New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Aboriginal hunting buffers climate-driven fire-size variability in Australia’s spinifex grasslands
Edited by B. L. Turner, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, and approved May 18, 2012 (received for review March 16, 2012)

Abstract
Across diverse ecosystems, greater climatic variability tends to increase wildfire size, particularly in Australia, where alternating wet–dry cycles increase vegetation growth, only to leave a dry overgrown landscape highly susceptible to fire spread. Aboriginal Australian hunting fires have been hypothesized to buffer such variability, mitigating mortality on small-mammal populations, which have suffered declines and extinctions in the arid zone coincident with Aboriginal depopulation. We test the hypothesis that the relationship between climate and fire size is buffered through the maintenance of an anthropogenic, fine-grained fire regime by comparing the effect of climatic variability on landscapes dominated by Martu Aboriginal hunting fires with those dominated by lightning fires. We show that Aboriginal fires are smaller, more tightly clustered, and remain small even when climate variation causes huge fires in the lightning region. As these effects likely benefit threatened small-mammal species, Aboriginal hunters should be considered trophic facilitators, and policies aimed at reducing the risk of large fires should promote land-management strategies consistent with Aboriginal burning regimes.
Footnotes
↵1R.B.B., B.F.C., and D.W.B. contributed equally to this work.
- ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rbird{at}stanford.edu.
Author contributions: R.B.B., B.F.C., and D.W.B. designed research; R.B.B., B.F.C., and D.W.B. performed research; R.B.B., B.F.C., and P.G.K. analyzed data; and R.B.B., B.F.C., and D.W.B. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Anthropology
- Social Sciences
- Environmental Sciences