New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Global economic potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove loss
Edited by Gretchen C. Daily, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved June 29, 2012 (received for review January 11, 2012)

Abstract
Mangroves are among the most threatened and rapidly disappearing natural environments worldwide. In addition to supporting a wide range of other ecological and economic functions, mangroves store considerable carbon. Here, we consider the global economic potential for protecting mangroves based exclusively on their carbon. We develop unique high-resolution global estimates (5′ grid, about 9 × 9 km) of the projected carbon emissions from mangrove loss and the cost of avoiding the emissions. Using these spatial estimates, we derive global and regional supply curves (marginal cost curves) for avoided emissions. Under a broad range of assumptions, we find that the majority of potential emissions from mangroves could be avoided at less than $10 per ton of CO2. Given the recent range of market price for carbon offsets and the cost of reducing emissions from other sources, this finding suggests that protecting mangroves for their carbon is an economically viable proposition. Political-economy considerations related to the ability of doing business in developing countries, however, can severely limit the supply of offsets and increases their price per ton. We also find that although a carbon-focused conservation strategy does not automatically target areas most valuable for biodiversity, implementing a biodiversity-focused strategy would only slightly increase the costs.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: juha{at}rff.org.
Author contributions: J.S. and J.N.S. designed research; J.S., J.N.S., and S.J. performed research; J.S. and J.N.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.S., J.N.S., and S.J. analyzed data; and J.S. and J.N.S. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
See Commentary on page 14287.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1200519109/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
More Articles of This Classification
Social Sciences
Sustainability Science
Biological Sciences
Related Content
Cited by...
- Coastal landforms and accumulation of mangrove peat increase carbon sequestration and storage
- Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000-2012
- Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation
- Avoiding mangrove destruction by avoiding carbon dioxide emissions