Strong reproductive isolation between humans and Neanderthals inferred from observed patterns of introgression
- aAnthropology, Genetics, and Peopling History Laboratory, Anthropology Unit, Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 1227 Geneva, Switzerland;
- bComputational and Molecular Population Genetics Laboratory, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Berne, 3012 Berne, Switzerland; and
- cSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Svante Pääbo, Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, and approved August 3, 2011 (received for review May 10, 2011)

Abstract
Recent studies have revealed that 2–3% of the genome of non-Africans might come from Neanderthals, suggesting a more complex scenario of modern human evolution than previously anticipated. In this paper, we use a model of admixture during a spatial expansion to study the hybridization of Neanderthals with modern humans during their spread out of Africa. We find that observed low levels of Neanderthal ancestry in Eurasians are compatible with a very low rate of interbreeding (<2%), potentially attributable to a very strong avoidance of interspecific matings, a low fitness of hybrids, or both. These results suggesting the presence of very effective barriers to gene flow between the two species are robust to uncertainties about the exact demography of the Paleolithic populations, and they are also found to be compatible with the observed lack of mtDNA introgression. Our model additionally suggests that similarly low levels of introgression in Europe and Asia may result from distinct admixture events having occurred beyond the Middle East, after the split of Europeans and Asians. This hypothesis could be tested because it predicts that different components of Neanderthal ancestry should be present in Europeans and in Asians.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: mathias.currat{at}unige.ch or laurent.excoffier{at}iee.unibe.ch.
Author contributions: M.C. and L.E. designed research; M.C. performed research; M.C. and L.E. analyzed data; and M.C. and L.E. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1107450108/-/DCSupplemental.
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Anthropology