Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Retrospective

Rita Levi-Montalcini: Neuroscientist par excellence

Leslie Lars Iversen
PNAS March 26, 2013 110 (13) 4862-4863; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301976110
Leslie Lars Iversen
Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: les.iversen@pharm.ox.ac.uk

Related Articles

  • Classic Profile of Rita Levi-Montalcini
    - Mar 20, 2013
  • Immunosympathectomy
    - Mar 20, 2013
  • Destruction of the sympathetic ganglia in mammals by an antiserum to a nerve-growth protein
    - Mar 15, 1960
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The scientific career of Rita Levi-Montalcini spanned more than 75 years, from her training as a graduate assistant to the histologist Giuseppe Levi in Turin; to her research on chicken embryos in her home laboratory, using eggs from local farms; to Nobel-Prize-winning research in Washington University, St Louis; and back to Italy. Along the way she faced and overcame many hurdles, including the prejudice that women were not suitable for higher education and research and the vicious persecution of non-Aryans in Mussolini’s Italy.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Rita Levi-Montalcini in 2009 on the occasion of her 100th birthday. Photo courtesy of Prof. G. Nistico, European Brain Research Institute, Rome.

From the start, Levi-Montalcini’s work on chicken embryos addressed a key question in developmental biology: how do nerves growing out from an embryonic nervous system find the limbs or other targets that they will innervate? In 1934 Victor Hamburger at Washington University published the results of a key experiment on developing chicken embryos, in which he showed that the unilateral removal of a wing bud led to a profound reduction in neurons in the spinal cord and spinal ganglia on the operated side (1). Hamburger speculated that one explanation of this result was that the peripheral fields transmitted signals to the appropriate nerve centers “…centripetally by the nerve fibres.” This prescient hypothesis was eventually shown to be correct, and Levi-Montalcini’s work helped to unlock this mystery.

Working with Levi in Turin and later in her home laboratory, Levi-Montalcini repeated Hamburger’s experiment and showed that the reduction of neurons after limb removal was not the result of a failure of the formation of neurons, but rather because of their degeneration when they failed to make contact with a suitable peripheral field (2). In 1947 Hamburger invited her to St Louis, to continue research in his laboratory. Both researchers set out to find the agent from the peripheral field that allowed the survival of innervating neurons. As often happens in scientific research, serendipity played an important role. Elmer Bueker, a former student of Hamburger, showed that the transplantation of small pieces of a mouse sarcoma tumor could take the place of a limb bud in sustaining neuronal survival (3). Levi-Montalcini repeated these experiments (4) and showed that the survival factor could penetrate through the amniotic membrane surrounding the chicken embryo; the cancerous tissue thus provided the first unequivocal evidence that the tumor cells released a soluble nerve growth-promoting factor.

In the 1950s a brilliant young biochemist, Stanley Cohen, joined Levi-Montalcini and Hamburger in the quest to identify the soluble “nerve growth factor” produced by the mouse sarcoma. The two researchers succeeded in preparing a cell-free extract, which replicated the growth-promoting effects on chicken-embryo neurons in tissue culture (5). When a snake venom was used to further purify the extract, it was surprisingly found to contain its own nerve growth factor (NGF) activity (6). Reasoning that the venom came from the snake’s salivary gland, Cohen investigated mammalian salivary glands and found that mouse salivary glands contained high levels of nerve growth factor activity, a crucial step for the purification of the protein.

This research culminated with the publication of a classic trio of papers in the March issue of PNAS in 1960. Cohen described the isolation of a novel protein, NGF, and the preparation of an antiserum (7). In two other papers Levi-Montalcini and her assistant Barbara Booker described the nerve growth-promoting activity of purified NGF on a wide variety of embryonic mammalian ganglia (including human tissue), and the growth-promoting effects of NGF on sympathetic ganglia when administered in vivo newborn, young, and adult mice (8). In a third paper Levi-Montalcini and Booker showed that the administration of an antiserum to NGF to newborn mice, rats, rabbits, and kittens lead to the almost complete destruction of the developing sympathetic nervous system, without damaging any other organs or tissues (9). The dramatic effect of such “immunosympathectomy” was the first example of a highly selective tool able to ablate particular populations of nerve cells. In the 1960s there was a high level of interest in sympathetic nervous system research, and immunosympathectomy offered an important new tool to probe its physiological functions (10). The demonstration of the specific actions of anti-NGF antibodies on the sympathetic nervous system in a wide variety of mammals helped to persuade skeptics, who had questioned the biological importance of NGF derived from such exotic sources as mouse tumors, snake venom, and mouse salivary glands. It was not until 1986, however, that Levi-Montalcini and Stanley Cohen were finally awarded their well-deserved Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine.

The discovery of NGF prompted a search for other nerve growth factors with the first success in the 1980s with the discovery of BDNF by Yves Barde and Hans Thoenen (11), and the subsequent discovery of families of other neurotrophins (12).

The question of how NGF gained access to its target cells in the nervous system remained unanswered for another decade after its discovery. In 1972 Levi-Montalcini and the Angelettis reported that after in vivo administration of [125I]-labeled NGF, the protein accumulated selectively in sympathetic ganglia (13), but this did not prove whether the protein gained access directly to the ganglion cells or via their axons. The fact that the accumulation of labeled NGF in ganglia was reduced in animals in which sympathetic terminals had been destroyed by prior treatment with 6-hydroxydopamine suggested that the uptake of labeled NGF in sympathetic ganglia might occur “…via the end terminals with subsequent retrograde transport to the cell body.” (13). However, it was not until Ian Hendry, a graduate student from my laboratory in Cambridge, joined Hans Thoenen’s group in Basel that this could be confirmed experimentally. Injection of radiolabeled NGF into the anterior chamber of the eye led to a preferential accumulation of labeled protein in the sympathetic ganglion on the injected side, reaching a peak after 16 h. Transection of the sympathetic axons or their destruction with colchicine completely abolished the preferential accumulation on the injected side. Autoradiographic studies confirmed that the accumulated labeled protein was located in the cell bodies of the sympathetic neurons (14). The concept that neurons respond to specific chemical signals produced by their target tissues represented a radical step forward in understanding how the nervous system and target tissues are correctly “wired” during development, and the selective retrograde transport of numerous other subsequently discovered neurotrophins has been demonstrated (15, 16).

Levi-Montalcini continued her research for another 50 years after the classic papers of 1960; she was not one to give up work because of retirement and continued actively in research, with sponsorship from the Italian government at the Research Institute of Neurobiology in Rome. Her review in 1995 “Update of the NGF saga” (17) summarizes some of the findings that emerged concerning the role of NGF, not only during development but also in the adult. In particular, NGF was found to exert a profound modulatory influence on pain mechanisms in the adult, and was associated with a heightened responsiveness to pain in response to tissue inflammation. A broad role of NGF in neuroimmune reactions and tissue inflammation was suggested (17). Franz Hefti and others used such information to plan a novel class of pain-relieving drugs based on antagonism of NGF (18). A number of anti-NGF monoclonal antibodies were developed, with some positive clinical studies, although this has not yielded a new medicine as yet (19).

In her later years Levi-Montalcini was influential in Italian politics and science. In 2006 she founded the European Brain Research Institute in Rome, with the aim of offering a multidisciplinary research center for young scientists, and she devoted much of her energy to this project in her last 10 years. In 2007, at the age of 98, Levi-Montalcini started a new research project. She had an idea that NGF might play a role in the very early stages of development of the chicken embryo. With her colleague Antonino Cattaneo, anti-NGF antibodies were injected into early chicken embryos. They observed a surprising result and the findings were published in January 2012 in PNAS (20). This was a fitting end to an illustrious career. I remember her as a gracious figure with an unquenchable passion for science. At the height of her quest for NGF, Levi-Montalcini wrote to her parents: “….our work is at its peak and the possibilities for development are such as to make us dizzy. My euphoria is evident to all of the entourage, we are all happy and excited, as if we are about to have a party.” (21)

Footnotes

  • ↵1E-mail: les.iversen{at}pharm.ox.ac.uk.
  • Author contributions: L.L.I. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • See Classic Profile on page 4873.

  • See Classic Perspective on page 4877.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hamburger V
    (1934) The effects of wing bud extirpation on the development of the central nervous system in chick embryos. J Exp Zool 68:449–494.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Levi-Montalcini R,
    2. Levi G
    (1943) Les consequences de la destruction d’un territoire d’innervation périphérique sur la développement des centres nerveuz correspondants dans l’embryo de Poulet [Consequences of the destruction of a peripheral innervation field on the development of central nervous system neurons in the chick embryo] Arch Biol (Liege) 54:53745.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Bueker ED
    (1948) Implantation of tumors in the hind limb field of the embryonic chick and the developmental response of the lumbosacral nervous system. Anat Rec 102(3):369–389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Levi-Montalcini R,
    2. Hamburger V
    (1951) Selective growth stimulating effects of mouse sarcoma on the sensory and sympathetic nervous system of the chick embryo. J Exp Zool 116(2):321–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Cohen S,
    2. Levi-Montalcini R,
    3. Hamburger V
    (1954) A nerve growth-stimulating factor isolated from sarcomas 37 and 180. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 40:1014–1018.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Levi-Montalcini R,
    2. Cohen S
    (1956) In vitro and in vivo effects of a nerve growth-stimulating agent isolated from snake venom. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 42:571–574.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Cohen S
    (1960) Purification of a nerve-growth promoting protein from the mouse salivary gland and its neuro-cytotoxic antiserum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 46:301–311.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Levi-Montalcini R,
    2. Booker B
    (1960) Excessive growth of the sympathetic ganglia evoked by a protein isolated from mouse salivary glands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 46(3):373–384.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Levi-Montalcini R,
    2. Booker B
    (1960) Destruction of the sympathetic ganglia in mammals by an antiserum to a nerve-growth protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 46(3):384–391.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Levi-Montalcini R,
    2. Angeletti PU
    (1966) Second symposium on catecholamines. Modification of sympathetic function. Immunosympathectomy. Pharmacol Rev 18(1):619–628.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Barde YA,
    2. Edgar D,
    3. Thoenen H
    (1982) Purification of a new neurotrophic factor from mammalian brain. EMBO J 1(5):549–553.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Götz R,
    2. et al.
    (1994) Neurotrophin-6 is a new member of the nerve growth factor family. Nature 372(6503):266–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Angeletti RH,
    2. Aneletti PU,
    3. Levi-Montalcini R
    (1972) Selective accumulation of (125 I) labelled nerve growth factor in sympathetic ganglia. Brain Res 46:421–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hendry IA,
    2. Stöckel K,
    3. Thoenen H,
    4. Iversen LL
    (1974) The retrograde axonal transport of nerve growth factor. Brain Res 68(1):103–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. DiStefano PS,
    2. et al.
    (1992) The neurotrophins BDNF, NT-3, and NGF display distinct patterns of retrograde axonal transport in peripheral and central neurons. Neuron 8(5):983–993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Neet KE,
    2. Campenot RB
    (2001) Receptor binding, internalization, and retrograde transport of neurotrophic factors. Cell Mol Life Sci 58(8):1021–1035.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Levi-Montalcini R,
    2. Dal Toso R,
    3. della Valle F,
    4. Skaper SD,
    5. Leon A
    (1995) Update of the NGF saga. J Neurol Sci 130(2):119–127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Hefti FF,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Novel class of pain drugs based on antagonism of NGF. Trends Pharmacol Sci 27(2):85–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kumar V,
    2. Mahal BA
    (2012) NGF—The TrkA to successful pain treatment. J Pain Res 5:279–287.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Manca A,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Nerve growth factor regulates axial rotation during early stages of chick embryo development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(6):2009–2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Levi-Montalcini R
    (2000) Cantico di una vita [Canticle of a life] (Raffaello Cortina, Milan).
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rita Levi-Montalcini: Neuroscientist par excellence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rita Levi-Montalcini: Neuroscientist par excellence
Leslie Lars Iversen
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2013, 110 (13) 4862-4863; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301976110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Rita Levi-Montalcini: Neuroscientist par excellence
Leslie Lars Iversen
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2013, 110 (13) 4862-4863; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301976110
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 110 (13)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490