Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
Research Article

The happiness–income paradox revisited

Richard A. Easterlin, Laura Angelescu McVey, Malgorzata Switek, Onnicha Sawangfa, and Jacqueline Smith Zweig
  1. Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0253

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS December 28, 2010 107 (52) 22463-22468; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015962107
Richard A. Easterlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Laura Angelescu McVey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malgorzata Switek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Onnicha Sawangfa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline Smith Zweig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Contributed by Richard A. Easterlin, October 26, 2010 (sent for review October 1, 2010)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The striking thing about the happiness–income paradox is that over the long-term —usually a period of 10 y or more—happiness does not increase as a country's income rises. Heretofore the evidence for this was limited to developed countries. This article presents evidence that the long term nil relationship between happiness and income holds also for a number of developing countries, the eastern European countries transitioning from socialism to capitalism, and an even wider sample of developed countries than previously studied. It also finds that in the short-term in all three groups of countries, happiness and income go together, i.e., happiness tends to fall in economic contractions and rise in expansions. Recent critiques of the paradox, claiming the time series relationship between happiness and income is positive, are the result either of a statistical artifact or a confusion of the short-term relationship with the long-term one.

  • Easterlin Paradox
  • life satisfaction
  • subjective well-being

Footnotes

  • 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: easterl{at}usc.edu.
  • Author contributions: R.A.E., L.A.M., M.S., O.S., and J.S.Z. designed research; R.A.E., L.A.M., M.S., O.S., and J.S.Z. performed research; R.A.E., L.A.M., M.S., O.S., and J.S.Z. analyzed data; and R.A.E. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1015962107/-/DCSupplemental.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The happiness–income paradox revisited
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The happiness–income paradox revisited
Richard A. Easterlin, Laura Angelescu McVey, Malgorzata Switek, Onnicha Sawangfa, Jacqueline Smith Zweig
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2010, 107 (52) 22463-22468; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015962107

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The happiness–income paradox revisited
Richard A. Easterlin, Laura Angelescu McVey, Malgorzata Switek, Onnicha Sawangfa, Jacqueline Smith Zweig
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2010, 107 (52) 22463-22468; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015962107
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Economic Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 107 (52)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Tadpoles gathered around an egg strand cannibalizing the hatchlings in a pond in Australia.
Cannibalism in invasive cane toads
Invasive cane toads use cannibalism to boost their ecological success, triggering counteradaptation in an evolutionary arms race.
Image credit: Jayna L. DeVore.
Asthma inhaler.
Why asthma worsens at night
Circadian rhythms have a standalone impact on asthma severity, independent of behavioral and environmental factors.
Image credit: Pixabay/coltsfan.
Wind-blown snow piles up against an ice core encampment on the Greenland Ice Sheet.
Variability of North Atlantic jet stream
Although natural variations have thus far largely influenced the position of the North Atlantic jet stream, continued warming could cause significant deviation from the norm.
Image credit: Luke D. Trusel (The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA).
Man checks mosquito trap at Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station.
News Feature: Climate change hastens disease spread across the globe
Trends in some regions are clear, but insect biology, climate quirks, and public health preparedness will determine whether outbreaks occur.
Image credit: Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station.
Kelp forest with multiple fish and plant species.
Journal Club: Minor interventions may mitigate network collapse
In arenas ranging from ecology to medicine, computer simulations suggest that changing just a few nodes in a system can lead to recovery.
Image credit: Andrew b Stowe/Shutterstock.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2022 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, CLOCKSS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.