Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Projections of future sea level becoming more dire

Jonathan T. Overpeck and Jeremy L. Weiss
PNAS December 22, 2009 106 (51) 21461-21462; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912878107
Jonathan T. Overpeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy L. Weiss
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Few of the possible impacts of future climate change have captured more public attention than sea-level rise. Globally, sea-level rise has accelerated since the 19th century, driven primarily by the expansion of warmer oceans and melting glaciers, along with a modest transfer of water into the ocean from the Earth's polar ice sheets. The observed rate of sea-level rise has not been uniform around the globe because of regional factors, but there is no doubt that the average sea-level trend is upwards (1). Implications for the rates and magnitudes of future sea-level rise are less clear, and a new study in this issue of PNAS (2) provides useful insight into how sea level will change through this century and beyond.

There are two main types of sea-level information needed to inform the development of effective climate change policy. First are estimates of the sea-level rise expected in the relative near term, namely by the end of the century. Second are estimates of the sea-level rise that will occur further into the future over many centuries as ice sheets and oceans come into equilibrium with a warmer atmosphere.

The Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1) was unable to provide a strong constraint on estimates of sea-level rise likely to occur by the end of this century. Their projection of 0.26- to 0.59-m sea-level rise by 2100 (under the business as usual A1FI greenhouse gas emissions scenario; ref. 1) represents a lower-bound estimate because it excludes sea-level change caused by rapid dynamical changes in the flow of Greenland and Antarctic ice. The IPCC excluded this information because the quantitative understanding of the dynamics internal to the Earth's great ice sheets was too incomplete. Nonetheless, new research is emphasizing the importance of these poorly understood dynamics when assessing possible rates of future sea-level rise (3–6). Most recently, gravity measurements observed from space have revealed that mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets is accelerating with time and more closely approximates a quadratic trend than a linear one (7).

The observed acceleration in the decline of polar ice sheet mass provides all the more reason to take the new results from Vermeer and Rahmstorf (2) seriously. Their work provides a significant update of previous work (8) and uses the relationship between observed past temperature and global sea level to project a sea-level rise of 0.75–1.90 m for the period 1990–2100. Empirically, this relationship is nonlinear and reflects the evolution of a sea-level rise currently dominated by the warming of the oceans to one dominated by the melting of polar ice sheets. Interestingly, the range of sea-level rise by 2100 projected by Vermeer and Rahmstorf (2) coincides remarkably well with a completely independent assessment of glaciological constraints published last year (0.8–2.0 m; ref. 3).

The take-home point of the new work (2) and independent previous work (3) is that it would be wise to assume that global sea-level rise could significantly exceed 1 m by 2100 unless dramatic efforts are soon made to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. It is sobering to see Vermeer and Rahmstorf's (2) result that modest reductions of emissions will likely be insufficient to preclude a meter of sea-level rise by 2100 or shortly thereafter and that much deeper cuts than those currently being given serious consideration by the world's political leaders are probably required to avoid the widespread large impacts of a 1-m sea-level rise on the East and Gulf coasts of the United States (Fig. 1) and elsewhere.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Spatial extent of 1- and 6-m potential future sea-level rise along the East and Gulf coasts of the United States and for selected major coastal municipalities. Elevation and connectivity to the ocean determine sea-level rise extent. Proportion of land area within municipalities coincident with sea-level rise extent determines percentage of susceptible area. The U.S. Geological Survey and Census Bureau provided elevation and municipality boundary data, respectively.

As highlighted by Vermeer and Rahmstorf (2), however, caution is warranted in using any relationship based on recent observed temperature and sea-level rise to project the future influence of polar ice sheet decay on sea level. The same holds true for efforts that rely on observed temperature and sea-level change of more distant periods when high-latitude ice sheets were much larger (9). In either case, the past is not necessarily a good analog for the future, and projections into a future dominated by the shrinking of interglacial-sized ice sheets are to some extent extrapolations. But again, as highlighted by Vermeer and Rahmstorf (2), glaciologists (3) are also concluding that future sea-level rise caused by this ice sheet behavior could be large.

Then there is the second type of sea-level information needed to inform climate change policy and adaptation. Vermeer and Rahmstorf (2) join an increasing body of work indicating that the relatively slow transfer of Greenland and Antarctic ice sheet mass into the oceans will likely become the primary determinant of sea-level rise later in this century. Just as important, it will take many centuries for these shrinking polar ice sheets and associated sea-level rise to stabilize with a warmer Earth. What policymakers need to know in this case is the amount of eventual sea-level rise to which the Earth will be committed for a given emissions trajectory in this century. In other words, what sea-level conditions will be forced on the future world community by the fossil fuel burners of this century?

A recent article in PNAS (10) shows that global warming will remain largely irreversible for at least 1,000 years after the cessation of greenhouse gas emissions. That article also notes that the persistent warmth could allow substantial ice sheet wastage for centuries to come. The recent IPCC report (1) weighed in on this issue as well, again with sea-level rise implications that may turn out to have been too conservative as new knowledge accumulates. The IPCC focused primarily on the potential demise of the Greenland Ice Sheet and its 7 m of sea-level rise equivalent, given a global warming of between 1.9 °C and 4.6 °C. More recent studies (3, 11), including that by Vermeer and Rahmstorf (2), additionally place emphasis on the Antarctic Ice Sheet as a potential source of eventual future large-scale sea-level rise, a conclusion supported by paleoclimatic and ice-sheet studies (12–15).

Global sea-level rise could significantly exceed 1 m by 2100.

The Antarctic Ice Sheet has many meters of potential sea-level rise to contribute in the future if warming is sufficient. Both the IPCC (1) and Overpeck et al. (13) suggest that warming in this century might be enough to commit future generations to 4–6 m of sea-level rise, or even more, beyond 2100 unless greenhouse gas emissions are reduced dramatically to keep the Earth from warming above ≈2 °C. The new and previously published constraints on rates (2, 3) also suggest that this future sea-level rise commitment could take place at rates approaching or exceeding 1 m per century. The impacts around the globe, including the United States (Fig. 1), would be profound and include the complete elimination of some island nations. This is one of the very real stakes facing those who set policy: should they knowingly allow this to happen?

Footnotes

  • 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jto{at}u.arizona.edu
  • Author contributions: J.L.W. constructed the figure; and J.T.O. and J.L.W. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 21527.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Solomon S,
    2. et al.
    , ed (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
  2. ↵
    1. Vermeer M,
    2. Rahmstorf S
    (2009) Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:21527–21532.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Pfeffer WT,
    2. Harper JT,
    3. O'Neel S
    (2008) Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st-century sea-level rise. Science 321:1340–1343.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Vaughan DG
    (2008) West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse: The fall and rise of a paradigm. Clim Change 91:65–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Allison I,
    2. Alley RB,
    3. Fricker HA,
    4. Thomas RH,
    5. Warner RC
    (2009) Ice sheet mass balance and sea level. Antarctic Sci 21:413–426.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Pritchard HD,
    2. Arthern RJ,
    3. Vaughan DG,
    4. Edwards LA
    (2009) Extensive dynamic thinning on the margins of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Nature 461:971–975.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Velicogna I
    (2009) Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE. Geophys Res Lett, 1029/2009GL040333.
  8. ↵
    1. Rahmstorf S
    (2007) A semiempirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science 315:368–370.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Siddall M,
    2. Stocker TF,
    3. Clark PU
    (2009) Constraints on future sea-level rise from past sea-level change. Nat Geosci 2:571–575.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Solomon S,
    2. Plattner GK,
    3. Knutti R,
    4. Friedlingstein P
    (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1704–1709.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Mitrovica JX,
    2. Gomez N,
    3. Clark PU
    (2009) The sea-level fingerprint of West Antarctic collapse. Science 323:753.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Scherer RP,
    2. et al.
    (1998) Pleistocene collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet. Science 281:82–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Overpeck JT,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Paleoclimatic evidence for future ice-sheet instability and rapid sea-level rise. Science 311:1747–1750.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Naish T,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Obliquity-paced Pliocene West Antarctic ice sheet oscillations. Nature 458:322–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Pollard D,
    2. DeConto RM
    (2009) Modeling West Antarctic ice sheet growth and collapse through the past five million years. Nature 458:329–333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Projections of future sea level becoming more dire
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Projections of future sea level becoming more dire
Jonathan T. Overpeck, Jeremy L. Weiss
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2009, 106 (51) 21461-21462; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912878107

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Projections of future sea level becoming more dire
Jonathan T. Overpeck, Jeremy L. Weiss
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2009, 106 (51) 21461-21462; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912878107
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

  • Solution to the 50-year-old Okazaki-fragment problem
  • Musical pleasure and musical emotions
  • Species coexistence through competition and rapid evolution
Show more

Related Content

  • Global sea level linked to global temperature
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Scopus (40)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490