Polar growth in the Alphaproteobacterial order Rhizobiales

Polar Growth of A. tumefaciens.

To determine whether polar growth occurs in the Rhizobiaceae, we selected the well-studied plant pathogen A. tumefaciens as a model bacterium. Time-lapse microscopy of individual growing A. tumefaciens cells revealed that the cell growth was asymmetric and initiation of constriction occurred at the future site of cell division even in relatively small cells (Fig. 1B and Movie S1). Transmission electron micrographs showed that the width of the cells at the site of constriction was similar (0.8–0.9 μm) in cells with a daughter cell compartment less than 1 μm in length and narrowed as the daughter cell compartment length increased further (Fig. 1 C and D). Notably, a narrow band of FtsZ (Atu_2086) is observed at the site of early constriction in small cells, suggesting that the formation of the early constriction may require the assembly of the FtsZ ring (Fig. 2 A and B). A band of FtsZ is observed at the mid-cell before the initiation of cell division, and a bright focus of FtsZ is found at the mid-cell of deeply constricted cells (Fig. 2 A). A small focus of FtsZ persists at the new cell pole for a short period after cell division; however, the polar focus disappears before the formation of the band of FtsZ at the site of early constriction. The position of FtsZ in the constriction appears to remain fixed relative to the old pole as the cell grows, suggesting that new cell growth is largely constrained to the daughter cell compartment (Fig. 2B and Movie S2). Plotting the position of the constriction (as observed in the transmission electron micrographs) relative to the cell poles indicates that the constriction shifts slightly away from the mother cell pole as the cell nears division (Fig. S1A). Tracking the length of the mother cell compartment over time in dividing cells reveals that there is only a small increase in mother cell length after cell division (Fig. S1 B and C). These data suggest that the size of the mother cell compartment is relatively constant and we infer that new cell growth occurs primarily within the daughter cell compartment.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 2.

FtsZ-eGFP localizes to the early constriction in A. tumefaciens. (A) FtsZ-eGFP localization in wild type A. tumefaciens. (B) Time-lapse microscopy of a single A. tumefaciens cell expressing FtsZ-eGFP during growth. (C) FtsZ-eGFP localization in TRSE-stained A. tumefaciens cells after a short (15-min) chase. (D) FtsZ-eGFP localization in TRSE-stained A. tumefaciens cells after a longer (2-h) chase.

To identify regions of new cell growth, A. tumefaciens cells were pulse labeled with the amine reactive dye Texas red-X succinimidyl ester (TRSE), which stains cell surface proteins. In E. coli the signal from TRSE-stained proteins dissipated homogenously along the sidewalls of the cells as a consequence of lateral cell growth as previously shown (21) but remained trapped at the old cell poles, which are comprised of inert peptidoglycan (Fig. 3A and Movie S3). In contrast, the fluorescent signal from TRSE remained fixed in A. tumefaciens (Fig. 3 B and C, Fig. S2B, and Movies S4, S5, and S6), suggesting that the main body of the cells, and not just the poles, were inert. When the growth of a fully stained newborn cell was tracked, unlabeled regions generated by the insertion of new surface protein emerged exclusively from one end of the cell (Fig. 3B and Movie S4). Furthermore, while bands of FtsZ-eGFP are readily observed in the regions stained with TRSE after a short chase (15 min; Fig. 2C), after a chase long enough to allow cell division (2 h), the bands of FtsZ-eGFP are consistently observed at the junction of the new and old cell material (Fig. 2D). This observation suggests that the junction between new and old cell material constitutes the future site of cell division. We conclude that cell growth is constrained to the daughter cell compartment.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 3.

A. tumefaciens cells display zonal cell wall synthesis. (A) Time-lapse microscopy of growth of a single E. coli cell pulse labeled with TRSE. (B) Growth pattern of a young cell pulse labeled with TRSE and d-cys labeling patterns of individual cell sacculi. Illustrations of the d-cys-labeled sacculi are provided. (C) Growth pattern of a predivisional cell pulse labeled with TRSE and d-cys-labeling patterns of individual cell sacculi. Illustrations of the d-cys-labeled sacculi are provided. (White scale bars: 2 μm; black scale bars: 0.5 μm.)

To precisely determine the region of active growth, we observed older cells pulse labeled with TRSE. If cell growth occurs at the cell pole, the TRSE should remain fixed within the daughter cell compartment; however, if growth occurs at the junction between the mother and daughter cell compartments, TRSE should persist at both cell poles (Fig. S2A). TRSE remained fixed in the daughter cell compartment as the cells grew, indicating that new cell growth is not dispersed throughout the daughter cell compartment (Fig. 3C, Fig. S2B, and Movies S5 and S6). An unlabeled region initially emerged from one end of the cell suggesting that elongation occurs at the cell pole and not at the region where the constriction is observed (Fig. S2B and Movie S6). In predivisional cells an unlabeled region was observed at the mid-cell just before cell division (Fig. 3C, 20 min; Fig. S2B, 80 min). The insertion of new material at the mid-cell is likely to be responsible for the modest increase in size observed in the mother cells (Fig. S1C). After cell division, unlabeled material emerged from the newly generated cell poles (Fig. 3C, Fig. S2B, and Movies S5 and S6). We conclude that new outer membrane protein insertion occurs at two distinct regions: the younger cell pole and the mid-cell of predivisional cells.

Similar patterns of TRSE segregation were observed in situ when A. tumefaciens cells were pulse labeled with TRSE and grown in association with an Arabidopsis thaliana plant root (Fig. S3 and Movies S7, S8, and S9). A. tumefaciens is a plant pathogen that can initiate extensive physical and genetic interactions with a wide range of host plants (22). Virulent interactions are stimulated by the presence of plant-released signals, primarily by phenolic lignin precursors such as acetosyringone (23). We therefore examined growth patterns under virulence inducing conditions and in association with plant roots (Fig. S3 A–C), and observed that localized insertion of new outer membrane proteins occurs under virulence inducing conditions (Fig. S3A and Movie S7). When A. tumefaciens cells are grown under conditions in which nutrients are provided by an Arabidopsis thaliana plant root, localized new protein insertion occurs among both attached and unattached cells (Fig. S3B and Movie S8). To ensure that localized protein insertion occurs when cells are attached to the plant root, fluorescent wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) was used to detect the unipolar polysaccharide, an adhesin which is specifically deployed at the point of cell-to-surface contact after initial attachment (24, 25) (Fig. S3C and Movie S9). Notably, these observations indicate that cells preferentially attach to surfaces at the old cell pole.

To determine if the observed regions of new protein insertion are indicative of cell growth due to expansion of the cell wall, d-cysteine (d-cys) labeling was used to monitor peptidoglycan synthesis. d-cys incorporates into peptidoglycan by replacing the terminal d-Ala residue of muropeptides and can be readily detected immunochemically in purified sacculi (2). After an appropriate chase period, the presence of d-cys in the sacculi demarks regions of old peptidoglycan, whereas unlabeled regions are comprised of newly synthesized peptidoglycan. Elongation of E. coli cells by diffuse insertion of new peptidoglycan causes a uniform decrease in the density of the signal from d-cys (2). In A. tumefaciens, d-cys incorporated specifically into muropeptides M4, D44, and T444 and did not adversely affect cell morphology (Table S1 and Fig. S4). Sacculi isolated from cells pulse-labeled with d-cys were comprised of regions either heavily labeled with d-cys or essentially devoid of label (Fig. 3 B and C and Fig. S2B). A variety of d-cys labeling patterns were observed for individual sacculi and were readily correlated with the patterns observed during growth of TRSE-stained cells (Fig. 3 B and C and Fig. S2B). Notably, bands of d-cys and TRSE persisted at fixed locations in daughter cells (Fig. 3C, Fig. S2B, and Movies S5 and S6). After a chase period of 3.25 doublings, we observed that 12.7% (23/181) of the sacculi were heavily labeled, consistent with the expected value of 10.5% if the peptidoglycan is essentially inert with little or no turnover (Fig. S2C). In sum, we conclude that: (i) once synthesized, the peptidoglycan is stable; (ii) peptidoglycan synthesis is constrained to the cell pole during elongation; (iii) polar peptidoglycan synthesis is terminated and peptidoglycan synthesis is redirected to the mid-cell of predivisional cells to allow septum formation; and (iv) peptidoglycan synthesis continues at the new cell pole generated after cell division to drive elongation (Fig. 4).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 4.

Model for the segregation of peptidoglycan and outer membrane labels in A. tumefaciens cells. The illustration shows the expected patterns for the distribution of labeled peptidoglycan or outer membrane in cells of different ages at the initiation of the chase, as indicated above each panel. Red indicates the area of the cell retaining the original label. Yellow indicate areas of active PG synthesis. Areas of new, unlabeled PG are shown in orange. The location of the label will remain constant in newly generated daughter cells due to the conservative nature of the growth process. The labeling and subsequent growth of intermediate and predivisional cells clearly explains generation of cells (and sacculi) with well-defined thin or thick bands of labeled material, respectively.

Polar Growth Is Conserved Among the Rhizobiales.

Because other members of the Rhizobiaceae and Brucellaceae families share a tendency to form branches rather than filaments when cell division is blocked (10, 13), and lack known modulators of cell elongation including MreB, the growth patterns of S. meliloti (Fig. 5A), Brucella abortus (Fig. 5B and Movie S10), and Ochrobactrum anthropi (Fig. 5C and Movie S11) were examined. Visualization of d-cys labeled sacculi from S. meliloti after a short chase period revealed that peptidoglycan synthesis occurs primarily at the cell pole and also at the mid-cell of predivisional cells in this bacterium (Fig. 5A). Time-lapse microscopy of TRSE stained B. abortus and O. anthropi revealed that new material emerged strictly from the new cell poles generated after cell division (Fig. 5 B and C and Movies S10 and S11). Broadening our analysis to include classically defined budding bacteria within the Rhizobiales, we demonstrate that for Hyphomicrobium denitrificans (Fig. 5D) and Prosthecomicrobium hirschii (Fig. 5E and Movie S12) new cell material emerged from the cell poles in cells pulse labeled with TRSE. In addition, recent reclassification of described budding bacteria (26–29) indicates that this mode of growth is widespread throughout the Rhizobiales (Fig. 1A and Fig. S5). Thus, we conclude that polar elongation is an ancient trait in the Rhizobiales.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 5.

Unipolar growth is conserved among the Rhizobiales. (A) d-cys labeling of individual S. meliloti sacculi. (Scale bar: 0.5 μm.) (B) Time-lapse microscopy of TRSE-stained Brucella abortus 544 cells. (C) Time-lapse microscopy of TRSE-stained O. anthropi cells. (D) TRSE-stained H. denitrificans cells after 18 h. (E) Time-lapse microscopy of TRSE-stained P. hirschii cells. (White scale bars: 2 μm.)

Peptidoglycan Composition of A. tumefaciens and S. meliloti is Atypical.

Because polar elongation causes the generation of a high proportion of inert peptidoglycan, A. tumefaciens peptidoglycan composition was analyzed in detail (Tables S1–S4 and Figs. S6 and S7). The HPLC pattern for A. tumefaciens was rather more complex (Fig. S6) than previously reported using a different HPLC protocol (30). Individual peaks were collected and subjected first to MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to identify the components eluting at each peak. The structure of the peptidoglycan basic subunit in A. tumefaciens is the canonical monomer for Gram-negative bacteria, the disaccharide pentapeptide GlucNAc-(β 1→4)-MurNAc-(L)-Ala-(d)-Glu (γ)-meso-Dap-(d)-Ala-(d)-Ala (30). We identified a total of 23 components that matched the molecular masses expected for muropeptides derived from the canonical monomer by means of known reactions (Table S1). In total, ∼85% of the total area in the HPLC could be assigned to specific muropeptides. The proposed structures were confirmed by electrospray-MS/MS analysis in all but four minor muropeptides, where ambiguities in the precise position of certain residues could not be resolved (Table S1 and Fig. S7).

A number of notable features differentiate the muropeptide profile of A. tumefaciens peptidoglycan from that of E. coli (31, 32). First, there was a high abundance of muropeptides cross-linked by LD-Dap-Dap peptide bridges (Tables S2–S4). LD-transpeptidation is not required for incorporation of new peptidoglycan precursors, indicating that postinsertional processing of peptidoglycan likely occurs. Second, anhydro muropeptides, which occupy the C-1 glycan strand terminal position in the peptidoglycan of all characterized Gram-negative bacteria (33), were not detected, suggesting either that A. tumefaciens glycan chains are terminated by an unexplained mechanism or the glycan chains are exceptionally long (250–500 disaccharides/chain). Third, we detected the presence of a Dap-Gly-Dap peptide bridge (see muropeptide 8; Fig. S7), a feature which is previously unreported among Gram-negative bacteria. Moreover, A. tumefaciens peptidoglycan is highly crosslinked (∼64%) due at least in part to accumulation of cross-linked trimers (Table S4). Fourth, the partial amidation of d-Glu results in the formation of two muropeptides (see muropeptides 17 and 19; Fig. S7) with Gln instead of Glu at position 2 in the peptidoglycan stem peptide, constituting another unique structural trait of A. tumefaciens peptidoglycan. Lastly, there are no lipoproteins covalently bound to peptidoglycan. An absence of Braun's lipoprotein was also reported for the peptidoglycan of C. crescentus suggesting that this may be a feature common to the Alphaproteobacteria (34). Interestingly, analysis of the muropeptide composition of S. meliloti peptidoglycan reveals a striking similarity to that of A. tumefaciens (Tables S2–S4 and Fig S6). We infer that the peptidoglycan biosynthesis pathway contains unique features that contribute to or are a consequence of polar growth.

What selective forces have driven the ancient emergence and persistence of such highly localized, polar growth among the Rhizobiales? It is possible to surmise several potential benefits for polar growth. First, recent studies have revealed bacterial aging based on asymmetric inheritance of cellular damage (35, 36). Polar peptidoglycan growth may facilitate reproductive asymmetry by helping to anchor damaged material to the aging mother cell. Second, given the vast number of proteins and coordinated activities required for peptidoglycan synthesis, constraining growth to a single region may prove to be energetically favorable. Lastly, ensuring that the newborn cells are comprised of newly synthesized peptidoglycan and outer membrane proteins may confer an advantage in the case of phase variation by allowing rapid and stable modification of newly synthesized outer membrane proteins and lipids, a trait likely to be exploited by pathogens to avoid detection by the immune systems of their hosts. We note that polar growth also occurs in other bacterial groups including the Caulobacterales (Fig. 1A), Actinobacteria (3, 19, 37), and Planctomycetes (38), suggesting that polar growth may be broadly distributed in bacteria. Therefore, polar growth may provide a target for the development of antibacterial strategies.