Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Commentary

Control of craving by the prefrontal cortex

Olivier George and George F. Koob
  1. Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS March 12, 2013 110 (11) 4165-4166; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301245110
Olivier George
Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George F. Koob
Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gkoob@scripps.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Craving is what makes addiction to drugs so difficult to overcome. The intense craving that follows a cue that has been previously associated with the drug, combined with a stressful state or a dysphoric state, represents an unstoppable force that leads to drug intake and relapse for most addicted individuals. However, although difficult, some people successfully control this craving, but the brain mechanisms responsible for this self-control are largely unknown. In the paper by Hayashi et al. (1), the authors unveil some of the neuropsychological mechanisms responsible for self-control by demonstrating that inactivation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) decreases the craving that a smoker experiences when told that he will be able to smoke a cigarette a few minutes later, through inhibition of the process of valuation of drug-related stimuli mediated by the medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and ventral striatum (VS). A two-stage process of cue reactivity is proposed by Hayashi et al., in which the mOFC tracks the subjective value of the drug, indexed by craving self-reports, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) incorporates intertemporal availability and cue information to modulate the presumed mOFC value signal. This is a compelling conceptual advance consistent with existing models of frontal decision-making circuitry.

Drug cues, such as the sight or smell of cigarettes, provoke intense craving in smokers that can be very difficult to control and often lead to drug-seeking and -taking (2). Several brain regions, such as the OFC, ACC, and VS, have been shown to be activated in response to the presentation of drug cues. These structures have been hypothesized to encode not only the subjective value of drug-related cues but also the value and cost of the actions related to procuring the drug (3⇓–5). The DLPFC has been hypothesized to combine these valuations together with other information, such as the drug context, drug availability, affective states, and outcome, to allow efficient decision-making (6). Dissecting the specific roles of these brain regions during craving and how they interact with each other is a challenging task in humans. The elegance of the study by Hayashi et al. (1) lies in its within-subject design that combines functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and focal inactivation of the DLPFC using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in smokers to allow them to obtain correlational and causal evidence of the role of the DLPFC in craving.

Hayashi et al. (1) first demonstrate that cue-induced craving for cigarettes is dramatically increased when subjects are instructed that they will be given the possibility to smoke immediately after testing (compared with 4 h later). This increased craving is associated with recruitment of the DLPFC (7). To test the causal role of the increased activity of the DLPFC in craving, Hayashi used TMS to inactivate the DLPFC during exposure to the cues and show that it prevents the increase in craving. This result alone is critical for the field because it demonstrates the causal relationship between activation of the DLPFC and cue-induced craving in a situation that is very similar to what abstinent smokers experience in the real world, in which smoking-related cues are often indicative of the imminent possibility to smoke. What is remarkable in the study by Hayashi et al. is that they did not stop here: they further investigated how inactivation of the DLPFC reduces craving through the modulation of other brain regions. They used fMRI to show that after inactivation of the dlPFC, the sensitivity of the mOFC, ACC, and VS to drug-related cues is dramatically attenuated. Moreover, the intensity of the cue-related signal in the mOFC predicts the individual’s craving intensity, suggesting that interindividual differences in self-control when experiencing craving may arise from interindividual differences in the capacity of the DLPFC to stimulate the mOFC (6).

These results are a critical step forward in our understanding of the brain mechanisms that underlie self-control during craving that may lead to better prevention and treatment of drug addiction in the future by identifying subjects with a specific neurocircuitry-based vulnerability to a lack of self-control.

This report clearly demonstrates how hyperactivity of the DLPFC in response to contextual and drug-related cues increases craving in smokers and raises several questions. Drug addiction and pathological gambling have also been associated with general hypofunction of the ventromedial (vm) PFC (8⇓⇓⇓–11). Considering the key role of the vmPFC in processing the consequences of future actions (12), inhibition of actions (13), and control of emotions (14), investigating the interaction between the vmPFC (processing a “STOP” signal) and DLPFC (processing a “GO” signal) would be important. For example, is the cue-induced hyperactivity of the DLPFC related to the decreased activity of the vmPFC? What is the contribution of stress and emotional states in the dysregulation of the proposed dlPFC, OFC, ACC, and VS? Cue-induced craving is often assumed to reflect the subjective value of drugs, but an alternative hypothesis is that cue-induced craving also reflects the emergence of a negative emotional state or, more likely, is augmented by the emergence of a negative emotional state. Research in animal models has demonstrated that cocaine-related cues produce an aversive state that drives subsequent cocaine intake (15), and key brain regions that are involved in processing stress and affective states, such as the amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), are known to also be modulated by the PFC (Fig. 1). Therefore, hyperactivity of the dlPFC, OFC, ACC, and VS may also be associated with a facilitation of cigarette-related cue-induced negative emotions, thereby increasing the motivation to smoke to obtain relief from the negative affective

The report by Hayashi et al. represents a major step forward in our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie self-control during craving.

state. Consistent with this hypothesis, deep brain stimulation of the PFC, particularly subregions that are known to modulate the OFC, ACC, and VS, are being investigated for the potential treatment of mood disorders, such as depression (16, 17). Considering the high comorbidity between substance abuse and mood disorders and the key role of the PFC in controlling the reward and stress systems, dysregulation of specific subregions of the PFC may be involved in both disorders.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Neuroanatomy of drug craving. Craving-related information is processed by the OFC, ACC, and nucleus accumbens in response to drug-related cues. Craving-related information can be modulated by the external/internal context, stress, and affective states through the hippocampus, insula, central nucleus of the amygdala, and BNST. Activation of the DLPFC produces increased craving by potentiating the response to drug-related cues through its connection with the OFC, ACC, and nucleus accumbens. The vmPFC plays a key role in emotional control and the inhibition of action associated with poor deleterious consequences. CeA, central nucleus of the amygdala; DS, dorsal striatum; GP, globus pallidus; HPC, hippocampus; NAC, nucleus accumbens; Thal, thalamus.

Activation of the dlPFC, OFC, ACC, and VS during craving may reflect increases in the positive or negative reinforcing effects of drug-related cues. The report by Hayashi et al. represents a major step forward in our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie self-control during craving and leads to a converging hypothesis about how dysregulation of specific subregions of the PFC and striatum produces vulnerability in response to drug-related cues. Their results certainly pave the ground for the future development of novel treatments for drug addiction.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gkoob{at}scripps.edu.
  • Author contributions: O.G. and G.F.K. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 4422.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hayashi T,
    2. Ko JH,
    3. Strafella AP,
    4. Dagher A
    (2013) Dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex interactions during self-control of cigarette craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:4422–4427.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Drummond DC,
    2. Tiffany ST,
    3. Glautier S,
    4. Remington B
    (1995) Addictive Behaviour: Cue Exposure Theory and Practice (Wiley, Chichester, UK), pp 1–17.
  3. ↵
    1. Kable JW,
    2. Glimcher PW
    (2007) The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci 10(12):1625–1633.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. McBride D,
    2. Barrett SP,
    3. Kelly JT,
    4. Aw A,
    5. Dagher A
    (2006) Effects of expectancy and abstinence on the neural response to smoking cues in cigarette smokers: An fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology 31(12):2728–2738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Walton ME,
    2. Devlin JT,
    3. Rushworth MFS
    (2004) Interactions between decision making and performance monitoring within prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 7(11):1259–1265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. George O,
    2. Koob GF
    (2010) Individual differences in prefrontal cortex function and the transition from drug use to drug dependence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35(2):232–247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. McBride D,
    2. Barrett SP,
    3. Kelly JT,
    4. Aw A,
    5. Dagher A
    (2006) Effects of expectancy and abstinence on the neural response to smoking cues in cigarette smokers: An fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology 31(12):2728–2738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Potenza MN,
    2. et al.
    (2003) Gambling urges in pathological gambling: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60(8):828–836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Potenza MN,
    2. et al.
    (2003) An FMRI Stroop task study of ventromedial prefrontal cortical function in pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry 160(11):1990–1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Reuter J,
    2. et al.
    (2005) Pathological gambling is linked to reduced activation of the mesolimbic reward system. Nat Neurosci 8(2):147–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. London ED,
    2. Ernst M,
    3. Grant S,
    4. Bonson K,
    5. Weinstein A
    (2000) Orbitofrontal cortex and human drug abuse: Functional imaging. Cereb Cortex 10(3):334–342.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Bechara A
    (2003) Risky business: Emotion, decision-making, and addiction. J Gambl Stud 19(1):23–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ghazizadeh A,
    2. Ambroggi F,
    3. Odean N,
    4. Fields HL
    (2012) Prefrontal cortex mediates extinction of responding by two distinct neural mechanisms in accumbens shell. J Neurosci 32(2):726–737.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Verdejo-García A,
    2. Bechara A
    (2009) A somatic marker theory of addiction. Neuropharmacology 56(Suppl 1):48–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Wheeler RA, et al. (2008) Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of negative affect predict cocaine self-administration. Neuron 13;57(5):774-785.
  16. ↵
    1. Giacobbe P,
    2. Mayberg HS,
    3. Lozano AM
    (2009) Treatment resistant depression as a failure of brain homeostatic mechanisms: Implications for deep brain stimulation. Exp Neurol 219(1):44–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Mayberg HS
    (2009) Targeted electrode-based modulation of neural circuits for depression. J Clin Invest 119(4):717–725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Control of craving by the prefrontal cortex
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Control of craving by the prefrontal cortex
Olivier George, George F. Koob
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2013, 110 (11) 4165-4166; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301245110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Control of craving by the prefrontal cortex
Olivier George, George F. Koob
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2013, 110 (11) 4165-4166; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301245110
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

See related content:

  • DLPFC integrates context into craving in addiction
    - Jan 28, 2013
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 110 (11)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490