Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

New host for carbon in the deep Earth

Eglantine Boulard, Alexandre Gloter, Alexandre Corgne, Daniele Antonangeli, Anne-Line Auzende, Jean-Philippe Perrillat, François Guyot, and Guillaume Fiquet
PNAS March 29, 2011 108 (13) 5184-5187; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016934108
Eglantine Boulard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: boulard@impmc.jussieu.fr
Alexandre Gloter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandre Corgne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniele Antonangeli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne-Line Auzende
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Philippe Perrillat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
François Guyot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillaume Fiquet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by David Walker, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, and approved February 4, 2011 (received for review November 10, 2010)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The global geochemical carbon cycle involves exchanges between the Earth’s interior and the surface. Carbon is recycled into the mantle via subduction mainly as carbonates and is released to the atmosphere via volcanism mostly as CO2. The stability of carbonates versus decarbonation and melting is therefore of great interest for understanding the global carbon cycle. For all these reasons, the thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of these minerals are needed up to core mantle boundary conditions. However, the nature of C-bearing minerals at these conditions remains unclear. Here we show the existence of a new Mg-Fe carbon-bearing compound at depths greater than 1,800 km. Its structure, based on three-membered rings of corner-sharing (CO4)4- tetrahedra, is in close agreement with predictions by first principles quantum calculations [Oganov AR, et al. (2008) Novel high-pressure structures of MgCO3, CaCO3 and CO2 and their role in Earth’s lower mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 273:38–47]. This high-pressure polymorph of carbonates concentrates a large amount of Fe(III) as a result of intracrystalline reaction between Fe(II) and (CO3)2- groups schematically written as 4FeO + CO2 → 2Fe2O3 + C. This results in an assemblage of the new high-pressure phase, magnetite and nanodiamonds.

  • diamond
  • Earth mantle
  • phase transition
  • experimental petrology
  • redox interaction

Carbonates are the main form of carbon-bearing minerals that can be transported deep in the Earth’s mantle via subduction of the oceanic lithosphere (1). This subducted component is considered to contribute significantly to the lower mantle carbon (C) reservoir along with primordial C (2, 3). Because of its very low solubility in deep Earth’s minerals (4, 5), C is likely to be present as a separate phase, either as carbonates or as diamonds. Several studies have suggested that magnesium carbonate (magnesite) could become the main host for C at depth at the expense of calcite and dolomite (6–8). Other models proposed that carbonates in equilibrium with peridotite would become reduced into diamonds at lower mantle conditions (9). However, as observed in the upper mantle, heterogeneities of the lower mantle redox state probably exist: For instance, subduction zones are made of more oxidized materials (10) that could survive on long time scales. Coexistence of both reduced and oxidized species in the deep Earth is also suggested by examples such as CO2-rich kimberlitic magmas that have transported diamonds to the surface (11, 12), and some carbonate inclusions that were found in diamonds from the lower mantle (13, 14). Results of high-pressure experiments on carbonate stability suggest that the rhombohedral structure of MgCO3 magnesite is stable up to 115 GPa at 2,000–3,000 K, but that it adopts a new structure at higher pressures (8). However, first-principle calculations predicted magnesite transformations into phases built with (CO4)4- tetrahedral groups at 82 GPa, and a transformation into pyroxene-like structures is expected at 160 GPa (15–17). Considering the average Fe/Mg molar ratio of 0.12 in the Earth’s mantle, the composition of carbonates is likely to lie between those of magnesite and the iron end member FeCO3 siderite, the two phases being known to form a continuous solid solution. So far, transformations of iron-bearing carbonates have rarely been examined. Siderite is known to be stable up to at least 47 GPa and 2,000 K (18), and up to 90 GPa at ambient temperature (19). Overall, the structural behavior of siderite and magnesite end members is thought to be similar because the effect of size mismatch between Fe(II) and Mg atoms is compensated by a spin transition in Fe(II) (19, 20).

Results

Consistent conclusions about the stability of a high-pressure carbon-bearing compound can be drawn for both MgCO3 and the assemblage MgO + CO2. In the two cases, X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns collected at comparable pressure (P) and temperature (T) (about 80 GPa–2,400 K) show several new peaks that cannot be attributed to the known structures of MgO and CO2 oxides nor to magnesite. Rather, they indicate that a new structure is stabilized in this pressure range. A typical XRD pattern of the assemblage of MgO + CO2 obtained at 82 GPa and 2,350 ± 150 K is shown in Fig 1A. Upon quenching to room temperature, the high-pressure phase is back-transformed to the low-pressure magnesite structure. Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) analyses performed on the recovered samples are consistent with in situ observations. Fig. 1B shows an EELS spectrum collected at the C K-edge on the recovered sample made from the assemblage MgO + CO2. The sharp peak located at 290.3 eV is characteristic of (CO3)2- carbonate groups (21). In addition, the measured stoichiometry deduced by EELS analysis indicates an MgCO3 composition. Therefore, the high-pressure phase is an isochemical polymorph of magnesite.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

(A) X-ray diffraction pattern of a sample obtained from the transformation of periclase in CO2 confining medium at 82 GPa and 2,350 ± 150 K. Crosses represent observed data after subtraction of the background and the solid line represents the profile refinement. For this refinement we used an assemblage of untransformed periclase (Upper), platinum (Middle), and the new high-pressure phase (Lower). Residual between observations and fit is shown below the spectrum. (B) C K-edge EELS spectrum done on the recovered sample.

Above 80 GPa, natural siderite-rich samples transformed at 1,850–2,300 K yield XRD reflections similar to those obtained in the MgCO3 samples described above, together with reflections of an iron oxide (Fig. 2A). This suggests the formation of a high-pressure carbon-bearing phase on the Mg-Fe join. In contrast with the MgCO3 end member, this high-pressure Fe-bearing structure is quenchable. Subsequent transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses made on the recovered sample show the presence of three different phases: a relic of untransformed (Fe0.75Mg0.25)CO3 siderite, the high-pressure phase, and an iron oxide (Fig. 2B). EELS spectra obtained at iron L2,3 edges are presented in Fig. 2C; some spectra match well with a remnant siderite crystal, with features similar to Fe(II) bearing phase’s spectra obtained with the same energy resolution (22). The presence of magnetite is also confirmed with our EELS analysis. The fine structure of the Fe L2,3-edges of the high-pressure phase shows unambiguously fine structures expected in Fe(III)-bearing minerals (22, 23) and quantification according to ref. 24 shows that at least about ¾ of iron is present under the Fe(III) oxidation state. EELS data from the C K-edge (Fig. 2D) confirm the presence of a remnant siderite and show a spectroscopic signature for the transformed carbonate with a main peak shifted at 290.7 eV. The smaller peak at 287.5 eV corresponds to the presence of carbon monoxide (CO) (25) probably present as inclusions/nanobubbles that give the particular microstructure of this high-pressure phase (Fig. 2B). As discussed below, these inclusions are produced during the formation of the high-pressure polymorph of carbonate. EELS measurements indicate element ratios that are different from the initial carbonate: Fe/C ∼ 0.61 ± 0.07 and Fe/O ∼ 0.22 ± 0.02.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

(A) X-ray diffraction pattern collected at 80 GPa and room temperature of siderite transformed at 1,850–2,300 K. Crosses represent observed diffraction data after subtraction of the background and solid line the profile refinement. For the refinement we used an assemblage of high-pressure polymorph of magnetite (37) (Upper), untransformed siderite (space group R-3c) (Middle), and the new high-pressure phase (Lower). Residual between observations and fit is shown below the spectrum. (B) STEM high-angle annular dark field showing the untransformed siderite (Sid), the iron oxide (Mt for magnetite), and the transformed carbonate (HP carb.) appearing as a dark gray uniform matrix in the left side of the image. (C) EELS spectra collected on the recovered sample. These spectra provide qualitative information on the Embedded Image ratio of each phase (23, 24) and noticeable features have been indicated by small bars and can be compared with reference siderite, magnetite, and Fe(III) oxide (22). Spectrum collected on the untransformed carbonate shows a high intensity peak of 707.7 eV that indicates the main iron speciation to be Fe(II). In the case of the iron oxide, the broad L3 peak at 707–709 eV with no splitting is characteristic of magnetite, whereas the L2 shows many subsplitting and an intermediate energy position between pure ferric and ferrous iron that is typical of a mixed valence of magnetite (23). The spectrum collected in the new phase shows a L3 line at higher energy loss than in carbonate groups with a fine structure indicating the main iron speciation to be Fe(III). (D) C K-edge spectra collected in the untransformed and transformed carbonate phases. In the case of siderite relic, the peak at 290.3 eV corresponds to planar (CO3)2- carbonate groups. In the spectrum collected in the transformed carbonate, the slightly broader peak at 290.7 eV is attributed to the tetrahedral (CO4)4- forming rings of (C3O9)6-. Presence of CO can also be detected in intimate association with the new phase.

Transformation of (Mg0.6,Fe0.4)O + CO2 at 105 GPa and ∼2,850 K led to the formation of the assemblage of a relic of unreacted material (M0.6,Fe0.4)O, a high-pressure phase of magnetite and the same new high-pressure phase. This assemblage was observed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and further confirmed by analytical transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 3A). Nanodiamonds were also identified by electron diffraction and EELS spectroscopy performed at the C K-edge (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

(A) TEM image of the recovered sample from the ferropericlase + CO2 experiment. Magnetite (Mt), high-pressure carbon-bearing phase (HP carb.), ferropericlase (FP), and nanodiamonds (D) are present. (B) C K-edge EELS spectrum of nanodiamonds observed in the recovered sample. The spectrum presents the absorption edge at 289 eV and the dip at 303 eV is characteristic of diamond C K-edge (38, 39).

Discussion

Refinement of the high-pressure and high-temperature XRD patterns allowed the identification of the high-pressure carbon-bearing structure. XRD patterns are consistent with phase II of magnesite (space group C2/m) suggested by theoretical calculations within this pressure range (15). However, the quality of the fit is considerably improved when using instead a slightly less symmetric lattice with space group P21/c (Table S1). This structure shown in Fig. 4 is made of groups of three (CO4)4- tetrahedra sharing one corner, which constitute (C3O9)6- rings. The lattice parameters are a = 8.39 Å, b = 6.41 Å, c = 6.82 Å, β = 105.49° (V = 354.7 Å3) in the case of MgO + CO2 at P = 82 GPa and T = 2,350 ± 150 K and a = 8.37 Å, b = 6.37 Å, c = 6.80 Å, β = 104.57° (V = 351.7 Å3) in the case of MgCO3 at P = 85 GPa and T = 2,400 ± 150 K (Table S2). In that latter case, assuming a number of formula unit per cell of 12 (15), a density of 4.76 g/cm3 is obtained corresponding to a density difference of about +10% with respect to the low-pressure structure at the same P-T conditions. Because of the incorporation of relatively smaller Fe(III) atoms, the volume of the new Fe-bearing phase is about 10% smaller than the one of the magnesian end member (Table S2) for which we obtained a = 7.72 Å, b = 6.41 Å, c = 6.57 Å, β = 101.31° (V = 319.0 Å3) in the case of (Mg0.6Fe0.4)O + CO2 at P = 105 GPa and T = 2,850 ± 150 K and a = 7.83 Å, b = 6.37 Å, c = 6.73Å, β = 101.97° (V = 328.9 Å3) in the case of (Mg0.25Fe0.75)CO3 at P = 80 GPa and room temperature.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Structure of the new high-pressure phase in space group P21/c related to phase II of magnesite proposed by theoretical calculation (15). (CO4)4- tetrahedra appear in green and magnesium atoms are shown as violet spheres.

Because no reference of EELS spectra exist for that new high-pressure phase, density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the unoccupied electronic density of state have been performed. The magnesite density of state shows a narrow peak at around 5 eV above the Fermi level that corresponds to the observed C K-edge and its “molecular” style (CO3)2- signature (Fig. 5). The density of state obtained for the new high-pressure carbon-bearing phase does not show any molecular (CO3)2- peak but rather a broad band at higher energy (from 7 to 11 eV). The crystal density is of 4.79 g·cm-3 at a pressure of 80 GPa. The geometry of (C3O9)6- rings can be seen on the right-hand side of Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

DFT calculations for electronic density of state of the carbon atoms (p orbital symmetry). This unoccupied density of state roughly corresponds to the excitation probed by EELS at the C K-edge (excitonic effects are neglected in the calculation).

In order to see how the tetrahedral (C3O9)6- rings change during the decompression, structures have been relaxed at ambient conditions. The result obtained is shown at the bottom (density is 3.60 g·cm-3) and the C-O bond lengths increase. From 80 GPa to 0 GPa the C-O-C angle also evolves from around 110–112° to 115–118°, which are values in agreement with published tetrahedral distortion (15). These structural changes have a strong influence on the unoccupied density of state. Indeed, as expected for less dense structures, the overall unoccupied density of state shifts to lower energy. Narrow peaks are present and correspond to tetrahedral (C3O9)6- rings, whose molecular signatures are similar to those observed by EELS in samples recovered from high-pressure experiments (i.e., a peak observed at around 290.7 eV).

In Fe-bearing experiments, a large amount of Fe(III) is incorporated in the new structure. No Pt was present in these experiments, and thus Pt had no interference with this redox reaction. The redox partner for Fe(III) formation could eventually be Fe(0) as observed for high-pressure silicates such as perovskite (9). Fe(0) may have been an intermediate partner; however, no evidence of Fe(0) was observed in the recovered samples. We argue that the incorporation of Fe(III) is more likely due to an oxidized carbon partner. We propose that oxidation of iron is balanced by partial reduction of carbon-bearing molecular structures such as (CO3)2- or CO2, according to the following chemical reaction: Embedded Image[1]

This reaction implies an elemental ratio of Fe/C ∼ 0.43 and Fe/O ∼ 0.14 in the new Fe(III)-bearing phase, in reasonable agreement with EELS estimations on the recovered sample.

Conclusion

Our study provides direct evidence for the recombination of CO2 with other oxides to form a high-pressure carbon-bearing phase at P-T conditions close to the lower mantle geotherm. This suggests a strong stability of this phase against dissociation into simple oxides. Also, the preference of the new high-pressure phase for Fe(III) implies reduction of part of the carbon, following the chemical reaction 1. It shows experimentally the coexistence of oxidized and reduced species of carbon at lower mantle conditions. This behavior might be due to a strong thermodynamic stability of the new carbon-bearing phase. However, for this new phase to be actually present in the deep lower mantle, carbonates must be preserved during deep subduction. Although the lower mantle assemblage is speculated to induce reducing conditions (9), carbonates could remain stable at depths if isolated from the surrounding mantle, for instance, in a relatively cold subducted slab where oxygen fugacity, as controlled by the local mineral assemblage, is locally higher (10, 26). This fraction of surviving carbonates may be transported beyond 1,800-km depth, where transformation into the newly observed Fe(III)-bearing phase would occur.

Materials and Methods

Two types of experiments have been conducted, with starting materials being either natural carbonate samples or a stoichiometric intimate assemblage of pure oxides. Grounded natural carbonates of two compositions on the iron-magnesium join, MgCO3 magnesite and (Fe0.75Mg0.25)CO3 siderite, were provided by the mineralogical collection of University of Pierre et Marie Curie and loaded in symmetric Mao-type diamond-anvil cell without a pressure-transmitting medium. Clear inclusion-free crystals were chosen and analyzed by electron microprobe showing very little minor elements content (Table S3). Moreover, in order to test the recombination of oxides, synthetic periclase (MgO) and ferropericlase (M0.6,Fe0.4)O were loaded into CO2 gas. For Mg end-member experiments using MgCO3 and MgO as starting material, finely ground powdered platinum (platinum black) was incorporated and used as infrared absorber. Samples were pressurized at ambient temperature and then heated using the double-sided heating system available on the high-pressure beam line ID-27 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) (27). Hot spots developed on the sample (and transformed areas) are of the order of 20 μm in diameter. Angle dispersive XRD pattern were collected in situ at high pressure and at high temperature, with a beam focused down with Kirkpatrick–Baez mirrors to 1.7 × 2.3 μm FWHM at 33.3 keV (wavelength of 0.3738 Å), so as to minimize the influence of lateral temperature gradients in X-ray diffraction patterns. Typical exposure time was about 90 s at high pressure–high temperature. About 2 h of heating at 2,000–2,500 K were applied to transform the samples. Pressure was measured using ruby fluorescence at room temperature (28) and the thermal equation of state of platinum (29) at high temperature. Temperatures were measured by spectroradiometric analysis of thermal emission spectra (30). The diffraction images were integrated with the Fit2d software (31), and the one-dimensional diffraction patterns were processed with the GSAS software package (32) using the LeBail method to identify phases and determine lattice parameters.

Analyses of recovered samples were carried out on carefully selected regions of interest, at the center of transformed area. The recovered samples were then thinned to electron transparency (∼100 nm) by the focused ion beam (FIB) method prior to observations in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and TEM. FIB milling was performed with a FEI STRATA DB 235 at Institut d’Electronique, de Microélectronique et de Nanotechologie (IEMN) and Zeiss Crossbeam Neon40 at Institut de Minéralogie et de Physique des Milieux Condensés (IMPMC). To protect the sample during the milling process, a linear strap of platinum was deposited across the heated area, localized by the electronic imaging capabilities of the FIB. A 30-kV Ga+ beam operating at ∼20 nA was used to excavate a thin foil, removing sample material on both sides of the platinum layer to a depth of 5–10 μm. The thin cross-sections (15 μm × 5 μm × 1 μm) were extracted using a micromanipulator and welded to a TEM copper grid. Final thinning down to a thickness of less than 100 nm was achieved using low incident angles and low Ga ion currents (approximately 50 pA). A further description of the FIB sample preparation technique can be found in Heaney et al. (33).

Transmission electron microscopy was done with a JEOL 2100-F operating at 200 kV with a field effect gun as electron source. STEM-EELS measurements were done with a dedicated scanning transmission electron microscope Vacuum Generators HB 501 microscope. All EELS spectra were recorded in STEM mode with 100-keV incident electrons focused on the specimen. The probe size was of ca. 1 nm and the current intensity of 100 pA. The collection semiangle and the convergent semiangle of this microscope are, respectively, of 24 mrad and 7 mrad. The electronic structures of each element were investigated using EELS spectra collected at the C K-, O K-, and Fe L2,3-edges with an energy dispersion of 0.2 eV per channel. The final energy resolution measured as the width of the zero-loss peak at half height was of 0.6 eV. We used the Hitchcock gas core excitation database and already published fingerprint of EELS data for identification and interpretation of fine structure EELS spectra of the different elements (Fe and C).

DFT has also been performed in order to interpret the C K-edges of the newly reported structure. The DFT calculations were performed for the Mg end-member carbonate using a pseudopotential method (valence electrons are C 2s2 2p2, O 2s2 2p4, and Mg 2p6 3s2) and a plane wave basis with an energy cutoff at the order of 1,000 eV (34, 35). Because no iron atoms were included in the structure, non-spin-polarized local density approximation has been used as an exchange-correlation functional, and site and symmetry projected density of state has been computed using the tetrahedron method. Structural models have been relaxed (residual atomic forces below 5.10-3 eV/Å) in order to obtain the quenched structure for the high-pressure phase. An indicative stoichiometry of the new phases was obtained using a conventional extraction and Hartree–Slater cross–section calculation (36). This method provides us cation ratios such as Fe/C, Fe/O, and C/O. The reliability of this method was first verified on different natural carbonates composition, and the measured stoichiometries were in good agreement with electron microprobe analysis.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank J. C. Boulliard from the mineralogical collection of Université Pierre et Marie Curie and P. Munsch, G. Lemarchand, and H. Ozawa for their help with experiments and cell loadings. D. Troadec and I. Machouk are acknowledged for their help with FIB sample preparation and N. Menguy for discussions and advice on FIB sample analyses. The FIB and SEM facility of IMPMC is supported by Région Ile de France Grant SESAME 2006 NOI-07-593/R, INSU-CNRS, INP-CNRS, University Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, and by the French National Research Agency (ANR) Grant ANR-07-BLAN-0124-01. A.C. acknowledges support from the European Research Council under European Community’s seven framework program (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant 207467. Two anonymous reviewers and the editor are warmly thanked for their help in strongly improving the quality of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: boulard{at}impmc.jussieu.fr.
  • Author contributions: E.B., F.G., and G.F. designed research; E.B., A.C., D.A., A.-L.A., J.-P.P., F.G., and G.F. performed research; A.G. and J.-P.P. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.B., A.G., F.G., and G.F. analyzed data; E.B., A.G., A.C., D.A., A.-L.A., J.-P.P., F.G., and G.F. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1016934108/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sleep NH,
    2. Zahnle K
    (2001) Carbon dioxide cycling and implications for climate on ancient Earth. J Geophys Res-Planet 106:1373–1399.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Javoy M
    (1997) The major volatile elements of the Earth: Their origin, behavior, and fate. Geophys Res Lett 24:177–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Lecuyer C,
    2. Simon L,
    3. Guyot F
    (2000) Comparison of carbon, nitrogen and water budgets on Venus and the Earth. Earth Planet Sci Lett 181:33–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Keppler H,
    2. Wiedenbeck M,
    3. Shcheka SS
    (2003) Carbon solubility in olivine and the mode of carbon storage in the Earth’s mantle. Nature 424:414–416.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Shcheka SS,
    2. Wiedenbeck M,
    3. Frost DJ,
    4. Keppler H
    (2006) Carbon solubility in mantle minerals. Earth Planet Sci Lett 245:730–742.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Biellmann C,
    2. Gillet P,
    3. Guyot F,
    4. Peyronneau J,
    5. Reynard B
    (1993) Experimental evidence for carbonate stability in the Earth’s lower mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 118:31–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Fiquet G,
    2. et al.
    (2002) Structural refinements of magnesite at very high pressure. Am Mineral 87:1261–1265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Isshiki M,
    2. et al.
    (2004) Stability of magnesite and its high-pressure form in the lowermost mantle. Nature 427:60–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Frost DJ,
    2. McCammon CA
    (2008) The redox state of Earth’s mantle. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 36:389–420.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Ballhaus C,
    2. Berry RF,
    3. Green DH
    (1990) Oxygen fugacity controls in the Earth’s upper mantle. Nature 348:437–440.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Haggerty SE
    (1999) Earth and planetary sciences—A diamond trilogy: Superplumes, supercontinents, and supernovae. Science 285:851–860.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Torsvik TH,
    2. Burke K,
    3. Steinberger B,
    4. Webb SJ,
    5. Ashwal LD
    (2010) Diamonds sampled by plumes from the core-mantle boundary. Nature 466:352–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Brenker FE,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Carbonates from the lower part of transition zone or even the lower mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 260:1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Stachel T,
    2. Harris JW,
    3. Brey GP,
    4. Joswig W
    (2000) Kankan diamonds (Guinea) II: Lower mantle inclusion parageneses. Contrib Mineral Petr 140(1):16–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Oganov AR,
    2. Ono S,
    3. Ma YM,
    4. Glass CW,
    5. Garcia A
    (2008) Novel high-pressure structures of MgCO3, CaCO3 and CO2 and their role in Earth’s lower mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 273:38–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Panero WR,
    2. Kabbes JE
    (2008) Mantle-wide sequestration of carbon in silicates and the structure of magnesite II. Geophys Res Lett 35:L14307, 10.1029/2008GL034442.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Skorodumova NV,
    2. Belonoshko AB,
    3. Huang L,
    4. Ahuja R,
    5. Johansson B
    (2005) Stability of the MgCO3 structures under lower mantle conditions. Am Mineral 90:1008–1011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Santillan J,
    2. Williams Q
    (2004) A high-pressure infrared and X-ray study of FeCO3 and MnCO3: Comparison with CaMg(CO3)2-dolomite. Phys Earth Planet In 143–144:291–304.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Lavina B,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Siderite at lower mantle conditions and the effects of the pressure-induced spin-pairing transition. Geophys Res Lett 36:L23306, 10.1029/2009GL039652.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Mattila A,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Pressure induced magnetic transition in siderite FeCO3 studied by x-ray emission spectroscopy. J Phys Condens Matt 19:386206, 10.1088/0953-8984/19/38/386206.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Hofer F,
    2. Golob P
    (1987) New examples for near-edge fine-structures in electron-energy loss spectroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 21:379–383.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Gloter A,
    2. Douiri A,
    3. Tence M,
    4. Colliex C
    (2003) Improving energy resolution of EELS spectra: An alternative to the monochromator solution. Ultramicroscopy 96:385–400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Paterson JH,
    2. Krivanek OL
    (1990) ELNES of 3d transition-metal oxides. 2. Variations with oxidation state and crystal structure. Ultramicroscopy 32(4):319–325.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. van Aken PA,
    2. Liebscher B,
    3. Styrsa VJ
    (1998) Quantitative determination of iron oxidation states in minerals using Fe L-2,L-3-edge electron energy-loss near-edge structure spectroscopy. Phys Chem Miner 25:323–327.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Hitchcock AP,
    2. Brion CE
    (1980) K-Shell excitation spectra of CO, N2 and O2. J Electron Spectrosc 18:1–21, Database of core excitation spectra: http://unicorn.mcmaster.ca/corex.html.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Dasgupta R,
    2. Hirschmann MM,
    3. Whiters AC
    (2004) Deep global cycling of carbon constrained by the solidus of anhydrous, carbonated eclogite under upper mantle conditions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 227:73–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Mezouar M,
    2. et al.
    (2005) Development of a new state-of-the-art beamline optimized for monochromatic single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction under extreme conditions at the ESRF. J Synchrotron Radiat 12:659–664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Mao HK,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Bell PM
    (1986) Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800-kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions. J Geophys Res-Solid 91:4673–4676.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Fei YW,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Toward an internally consistent pressure scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9182–9186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Benedetti LR,
    2. Loubeyre P
    (2004) Temperature gradients, wavelength-dependent emissivity, and accuracy of high and very-high temperatures measured in the laser-heated diamond cell. High Pressure Res 24:423–445.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Hammersley AP,
    2. Svensson SO,
    3. Hanfland M,
    4. Fitch AN,
    5. Hausermann D
    (1996) Two-dimensional detector software: From real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan. High Pressure Res 14:235–248.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Larson AC,
    2. Von Dreele RB
    (1994) General structure analysis system (GSAS) Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR, pp 86–748.
  33. ↵
    1. Heaney PJ,
    2. Vicenzi EP,
    3. Giannuzzi LA,
    4. Livi KJT
    (2001) Focused ion beam milling: A method of site-specific sample extraction for microanalysis of Earth and planetary materials. Am Mineral 86:1094–1099.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Gonze X,
    2. et al.
    (2009) ABINIT: First-principles approach to material and nanosystem properties. Comput Phys Commun 180:2582–2615.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Gonze X,
    2. et al.
    (2002) First-principles computation of material properties: The ABINIT software project. Comp Mater Sci 25:478–492.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Egerton RF
    , ed (1996) Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope (Springer, Berlin), p 500.
  37. ↵
    1. Haavik C,
    2. Stolen S,
    3. Fjellvag H,
    4. Hanfland M,
    5. Hausermann D
    (2000) Equation of state of magnetite and its high-pressure modification: Thermodynamics of the Fe-O system at high pressure. Am Mineral 85:514–523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Batson PE,
    2. Bruley J
    (1991) Dynamic screening of the core exciton-energy-loss scattering. Phys Rev Lett 67:350–353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Morar JF,
    2. Himpsel FJ,
    3. Hollinger G,
    4. Hughes G,
    5. Jordan JL
    (1985) Observation of a C 1 s core exciton in diamond. Phys Rev Lett 54:1960–1963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
New host for carbon in the deep Earth
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
New host for carbon in the deep Earth
Eglantine Boulard, Alexandre Gloter, Alexandre Corgne, Daniele Antonangeli, Anne-Line Auzende, Jean-Philippe Perrillat, François Guyot, Guillaume Fiquet
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2011, 108 (13) 5184-5187; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1016934108

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
New host for carbon in the deep Earth
Eglantine Boulard, Alexandre Gloter, Alexandre Corgne, Daniele Antonangeli, Anne-Line Auzende, Jean-Philippe Perrillat, François Guyot, Guillaume Fiquet
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2011, 108 (13) 5184-5187; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1016934108
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 108 (13)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Geology

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490