W chromosome expression responds to female-specific selection
- aDepartment of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom;
- bDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and
- cDepartment of Plant Biology and Forest Genetics, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish Agricultural University, Uppsala SE 750 07, Sweden
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Wyatt W. Anderson, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, and approved April 16, 2012 (received for review February 18, 2012)

Abstract
The W chromosome is predicted to be subject to strong female-specific selection stemming from its female-limited inheritance and therefore should play an important role in female fitness traits. However, the overall importance of directional selection in shaping the W chromosome is unknown because of the powerful degradative forces that act to decay the nonrecombining sections of the genome. Here we greatly expand the number of known W-linked genes and assess the expression of the W chromosome after >100 generations of different female-specific selection regimens in different breeds of chicken and in the wild ancestor, the Red Jungle Fowl. Our results indicate that female-specific selection has a significant effect on W chromosome gene-expression patterns, with a strong convergent pattern of up-regulation associated with increased female-specific selection. Many of the transcriptional changes in the female-selected breeds are the product of positive selection, suggesting that selection is an important force in shaping the evolution of gene expression on the W chromosome, a finding consistent with both the importance of the W chromosome in female fertility and the haploid nature of the W. Taken together, these data provide evidence for the importance of the sex-limited chromosome in a female heterogametic species and show that sex-specific selection can act to preserve sex-limited chromosomes from degrading forces.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: judith.mank{at}ucl.ac.uk.
Author contributions: S.B. and J.E.M. designed research; H.K.M., M.A.P., A.E.W., and J.E.M. performed research; J.E.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; H.K.M., M.A.P., A.E.W., and J.E.M. analyzed data; and H.K.M., M.A.P., A.E.W., S.B., and J.E.M. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1202721109/-/DCSupplemental.
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Evolution