Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being

Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton
  1. Center for Health and Well-being, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS September 21, 2010 107 (38) 16489-16493; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011492107
Daniel Kahneman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kahneman@princeton.edu
Angus Deaton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Contributed by Daniel Kahneman, August 4, 2010 (sent for review July 4, 2010)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Recent research has begun to distinguish two aspects of subjective well-being. Emotional well-being refers to the emotional quality of an individual's everyday experience—the frequency and intensity of experiences of joy, stress, sadness, anger, and affection that make one's life pleasant or unpleasant. Life evaluation refers to the thoughts that people have about their life when they think about it. We raise the question of whether money buys happiness, separately for these two aspects of well-being. We report an analysis of more than 450,000 responses to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, a daily survey of 1,000 US residents conducted by the Gallup Organization. We find that emotional well-being (measured by questions about emotional experiences yesterday) and life evaluation (measured by Cantril's Self-Anchoring Scale) have different correlates. Income and education are more closely related to life evaluation, but health, care giving, loneliness, and smoking are relatively stronger predictors of daily emotions. When plotted against log income, life evaluation rises steadily. Emotional well-being also rises with log income, but there is no further progress beyond an annual income of ~$75,000. Low income exacerbates the emotional pain associated with such misfortunes as divorce, ill health, and being alone. We conclude that high income buys life satisfaction but not happiness, and that low income is associated both with low life evaluation and low emotional well-being.

  • life evaluation
  • emotional experience
  • household income
  • satiation
  • happiness

Footnotes

  • 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kahneman{at}princeton.edu.
  • Author contributions: D.K. and A.D. designed research; performed research; analyzed data; and wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

    View Full Text
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being
    Daniel Kahneman, Angus Deaton
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2010, 107 (38) 16489-16493; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011492107

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being
    Daniel Kahneman, Angus Deaton
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2010, 107 (38) 16489-16493; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011492107
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley

    Article Classifications

    • Social Sciences
    • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 107 (38)
    Table of Contents

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Materials and Methods
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Indus River.
    Lockdowns and snow melt in South Asia
    Relatively clean snow and ice in the Indus River Basin during the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced meltwater in 2020, compared with the 20-year average.
    Image credit: Pixabay/Abdullah_Shakoor.
    Water ice clouds on modern Mars.
    Greenhouse warming of early Mars
    Atmospheric and climate conditions could have created a cloud greenhouse effect to warm Mars and support liquid surface water.
    Image credit: NASA/JPL/MSSS.
    Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19.
    Risk of indoor aerosol transmission
    Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19 that goes beyond the six-foot social distancing guideline.
    Image credit: Pixabay/Matryx.
    Illustration of colorful carbon nanotube-like figure with a meadow at the center.
    Opinion: We can use carbon to decarbonize—and get hydrogen for free
    What if we stopped using oil and gas as fuels and instead use them as sources of both hydrogen for fuel and carbon for useful, pervasive materials?
    Nanotube image credit: Shutterstock/Gl0ck; Field image credit: Shutterstock/Evgeny Karandaev.
    Magnified seed pod of Arabidopsis shown in colored scanning electron micrograph.
    Journal Club: Prion-like protein acts as water sensor in seeds
    The protein's capacity to fold into multiple conformations is reminiscent of a prion.
    Image credit: Science Source/Dennis Kunkel.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Youtube
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
    • List of Issues

    PNAS Portals

    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science
    • Teaching Resources

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Librarians
    • Press
    • Cozzarelli Prize
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates
    • FAQs
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights & Permissions
    • About
    • Contact

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.