New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Deficits in human trisomy 21 iPSCs and neurons
Edited by Fred H. Gage, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, CA, and approved May 1, 2013 (received for review September 26, 2012)

Abstract
Down syndrome (trisomy 21) is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability, but the precise molecular mechanisms underlying impaired cognition remain unclear. Elucidation of these mechanisms has been hindered by the lack of a model system that contains full trisomy of chromosome 21 (Ts21) in a human genome that enables normal gene regulation. To overcome this limitation, we created Ts21-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from two sets of Ts21 human fibroblasts. One of the fibroblast lines had low level mosaicism for Ts21 and yielded Ts21 iPSCs and an isogenic control that is disomic for human chromosome 21 (HSA21). Differentiation of all Ts21 iPSCs yielded similar numbers of neurons expressing markers characteristic of dorsal forebrain neurons that were functionally similar to controls. Expression profiling of Ts21 iPSCs and their neuronal derivatives revealed changes in HSA21 genes consistent with the presence of 50% more genetic material as well as changes in non-HSA21 genes that suggested compensatory responses to oxidative stress. Ts21 neurons displayed reduced synaptic activity, affecting excitatory and inhibitory synapses equally. Thus, Ts21 iPSCs and neurons display unique developmental defects that are consistent with cognitive deficits in individuals with Down syndrome and may enable discovery of the underlying causes of and treatments for this disorder.
Down syndrome (DS) is the most frequent single cause of human birth defects and intellectual disability (ID) (1). DS is caused by trisomy of chromosome 21 (Ts21) (2), resulting in the triplication of over 400 genes (3⇓–5), which makes elucidation of the precise mechanisms underlying ID in DS a significant challenge. Confounding this difficulty is the relative inaccessibility of human tissue and incomplete human Ts21 in the context of mouse models. Despite these shortcomings, studies using mouse models containing trisomy of parts of syntenic chromosome 21 (HSA21) have put forth several critical hypotheses on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying DS features. It is essential, however, to test these hypotheses in human cells with full triplication of HSA21 in a context that allows for normal gene regulation. Here, we used Ts21-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to test hypotheses of the underlying causes of ID in DS, with specific regard to neuropathophysiology.
Results
Isogenic Human Ts21 iPSCs.
Fibroblasts from two individuals diagnosed with DS were reprogrammed to iPSCs. FISH for HSA21 in one fibroblast line showed mosaicism, where ∼90% of cells carried Ts21, whereas ∼10% were euploid (Fig. 1A). Reprogramming of the mosaic fibroblasts by retrovirus (6) resulted in three viable iPSC clones, two clones that carried Ts21 and one euploid (Fig. 1B). Mosaicism in DS individuals is rare, occurring in ∼1–3% of DS cases (7), but it can also emerge in vitro (8), potentially because of nondisjunction events during cell division. Regardless, the generation of euploid isogenic controls is fortuitous, because they become vital controls for a complex multigene disorder such as DS, potentially limiting the need for multiple iPSC lines to control for genetic and epigenetic variation (9⇓–11). SNP analysis of HSA21 in the euploid DS2U iPSC line ruled out uniparental disomy (or isodisomy), which is often associated with trisomy rescue (Fig. 1D). Short tandem repeats at various loci indicated that the Ts21 and euploid lines were isogenic other than the presence of Ts21 (Fig. 1E). To increase statistical power, fibroblasts from a second DS individual were reprogrammed using Sendai virus (12), an RNA virus, which yielded another Ts21 iPSC line (Fig. 1C). All iPSC clones were named according to standardized naming procedures (Fig. 1F) (13) and used in all experiments. Importantly, no chromosomal abnormalities, other than Ts21, were observed in any line throughout the duration of this study, in contrast to the propensity of many iPSC lines to acquire aneuploidy (14, 15). Expression of pluripotent genes and proteins POU class 5 homeobox 1 (Oct4), SRY-box containing gene 2 (Sox2), stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA-4), and Tra1-81 and lack of expression of the neuroepithelial marker paired box gene 6 (Pax6) (16) and reprogramming genes verified the pluripotency of the iPSCs (Fig. S1 A–D). In addition, all iPSCs expressed markers of each germ layer after nondirected differentiation (Fig. S1).
Reprogramming of mosaic fibroblasts yields Ts21 iPSCs and an isogenic control. (A) Fibroblast line AG05397 was mosaic for Ts21, with (Upper) ∼89% of cells carrying three copies [runt-related transcription factor 1 (AML1)/Down syndrome critical region (DSCR); orange], whereas (Lower) 10% were disomic for HSA21 (AML1/DSCR; orange). The telomere (TEL) marker (green) was used as a control probe. (B) All iPSC lines had morphological characteristics of pluripotent stem cells, and karyotype analysis showed that DS1 and DS4 iPSCs are trisomic, whereas DS2U is disomic for HSA21 (red circles). (C) 2DS3 iPSCs from a second DS individual carry Ts21. (D) SNP analysis revealed no absence of heterozygosity of HSA21 in the euploid DS2U iPSC line. (E) Short terminal repeat analysis revealed that Ts21 and control lines are isogenic at all loci tested. (F) Table of different iPSC lines used in this study. (G) A heat map shows that genes changed more than fivefold in DS1 and DS4 iPSCs compared with the isogenic DS2U control iPSCs. (H) qPCR verification in all Ts21 iPSC lines of various genes that are changed in microarray results. (I) Ts21 iPSCs did not exhibit increased oxidative stress compared with their respective controls, which were assayed by DHE. (J) The proportion of Ts21 cells that underwent apoptosis was similar to controls, which were assayed by TUNEL+ cells. Error bars represent SEM. (Scale bars: 100 µm.)
Theories of the pathophysiology of DS stem from the imbalance of gene expression in critical developmental pathways caused by the presence of an extra HSA21 (17⇓⇓–20). We analyzed global gene expression of DS1 and DS4 Ts21 iPSCs compared with isogenic euploid DS2U to determine if there were gene expression changes that might foreshadow later defects in differentiated tissues. Comparison of gene expression between isogenic cells enabled the identification of changes that were caused by the extra copy of HSA21 and not normal human variation. Both Ts21 iPSC lines (DS1 and DS4) displayed a preferential increase in expression of HSA21 genes compared with genes on other chromosomes (Fig. S2A), consistent with gene expression in Ts21 human ES cells (21). Changes in HSA21 genes seemed evenly distributed across HSA21 (Fig. S2C), and almost 90% were increased (125 of 139) (Dataset S1) with a significantly greater percentage of chromosomal content compared with other chromosomes (Fig. S2A) (n = 3, P < 0.001). Furthermore, mean fold change for altered genes on HSA21 was significantly greater than all other chromosomes and generally reflected the 3:2 ratio of HSA21 genes (Fig. S2B and Datasets S1 and S2). Together, these data suggest that gene expression in this early pluripotent stage is largely based on simple gene dosage.
Functionally, most of the genes with expression that was changed in Ts21 iPSCs were involved with metabolism, but these changes did not cause changes in proliferation of Ts21 iPSCs (Fig. S1G) [Ki67: DS1/4, P = 0.87, n = 4; 2DS3, P = 0.4, n = 3; phospho-histone H3 (PHH3): DS1/4, P = 0.90, n = 4; 2DS3, P = 0.07, n = 3]. Some of the largest expression changes in Ts21 iPSCs were in non-HSA21 genes involved in transcriptional activation and the response to oxidative stress (OS; e.g., catalase, CAT) (Fig. 1 G and H). Similar expression changes were detected in Ts21 neurons (see below). Many of the highly up-regulated transcription factors are members of the zinc finger family that regulate the expression of a variety of downstream genes and have been implicated in numerous developmental disorders affecting different cell lineages (22). Based on the increased expression of OS responsive genes in Ts21 iPSCs, we evaluated the cells for evidence of OS but found no increase in OS, which was assayed by dihydroethidium (DHE) (Fig. 1I) (DS1, P = 0.62; DS4, P = 0.98; 2DS3, P = 0.95; n = 2 each), or cell death in Ts21 iPSCs compared with their control counterparts (Fig. 1J) (DS1, P = 0.79, n = 3; DS4, P = 0.86, n = 2; 2DS3, P = 0.57, n = 2).
Generation of Early-Born Cortical Neurons Is Not Affected by Ts21.
A universal characteristic of DS is the presence of mild to moderate cognitive impairment, potentially because of diminished cortical neuron numbers in DS brains (23⇓⇓–26). However, using our established protocol for cortical neuronal differentiation (27, 28), we found that all iPSC lines robustly differentiated to Pax6+ neuroepithelia by day 10 (16) (Fig. 2A), consistent with the best efficiency shown by other iPSC lines (11). Neural progenitors differentiated from Ts21 iPSCs also had increased catalase expression, similar to Ts21 iPSCs, but expressed other HSA21 genes implicated in OS at the expected 1.5-fold (Fig. 2B). PCR analysis and immunostaining revealed no difference in the regional identity of βIII-tubulin+ neurons in euploid and Ts21 cultures, where the vast majority expressed dorsal forebrain markers (Fig. 2C). Similarly, quantification of βIII-tubulin+ neurons at 6 wk of differentiation revealed no significant differences between the fraction of neurons in euploid and Ts21 cultures (Fig. 2 D and E) (βIII-tubulin: n = 6, P = 0.78; FoxG1: n = 6, P = 0.88; Otx2: n = 6, P = 0.29).
Generation of cortical neurons is not affected by Ts21. (A) FACS analysis reveals no difference in the propensity of Ts21 iPSCs to generate Pax6+ neuroepithelia. (B) Ts21 iPSC-derived neural progenitor cells exhibited increases in many HSA21 and oxidative stress genes, which were assayed by qPCR. (C) Transcript expression of dorsal telencephalic markers was evident in neurons differentiated from all lines, but ventral forebrain [NK2 homeobox 1 (Nkx2.1)], hindbrain [gastrulation brain homeobox 2 (Gbx2)], and spinal cord [homeobox B4 (Hoxb4)] markers were not readily observed. (D and E) Immunostaining of cultured cells shows no difference in βIII-tubulin+ neurons or forebrain markers [forkhead box G1 (FoxG1) and orthodenticle homeobox 2 (OTX2)] across iPSC lines. (F) Heat map depicts global gene expression changes more than threefold in isogenic Ts21 (DS1 and DS4) vs. control (DS2U) iPSC-derived neuronal cultures. (G) qPCR verification of various genes up-regulated in microarray results in all iPSC-derived neuronal cultures. (H) DS neurons exhibited increased oxidative stress, which was assayed by DHE, and (I) mitochondrial membrane potential. (J) The proportion of Ts21 cells that underwent apoptosis was similar to controls, which were assayed by TUNEL+ cells. (Scale bars: 50 µm.) Error bars represent SEM. *P < 0.05. (A, B, D, E, and J) For measures where no significant differences were found between groups, dashed lines indicate the average of the control groups (DS2U and IMR90).
Thus, although studies in both human and mouse have implicated reduced cortical neurogenesis (24, 29⇓⇓⇓–33), our data suggest that early cortical neural progenitors and initial waves of differentiating neurons are unaffected in the presence of Ts21. The reported reductions in cortical neurons in DS brains may affect primarily late-born neurons that are not being evaluated in our study (24, 30, 34, 35).
Gene Expression Changes and Oxidative Stress Vulnerability.
To gain insight into the neuropathophysiology of Ts21 neurons, we analyzed global gene expression of 30-d-old neurons from DS1 and DS4 Ts21 iPSCs compared with those neurons from euploid DS2U iPSCs (Fig. 2F). Ts21 neurons displayed a preferential increase in expression of HSA21 genes, similar to Ts21 iPSCs in number and chromosomal distribution (Fig. S2 D–F). Virtually all of the HSA21 genes with expression that was changed in Ts21 neurons were increased (112 of 113) (Dataset S3), a significantly greater percentage of chromosomal content compared with other chromosomes (Fig. S2D). Furthermore, mean fold change for altered genes on HSA21 was significantly greater than all other chromosomes and generally reflected the 3:2 ratio of HSA21 genes (Fig. S2E and Dataset S4).
A central tenet in DS research is that symptoms are caused by modest increases in expression of trisomic genes and that these expression changes, in turn, cause dysregulation of normal cellular function through alterations in signaling pathways. Our data in both Ts21 iPSCs and neurons largely agree with this principle, whereby gene expression changes were based on gene dosage, but the greatest changes in Ts21 cells were observed for genes on chromosomes other than 21 (Figs. 1G and 2F and Datasets S2 and S4). The largest gene expression changes (more than fivefold) in both Ts21 iPSCs and neurons were of genes associated with transcriptional regulation and OS that we confirmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) from all Ts21 lines (Figs. 1 G and H and 2 F and G). We did not observe expression of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and amyloid precursor protein (APP), HSA21 genes known to be involved in OS over the expected amount of 1.5-fold (Figs. 1H and 2G), but these modest increases may be sufficient to drive the response to OS. Ts21 neurons did exhibit increased OS, which was assayed by DHE (Fig. 2H) (DS1/4, P = 0.005; 2DS3, P = 0.03; n = 3 each). Furthermore, the increased expression of v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2 (ETS2), an HSA21-encoded transcription factor implicated in neuronal death and mitochondrial dysfunction (36), over the expected 1.5-fold in Ts21 neurons (Fig. 2G) prompted us to assess mitochondrial health in these cells. We detected increased mitochondrial membrane potential, a feature reported in human Ts21 neurons (37, 38) (Fig. 2I) (DS1, P = 0.04; 2DS3, P = 0.01; n = 2 each). However, we did not detect a significant increase in cell death in Ts21 neurons (Fig. 2J) (DS1, P = 0.62; 2DS3, P = 0.94; n = 2 each).
DS Neurons Are Deficient in Their Ability to Form Functional Synapses.
Changes in neuronal excitability and synaptic efficacy have been shown to contribute to cognitive impairment in DS mouse models (33, 39, 40). Whole-cell patch clamp recordings were performed on Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons between 5 and 6 wk, a time when human PSC-derived neurons have substantial synaptic activity (41, 42). Results revealed equivalent mean inward sodium and outward potassium currents in response to voltage steps as well as action potential (AP) generation in response to depolarizing current injections (Fig. 3 A and B) (Na+ current: DS1: P = 0.33; DS4: P = 0.37; 2DS3: P = 0.29; K+ current: DS1: P = 0.18; DS4: P = 0.11; 2DS3: P = 0.97; n = 6 replicates with ∼90 total cells/group) (SI Materials and Methods). Furthermore, no differences were seen in multiple physiological parameters, including cell size (capacitance), resting membrane potential, and AP amplitude in response to current injections (Fig. S3A), suggesting that basic physiological properties are unchanged in Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons at early stages. Interestingly, we found trends in all groups and significant reductions in most groups in the fraction of Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons that displayed spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSCs) (Fig. 3D) (DS1: P = 0.04; DS4: P = 0.01; 2DS3: P = 0.06; n = 6 each) as well as the sPSC frequency in Ts21 cells compared with euploid controls (Fig. 3 C–E) (DS1: P = 0.16; DS4: P = 0.04; 2DS3: P = 0.04; n = 6 each). This reduction was mirrored by a decrease in the number of synapsin+ punctae on Ts21 neurites (Fig. 3F and SI Materials and Methods) (DS1: P = 0.09; DS4: P = 0.17; 2DS3: P = 0.04; n = 3 replicates with ∼200 total neurites/group).
Forebrain Ts21 neurons display synaptic deficits across transmitter phenotype. (A and B) Representative whole-cell patch clamp traces illustrate that Ts21 (DS) did not show differences in (A) sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) currents or (B) the number of APs in response to current injection. (C) Representative voltage clamp (−70 mV) traces show that both control and DS neurons displayed sPSCs. Expanded timescale (traces 3 and 4) illustrates sPSCs with different kinetics in both control and DS neurons. (D) Significantly fewer DS neurons display synaptic activity relative to controls (DS2U: 86 ± 3.9%; IMR90: 81 ± 3.2%). (E) DS neurons also displayed significantly lower frequencies of sPSCs compared with controls (DS2U: 0.48 Hz; IMR90: 0.92 Hz). (F) Representative images of control and DS βIII-tubulin+ neurites (red) displaying synapsin+ puncta (green; arrows). (Blue) Hoechst. Pooled data revealed fewer synapsin+ puncta in DS neurons compared with controls (DS2U: 2.9 ± 0.6/100 µm; IMR90: 4.4 ± 0.6/100 µm). (G) The proportion of excitatory and inhibitory sPSCs was not changed in DS cultures relative to controls [excitatory PSCs (ePSCs): DS2U: 0.54 ± 0.07 Hz; IMR90: 0.55 ± 0.11 Hz; iPSCs: DS2U: 0.46 ± 0.06 Hz; IMR90: 0.45 ± 0.09 Hz]. No differences were observed in (H) the fraction of GABA+ neurons compared with controls (DS2U: 47.7 ± 1.9%; IMR90: 46.2 ± 2.2%) or (I) the fraction of VGAT+/synapsin+ puncta (arrowheads) in DS cultures compared with controls (DS2U: 37.1 ± 6.1%; IMR90: 41.5 ± 4.5%). Error bars represent SEM. *P < 0.05. (Scale bars: F and I, 10 µm; H, 50 µm.)
Studies in DS mouse models have shown impaired synaptic efficacy because of increased inhibition (40, 43), which is potentially caused by overproduction of inhibitory interneurons at the expense of glutamatergic projection neurons (44). However, we found no significant difference in the ratio of excitatory to inhibitory sPSCs (Fig. 3G) (DS1: P = 0.38; DS4: P = 0.83; 2DS3: P = 0.86; n = 6 each), the percentage of neurons that expressed GABA (Fig. 3H) (DS1: P = 0.59; DS4: P = 0.94; 2DS3: P = 0.52; n = 3 each), or the fraction of synapses that stained positive for vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT) (Fig. 3I) (DS1: P = 0.50; DS4: P = 0.96; 2DS3: P = 0.77; n = 3 each). Importantly, the biophysical properties (e.g., amplitude, rise time, and decay constant) of sPSCs did not differ between groups (Fig. S3 C–E), and the proportion of cells that displayed AP firing (Fig. S3A) as well as spontaneous AP frequency (Fig. S3F) remained unchanged between groups. Together, these data suggest that changes in overall excitability of human Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons did not cause reductions in synaptic activity.
Discussion
Although DS is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability and its etiology has been known for over 50 y (2), its underlying mechanisms and effective treatments have yet to be discovered. Here, Ts21 iPSCs and their neuronal derivatives displayed a combination of predictable and unique changes in gene expression as well as a distinct physiological phenotype in forebrain neurons. Although these two phenotypes, susceptibility to oxidative stress and reduced synaptic activity, may be related (45, 46), we will examine them independently, because the current data do not address any mechanistic connection.
Gene Expression Changes Implicate Oxidative Stress Vulnerability.
Global gene expression analysis of both Ts21 iPSCs and forebrain neurons revealed changes in HSA21 genes consistent with gene dosage, suggesting a generally passive epigenetic regulatory process in these cells. Interestingly, dramatic changes were observed in a relatively small number of non-HSA21 genes that were largely maintained during the switch from pluripotent to differentiated cells. These genes included those that encode transcription factors belonging to the zinc finger family, many of which remain uncharacterized. Furthermore, expression of genes that are involved in the response to OS was significantly up-regulated in Ts21 cells. The striking overexpression of catalase, an indicator of a cell’s response to OS, in Ts21 cells may be an early sign of the sensitivity to OS that these cells, particularly neurons, display (47). However, we did not see a significant increase in cell death in DS iPSCs or neurons, suggesting that OS gene up-regulation may act as a compensatory mechanism to allow survival of Ts21 cells, consistent with previous studies using exogenous catalase (47). OS was detectable in Ts21 differentiated neuronal cultures but not Ts21 iPSCs. Therefore, a unique mechanism may be in play in Ts21 cells during early developmental stages, where compensatory changes in OS genes allow for nearly normal cell proliferation and differentiation but cells remain highly susceptible to insults later in development (38, 47⇓⇓–50). This mechanism may exacerbate the consequences of APP overexpression that predispose DS individuals to develop Alzheimer’s disease pathology (51⇓⇓–54).
DS iPSC-Derived Neurons Display a Significant Synaptic Deficit.
Recent studies in DS mouse models have put forth the hypothesis that an imbalance in the excitation–inhibition ratio may underlie ID in DS. Results have shown impaired synaptic efficacy because of increased inhibition in various brain regions (40, 43), potentially caused by overproduction of inhibitory interneurons that primarily originate from the ventral forebrain, at the expense of glutamatergic projection neurons (44). Synaptic deficits in humans have been inferred from ultrastructural studies showing abnormal dendritic spine morphology (23, 55, 56). Our results reveal unaltered glutamatergic and GABAergic neuronal populations during early cortical neuronal differentiation. We show that, although many neuronal characteristics appear normal, Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons display a significant synaptic deficit that is present in both glutamatergic and GABAergic subtypes. Recently, the work by Shi et al. (57) reported “normal” synaptic activity in glutamatergic neurons differentiated from a single Ts21 iPSC line. However, the absence of GABAergic neurons in their system and diminutive excitatory synaptic currents (<5 pA) suggest aberrant network formation as well. Although previous studies and current therapeutic strategies target an imbalanced excitation–inhibition ratio as a primary cause of learning and memory deficits, these data suggest that early Ts21 forebrain neurons are deficient in their ability to form functional synapses, generating a quieter network as a whole. Therefore, current therapeutic strategies aimed at excitation–inhibition imbalance may have different effects in individuals with DS than DS mouse models.
It is important to note, however, that a direct comparison between these data and the data of mature mouse models should be approached with caution. The imbalance in the excitation–inhibition ratio in mouse models reflects the summation of synaptic activities of many neuronal types, including late-born interneurons. Nonetheless, our study reveals synaptic deficits, even in early-born projection neurons.
Future studies of iPSC-derived neuronal maturation, when new neurons (particularly interneurons originating from the ventral forebrain) are added to neural networks, will assist in the interpretation of stem cell-based assays and their synthesis with rodent studies. The examination of the role of Ts21 astrocytes in neuronal maturation and synaptogenesis is also crucial. In addition, it will be important to test hypotheses of premature death in DS neurons by determining whether Ts21 iPSC-derived human neurons die with long-term culture, which has been shown for human Ts21 neurons cultured from fetal neural progenitor cells (47).
Together, these results reveal predicted features of DS cells and identify deficits that may influence mechanistic studies, small-molecule screening, and genetic manipulation to identify therapeutic targets for this common but understudied disorder.
Materials and Methods
Reprogramming.
Fibroblast lines AG05397 and GM02504 were obtained from the Coriell Institute for Medical Research. Fibroblasts were reprogrammed to iPSCs according to previously published methods (6, 12). The isogenic clone was unaffected (U), meaning that it does not carry a third copy of HSA21. Karyotype analysis (G banding and FISH), short tandem repeat confirmation, and SNP analysis were carried out at WiCell Research Institute using standard protocols.
iPSC Culture and Differentiation.
Three Ts21 iPSC lines (DS1, DS4, and 2DS3) and two euploid iPSC lines (DS2U and IMR90-4) (58) were used in each experiment in this study. iPSCs were maintained and differentiated according to previously established methods (59⇓–61) (SI Materials and Methods, Table S1).
Gene Expression Analysis.
Three independent RNA samples were collected from the isogenic Ts21 and control iPSCs (DS1, DS4, and DS2U) between passages 24 and 48 and from day 30 neurons. All samples were compared with Universal Human Reference RNA (Stratagene). RNA amplification, fluorescent labeling, array hybridization, scanning, scoring, and cataloging online were performed by the University of Wisconsin at Madison Biotechnology Center using Affymetrix human U133 Plus 2.0 gene chips. Statistical analyses of the microarray data were carried out using Genesifter software (Geospiza). Student t tests were conducted for each dataset, with only genes with a P value < 0.05 being considered in the statistical analysis. Subsequent analyses used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) posthoc tests. Data sharing is accomplished by deposition of the data into the Gene Expression Omnibus, a public functional genomics data repository supporting minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-compliant data submissions (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). qPCR validation of changed genes was carried out on all lines.
Oxidative Stress Assays.
Oxidative stress was measured using DHE (Life Technologies). Mitochondrial membrane potential was assayed using membrane-permeable JC-1 dye (Cayman Chemical).
Electrophysiological Recordings.
Whole-cell patch clamp recordings were performed on paired, age-matched populations of Ts21 and control cells after 5 and 6 wk of differentiation (n = 9 independent paired experiments) (SI Materials and Methods).
Acknowledgments
We thank Qiang Chang, David Gamm, and Jeffrey R. Jones for their critical reading of the manuscript and helpful advice. We also thank Karen Montgomery, Seth Taapken, and Benjamin Nisler at WiCell for helpful discussions. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health—National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant 2R01NS045926 (to S.-C.Z.), the Jerome LeJeune Foundation (A.B.), National Institutes of Health—National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant R21HD060134 (to A.B.), and the Charles and MaryClaire Phipps Foundation (A.B.). This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health—National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Core Grant P30 HD03352 (to the Waisman Center).
Footnotes
↵1Present address: Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131.
- ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bhattacharyy{at}waisman.wisc.edu.
Author contributions: J.P.W., D.L.H., S.-C.Z., and A.B. designed research; J.P.W., D.L.H., G.F.B., M.E.D., Y.L., C.M., A.C., J.A.K., K.M., M.M., L.Y., Y.Y., J.L., and X.Z. performed research; J.P.W., D.L.H., G.F.B., M.E.D., Y.L., and A.B. analyzed data; and J.P.W., S.-C.Z., and A.B. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data deposition: The data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1216575110/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
References
- ↵
- ↵
- Lejeune J,
- Turpin R,
- Gautier M
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Devlin L,
- Morrison PJ
- ↵
- Maclean GA,
- et al.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Hu BY,
- et al.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Gardiner K,
- et al.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Li XJ,
- et al.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Haydar TF,
- Nowakowski RS,
- Yarowsky PJ,
- Krueger BK
- ↵
- ↵
- Chakrabarti L,
- Galdzicki Z,
- Haydar TF
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Helguera P,
- et al.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Kleschevnikov AM,
- et al.
- ↵
- Wu H,
- et al.
- ↵
- Weick JP,
- Liu Y,
- Zhang SC
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Chen BT,
- Avshalumov MV,
- Rice ME
- ↵
- ↵
- Esposito G,
- et al.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Shi Y,
- et al.
- ↵
- Yu J,
- et al.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
More Articles of This Classification
Biological Sciences
Neuroscience
Related Content
- No related articles found.
Cited by...
- Neuron-Specific Gene 2 (NSG2) Encodes an AMPA Receptor Interacting Protein That Modulates Excitatory Neurotransmission
- In vivo modeling of human neuron dynamics and Down syndrome
- The telomerase inhibitor AZT enhances differentiation and prevents overgrowth of human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural progenitors
- Stem and progenitor cell dysfunction in human trisomies
- Perspectives for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Technology: New Insights Into Human Physiology Involved in Somatic Mosaicism