New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions
Edited* by Daniel Kahneman, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved February 25, 2011 (received for review December 8, 2010)

Abstract
Are judicial rulings based solely on laws and facts? Legal formalism holds that judges apply legal reasons to the facts of a case in a rational, mechanical, and deliberative manner. In contrast, legal realists argue that the rational application of legal reasons does not sufficiently explain the decisions of judges and that psychological, political, and social factors influence judicial rulings. We test the common caricature of realism that justice is “what the judge ate for breakfast” in sequential parole decisions made by experienced judges. We record the judges’ two daily food breaks, which result in segmenting the deliberations of the day into three distinct “decision sessions.” We find that the percentage of favorable rulings drops gradually from ≈65% to nearly zero within each decision session and returns abruptly to ≈65% after a break. Our findings suggest that judicial rulings can be swayed by extraneous variables that should have no bearing on legal decisions.
Footnotes
↵1S.D. and J.L. contributed equally to this work.
- ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jl2351{at}columbia.edu.
Author contributions: S.D., J.L., and L.A.-P. designed research; S.D., J.L., and L.A.-P. performed research; J.L. analyzed data; and S.D. and J.L. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
↵*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1018033108/-/DCSupplemental.
Citation Manager Formats
More Articles of This Classification
Related Content
- No related articles found.
Cited by...
- Chronotype Diversity in Teams: Toward a Theory of Team Energetic Asynchrony
- Self-Control at Work
- Evaluating Novelty: The Role of Panels in the Selection of R&D Projects
- Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of daylong cognitive work on economic decisions
- Cognitive fatigue influences students performance on standardized tests
- Gender Bias and Judicial Decisions of Undue Influence in Testamentary Challenges
- Crossing the Rubicon
- Approach, Ability, Aftermath: A Psychological Process Framework of Unethical Behavior at Work
- Law and Neuroscience
- Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
- Your decisions are what you eat: Metabolic state can have a serious impact on risk-taking and decision-making in humans and animals
- Believing Doesn't Make It So: Forensic Education and the Search for Truth
- Reply to Weinshall-Margel and Shapard: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions persist
- Overlooked factors in the analysis of parole decisions














