Two abundant proteasome subtypes that uniquely process some antigens presented by HLA class I molecules

Benoît Guillaume; Jacques Chapiro; Vincent Stroobant; Didier Colau; Benoît Van Holle; Grégory Parvizi; Marie-Pierre Bousquet-Dubouch; Ivan Théate; Nicolas Parmentier; Benoît J. Van den Eynde

doi:10.1073/pnas.1009778107

Edited* by Peter Cresswell, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, and approved September 24, 2010 (received for review July 13, 2010)

Abstract

Most antigenic peptides presented by MHC class I molecules result from the degradation of intracellular proteins by the proteasome. In lymphoid tissues and cells exposed to IFNγ, the standard proteasome is replaced by the immunoproteasome, in which all of the standard catalytic subunits β1, β2, and β5 are replaced by their inducible counterparts β1i, β2i, and β5i, which have different cleavage specificities. The immunoproteasome thereby shapes the repertoire of antigenic peptides. The existence of additional forms of proteasomes bearing a mixed assortment of standard and inducible catalytic subunits has been suggested. Using a new set of unique subunit-specific antibodies, we have now isolated, quantified, and characterized human proteasomes that are intermediate between the standard proteasome and the immunoproteasome. They contain only one (β5i) or two (β1i and β5i) of the three inducible catalytic subunits of the immunoproteasome. These intermediate proteasomes represent between one-third and one-half of the proteasome content of human liver, colon, small intestine, and kidney. They are also present in human tumor cells and dendritic cells. We identified two tumor antigens of clinical interest that are processed exclusively either by intermediate proteasomes β5i (MAGE-A3_271–279) or by intermediate proteasomes β1i-β5i (MAGE-A10_254–262). The existence of these intermediate proteasomes broadens the repertoire of antigens presented to CD8 T cells and implies that the antigens presented by a given cell depend on their proteasome content.

Most antigenic peptides presented by MHC class I molecules are produced through degradation of intracellular proteins by the proteasome, a large protease complex responsible for most of the nonlysosomal protein degradation in eukaryotic cells (1). As a major actor of ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, the proteasome is also involved in many cellular processes, including cell cycle control and cell signaling. The 20S core of the proteasome has the shape of a barrel made of 28 subunits assembled in four stacked rings (2). The two outer rings are identical and contain seven different α subunits, whereas the two identical inner rings contain seven different β subunits, three of which exert catalytic activities, namely β1, β2, and β5. Each of these subunits was ascribed a typical activity profile on the basis of studies of the activity of yeast mutant proteasomes on small fluorogenic substrates: subunit β1 is considered to cleave mostly after acidic residues (caspase-like activity), subunit β2 after basic amino acids (trypsin-like activity), and subunit β5 after hydrophobic residues (chymotrypsin-like activity) (3).

In some lymphoid tissues and in cells exposed to IFNγ, the standard catalytic subunits are replaced by their inducible counterparts β1i (LMP2), β2i (MECL1), and β5i (LMP7), which are preferentially incorporated into proteasome particles, leading to the formation of immunoproteasomes (1). The activity of immunoproteasomes on fluorogenic substrates is different from that of the standard proteasome, with a lower caspase-like activity and higher chymotrypsin- and trypsin-like activities. The processing and presentation of a number of antigenic peptides is thereby favored in cells harboring immunoproteasomes, and this contributes to shape the repertoire of immunodominant epitopes (4). However, a number of other antigens, mainly derived from self or tumoral proteins, are produced less efficiently by the immunoproteasome (5). In many cases, these processing differences result from the occurrence of a prominent internal cleavage by one proteasome type, which destroys the antigenic peptide (6). Because the immunoproteasome is abundant in dendritic cells, those differences have implications for the induction of immune responses against such epitopes (7–9). Recently, the immunoproteasome was shown to contribute to the induction of inflammatory cytokines, and its selective inhibition attenuates inflammation in a model of rheumatoid arthritis (10). The immunoproteasome also plays a key role in the degradation of oxidized proteins, thereby maintaining protein homeostasis (11, 12). The thymic cortex harbors an alternative proteasome form containing a thymus-specific β5 subunit called β5t, which associates with β1i and β2i to form thymoproteasomes (13).

The assembly of vertebrate proteasomes is a highly ordered process involving the building of half-proteasomes containing one α ring and one β ring in which catalytic β subunits are maintained inactive by the presence of an N-terminal propeptide that masks the catalytic N-terminal threonine of the mature subunit (14). The α ring serves as a scaffold for the assembly of β subunits, which are incorporated in a defined order dictated by the mutual interaction of their propeptides. Incorporation of the last β subunit, β7, triggers the dimerization of two half-proteasomes through the intercalation of its C-terminal tail between β1 and β2 of the opposing β ring. This is orchestrated by a chaperone named proteassemblin or POMP. During dimerization, the catalytic subunits are activated by autocatalytic removal of the propeptides, and proteassemblin is degraded, as the first substrate of the newly matured proteasome. The assembly of immunoproteasomes was studied using cells transfected with various constructs encoding catalytic subunits and was found to be cooperative: subunits β1i, β2i, and β5i interact with each other to favor their common incorporation into homogeneous immunoproteasome particles containing all three subunits, even in cells coexpressing immuno- and standard catalytic subunits (15). This is favored by a quicker incorporation of β1i over β1, which then favors further assembly of β2i and β5i (15–18). Indeed, incorporation of β2i is dependent on that of β1i, whereas β5i is needed for removal of the propeptide of β1i and β2i. β5i was the only subunit able to incorporate into proteasomes independently from the other immunosubunits. These effects, which are dictated by the propeptide sequence of each subunit, theoretically allow for the existence of intermediate proteasomes containing β5i without β2i (18). Intermediate proteasomes were observed in transfected cells and were suggested to partly account for the heterogeneity of proteasome preparations isolated from rat muscle, which displayed varying physicochemical and functional properties and contained varying compositions in catalytic β subunits (18–23). Such heterogeneity was also observed in rodent heart (20, 24) and in human colon and liver (25). Posttranslational modifications, such as phopshorylation, acetylation, or methylation, were suggested to also contribute to this heterogeneity (20, 22, 26, 27). The lack of catalytic subunit-specific antibodies recognizing native proteasome particles has prevented the isolation of intermediate proteasomes so that it proved difficult to confirm their existence in normal tissues and study their actual composition in catalytic subunits. Here we produced a set of unique subunit-specific antibodies that allowed us to isolate intermediate proteasomes, confirm and quantify their presence in normal tissues, determine their composition stoichiometry in β subunits, and study their function.

Results

We produced antibodies able to immunoprecipitate human proteasomes containing subunit β1i, β2i, β5i, or β5 by immunizing rabbits with small peptides corresponding to the C terminus of each subunit and selected for their lack of homology with the other subunits, their lack of secondary structure, and their accessibility as predicted from the structure of bovine proteasome (Fig. S1) (28). From one of these rabbits, we also obtained a monoclonal antibody against subunit β5 (29). When tested by immunoblot on purified standard or immunoproteasomes or on proteasomes isolated from cells transfected with β1i and/or β5i, these antibodies each stained a unique band of the expected size only in the relevant samples (Fig. S2A). The specificity of the four antibodies was further established by immunoblotting after 2D electrophoresis and identification of the spots by mass spectrometry (Figs. S3 and S4). Each antibody stained only two spots corresponding to two isoforms of the relevant subunit. Additional data further illustrating the high specificity of these antibodies are provided in the SI Materials and Methods. Importantly, all these antibodies specifically recognized not only denatured proteasome subunits, but also native proteasome particles, as indicated by a sandwich ELISA (Fig. S2B). This was not true for commercial antibodies that we used for comparison, which recognized denatured proteasome subunits but not native particles (anti-β1 shown on Fig. S2B).

We analyzed the presence of inducible subunits β1i, β2i, and β5i in total proteasomes immunoprecipitated from a series of human tumor lines (Fig. 1A). Eight of 16 tumor lines showed the presence of β1i and β5i in their proteasomes but the absence of β2i. This lack of β2i excluded the presence of immunoproteasome and suggested the presence of intermediate proteasome forms containing only β1i and/or β5i. To characterize those intermediate proteasomes, we depleted melanoma EB81-MEL cell lysates of β5i-containing proteasomes using anti-β5i–coated beads. We immunoprecipitated all remaining proteasomes with an anti-α2 antibody and analyzed their subunit content (Fig. 1B). We detected β5 but not β5i, indicating that the depletion was complete. We also did not detect any β1i. This result excluded the presence of intermediate proteasomes bearing β1i as the only inducible subunit. We then returned to the melanoma lysate, which we depleted of β5-containing proteasomes. The remaining proteasomes contained β1i, β5i, and β1 (Fig. 1B). They corresponded to intermediate proteasomes containing β1i and β5i, and probably also proteasomes containing β1 and β5i. To confirm the presence of the latter, we repeated depletion of the melanoma lysate with anti-β5 antibodies and performed a second depletion using our β1i-specific antibodies. The remaining proteasomes contained both β5i and β1, confirming the presence of proteasomes containing β5i as the only inducible subunit in those melanoma cells (Fig. 1B). We also analyzed the proteasomes immunoprecipitated with anti-β5 antibodies: they did not contain β1i, further excluding the presence of proteasomes β1i-β2-β5 (Fig. S5A). In conclusion, this analysis demonstrated the presence of two intermediate proteasome types in these melanoma cells, one with catalytic subunits β1, β2, and β5i (proteasome β5i) and one with catalytic subunits β1i, β2, and β5i (proteasome β1i-β5i). Similar results were obtained with melanoma lines LB39-MEL and LB1751-MEL, and myeloma line L363. Lung carcinoma line NCI-H460 was also analyzed and was found to contain only the intermediate proteasome β1i-β5i.

Fig. 1.

Identification of intermediate proteasomes in human cancer cell lines. (A) Immunoblots performed with total proteasomes isolated by immunoprecipitation with anti-α2 mAb MCP21 (39) from tumor lines not exposed to IFNγ. Subunits were detected using the rabbit antibodies characterized in Figs. S2–S4. (B) Characterization of intermediate proteasomes form melanoma line EB81-MEL. Cell lysates were depleted of β5i-containing or β5-containing proteasomes before immunoprecipitation with mAb MCP21 of all of the remaining proteasomes and their analysis by immunoblot. Where indicated, a second depletion with anti-β1i was performed after the β5 depletion. The commercial anti-β1 antibodies used were of mouse origin and therefore in some cases the secondary antibody cross-reacted with the light chain of the mouse mAb used for the immunoprecipitation (Upper bands). The control showing complete depletion of β5-containing proteasomes is shown on Fig. S8.

To determine the relative abundance of the different proteasome types in those cell lines, we repeated the depletion approach and quantified the proteasomes after each step using a sandwich ELISA (30). Additional quantifications were performed by testing total lysates directly in sandwich ELISA using the anti-β5, anti-β1i, anti-β2i or anti-β5i antibodies for detection. Intermediate proteasomes represented 9 to 17% of the proteasome content of melanoma cells and comprised a majority of proteasome β5i (Table 1). Lung carcinoma line NCI-H460 and myeloma line L363 contained about 20% of proteasome β1i-β5i.

View this table:

Table 1.

Quantification of intermediate proteasomes in human cells and tissues

In normal human tissues, we observed high proportions of intermediate proteasomes: these represented between one-third and one-half of the proteasome content of liver, kidney, small bowel, and colon (Table 1). Liver and kidney essentially contained standard proteasomes and intermediate proteasome β5i. Small bowel mostly contained immunoproteasomes, together with both types of intermediate proteasomes, whereas colon contained equally high amounts of immunoproteasomes and intermediate proteasome β5i. Heart mostly contained standard proteasomes (Table 1). It should be stressed that, because of the difficulty in obtaining normal human tissues, these estimates are based on small numbers of samples and should be taken as indications rather than precise and final quantifications.

Intermediate proteasomes were also abundant in monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Table 1). Proteasome β5i was the most abundant form, accounting for about 40% of the proteasome content of dendritic cells. These proportions were relatively similar in immature and mature dendritic cells, but large variations were observed between different donors, possibly reflecting differences in the inflammatory conditions prevailing in vivo in the donors of blood monocytes.

Activity of Intermediate Proteasomes.

To study the function of intermediate proteasomes, we produced cells whose proteasome content was composed exclusively of intermediate proteasomes β5i or intermediate proteasomes β1i-β5i. This was achieved by transfecting 293-EBNA cells, which contain only standard proteasomes, with strong expression vectors encoding β1i or β5i. The overexpression of the transfected subunit ensured a complete replacement of standard proteasomes by intermediate proteasomes β5i in the β5i-transfected cells 293-β5i, or by proteasomes β1i-β5i in doubly transfected cells 293-β1i-β5i (Fig. S2A). When tested on fluorogenic substrates, the activity of intermediate proteasomes purified from those cells was similar, although not identical, to that of the immunoproteasome with regard to the chymotrypsin- and trypsin-like activities (Fig. S6). The caspase-like activity, which is attributed to the β1 subunit, was predictably different for the two intermediate proteasomes: high for proteasome β5i, like the standard proteasome, and very low for the proteasome β1i-β5i, like the immunoproteasome.

Exclusive Processing of a MAGE-A10 Tumor Peptide by the Intermediate Proteasome β1i-β5i.

Peptide GLYDGMEHL_254–262 is an HLA-A2–restricted tumor antigenic peptide encoded by gene MAGE-A10 and currently used in cancer vaccine trials (31). The presentation of this antigen is proteasome dependent (Fig. S7). We compared the production of this antigenic peptide by the different proteasome types using two complementary approaches. First, we transfected our panel of 293 cell lines expressing either proteasome type with increasing amounts of MAGE-A10 cDNA. Only cells containing intermediate proteasomes β1i-β5i were efficiently recognized by the MAGE-A10/HLA-A2–specific CTL clone (Fig. 2A). Second, we used proteasomes purified from the different 293 cells to digest a precursor peptide of 24 amino acids encompassing the antigenic peptide. Using HPLC coupled to mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), we observed production of the antigenic peptide in the digest performed with intermediate proteasomes β1i-β5i, but not in the other digests (Fig. 2B). The main fragments observed in the other digests resulted from a cleavage within the sequence of the antigenic peptide, between D₂₅₇ and G₂₅₈ (Fig. 2C). These fragments were much less abundant in the digest obtained with proteasomes β1i-β5i. This result indicates that proteasome β1i-β5i is less active at destroying the antigenic peptide. As a result, fragments with the proper N terminus or C terminus of the antigenic peptide become prominent in the digests obtained with proteasome β1i-β5i (Fig. 2C). We concluded that most proteasome types, except proteasome β1i-β5i, destroy the antigenic peptide by internal cleavage. The lack of destructive cleavage by proteasome β1i-β5i may explain its exclusive capacity to produce the antigenic peptide. Those results imply that the recognition of tumor cells by the MAGE-A10–specific CTL is made possible by their expression of proteasome β1i-β5i. Remarkably, melanoma line LB1751-MEL, which is recognized by the CTL, contains only 2–8% of proteasome β1i-β5i (Table 1), indicating that a low proportion of the appropriate proteasome type is sufficient to produce enough antigenic peptide for CTL recognition.

Fig. 2.

Exclusive processing of peptide MAGE-A10_254–262 by the intermediate proteasome β1i-β5i. (A) Processing of peptide GLYDGMEHL_254–262 by 293-EBNA cells containing different proteasome subtypes (characterized in Fig. S2). 293-SP, untransfected 293-EBNA cells containing only standard proteasomes (SP); 293-β1i, 293-EBNA cells transfected with a construct encoding β1i; 293-β1i-β5i, transfected with β1i and β5i; 293-IP, transfected with β1i, β2i, and β5i, and containing only immunoproteasomes (IP). Cells were transfected with an HLA-A2 construct and the indicated amount of plasmid encoding MAGE-A10. As positive control, cells were loaded with the synthetic peptide at 0.5 μg/mL MAGE-A10–specific CTL was added and TNF production was measured. (B) Detection of antigenic peptide GLYDGMEHL in digests obtained by incubating precursor peptide ALNMMGLYDGMEHLIYGEPRKLLT with purified 20S proteasomes. Digests were analyzed by mass spectrometry coupled to HPLC, and the detection of the relevant ion was plotted as a function of the degradation of the precursor peptide. AU, arbitrary units. (C) MS detection of the indicated peptide fragments in the digests shown in B, analyzed at a time point corresponding to a precursor degradation of 59% (β5i), 55% (β1i-β5i), 53% (SP), and 40% (IP).

Exclusive Processing of a MAGE-A3 Tumor Peptide by the Intermediate Proteasome β5i.

We analyzed the processing of another tumor peptide widely used in cancer vaccine trials, the MAGE-A3–derived peptide FLWGPRALV_271–279 presented by HLA-A2 (32). The processing and presentation of this antigen seems unconventional: although some HLA-A2⁺ tumor cells expressing MAGE-A3 were clearly recognized by CTL specific for this peptide, others were not, leading to the proposal that this peptide was poorly processed (33, 34). Moreover, the treatment of tumor cells with proteasome inhibitors was surprisingly able to induce their recognition by the CTL (ref. 34 and Fig. 3A). We transfected our various 293 cells with increasing amounts of a MAGE-A3 cDNA and observed that only cells containing intermediate proteasomes β5i were recognized by the specific CTL clone (Fig. 3B). When we digested a 23-amino-acid-long precursor peptide with purified proteasomes of either type and analyzed the digests by HPLC-MS, we detected the production of the antigenic peptide FLWGPRALV after digestion with proteasome β5i, but not with proteasomes β1i-β5i or immunoproteasomes, and only weakly with standard proteasomes (Fig. 3C, Left). In the presence of proteasome inhibitor epoxomicin, the digest obtained with standard proteasomes became strongly positive, whereas the other digests remained unchanged (Fig. 3C, Left). Similar results were obtained when the digests were loaded onto HLA-A2⁺ target cells and tested for recognition by specific CTL (Fig. 3C, Right). These results suggested that standard proteasomes destroyed the antigenic peptide by internal cleavage through an epoxomicin-sensitive activity, whereas an epoxomicin-resistant activity was responsible for production of the antigenic peptide. They also suggested that the destructive activity was absent in proteasome β5i.

Fig. 3.

Exclusive processing of peptide MAGE-A3_271–279 by the intermediate proteasome β5i. (A) Restoration of the presentation of MAGE-A3 peptide FLWGPRALV_271–279 by tumor cells after treatment with proteasome inhibitors. Melanoma SK23-MEL and myeloma L363 were treated with lactacystin (50 μM), epoxomicin (1 μM), or PS341 (50 nM) for 1 h before addition of the MAGE-A3_271–279–specific CTL. The synthetic peptide (0.2 μg/mL) was loaded on tumor cells as positive control. Production of TNF was measured after 24 h. (B) Processing of peptide FLWGPRALV_271–279 by 293-EBNA cells containing different proteasome subtypes. Cells were transfected with HLA-A2 and the indicated amount of plasmid encoding MAGE-A3. As positive control, cells were loaded with the peptide at 1 μg/mL. MAGE-A3–specific CTL was added and TNF production was measured. (C) Detection of antigenic peptide FLWGPRALV in digests obtained by incubating precursor peptide SPDACYEFLWGPRALVETSYVKV with purified 20S proteasomes, in the absence (solid lines) or in the presence (dotted lines) of 1 μM epoxomicin. (Left) Digests were analyzed by mass spectrometry coupled to HPLC, and the detection of the relevant ion was plotted as a function of the degradation of the precursor peptide. (Right) The same digests were loaded onto HLA-A2⁺ melanoma cells LB2667-MEL. MAGE-A3–specific CTL was added and TNF production was measured. Similar results were obtained when lactacystin was used instead of epoxomicin. (D) MS detection of the indicated peptide fragments in the digests shown in C, analyzed at a time point corresponding to a precursor degradation of 41% (β5i), 36% (β5i + epoxo), 35% (SP), 41% (SP + epoxo), 22% (β1i-β5i), 28% (β1i-β5i + epoxo), 28% (IP), and 26% (IP + epoxo). Similar results were obtained when lactacystin was used instead of epoxomicin.

Among the activities monitored with fluorogenic substrates, the least sensitive to epoxomicin is the caspase-like activity, which is exerted by the β1 subunit and cleaves after acidic and branched residues including valine, which is present at the C terminus of the MAGE-A3/HLA-A2 peptide (Fig. S6B) (3). This activity is high in standard proteasomes and proteasomes β5i, which have the β1 subunit, whereas it is low in immunoproteasomes and proteasomes β1i-β5i, which have the β1i subunit (Fig. S6). The β1 subunit could therefore be responsible for the epoxomicin-resistant activity needed to produce the C-terminal cleavage of the antigenic peptide. Indeed, when we analyzed the digests by HPLC-MS, we found that only standard proteasomes and proteasomes β5i were able to perform the C-terminal cleavage after valine (Fig. 3D). The data also confirmed that this cleavage was not clearly prevented by epoxomicin. Rather, the abundance of the fragments resulting from this C-terminal cleavage was increased by epoxomicin in the digests obtained with standard proteasomes, likely because epoxomicin prevented a prominent “competitive” destructive cleavage within the antigenic peptide. Indeed, a prominent cleavage was observed between F₂₇₁ and L₂₇₂ in the digests obtained with standard proteasomes, but not in the other digests (Fig. 3D), suggesting an involvement of subunit β5 in this cleavage. This was further supported by the fact that this cleavage was strongly reduced by epoxomicin. Altogether, these results indicate that efficient processing of the MAGE-A3/HLA-A2 peptide requires the presence of subunit β1 to make the proper C terminus and the absence of subunit β5 to avoid a prominent destructive cleavage within the peptide. These conditions are met naturally with intermediate proteasomes β5i and artificially with standard proteasomes exposed to epoxomicin, which blocks β5 but not β1 activity.

Discussion

The existence of intermediate proteasomes β5i and β1i-β5i reported here is consistent with the rules of cooperative assembly of inducible catalytic subunits (15–18). These intermediate proteasomes all have β5i, which is needed for the maturation of β1i and β2i, and none of them has β2i, which cannot incorporate without β1i. The abundance of intermediate proteasomes β5i in human liver and colon is in line with the previous detection of high amounts of subunit β5i with low amounts of β1i and β2i in these tissues (25). Human heart mostly contained standard proteasomes, in line with a recent study performed in rat heart (24).

Our study focused initially on the characterization of proteasomes in tumor cell lines lacking β2i (Fig. 1). Our results exclude the presence of proteasomes β1i-β2-β5 and demonstrate the presence of intermediate proteasomes β1-β2-β5i and β1i-β2-β5i. Cells containing β2i might theoretically contain proteasomes β1-β2i-β5, β1i-β2i-β5, and/or β1-β2i-β5i. Although the rules of cooperative assembly preclude the formation of such proteasomes, one study suggested the possible assembly of proteasomes β1-β2i-β5i (18). We searched for such proteasomes in human liver by analyzing the proteasomes immunoprecipitated with anti-β2i antibodies: we found β1i and β5i but no β1 or β5, indicating that all of the β2i subunits are associated with immunoproteasomes, and confirming the absence of intermediate proteasomes bearing β2i (Fig. S5C).

The mature proteasome particle is made of two α rings and two β rings, arranged in a symmetrical order αββα. The existence of proteasomes with an asymmetrical assortment of inducible and standard catalytic subunits is conceivable. Such asymmetric proteasomes were recently observed in HeLa cells transfected with a tagged β1 subunit and exposed to IFNγ (21). The question remains whether asymmetrical proteasomes exist in untransfected cells and normal tissues. The approach we followed to characterize intermediate proteasomes in tumor lines ensured that we detected symmetrical intermediate proteasomes, as any asymmetrical particle containing both β5 and β5i, or both β1 and β1i, would have been depleted with the antibodies to β5i, β5, or β1i (Fig. 1B). We can therefore confirm the existence of symmetrical intermediate proteasomes β5i and β1i-β5i. These results, however, do not exclude the existence of asymmetrical proteasomes. We performed additional experiments where we analyzed proteasomes immunoprecipitated with anti-β5 in immunoblots probed with anti-β5i antibodies. We did not observe proteasomes bearing β5 together with β5i in melanoma cells nor in normal kidney, indicating the absence of asymmetrical proteasomes β5/β5i in these samples (Fig. S5B).

Although the activity profile of intermediate proteasomes on fluorogenic substrates largely fits the catalytic activities previously ascribed to each subunit (3), our results illustrate limitations in the definition of activities with fluorogenic substrates and their ascription to a given subunit. The replacement of subunit β1 by β1i decreased the caspase-like activity, as expected (Fig. S6). The chymotrypsin-like activity is expected to increase upon replacement of β5 by β5i. We did observe an increased chymotrypsin-like activity in proteasomes containing β5i, although this was clearer with one of the two fluorogenic substrates tested (Fig. S6). The trypsin-like activity, which is considered to be exerted by subunits β2/β2i, is increased in intermediate proteasomes β5i and β1i-β5i as compared with standard proteasomes, even though they all have subunit β2, suggesting that several distinct catalytic subunits contribute to a given activity. In addition, the classification into chymotrypsin-like, trypsin-like, and caspase-like proteasome activities does not consider the sequence flanking the cleavage site in the peptidic substrate. Flanking residues located before or after the cleavage site were shown to influence cleavage efficiency (35). Altogether, these considerations may explain the unexpected destructive cleavage of the MAGE-A10/HLA-A2 peptide by the immunoproteasome after an internal aspartic acid (Fig. 2), despite a low caspase-like activity measured on fluorogenic substrates (Fig. S6). In a similar fashion, the destructive cleavage of the MAGE-A3/HLA-A2 peptide between F271 and L272 is exerted by subunit β5 and not by β5i, despite the higher chymotryptic-like activity of β5i. The study of preferred cleavage sites of protein enolase indicated that immunoproteasomes, as opposed to standard proteasomes, favor cleavage after hydrophobic residues but disfavor cleavage before hydrophobic residues, suggesting that subunit β5i—as opposed to β5—does not cleave efficiently in the middle of hydrophobic stretches (35). This conclusion, which was supported by our analysis of the processing of other antigenic peptides (30), explains the destructive cleavage of the MAGE-A3 peptide reported here, which occurs between two hydrophobic residues and is exerted by subunit β5 and not β5i.

The existence of intermediate proteasomes, their presence in tumor and dendritic cells, their abundance in normal tissues, and their different activity profiles may have important bearings on the development of CD8⁺ immune responses. We describe two tumor antigens whose processing is dependent on the presence of intermediate proteasomes. It is likely that other antigens involved in host defense or autoimmunity are also processed differently by the intermediate proteasomes. The repertoire of antigens presented by a given cell is therefore, at least partly, dependent on its proteasome content. In a clinical context, it may become important to determine the proteasome content of cells that are targeted by immunotherapeutic approaches. A change in this proteasome content may modulate the antigenic repertoire, preventing or ensuring immune recognition of the cells. A clear illustration is the example of the MAGE-A3/HLA-A2 peptide, for which conflicting data were reported in the literature regarding its presentation by tumor cells (32–34). Our results provide an explanation for this controversy, by showing that the processing of this antigenic peptide is dependent on the presence of intermediate proteasomes β5i. They also explain the reported paradoxically increased presentation of the MAGE-A3 peptide upon treatment with proteasome inhibitors (34), which efficiently block the activity of subunit β5, responsible for destruction of the antigenic peptide, but not that of β1, responsible for production of the C terminus of the antigenic peptide. The presentation of other antigenic peptides is increased by lactacystin (36–38) and, in two cases, by transfection of β5i (36, 38), suggesting that the processing of these peptides also depends on the intermediate proteasome β5i.

An interesting question for further studies will be whether, in addition to changing the antigenic repertoire, modulation of the proteasome content also affects other proteasome functions such as the activation of transcription factors, the production of inflammatory cytokines, the regulation of the cell cycle, or the degradation of oxidized proteins.

Materials and Methods

Quantification of Proteasome Subtypes by Sandwich ELISA.

The proportions of proteasome subtypes were determined on the basis of the ELISA results, as follows: total amount of proteasomes = β5 + β5i; amount of immunoproteasomes = β2i; amount of intermediate proteasomes β5i = β5i − β1i; amount of intermediate proteasomes β1i-β5i = β1i − β2i. More details are provided in SI Materials and Methods.

Acknowledgments

We thank J.-L. Balligand and F. Brasseur for providing normal tissue samples. We thank T. Boon, P. Coulie, E. De Plaen, and N. Vigneron for comments on the manuscript and S. Depelchin and J. Klein for editorial assistance. This work was supported by grants from the European Union under the Sixth Programme (CancerImmunotherapy; LSHC-CT-2006-518234), from the Fondation Contre le Cancer (Belgium), from the Walloon Region (Programme d'Excellence CIBLES), from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) and the Télévie (Belgium) and from the Fonds Maisin (Belgium). B.G. was a research fellow with the FNRS.

Footnotes

¹To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Benoit.Vandeneynde{at}bru.licr.org.
Author contributions: B.G., J.C., V.S., D.C., N.P., and B.J.V.d.E. designed research; B.G., J.C., V.S., D.C., B.V.H., G.P., and M.-P.B.-D. performed research; B.G. and I.T. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; B.G., J.C., and B.J.V.d.E. analyzed data; and B.G. and B.J.V.d.E. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
↵*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1009778107/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

References

↵
1. Rock KL,
2. Goldberg AL
(1999) Degradation of cell proteins and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. Annu Rev Immunol 17:739–779.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Groll M,
2. et al.
(1997) Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386:463–471.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Dick TP,
2. et al.
(1998) Contribution of proteasomal beta-subunits to the cleavage of peptide substrates analyzed with yeast mutants. J Biol Chem 273:25637–25646.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Chen W,
2. Norbury CC,
3. Cho Y,
4. Yewdell JW,
5. Bennink JR
(2001) Immunoproteasomes shape immunodominance hierarchies of antiviral CD8(+) T cells at the levels of T cell repertoire and presentation of viral antigens. J Exp Med 193:1319–1326.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Morel S,
2. et al.
(2000) Processing of some antigens by the standard proteasome but not by the immunoproteasome results in poor presentation by dendritic cells. Immunity 12:107–117.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Chapiro J,
2. et al.
(2006) Destructive cleavage of antigenic peptides either by the immunoproteasome or by the standard proteasome results in differential antigen presentation. J Immunol 176:1053–1061.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Van den Eynde BJ,
2. Morel S
(2001) Differential processing of class-I-restricted epitopes by the standard proteasome and the immunoproteasome. Curr Opin Immunol 13:147–153.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Chapatte L,
2. et al.
(2006) Processing of tumor-associated antigen by the proteasomes of dendritic cells controls in vivo T-cell responses. Cancer Res 66:5461–5468.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Dannull J,
2. et al.
(2007) Immunoproteasome down-modulation enhances the ability of dendritic cells to stimulate antitumor immunity. Blood 110:4341–4350.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Muchamuel T,
2. et al.
(2009) A selective inhibitor of the immunoproteasome subunit LMP7 blocks cytokine production and attenuates progression of experimental arthritis. Nat Med 15:781–787.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Ding Q,
2. Martin S,
3. Dimayuga E,
4. Bruce-Keller AJ,
5. Keller JN
(2006) LMP2 knock-out mice have reduced proteasome activities and increased levels of oxidatively damaged proteins. Antioxid Redox Signal 8:130–135.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Seifert U,
2. et al.
(2010) Immunoproteasomes preserve protein homeostasis upon interferon-induced oxidative stress. Cell 142:613–624.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Murata S,
2. et al.
(2007) Regulation of CD8+ T cell development by thymus-specific proteasomes. Science 316:1349–1353.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Murata S,
2. Yashiroda H,
3. Tanaka K
(2009) Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:104–115.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Griffin TA,
2. et al.
(1998) Immunoproteasome assembly: Cooperative incorporation of interferon γ (IFN-γ)-inducible subunits. J Exp Med 187:97–104.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Groettrup M,
2. Standera S,
3. Stohwasser R,
4. Kloetzel PM
(1997) The subunits MECL-1 and LMP2 are mutually required for incorporation into the 20S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:8970–8975.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Kingsbury DJ,
2. Griffin TA,
3. Colbert RA
(2000) Novel propeptide function in 20 S proteasome assembly influences β subunit composition. J Biol Chem 275:24156–24162.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. De M,
2. et al.
(2003) Beta 2 subunit propeptides influence cooperative proteasome assembly. J Biol Chem 278:6153–6159.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Dahlmann B,
2. Ruppert T,
3. Kuehn L,
4. Merforth S,
5. Kloetzel P-M
(2000) Different proteasome subtypes in a single tissue exhibit different enzymatic properties. J Mol Biol 303:643–653.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Drews O,
2. et al.
(2007) Mammalian proteasome subpopulations with distinct molecular compositions and proteolytic activities. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:2021–2031.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Klare N,
2. Seeger M,
3. Janek K,
4. Jungblut PR,
5. Dahlmann B
(2007) Intermediate-type 20 S proteasomes in HeLa cells: “Asymmetric” subunit composition, diversity and adaptation. J Mol Biol 373:1–10.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Gomes AV,
2. et al.
(2009) Contrasting proteome biology and functional heterogeneity of the 20 S proteasome complexes in mammalian tissues. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:302–315.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Pelletier S,
2. et al.
(2010) Quantifying cross-tissue diversity in proteasome complexes by mass spectrometry. Mol Biosyst 6:1450–1453.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Kloss A,
2. Meiners S,
3. Ludwig A,
4. Dahlmann B
(2010) Multiple cardiac proteasome subtypes differ in their susceptibility to proteasome inhibitors. Cardiovasc Res 85:367–375.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Visekruna A,
2. et al.
(2009) Comparative expression analysis and characterization of 20S proteasomes in human intestinal tissues: The proteasome pattern as diagnostic tool for IBD patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:526–533.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Gomes AV,
2. et al.
(2006) Mapping the murine cardiac 26S proteasome complexes. Circ Res 99:362–371.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Zong C,
2. et al.
(2006) Regulation of murine cardiac 20S proteasomes: Role of associating partners. Circ Res 99:372–380.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Unno M,
2. et al.
(2002) The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure 10:609–618.
OpenUrl PubMed
↵
1. Spieker-Polet H,
2. Sethupathi P,
3. Yam PC,
4. Knight KL
(1995) Rabbit monoclonal antibodies: Generating a fusion partner to produce rabbit-rabbit hybridomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9348–9352.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Schultz ES,
2. et al.
(2002) The production of a new MAGE-3 peptide presented to cytolytic T lymphocytes by HLA-B40 requires the immunoproteasome. J Exp Med 195:391–399.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Huang L-Q,
2. et al.
(1999) Cytolytic T lymphocytes recognize an antigen encoded by MAGE-A10 on a human melanoma. J Immunol 162:6849–6854.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. van der Bruggen P,
2. et al.
(1994) A peptide encoded by human gene MAGE-3 and presented by HLA-A2 induces cytolytic T lymphocytes that recognize tumor cells expressing MAGE-3. Eur J Immunol 24:3038–3043.
OpenUrl PubMed
↵
1. Valmori D,
2. et al.
(1997) Analysis of MAGE-3-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes in human leukocyte antigen-A2 melanoma patients. Cancer Res 57:735–741.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Valmori D,
2. et al.
(1999) Modulation of proteasomal activity required for the generation of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-defined peptide derived from the tumor antigen MAGE-3. J Exp Med 189:895–906.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Toes REM,
2. et al.
(2001) Discrete cleavage motifs of constitutive and immunoproteasomes revealed by quantitative analysis of cleavage products. J Exp Med 194:1–12.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Gileadi U,
2. et al.
(1999) Generation of an immunodominant CTL epitope is affected by proteasome subunit composition and stability of the antigenic protein. J Immunol 163:6045–6052.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Noppen C,
2. et al.
(2000) Naturally processed and concealed HLA-A2.1-restricted epitopes from tumor-associated antigen tyrosinase-related protein-2. Int J Cancer 87:241–246.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Sewell AK,
2. et al.
(1999) IFN-γ exposes a cryptic cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. J Immunol 162:7075–7079.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Hendil KB,
2. Uerkvitz W
(1991) The human multicatalytic proteinase: Affinity purification using a monoclonal antibody. J Biochem Biophys Methods 22:159–165.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

Article Alerts

Email Article

Citation Tools

Request Permissions

Article Classifications

Biological Sciences
Immunology

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 107 (43)

Table of Contents

Submit

[1] ↵
Rock KL,
Goldberg AL
(1999) Degradation of cell proteins and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. Annu Rev Immunol 17:739–779.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[2] Rock KL,

[3] Goldberg AL

[4] ↵
Groll M,
et al.
(1997) Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386:463–471.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[5] Groll M,

[6] et al.

[7] ↵
Dick TP,
et al.
(1998) Contribution of proteasomal beta-subunits to the cleavage of peptide substrates analyzed with yeast mutants. J Biol Chem 273:25637–25646.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[8] Dick TP,

[9] et al.

[10] ↵
Chen W,
Norbury CC,
Cho Y,
Yewdell JW,
Bennink JR
(2001) Immunoproteasomes shape immunodominance hierarchies of antiviral CD8(+) T cells at the levels of T cell repertoire and presentation of viral antigens. J Exp Med 193:1319–1326.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[11] Chen W,

[12] Norbury CC,

[13] Cho Y,

[14] Yewdell JW,

[15] Bennink JR

[16] ↵
Morel S,
et al.
(2000) Processing of some antigens by the standard proteasome but not by the immunoproteasome results in poor presentation by dendritic cells. Immunity 12:107–117.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[17] Morel S,

[18] et al.

[19] ↵
Chapiro J,
et al.
(2006) Destructive cleavage of antigenic peptides either by the immunoproteasome or by the standard proteasome results in differential antigen presentation. J Immunol 176:1053–1061.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[20] Chapiro J,

[21] et al.

[22] ↵
Van den Eynde BJ,
Morel S
(2001) Differential processing of class-I-restricted epitopes by the standard proteasome and the immunoproteasome. Curr Opin Immunol 13:147–153.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[23] Van den Eynde BJ,

[24] Morel S

[25] ↵
Chapatte L,
et al.
(2006) Processing of tumor-associated antigen by the proteasomes of dendritic cells controls in vivo T-cell responses. Cancer Res 66:5461–5468.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[26] Chapatte L,

[27] et al.

[28] ↵
Dannull J,
et al.
(2007) Immunoproteasome down-modulation enhances the ability of dendritic cells to stimulate antitumor immunity. Blood 110:4341–4350.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[29] Dannull J,

[30] et al.

[31] ↵
Muchamuel T,
et al.
(2009) A selective inhibitor of the immunoproteasome subunit LMP7 blocks cytokine production and attenuates progression of experimental arthritis. Nat Med 15:781–787.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[32] Muchamuel T,

[33] et al.

[34] ↵
Ding Q,
Martin S,
Dimayuga E,
Bruce-Keller AJ,
Keller JN
(2006) LMP2 knock-out mice have reduced proteasome activities and increased levels of oxidatively damaged proteins. Antioxid Redox Signal 8:130–135.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[35] Ding Q,

[36] Martin S,

[37] Dimayuga E,

[38] Bruce-Keller AJ,

[39] Keller JN

[40] ↵
Seifert U,
et al.
(2010) Immunoproteasomes preserve protein homeostasis upon interferon-induced oxidative stress. Cell 142:613–624.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[41] Seifert U,

[42] et al.

[43] ↵
Murata S,
et al.
(2007) Regulation of CD8+ T cell development by thymus-specific proteasomes. Science 316:1349–1353.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[44] Murata S,

[45] et al.

[46] ↵
Murata S,
Yashiroda H,
Tanaka K
(2009) Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:104–115.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[47] Murata S,

[48] Yashiroda H,

[49] Tanaka K

[50] ↵
Griffin TA,
et al.
(1998) Immunoproteasome assembly: Cooperative incorporation of interferon γ (IFN-γ)-inducible subunits. J Exp Med 187:97–104.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[51] Griffin TA,

[52] et al.

[53] ↵
Groettrup M,
Standera S,
Stohwasser R,
Kloetzel PM
(1997) The subunits MECL-1 and LMP2 are mutually required for incorporation into the 20S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:8970–8975.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[54] Groettrup M,

[55] Standera S,

[56] Stohwasser R,

[57] Kloetzel PM

[58] ↵
Kingsbury DJ,
Griffin TA,
Colbert RA
(2000) Novel propeptide function in 20 S proteasome assembly influences β subunit composition. J Biol Chem 275:24156–24162.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[59] Kingsbury DJ,

[60] Griffin TA,

[61] Colbert RA

[62] ↵
De M,
et al.
(2003) Beta 2 subunit propeptides influence cooperative proteasome assembly. J Biol Chem 278:6153–6159.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[63] De M,

[64] et al.

[65] ↵
Dahlmann B,
Ruppert T,
Kuehn L,
Merforth S,
Kloetzel P-M
(2000) Different proteasome subtypes in a single tissue exhibit different enzymatic properties. J Mol Biol 303:643–653.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[66] Dahlmann B,

[67] Ruppert T,

[68] Kuehn L,

[69] Merforth S,

[70] Kloetzel P-M

[71] ↵
Drews O,
et al.
(2007) Mammalian proteasome subpopulations with distinct molecular compositions and proteolytic activities. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:2021–2031.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[72] Drews O,

[73] et al.

[74] ↵
Klare N,
Seeger M,
Janek K,
Jungblut PR,
Dahlmann B
(2007) Intermediate-type 20 S proteasomes in HeLa cells: “Asymmetric” subunit composition, diversity and adaptation. J Mol Biol 373:1–10.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[75] Klare N,

[76] Seeger M,

[77] Janek K,

[78] Jungblut PR,

[79] Dahlmann B

[80] ↵
Gomes AV,
et al.
(2009) Contrasting proteome biology and functional heterogeneity of the 20 S proteasome complexes in mammalian tissues. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:302–315.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[81] Gomes AV,

[82] et al.

[83] ↵
Pelletier S,
et al.
(2010) Quantifying cross-tissue diversity in proteasome complexes by mass spectrometry. Mol Biosyst 6:1450–1453.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[84] Pelletier S,

[85] et al.

[86] ↵
Kloss A,
Meiners S,
Ludwig A,
Dahlmann B
(2010) Multiple cardiac proteasome subtypes differ in their susceptibility to proteasome inhibitors. Cardiovasc Res 85:367–375.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[87] Kloss A,

[88] Meiners S,

[89] Ludwig A,

[90] Dahlmann B

[91] ↵
Visekruna A,
et al.
(2009) Comparative expression analysis and characterization of 20S proteasomes in human intestinal tissues: The proteasome pattern as diagnostic tool for IBD patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:526–533.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[92] Visekruna A,

[93] et al.

[94] ↵
Gomes AV,
et al.
(2006) Mapping the murine cardiac 26S proteasome complexes. Circ Res 99:362–371.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[95] Gomes AV,

[96] et al.

[97] ↵
Zong C,
et al.
(2006) Regulation of murine cardiac 20S proteasomes: Role of associating partners. Circ Res 99:372–380.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[98] Zong C,

[99] et al.

[100] ↵
Unno M,
et al.
(2002) The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure 10:609–618.
OpenUrl PubMed

[101] Unno M,

[102] et al.

[103] ↵
Spieker-Polet H,
Sethupathi P,
Yam PC,
Knight KL
(1995) Rabbit monoclonal antibodies: Generating a fusion partner to produce rabbit-rabbit hybridomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9348–9352.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[104] Spieker-Polet H,

[105] Sethupathi P,

[106] Yam PC,

[107] Knight KL

[108] ↵
Schultz ES,
et al.
(2002) The production of a new MAGE-3 peptide presented to cytolytic T lymphocytes by HLA-B40 requires the immunoproteasome. J Exp Med 195:391–399.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[109] Schultz ES,

[110] et al.

[111] ↵
Huang L-Q,
et al.
(1999) Cytolytic T lymphocytes recognize an antigen encoded by MAGE-A10 on a human melanoma. J Immunol 162:6849–6854.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[112] Huang L-Q,

[113] et al.

[114] ↵
van der Bruggen P,
et al.
(1994) A peptide encoded by human gene MAGE-3 and presented by HLA-A2 induces cytolytic T lymphocytes that recognize tumor cells expressing MAGE-3. Eur J Immunol 24:3038–3043.
OpenUrl PubMed

[115] van der Bruggen P,

[116] et al.

[117] ↵
Valmori D,
et al.
(1997) Analysis of MAGE-3-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes in human leukocyte antigen-A2 melanoma patients. Cancer Res 57:735–741.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[118] Valmori D,

[119] et al.

[120] ↵
Valmori D,
et al.
(1999) Modulation of proteasomal activity required for the generation of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-defined peptide derived from the tumor antigen MAGE-3. J Exp Med 189:895–906.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[121] Valmori D,

[122] et al.

[123] ↵
Toes REM,
et al.
(2001) Discrete cleavage motifs of constitutive and immunoproteasomes revealed by quantitative analysis of cleavage products. J Exp Med 194:1–12.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[124] Toes REM,

[125] et al.

[126] ↵
Gileadi U,
et al.
(1999) Generation of an immunodominant CTL epitope is affected by proteasome subunit composition and stability of the antigenic protein. J Immunol 163:6045–6052.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[127] Gileadi U,

[128] et al.

[129] ↵
Noppen C,
et al.
(2000) Naturally processed and concealed HLA-A2.1-restricted epitopes from tumor-associated antigen tyrosinase-related protein-2. Int J Cancer 87:241–246.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[130] Noppen C,

[131] et al.

[132] ↵
Sewell AK,
et al.
(1999) IFN-γ exposes a cryptic cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. J Immunol 162:7075–7079.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[133] Sewell AK,

[134] et al.

[135] ↵
Hendil KB,
Uerkvitz W
(1991) The human multicatalytic proteinase: Affinity purification using a monoclonal antibody. J Biochem Biophys Methods 22:159–165.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[136] Hendil KB,

[137] Uerkvitz W

Main menu

User menu

Search

Two abundant proteasome subtypes that uniquely process some antigens presented by HLA class I molecules

Abstract

Results

Activity of Intermediate Proteasomes.

Exclusive Processing of a MAGE-A10 Tumor Peptide by the Intermediate Proteasome β1i-β5i.

Exclusive Processing of a MAGE-A3 Tumor Peptide by the Intermediate Proteasome β5i.

Discussion

Materials and Methods

Quantification of Proteasome Subtypes by Sandwich ELISA.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

Citation Manager Formats

Article Classifications

You May Also be Interested in

Similar Articles

Articles

PNAS Portals

Information

Main menu

User menu

Search

Abstract

Results

Activity of Intermediate Proteasomes.

Exclusive Processing of a MAGE-A10 Tumor Peptide by the Intermediate Proteasome β1i-β5i.

Exclusive Processing of a MAGE-A3 Tumor Peptide by the Intermediate Proteasome β5i.

Discussion

Materials and Methods

Quantification of Proteasome Subtypes by Sandwich ELISA.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

Citation Manager Formats

Article Classifications

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

You May Also be Interested in

Similar Articles

Articles

PNAS Portals

Information