipitation reactions that create porosity, preferentially alter some elements of the original fabric, and release H4SiO4 into solution, which can then reprecipitate elsewhere in the sediment pile, resulting in a mixture of original sedimentary fabrics (e.g., laminae), dissolution fabrics, and reprecipitation fabrics (cavity fill) (19). Thus, the observed diagenetic chert fabrics are not necessarily evidence of replacement of a nonsilica precursor. Moreover, the chert laminae are present in intraclast conglomerate clasts within beds 1, 2, and 3, which supports a primary or very early diagenetic origin and is not consistent with a late-stage (postmember 2 deposition) hydrothermal replacement origin as proposed previously (20).
Organic Laminae.
Raman spectra confirm that black laminae within the stromatolite fabric consist of disordered carbonaceous material (Fig. S5). The spectral characteristics of the organic matter are similar to those exhibited by the Strelley Pool Formation samples examined previously and are consistent with the regional lower greenschist metamorphism (21). This observation indicates that the organic material has been subject to the thermal history of the host rock and did not migrate recently into the bed. Significantly, the organic laminae are also preserved in flat pebble intraclast conglomerates that onlap the stromatolites (Fig. 1 A, E, and F). The organic matter is concentrated in a discrete layer on the upper side of the intraclasts and is partially intermingled with the dolomite (D1/D2) that makes up the clasts. Furthermore, the organic layer was then overgrown by D3 dolomite crystals that surround the clasts. The clasts, organics, and D2 dolomite overgrowths were then surrounded by isopachous chert rims and chert matrix, both of which contain no organic matter. Thus, it seems very unlikely that the organic matter migrated through the matrix and coated the clasts after burial. The weight of evidence indicates that the organic layers were synsedimentary laminae formed at the stromatolite–water interface during deposition and are not younger contaminants introduced to the rock during diagenesis.
Having determined with reasonable certainty that the organic laminae in the encrusting/domical stromatolites are syngenetic, multiple hypotheses for the origin of the organic material remain to be tested. On one hand, the laminae could represent allochthonous organic detritus transported and settled onto the stromatolites, in which case either biotic or abiotic (mantle or meteorite-derived) ultimate origins are possible. Alternatively, the organic laminae could be the remains of microbial mats formed in situ at the sediment–water interface.
Under transmitted light, the organic laminae are seen to consist of submillimeter-sized amorphous clots, specks, and wisps of opaque material included in crystals or accumulated along dolomite grain boundaries, where it appears to have been displaced by the margins of growing crystals during recrystallization. Insufficient morphological detail has been preserved to determine whether microbial cells were once present as part of a microbial mat. Biogenic and abiogenic hypotheses must therefore be tested using attributes at scales large enough to survive recrystallization. At the naked eye and hand-lens scale, the polished slabs display sufficient attributes to test those hypotheses.
A hypothesis that proposes the laminae are formed of allochthonous organic detritus would predict that the organic particles were subject to current reworking and gravity-driven settling, and therefore tend to accumulate in lows. They would also potentially mix with other grain types. Such fabrics are not observed. Rather, the stromatolites have discrete, organic-rich, wrinkly laminae between sediment layers, indicating distinct episodes of organic layer formation (Figs. 1A and 2). Moreover, the organics formed mat-like layers that contoured the stromatolites from cusp to cusp, did not thicken into lows, and possessed sufficient cohesive/adhesive properties to enable their establishment on stromatolite margin slopes greater than the angle of repose for particulate sediment [≈30° (22)] (Figs. 1A and 2 A and B). Thus, the organic layers likely do not consist of transported allochthonous organic detritus. Rather, their character and distribution are consistent with their interpretation as the remains of microbial mats formed at the sediment–water interface, in many places on steep to near-vertical slopes, during stromatolite growth.
These observations lead to the question of the role of microbes in stromatolite accretion, which requires an understanding of the roles of in situ chemical precipitation (i.e., precipitation at the sediment–water interface) and “clastic” sedimentation (i.e., mechanical deposition of sediment particles, including mineral particles formed by precipitation in the water column). In the case of clastic sedimentation, active microbial trapping and binding would be the only plausible way to accumulate sediment on steep- to vertical-sided domes. In the case of in situ precipitation, sediment can accumulate on any slope with or without the presence of microbial mat. However, in a precipitative environment microbes could also have played 2 roles influencing the precipitation of sediment: metabolically inducing mineral precipitation within the mat microenvironment or forming an organic “template” for localization of mineral precipitation.
Determining the nature of the primary sediments (precipitated in situ vs. clastic) is hampered by the absence of pristine primary fabrics or interspace deposits between stromatolites, which might have offered clues in sedimentary fabrics not modified by stromatolite-forming processes. However, valuable insights are nonetheless recorded within the stromatolites themselves: in the relict fabrics and geometry of the laminae, and their covariation through time. Many stromatolite laminae retain faint vestiges of clastic or palisades/crystal fabrics. Laminae with probable clastic character are more prevalent in the lower strata (Figs. 1 and 2) whereas precipitated (palisades) fabrics become more abundant in the upper strata (Fig. 3 B and C and Fig. S3). This vertical transition is matched by a change in lamina geometry: most of the laminae in the lower strata become thinner toward the stromatolite margins (Fig. 2 A and B), as would be expected if microbes were actively trapping and binding sediment or causing intramat precipitation, leading to thicker accretion on horizontal surfaces. Laminae in the upper strata, however, are isopachous, as expected if the layers formed dominantly by surface-normal crystal growth (4). These parallel changes in fabric and morphology suggest that stromatolite accretion was initially dominated by microbial trapping and binding of sediment and/or intramat precipitation, but became increasingly dominated by in situ precipitation through time. Importantly, the stacking of marginal-thinning laminae in the lower strata resulted in minimal change in laminae morphology during early stromatolite growth, whereas stacking of isopachous, precipitated laminae during later growth resulted in cusp infill and coalescence of the domes (Fig. 3). The correlation between changes in stromatolite morphology and sedimentary process, as inferred from fabrics and laminar architecture, conforms well to expectations from theoretical models of stromatolite morphogenesis (4, 23, 24) for a system evolving from microbially-dominated to precipitation-dominated accretion. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that benthic microbial communities or colonies contributed to formation of the encrusting/domical stromatolites, but their morphogenetic influence decreased over time as chemical precipitation increased.
Coniform Stromatolites
The coniform stromatolites of member 2/bed 2 contrast markedly to the encrusting/domical stromatolites of bed 1 in terms of fabrics and morphology. Here, we examine 2 types of coniform stromatolites to analyze these differences: the LCC stromatolites, which occur mainly near the platform margin, and the pseudoconical “cuspate swale stromatolites,” which dominate the platform interior.
Well-preserved LCC specimens were collected from an outcrop on southern Trendall Ridge, where abundant stromatolites clustered on the high side of a rim-like topographic feature at the platform margin (Fig. 4). Cuspate swale stromatolite samples were collected at southern Anchor Ridge. Both stromatolite types consist of alternating dolomite and chert laminae. The LCC structures have distinctive coniform morphology (Fig. 4) that is inherited through stacks of laminae that form pseudocolumns up to 2 m high (i.e., 2-m stratigraphic thickness) (7). Individual stromatolites are laterally separated by a few centimeters up to several decimeters of flat-lying laminated dolomite/chert. The cuspate swale stromatolites consist of pseudoconical structures with concave-upward slopes that grade into trough-shaped interspaces (Fig. S6). The apices of adjacent structures are connected by saddle-shaped ridges) (7, 9).
Fig. 4.
Stromatolites at the platform margin outcrop on southern Trendall Ridge. (A) Outcrop map showing cross-section view of stratigraphy from underlying altered volcanic rocks up through members 1–3 and part of member 4 of the Strelley Pool Formation. Note the paleotopographic feature on which the stromatolites were deposited: stromatolites only formed on the high side (Right). (B) Wavy laminites deposited in deeper water south of the paleohigh. (C) LCC (conical) stromatolites formed on the paleohigh. The dotted white line traces a single lamina across 2 coniform stromatolites. The sample indicated is shown in Fig. 5. (Scale rule in B and C: 15 cm.) Modified from ref. 32.
One notable aspect of the fabrics in both LCC and cuspate swale stromatolites is the high degree of lateral correlation between stromatolite and intercolumn laminae, which attests to uniform rates of accumulation and some commonality of depositional process between stromatolite and intercolumn areas. However, another notable feature is the contrast between the type of fabrics seen in the stromatolite and intercolumn areas (Fig. 5A), which attests to differences in the processes occurring in the 2 areas.
Fig. 5.
Sedimentary fabrics of an Early Archean coniform stromatolite and Mesoproterozoic Omachtenia stromatolite. (A) Coniform LCC stromatolite from the Early Archean Strelley Pool Formation. The stromatolite is on the right, and flat-lying intercolumn laminae are on the left. Polished slab showing a cross-section view. Dark laminae are chert-rich, light laminae are dolomite-rich. Dark cross-cutting fractures filled with hematite are the result of recent weathering. Dotted white lines highlight bundles of laminae with different character. Numbers refer to locations discussed in text. (B) Mesoproterozoic O. omachtensis stromatolite from the Uchuro-Maya region, Siberia, showing precipitated and clastic textures with thin organic laminae. Thin section, plane polarized light. Colored arrows on laminae indicate the inferred processes by which those laminae formed.
The intercolumn fabric is characterized by slightly to moderately undulose laminae that thicken and thin laterally. Current scours, topographic infill geometry (e.g., onlap, drape), tangential truncations, low-angle cross laminations, and graded fabrics are well expressed and abundant (Fig. 5A). Together, these features indicate deposition of clastic sediment from current and wave-agitated water. However, rather than being defined by changes in size and composition of clastic grains (none are visible because of recrystallization), they are defined by variations in size and type (i.e., chert, D1, D2, or D3 dolomite) of the neomorphic crystals. Here, we infer that crystal size, in a relative sense, approximates sediment grain size. Although it cannot be demonstrated because of the complete absence of primary grains, the distinct relationship of crystal size to stratification style supports this inference. In contrast to the intercolumn fabrics, the stromatolite interior fabrics consist of thin, continuous, nearly isopachous laminae reminiscent of precipitated layers. In the case of the cuspate swales there is a gradual lateral transition between the 2 fabrics across the concave slope (Fig. S6), whereas in the LCC stromatolites the transition is very sharp across an abrupt slope change. This contrast between stromatolite and intercolumn fabrics persists through many hundreds of laminae, attesting to long-lived differentiation of sedimentary processes on the stromatolites compared with the intercolumn area.
Although the presence of a benthic microbial community could cause such highly-localized and sustained modification of sedimentary process, the textural hallmarks typically associated with microbial mat buildup are absent: namely, wrinkled or crinkly laminoid fabrics, fenestrae and organic laminae (organic matter is rare, occurring only as faint, lamina-parallel wisps of organic material in some samples). However, it is also true that neither precipitation nor clastic sedimentation alone satisfactorily explains the combination of stromatolite and intercolumn area fabrics. It also seems unlikely that in situ precipitation on the stromatolite was juxtaposed against clastic sedimentation in the intercolumn areas, because, as already noted, the lateral correlation of intercolumn and stromatolite laminae indicates that material both on and off the stromatolites accumulated at a uniform rate, signifying commonality of depositional process.
An alternative hypothesis that incorporates alternating clastic sedimentation and biofilm-nucleated precipitation arises from comparison with Mesoproterozoic Omachtenia omachtensis and Gongylina differenciata stromatolites (Uchuro-Maya region, Siberia) (25). The microstructure of those stromatolites formed by emplacement of mm-scale sediment-rich laminae during depositional events such as storms or high tides, alternating with development of thin, laterally continuous micritic laminae, preserved by penecontemporaneous mineral precipitation within thin organic sheets (Fig. 5B). Silicified structures show that the organic sheets formed through decay of microbial mats that inhabited and stabilized the sediment surface during intervals of nondeposition (25).
In the Strelley Pool Formation, the thin, near-isopachous laminae that span the coniform stromatolites and the intercolumn areas (e.g., location 1; Fig. 5A) resemble Omachtenia's organic-sheet-nucleated precipitates, whereas the undulating intercolumn deposits resemble the “sedimentary event beds.” Thus, the processes inferred for formation of Omachtenia and Gongylina stromatolites may also explain coniform stromatolite development in the Strelley Pool Formation (Fig. 6). However, closer examination of LCC and cuspate swale stromatolites suggests some minor differences.
Fig. 6.
A simplified schematic representation of 2 inferred modes of formation of coniform stromatolites in the Strelley Pool Formation, incorporating spatial and temporal variations in process sequences, and the resulting sedimentary fabrics in relation to morphology. The first mode (Left) is similar to the sequence of processes that formed Proterozoic Omachtenia stromatolites and involves temporal variations in laterally-uniform processes (25). The second mode (Right) also involves lateral variations in process because of the formation of microbial films only on stromatolites.
The Omachtenia style of stromatolite morphogenesis involves temporal (rather than spatial) variations in sedimentary regime, and implies that contemporaneous sedimentary layers should therefore exhibit the same fabric, having formed under the same regime. In the LCC stromatolites this is true at some stratigraphic levels; some stromatolite laminae correlate with similarly thin, isopachous laminae in the intercolumn area, whereas clastic deposits lie above and below those, reflecting temporal alternation between 2 regimes. However, there are many places (e.g., locations 2 and 3; Fig. 5A) where sets of stromatolite laminae (with precipitate-like fabric) transit directly across the stromatolite margins into a set of correlative, and therefore contemporaneous, clastic laminae. Evidently, there were spatial variations in the way those laminae formed.
These relationships indicate that at least some organic films influencing formation of laminae on the stromatolite terminated at the stromatolite margins. In addition, the direct correlation of stromatolite laminae with clastic intercolumn deposits may indicate that the stromatolite laminae formed by microbial adhesion of clastic sediment, rather than by in situ precipitation on the organic films. We have argued against microbial trapping and binding of sediment particles on the stromatolite because of the lack of textural evidence in the stromatolitic laminae. However, a possible explanation for this apparent paradox involves settling of micrometer-scale, water column-nucleated crystals onto both the stromatolite (whereupon they adhered to an organic layer) and the intercolumn surfaces (where no organic layer existed and the particles could be moved around by currents and waves), thereby creating a single layer with lateral variation in cohesiveness. Deposition of water column-nucleated precipitates is a well-documented phenomenon in precipitative environments such as evaporite basins (ref. 26 and references therein). Such extremely-fine crystals settling from the water column may not require a well-developed, trapping and binding mat community to adhere to stromatolite slopes. A thin organic film could have sufficed, either a thin biofilm or decayed mat remnants like those observed in Omachtenia and Gongylina, and inferred here to have been templates for precipitation. Experiments have shown that the presence of a thin, low profile but mucilaginous organic film on a submerged surface greatly enhances sediment particle adhesion, even under flow conditions.* Thus, the presence of a either a low-profile biofilm or the decayed remnants of a mat on the stromatolite could have facilitated particle adhesion.
The surviving textural evidence cannot be used to discriminate between this latter hypothesis and the hypothesis that the stromatolite laminae formed by localized in situ precipitation. Potentially, a combination of grain adhesion and mat-nucleated precipitation could have contributed to stromatolite accretion. However, the “grain adhesion” hypothesis better explains the consistent vertical thickness of laminae throughout stromatolite and intercolumn areas and the resulting consistency of laminar geometry through the pseudocolumn (7). Such geometry is consistent with vertical settling of particles onto the surface.
In summary, formation of the Strelley Pool Formation coniform stromatolites likely involved a combination of the following “sedimentation/accretion modes” (illustrated in Figs. 5A and 6):
-
Formation of laterally extensive laminae by precipitation within thin organic layers (location 1; Fig. 5A).
-
Rare deposition of laterally restricted sedimentary “event” layers in the low areas between stromatolites (location 4; Fig. 5A).
-
Formation of laterally variable laminae from accumulation of clastic layers between stromatolites (consisting of water-column precipitated particles) coupled with either: (i) adhesion of water column-nucleated particles to thin organic films on stromatolites, or (ii) localized precipitation of laminae on stromatolites, nucleated on thin organic layers. (locations 2 and 3; Fig. 5A).
In reality there were probably infinitely variable intermediate modes, combining aspects of these 3 “end member” modes. However, there also appear to be relatively distinct examples of the fabrics associated with each end member mode. The changing relative importance of each of these modes of accretion/deposition through time can be traced through the changing arrangement of the different fabric suites.
In this view, the role of microbes in coniform stromatolite accretion was largely passive. Microbes simply provided a layer of organic material that formed a template for crystal nucleation and/or particle adhesion. Accepting this interpretation, the most direct evidence for microbial involvement in stromatolite morphogenesis comes not from stromatolite morphology or specific textural observations in isolation, but from the spatiotemporal arrangement of textures and fabrics within the context of stromatolite morphology. If morphology does not of itself encapsulate the microbial influence, then it is unlikely that a morphotype can be definitively linked to a specific type of organism, or even a metabolic strategy such as photosynthesis (27).
Genesis and Variability of Stromatolites
The existence of microbial mats during formation of stromatolites in the Strelley Pool Formation can be deduced from different sets of evidence in multiple stromatolite types. In domical stromatolites, evidence of microbial mat formation lies in the observation that cohesive layers of organic material formed at discrete, regular intervals at the surface of stromatolites, coupled with the fact that those laminae adhered to the steep stromatolite margins and did not preferentially thicken into topographic lows. In the coniform stromatolites, microbial activity is inferred from the juxtaposition of contemporaneous but contrasting sedimentary fabrics and their arrangement within the context of stromatolite morphology. In both instances the interpretation benefits from comparisons with microbially-influenced microstructure in well-preserved Proterozoic stromatolites (25). Unfortunately, microfossils are not preserved because of redistribution of the organic material by neomorphic crystal growth during recrystallization. Biomarker preservation is possible but perhaps unlikely because of the thermal maturity of the organic matter (28).
In addition to preserving different types of biosignatures, the stromatolites preserve evidence that microbes played a variable role in accretion. In coniform stromatolites, microbes may simply have provided a template, perhaps postmortem, for chemical precipitation or adhesion of fine crystalline sediment nucleated in the water column. In the encrusting/domical stromatolites, thinning of laminae at the margins suggests a component of active microbial trapping and binding and/or intramat biomediated precipitation, which gave way through time to in situ precipitation during later stages of accretion. Effectively, the proportion of microbial mat formation, relative to other processes of deposition, played a role in determining stromatolite morphogenetic variability.
Whether biological factors were the principal control on stromatolite initiation is unclear from either fabrics or morphology. However, some contextual features provide insight to alternate possibilities. A major clue is the fact that most stromatolites appear to initiate on a preexisting topographic feature such as an intraclast, cobble, boulder, ripple crest, or mound. Microbial colonization and biofilm formation at the benthic boundary layer can hinge on subtle lateral topographic variations that affect fluid circulation and chemical gradients in pore spaces of the upper millimeters of sediment (29). Thus, slightly-elevated locations such as ripple crests are differentiated from their surroundings, from an ecological or biochemical point of view, in terms of pore space chemistry, and could become preferred substrates for local mat formation and stromatolite initiation. Precipitation could also occur preferentially on highs, because elevated sites would be more likely to remain free of sediment, enabling uninterrupted crystal growth. However, evidence from Proterozoic rocks suggests that seafloor carbonate precipitation can be facilitated by or nucleated within mats (e.g. ref. 14), a process that is also inferred here for “established” stromatolites in the Strelley Pool Formation. Thus, if the better-understood, younger geologic record is the key to the deep past, then microbial colonization and biofilm formation may have been the initializing factor, leading to subsequent mat-nucleated precipitation or particle adhesion. Experimental work may determine whether this latter hypothesis is likely or whether seafloor precipitation could equally have provided rapid initial stabilization of the sediment, before microbial colonization on the highs.
Although the location and relative amount of microbial mat formation played a role in determining stromatolite initiation, distribution, and morphogenesis, this does not necessarily imply that stromatolite morphologic changes equate to biodiversity. Changes in stromatolite morphology described herein are evidently linked to shifts in environmental processes through the Strelley Pool Formation. For example, in the case of domical stromatolites, the change from inherited to coalescing morphology through time is clearly linked to increasing precipitation, as evidenced in the vertical increase in crystals and palisades fabrics (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the change from domical to coniform morphology is accompanied by a relative decrease in evidence for precipitation. These latter observations conform well to model predictions of shifting interaction between the amount of surface-normal growth driven by in situ precipitation and the amount of vertical growth driven by microbial processes (23). There is no biodiversity implicit in this relationship, simply a change in the relative influence of microbial input compared with other processes. The textural and morphological evidence described herein does not provide direct evidence of biodiversity, and without microfossils it is impossible to test the null hypothesis that the entire stromatolite assemblage involved just 1 type of microorganism. Nonetheless, the environmental changes that accompanied stromatolite morphologic changes imply that microbial communities at the stromatolite surfaces had to adapt to those changes.
It is clear from sedimentological evidence that any microbial communities present during deposition of the Strelley Pool Formation would have been subject to significant environmental shifts, including changes in water depth, sedimentation rate, precipitation rate, and wave or current energy. Extant microbial systems respond to such changes by altering the survival strategies or gene expression of individual species and the composition of multispecies communities. Therefore, to the extent that modern analogs guide interpretation of ancient processes, then ecologically-diverse microbial mat communities were probably involved in stromatolite formation and changed their community composition and survival strategies in response to changing environmental conditions. Those changes may be reflected in the diverse array of stromatolite morphologies and textures that formed during deposition of the Strelley Pool Formation.
One important question involves the possible role of photosynthetic organisms in Early Archean mat communities (e.g., ref. 30). Early studies of modern tufted mat stromatolites suggested coniform morphology was caused by the phototactic aggregation of filamentous cyanobacteria (31). However, recent experimental results on tuft formation under variable illumination conditions indicate that coniform morphology can develop independently of photosynthesis (27). The morphology of Strelley Pool Formation coniform stromatolites suggests a tendency for vertical growth (7), which has been attributed to the vertical migration of photosynthetic microbial communities (23). However, chemotaxis and the settling of sediment could, in principal, play the same role in causing vertical growth in stromatolites. That is, continuing sediment deposition could prompt migration of microbes toward the sediment–water interface, along a vertical chemical gradient in the upper millimeters of sediment. Thus, whether or not photoautotrophs were included within Strelley Pool Formation microbial communities is unclear from either textural or morphological evidence. Perhaps the best evidence for possible photoautotrophs in former Strelley Pool microbial communities lies in the effect of water depth, and inferred seafloor illumination, on stromatolite distribution. Previous studies documented a regional trend wherein stromatolites occur only in the shallow water parts of the Strelley Pool Formation carbonate platform and are absent in laterally equivalent deeper water deposits (7). The present study documents even more compelling evidence for this relationship along southern Trendall Ridge, where stromatolite distribution across relict topography at the platform margin was very tightly controlled by water depth. (Fig. 4A).
In conclusion, evidence preserved in the Strelley Pool Formation suggests that microbial mat communities probably existed 3.43 billion years ago in the Pilbara sea, flourishing under shifting environmental conditions, resulting in a morphologically-diverse assemblage of stromatolites. These stromatolites may have been inhabited by diverse microbial communities, possibly including photoautotrophs.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Geological Survey of Western Australia for generous field support, Malcolm Walter and Arthur Hickman for helpful discussions, George Rossman for use of Caltech Raman Laboratory, and Dawn Sumner and Ian Fairchild for helpful reviews. Fieldwork was partly supported by the Agouron Institute. A.C.A. was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Postdoctoral Program. The work of A.C.A., M.S.A., M.L.C., and I.K. was conducted at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory under contract to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (with Research and Technology Program/Astrobiology Science and Technology for Exploring Planets funding).
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: abigail.c.allwood{at}jpl.nasa.gov or grotz{at}gps.caltech.edu
-
This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2002.
-
Author contributions: A.C.A., J.P.G., M.L.C., and I.K. designed research; A.C.A., J.P.G., A.H.K., I.W.B., and M.S.A. performed research; A.C.A., J.P.G., A.H.K., I.W.B., and M.S.A. analyzed data; and A.C.A., J.P.G., and A.H.K. wrote the paper.
-
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0903323106/DCSupplemental.
-
↵* Salant NL, Hassan MA, Fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union 10–14 Dec, 2007, San Francisco, CA, abstract H13D-1534.
- Received February 6, 2009.
References
Controls on development and diversity of Early Archean stromatolites
More Articles of This Classification
Physical Sciences
Related Content
Cited by...
- Increased mud deposition reduces stromatolite complexity
- The timetable of evolution
- Paleobiological Perspectives on Early Microbial Evolution
- Focusing the Search for Biosignatures on Mars: Facies Prediction with an Example from Acidalia Planitia
- Surface Orientation Affects the Direction of Cone Growth by Leptolyngbya sp. Strain C1, a Likely Architect of Coniform Structures Octopus Spring (Yellowstone National Park)
- BIOLOGICAL INFLUENCES ON SEAFLOOR CARBONATE PRECIPITATION
- Carbon Mineral Evolution
- Sulfur isotopes of organic matter preserved in 3.45-billion-year-old stromatolites reveal microbial metabolism
- THE GEOZOIC SUPEREON
- Biophysical basis for the geometry of conical stromatolites
Similar Articles
You May Also be Interested in
PNAS Profile of NAS member and immunologist Akiko Iwasaki
Researchers report biparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in 17 members of three unrelated multigeneration families, paving the way for insights into alternative mechanisms for the treatment of inherited mitochondrial diseases.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/PublicDomainPictures.
Researchers report a machine-learning approach to identify land plants at risk of extinction, suggesting that the approach can be used to guide policies aimed at allocating resources for biodiversity conservation.
Image courtesy of Abbie Zimmer (Ohio State University, Columbus, OH).
A study explores how cats groom fur using fine structures called papillae on the surface of the tongue and presents a biologically inspired hairbrush to remove allergens from cat fur and apply medications on cat skin.
Image courtesy of Candler Hobbs (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta).
