Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Comment on the subsidence adjustment applied to the Kemp et al. proxy of North Carolina relative sea level

Aslak Grinsted, Svetlana Jevrejeva, and John C. Moore
PNAS October 4, 2011 108 (40) E781-E782; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111523108
Aslak Grinsted
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Svetlana Jevrejeva
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John C. Moore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Kemp et al. (1) presented a new salt-marsh proxy record of relative sea level (RSL) from North Carolina (NCRSL). The salt marsh is slowly subsiding as a result of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), and the NCRSL record needs to be adjusted to remove this vertical land movement from the sea level record. Kemp et al. (1) corrected for a constant subsidence rate of approximately 1 mm/y. This is a “geologic” estimate based on sea level index points, which are determined from linear fits to data from other North American RSL proxy records. Thus, the geologic method implicitly assumes that the entire trend is a result of subsidence and leaves no room for any millennial-scale climate-driven changes in sea level. It is therefore not surprising that the adjusted RSL record has a preindustrial trend near zero.

To assess the uncertainty of the subsidence adjustment, we can look at several alternative estimates of the subsidence rate, and this is done by Engelhart et al. (2). Global modeling of glacial isostasy (3) gives a rate of subsidence of approximately 1.3 mm/y. Direct GPS measurements indicate an even higher rate of subsidence of the regional proglacial forebulge (2). Finally, local tide gauge records have a 20th century rate of sea level rise of close to 4 mm/y (2), or approximately 2 mm/y higher than the global mean rate of sea level rise. To summarize, all these alternative estimates point to a substantially greater rate of subsidence than the 1 mm/y geologic estimate. We therefore question the zero-trend assumption used in the geologic estimates. We prefer the midrange correction from modeled GIA (3), which incorporates many lines of evidence and additionally includes nonlinear terms. Until the disagreement in subsidence rate has been resolved, the uncertainty must be gauged from the spread in alternative estimates, which is clearly much greater than the 2σ estimate of 0.1 mm/y in the study of Kemp et al. (1). In Fig. 1, we tentatively use an uncertainty of 0.5 mm/y, which accumulates to 1 m over 2,000 y. The impact of a greater rate of subsidence is that the adjusted NCRSL has a negative preindustrial trend with a pronounced Little Ice Age minimum rather than being a record of predominantly rising sea level (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Comparison of the North Carolina sea level reconstruction corrected for two different GIA adjustments (red lines) and global sea level hind-casts from semiempirical models (thin solid lines). The choice of GIA has a large impact on the adjusted North Carolina sea level. Semiempirical hind-casts of global sea level deviate slowly from the adjusted NCRSL curve, but confidence intervals overlap for more than a millennium. Illustrative 5% to 95% confidence intervals are shown by the shaded regions colored for the appropriate curves. A 50-y smoothing has been applied to NCRSL.

We emphasize that the salt marsh record is an exceptional dataset on past sea level, but that great care must be taken to consider uncertainty in land movement that accumulates remorselessly over time, as we highlight here. Many of the primary conclusions of the work of Kemp et al. (1) were unaffected by a slightly greater subsidence correction, and the 20th century rate of rise is still exceptional. Hind-casts from semiempirical models (1, 4, 5) are consistent with the North Carolina salt-marsh proxy for a millennium (Fig. 1), but uncertainties are too large before that date.

Acknowledgments

This work was performed under the European Research Council Advanced Grant no. 246815 WATERundertheICE, National Natural Science Foundation of China no. 41076125, and China's National Key Science Program for Global Change Research (no. 2010C8950504).

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ag{at}glaciology.net.
  • Author contributions: A.G., S.J., and J.C.M. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kemp AC,
    2. et al.
    (2011) Climate related sea-level variations over the past two millennia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:11017–11022.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Engelhart SE,
    2. Horton BP,
    3. Douglas BC,
    4. Peltier WR,
    5. Tornqvist TE
    (2009) Spatial variability of late Holocene and 20th century sea level rise along the US Atlantic coast. Geology 37:1115–1118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Peltier WR
    (2004) Global glacial isostasy and the surface of the ice-age Earth: the ICE-5G (VM2) model and GRACE. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 32:111–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Jevrejeva S,
    2. Grinsted A,
    3. Moore JC
    (2009) Anthropogenic forcing dominates sea level rise since 1850. Geophys Res Lett 36:L20706.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Grinsted A,
    2. Moore JC,
    3. Jevrejeva S
    (2010) Reconstructing sea level from paleo and projected temperatures 200 to 2100 AD. Clim Dyn 34:461–472.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comment on the subsidence adjustment applied to the Kemp et al. proxy of North Carolina relative sea level
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Comment on the subsidence adjustment applied to the Kemp et al. proxy of North Carolina relative sea level
Aslak Grinsted, Svetlana Jevrejeva, John C. Moore
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2011, 108 (40) E781-E782; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111523108

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Comment on the subsidence adjustment applied to the Kemp et al. proxy of North Carolina relative sea level
Aslak Grinsted, Svetlana Jevrejeva, John C. Moore
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2011, 108 (40) E781-E782; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111523108
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

  • SNPs deciding the rapid growth of cyanobacteria are alterable
  • Reply to Zhou and Li: Plasticity of the genomic haplotype of Synechococcus elongatus leads to rapid strain adaptation under laboratory conditions
  • Genetic variant rs17185536 regulates SIM1 gene expression in human brain hypothalamus
Show more

Related Content

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Reply to Grinsted et al.: Estimating land subsidence in North Carolina
  • Scopus (5)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490