Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Deficits in human trisomy 21 iPSCs and neurons

Jason P. Weick, Dustie L. Held, George F. Bonadurer III, Matthew E. Doers, Yan Liu, Chelsie Maguire, Aaron Clark, Joshua A. Knackert, Katharine Molinarolo, Michael Musser, Lin Yao, Yingnan Yin, Jianfeng Lu, Xiaoqing Zhang, Su-Chun Zhang, and Anita Bhattacharyya
PNAS June 11, 2013 110 (24) 9962-9967; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216575110
Jason P. Weick
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dustie L. Held
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George F. Bonadurer
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew E. Doers
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Liu
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chelsie Maguire
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron Clark
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua A. Knackert
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katharine Molinarolo
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Musser
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lin Yao
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yingnan Yin
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianfeng Lu
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoqing Zhang
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Su-Chun Zhang
aWaisman Center,bNeuroscience Training Program, andDepartments of cNeuroscience anddNeurology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita Bhattacharyya
aWaisman Center,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bhattacharyy@waisman.wisc.edu
  1. Edited by Fred H. Gage, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, CA, and approved May 1, 2013 (received for review September 26, 2012)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Down syndrome (trisomy 21) is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability, but the precise molecular mechanisms underlying impaired cognition remain unclear. Elucidation of these mechanisms has been hindered by the lack of a model system that contains full trisomy of chromosome 21 (Ts21) in a human genome that enables normal gene regulation. To overcome this limitation, we created Ts21-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from two sets of Ts21 human fibroblasts. One of the fibroblast lines had low level mosaicism for Ts21 and yielded Ts21 iPSCs and an isogenic control that is disomic for human chromosome 21 (HSA21). Differentiation of all Ts21 iPSCs yielded similar numbers of neurons expressing markers characteristic of dorsal forebrain neurons that were functionally similar to controls. Expression profiling of Ts21 iPSCs and their neuronal derivatives revealed changes in HSA21 genes consistent with the presence of 50% more genetic material as well as changes in non-HSA21 genes that suggested compensatory responses to oxidative stress. Ts21 neurons displayed reduced synaptic activity, affecting excitatory and inhibitory synapses equally. Thus, Ts21 iPSCs and neurons display unique developmental defects that are consistent with cognitive deficits in individuals with Down syndrome and may enable discovery of the underlying causes of and treatments for this disorder.

  • cerebral cortex
  • developmental disorders

Down syndrome (DS) is the most frequent single cause of human birth defects and intellectual disability (ID) (1). DS is caused by trisomy of chromosome 21 (Ts21) (2), resulting in the triplication of over 400 genes (3⇓–5), which makes elucidation of the precise mechanisms underlying ID in DS a significant challenge. Confounding this difficulty is the relative inaccessibility of human tissue and incomplete human Ts21 in the context of mouse models. Despite these shortcomings, studies using mouse models containing trisomy of parts of syntenic chromosome 21 (HSA21) have put forth several critical hypotheses on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying DS features. It is essential, however, to test these hypotheses in human cells with full triplication of HSA21 in a context that allows for normal gene regulation. Here, we used Ts21-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to test hypotheses of the underlying causes of ID in DS, with specific regard to neuropathophysiology.

Results

Isogenic Human Ts21 iPSCs.

Fibroblasts from two individuals diagnosed with DS were reprogrammed to iPSCs. FISH for HSA21 in one fibroblast line showed mosaicism, where ∼90% of cells carried Ts21, whereas ∼10% were euploid (Fig. 1A). Reprogramming of the mosaic fibroblasts by retrovirus (6) resulted in three viable iPSC clones, two clones that carried Ts21 and one euploid (Fig. 1B). Mosaicism in DS individuals is rare, occurring in ∼1–3% of DS cases (7), but it can also emerge in vitro (8), potentially because of nondisjunction events during cell division. Regardless, the generation of euploid isogenic controls is fortuitous, because they become vital controls for a complex multigene disorder such as DS, potentially limiting the need for multiple iPSC lines to control for genetic and epigenetic variation (9⇓–11). SNP analysis of HSA21 in the euploid DS2U iPSC line ruled out uniparental disomy (or isodisomy), which is often associated with trisomy rescue (Fig. 1D). Short tandem repeats at various loci indicated that the Ts21 and euploid lines were isogenic other than the presence of Ts21 (Fig. 1E). To increase statistical power, fibroblasts from a second DS individual were reprogrammed using Sendai virus (12), an RNA virus, which yielded another Ts21 iPSC line (Fig. 1C). All iPSC clones were named according to standardized naming procedures (Fig. 1F) (13) and used in all experiments. Importantly, no chromosomal abnormalities, other than Ts21, were observed in any line throughout the duration of this study, in contrast to the propensity of many iPSC lines to acquire aneuploidy (14, 15). Expression of pluripotent genes and proteins POU class 5 homeobox 1 (Oct4), SRY-box containing gene 2 (Sox2), stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA-4), and Tra1-81 and lack of expression of the neuroepithelial marker paired box gene 6 (Pax6) (16) and reprogramming genes verified the pluripotency of the iPSCs (Fig. S1 A–D). In addition, all iPSCs expressed markers of each germ layer after nondirected differentiation (Fig. S1).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Reprogramming of mosaic fibroblasts yields Ts21 iPSCs and an isogenic control. (A) Fibroblast line AG05397 was mosaic for Ts21, with (Upper) ∼89% of cells carrying three copies [runt-related transcription factor 1 (AML1)/Down syndrome critical region (DSCR); orange], whereas (Lower) 10% were disomic for HSA21 (AML1/DSCR; orange). The telomere (TEL) marker (green) was used as a control probe. (B) All iPSC lines had morphological characteristics of pluripotent stem cells, and karyotype analysis showed that DS1 and DS4 iPSCs are trisomic, whereas DS2U is disomic for HSA21 (red circles). (C) 2DS3 iPSCs from a second DS individual carry Ts21. (D) SNP analysis revealed no absence of heterozygosity of HSA21 in the euploid DS2U iPSC line. (E) Short terminal repeat analysis revealed that Ts21 and control lines are isogenic at all loci tested. (F) Table of different iPSC lines used in this study. (G) A heat map shows that genes changed more than fivefold in DS1 and DS4 iPSCs compared with the isogenic DS2U control iPSCs. (H) qPCR verification in all Ts21 iPSC lines of various genes that are changed in microarray results. (I) Ts21 iPSCs did not exhibit increased oxidative stress compared with their respective controls, which were assayed by DHE. (J) The proportion of Ts21 cells that underwent apoptosis was similar to controls, which were assayed by TUNEL+ cells. Error bars represent SEM. (Scale bars: 100 µm.)

Theories of the pathophysiology of DS stem from the imbalance of gene expression in critical developmental pathways caused by the presence of an extra HSA21 (17⇓⇓–20). We analyzed global gene expression of DS1 and DS4 Ts21 iPSCs compared with isogenic euploid DS2U to determine if there were gene expression changes that might foreshadow later defects in differentiated tissues. Comparison of gene expression between isogenic cells enabled the identification of changes that were caused by the extra copy of HSA21 and not normal human variation. Both Ts21 iPSC lines (DS1 and DS4) displayed a preferential increase in expression of HSA21 genes compared with genes on other chromosomes (Fig. S2A), consistent with gene expression in Ts21 human ES cells (21). Changes in HSA21 genes seemed evenly distributed across HSA21 (Fig. S2C), and almost 90% were increased (125 of 139) (Dataset S1) with a significantly greater percentage of chromosomal content compared with other chromosomes (Fig. S2A) (n = 3, P < 0.001). Furthermore, mean fold change for altered genes on HSA21 was significantly greater than all other chromosomes and generally reflected the 3:2 ratio of HSA21 genes (Fig. S2B and Datasets S1 and S2). Together, these data suggest that gene expression in this early pluripotent stage is largely based on simple gene dosage.

Functionally, most of the genes with expression that was changed in Ts21 iPSCs were involved with metabolism, but these changes did not cause changes in proliferation of Ts21 iPSCs (Fig. S1G) [Ki67: DS1/4, P = 0.87, n = 4; 2DS3, P = 0.4, n = 3; phospho-histone H3 (PHH3): DS1/4, P = 0.90, n = 4; 2DS3, P = 0.07, n = 3]. Some of the largest expression changes in Ts21 iPSCs were in non-HSA21 genes involved in transcriptional activation and the response to oxidative stress (OS; e.g., catalase, CAT) (Fig. 1 G and H). Similar expression changes were detected in Ts21 neurons (see below). Many of the highly up-regulated transcription factors are members of the zinc finger family that regulate the expression of a variety of downstream genes and have been implicated in numerous developmental disorders affecting different cell lineages (22). Based on the increased expression of OS responsive genes in Ts21 iPSCs, we evaluated the cells for evidence of OS but found no increase in OS, which was assayed by dihydroethidium (DHE) (Fig. 1I) (DS1, P = 0.62; DS4, P = 0.98; 2DS3, P = 0.95; n = 2 each), or cell death in Ts21 iPSCs compared with their control counterparts (Fig. 1J) (DS1, P = 0.79, n = 3; DS4, P = 0.86, n = 2; 2DS3, P = 0.57, n = 2).

Generation of Early-Born Cortical Neurons Is Not Affected by Ts21.

A universal characteristic of DS is the presence of mild to moderate cognitive impairment, potentially because of diminished cortical neuron numbers in DS brains (23⇓⇓–26). However, using our established protocol for cortical neuronal differentiation (27, 28), we found that all iPSC lines robustly differentiated to Pax6+ neuroepithelia by day 10 (16) (Fig. 2A), consistent with the best efficiency shown by other iPSC lines (11). Neural progenitors differentiated from Ts21 iPSCs also had increased catalase expression, similar to Ts21 iPSCs, but expressed other HSA21 genes implicated in OS at the expected 1.5-fold (Fig. 2B). PCR analysis and immunostaining revealed no difference in the regional identity of βIII-tubulin+ neurons in euploid and Ts21 cultures, where the vast majority expressed dorsal forebrain markers (Fig. 2C). Similarly, quantification of βIII-tubulin+ neurons at 6 wk of differentiation revealed no significant differences between the fraction of neurons in euploid and Ts21 cultures (Fig. 2 D and E) (βIII-tubulin: n = 6, P = 0.78; FoxG1: n = 6, P = 0.88; Otx2: n = 6, P = 0.29).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Generation of cortical neurons is not affected by Ts21. (A) FACS analysis reveals no difference in the propensity of Ts21 iPSCs to generate Pax6+ neuroepithelia. (B) Ts21 iPSC-derived neural progenitor cells exhibited increases in many HSA21 and oxidative stress genes, which were assayed by qPCR. (C) Transcript expression of dorsal telencephalic markers was evident in neurons differentiated from all lines, but ventral forebrain [NK2 homeobox 1 (Nkx2.1)], hindbrain [gastrulation brain homeobox 2 (Gbx2)], and spinal cord [homeobox B4 (Hoxb4)] markers were not readily observed. (D and E) Immunostaining of cultured cells shows no difference in βIII-tubulin+ neurons or forebrain markers [forkhead box G1 (FoxG1) and orthodenticle homeobox 2 (OTX2)] across iPSC lines. (F) Heat map depicts global gene expression changes more than threefold in isogenic Ts21 (DS1 and DS4) vs. control (DS2U) iPSC-derived neuronal cultures. (G) qPCR verification of various genes up-regulated in microarray results in all iPSC-derived neuronal cultures. (H) DS neurons exhibited increased oxidative stress, which was assayed by DHE, and (I) mitochondrial membrane potential. (J) The proportion of Ts21 cells that underwent apoptosis was similar to controls, which were assayed by TUNEL+ cells. (Scale bars: 50 µm.) Error bars represent SEM. *P < 0.05. (A, B, D, E, and J) For measures where no significant differences were found between groups, dashed lines indicate the average of the control groups (DS2U and IMR90).

Thus, although studies in both human and mouse have implicated reduced cortical neurogenesis (24, 29⇓⇓⇓–33), our data suggest that early cortical neural progenitors and initial waves of differentiating neurons are unaffected in the presence of Ts21. The reported reductions in cortical neurons in DS brains may affect primarily late-born neurons that are not being evaluated in our study (24, 30, 34, 35).

Gene Expression Changes and Oxidative Stress Vulnerability.

To gain insight into the neuropathophysiology of Ts21 neurons, we analyzed global gene expression of 30-d-old neurons from DS1 and DS4 Ts21 iPSCs compared with those neurons from euploid DS2U iPSCs (Fig. 2F). Ts21 neurons displayed a preferential increase in expression of HSA21 genes, similar to Ts21 iPSCs in number and chromosomal distribution (Fig. S2 D–F). Virtually all of the HSA21 genes with expression that was changed in Ts21 neurons were increased (112 of 113) (Dataset S3), a significantly greater percentage of chromosomal content compared with other chromosomes (Fig. S2D). Furthermore, mean fold change for altered genes on HSA21 was significantly greater than all other chromosomes and generally reflected the 3:2 ratio of HSA21 genes (Fig. S2E and Dataset S4).

A central tenet in DS research is that symptoms are caused by modest increases in expression of trisomic genes and that these expression changes, in turn, cause dysregulation of normal cellular function through alterations in signaling pathways. Our data in both Ts21 iPSCs and neurons largely agree with this principle, whereby gene expression changes were based on gene dosage, but the greatest changes in Ts21 cells were observed for genes on chromosomes other than 21 (Figs. 1G and 2F and Datasets S2 and S4). The largest gene expression changes (more than fivefold) in both Ts21 iPSCs and neurons were of genes associated with transcriptional regulation and OS that we confirmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) from all Ts21 lines (Figs. 1 G and H and 2 F and G). We did not observe expression of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and amyloid precursor protein (APP), HSA21 genes known to be involved in OS over the expected amount of 1.5-fold (Figs. 1H and 2G), but these modest increases may be sufficient to drive the response to OS. Ts21 neurons did exhibit increased OS, which was assayed by DHE (Fig. 2H) (DS1/4, P = 0.005; 2DS3, P = 0.03; n = 3 each). Furthermore, the increased expression of v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2 (ETS2), an HSA21-encoded transcription factor implicated in neuronal death and mitochondrial dysfunction (36), over the expected 1.5-fold in Ts21 neurons (Fig. 2G) prompted us to assess mitochondrial health in these cells. We detected increased mitochondrial membrane potential, a feature reported in human Ts21 neurons (37, 38) (Fig. 2I) (DS1, P = 0.04; 2DS3, P = 0.01; n = 2 each). However, we did not detect a significant increase in cell death in Ts21 neurons (Fig. 2J) (DS1, P = 0.62; 2DS3, P = 0.94; n = 2 each).

DS Neurons Are Deficient in Their Ability to Form Functional Synapses.

Changes in neuronal excitability and synaptic efficacy have been shown to contribute to cognitive impairment in DS mouse models (33, 39, 40). Whole-cell patch clamp recordings were performed on Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons between 5 and 6 wk, a time when human PSC-derived neurons have substantial synaptic activity (41, 42). Results revealed equivalent mean inward sodium and outward potassium currents in response to voltage steps as well as action potential (AP) generation in response to depolarizing current injections (Fig. 3 A and B) (Na+ current: DS1: P = 0.33; DS4: P = 0.37; 2DS3: P = 0.29; K+ current: DS1: P = 0.18; DS4: P = 0.11; 2DS3: P = 0.97; n = 6 replicates with ∼90 total cells/group) (SI Materials and Methods). Furthermore, no differences were seen in multiple physiological parameters, including cell size (capacitance), resting membrane potential, and AP amplitude in response to current injections (Fig. S3A), suggesting that basic physiological properties are unchanged in Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons at early stages. Interestingly, we found trends in all groups and significant reductions in most groups in the fraction of Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons that displayed spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSCs) (Fig. 3D) (DS1: P = 0.04; DS4: P = 0.01; 2DS3: P = 0.06; n = 6 each) as well as the sPSC frequency in Ts21 cells compared with euploid controls (Fig. 3 C–E) (DS1: P = 0.16; DS4: P = 0.04; 2DS3: P = 0.04; n = 6 each). This reduction was mirrored by a decrease in the number of synapsin+ punctae on Ts21 neurites (Fig. 3F and SI Materials and Methods) (DS1: P = 0.09; DS4: P = 0.17; 2DS3: P = 0.04; n = 3 replicates with ∼200 total neurites/group).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Forebrain Ts21 neurons display synaptic deficits across transmitter phenotype. (A and B) Representative whole-cell patch clamp traces illustrate that Ts21 (DS) did not show differences in (A) sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) currents or (B) the number of APs in response to current injection. (C) Representative voltage clamp (−70 mV) traces show that both control and DS neurons displayed sPSCs. Expanded timescale (traces 3 and 4) illustrates sPSCs with different kinetics in both control and DS neurons. (D) Significantly fewer DS neurons display synaptic activity relative to controls (DS2U: 86 ± 3.9%; IMR90: 81 ± 3.2%). (E) DS neurons also displayed significantly lower frequencies of sPSCs compared with controls (DS2U: 0.48 Hz; IMR90: 0.92 Hz). (F) Representative images of control and DS βIII-tubulin+ neurites (red) displaying synapsin+ puncta (green; arrows). (Blue) Hoechst. Pooled data revealed fewer synapsin+ puncta in DS neurons compared with controls (DS2U: 2.9 ± 0.6/100 µm; IMR90: 4.4 ± 0.6/100 µm). (G) The proportion of excitatory and inhibitory sPSCs was not changed in DS cultures relative to controls [excitatory PSCs (ePSCs): DS2U: 0.54 ± 0.07 Hz; IMR90: 0.55 ± 0.11 Hz; iPSCs: DS2U: 0.46 ± 0.06 Hz; IMR90: 0.45 ± 0.09 Hz]. No differences were observed in (H) the fraction of GABA+ neurons compared with controls (DS2U: 47.7 ± 1.9%; IMR90: 46.2 ± 2.2%) or (I) the fraction of VGAT+/synapsin+ puncta (arrowheads) in DS cultures compared with controls (DS2U: 37.1 ± 6.1%; IMR90: 41.5 ± 4.5%). Error bars represent SEM. *P < 0.05. (Scale bars: F and I, 10 µm; H, 50 µm.)

Studies in DS mouse models have shown impaired synaptic efficacy because of increased inhibition (40, 43), which is potentially caused by overproduction of inhibitory interneurons at the expense of glutamatergic projection neurons (44). However, we found no significant difference in the ratio of excitatory to inhibitory sPSCs (Fig. 3G) (DS1: P = 0.38; DS4: P = 0.83; 2DS3: P = 0.86; n = 6 each), the percentage of neurons that expressed GABA (Fig. 3H) (DS1: P = 0.59; DS4: P = 0.94; 2DS3: P = 0.52; n = 3 each), or the fraction of synapses that stained positive for vesicular GABA transporter (VGAT) (Fig. 3I) (DS1: P = 0.50; DS4: P = 0.96; 2DS3: P = 0.77; n = 3 each). Importantly, the biophysical properties (e.g., amplitude, rise time, and decay constant) of sPSCs did not differ between groups (Fig. S3 C–E), and the proportion of cells that displayed AP firing (Fig. S3A) as well as spontaneous AP frequency (Fig. S3F) remained unchanged between groups. Together, these data suggest that changes in overall excitability of human Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons did not cause reductions in synaptic activity.

Discussion

Although DS is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability and its etiology has been known for over 50 y (2), its underlying mechanisms and effective treatments have yet to be discovered. Here, Ts21 iPSCs and their neuronal derivatives displayed a combination of predictable and unique changes in gene expression as well as a distinct physiological phenotype in forebrain neurons. Although these two phenotypes, susceptibility to oxidative stress and reduced synaptic activity, may be related (45, 46), we will examine them independently, because the current data do not address any mechanistic connection.

Gene Expression Changes Implicate Oxidative Stress Vulnerability.

Global gene expression analysis of both Ts21 iPSCs and forebrain neurons revealed changes in HSA21 genes consistent with gene dosage, suggesting a generally passive epigenetic regulatory process in these cells. Interestingly, dramatic changes were observed in a relatively small number of non-HSA21 genes that were largely maintained during the switch from pluripotent to differentiated cells. These genes included those that encode transcription factors belonging to the zinc finger family, many of which remain uncharacterized. Furthermore, expression of genes that are involved in the response to OS was significantly up-regulated in Ts21 cells. The striking overexpression of catalase, an indicator of a cell’s response to OS, in Ts21 cells may be an early sign of the sensitivity to OS that these cells, particularly neurons, display (47). However, we did not see a significant increase in cell death in DS iPSCs or neurons, suggesting that OS gene up-regulation may act as a compensatory mechanism to allow survival of Ts21 cells, consistent with previous studies using exogenous catalase (47). OS was detectable in Ts21 differentiated neuronal cultures but not Ts21 iPSCs. Therefore, a unique mechanism may be in play in Ts21 cells during early developmental stages, where compensatory changes in OS genes allow for nearly normal cell proliferation and differentiation but cells remain highly susceptible to insults later in development (38, 47⇓⇓–50). This mechanism may exacerbate the consequences of APP overexpression that predispose DS individuals to develop Alzheimer’s disease pathology (51⇓⇓–54).

DS iPSC-Derived Neurons Display a Significant Synaptic Deficit.

Recent studies in DS mouse models have put forth the hypothesis that an imbalance in the excitation–inhibition ratio may underlie ID in DS. Results have shown impaired synaptic efficacy because of increased inhibition in various brain regions (40, 43), potentially caused by overproduction of inhibitory interneurons that primarily originate from the ventral forebrain, at the expense of glutamatergic projection neurons (44). Synaptic deficits in humans have been inferred from ultrastructural studies showing abnormal dendritic spine morphology (23, 55, 56). Our results reveal unaltered glutamatergic and GABAergic neuronal populations during early cortical neuronal differentiation. We show that, although many neuronal characteristics appear normal, Ts21 iPSC-derived neurons display a significant synaptic deficit that is present in both glutamatergic and GABAergic subtypes. Recently, the work by Shi et al. (57) reported “normal” synaptic activity in glutamatergic neurons differentiated from a single Ts21 iPSC line. However, the absence of GABAergic neurons in their system and diminutive excitatory synaptic currents (<5 pA) suggest aberrant network formation as well. Although previous studies and current therapeutic strategies target an imbalanced excitation–inhibition ratio as a primary cause of learning and memory deficits, these data suggest that early Ts21 forebrain neurons are deficient in their ability to form functional synapses, generating a quieter network as a whole. Therefore, current therapeutic strategies aimed at excitation–inhibition imbalance may have different effects in individuals with DS than DS mouse models.

It is important to note, however, that a direct comparison between these data and the data of mature mouse models should be approached with caution. The imbalance in the excitation–inhibition ratio in mouse models reflects the summation of synaptic activities of many neuronal types, including late-born interneurons. Nonetheless, our study reveals synaptic deficits, even in early-born projection neurons.

Future studies of iPSC-derived neuronal maturation, when new neurons (particularly interneurons originating from the ventral forebrain) are added to neural networks, will assist in the interpretation of stem cell-based assays and their synthesis with rodent studies. The examination of the role of Ts21 astrocytes in neuronal maturation and synaptogenesis is also crucial. In addition, it will be important to test hypotheses of premature death in DS neurons by determining whether Ts21 iPSC-derived human neurons die with long-term culture, which has been shown for human Ts21 neurons cultured from fetal neural progenitor cells (47).

Together, these results reveal predicted features of DS cells and identify deficits that may influence mechanistic studies, small-molecule screening, and genetic manipulation to identify therapeutic targets for this common but understudied disorder.

Materials and Methods

Reprogramming.

Fibroblast lines AG05397 and GM02504 were obtained from the Coriell Institute for Medical Research. Fibroblasts were reprogrammed to iPSCs according to previously published methods (6, 12). The isogenic clone was unaffected (U), meaning that it does not carry a third copy of HSA21. Karyotype analysis (G banding and FISH), short tandem repeat confirmation, and SNP analysis were carried out at WiCell Research Institute using standard protocols.

iPSC Culture and Differentiation.

Three Ts21 iPSC lines (DS1, DS4, and 2DS3) and two euploid iPSC lines (DS2U and IMR90-4) (58) were used in each experiment in this study. iPSCs were maintained and differentiated according to previously established methods (59⇓–61) (SI Materials and Methods, Table S1).

Gene Expression Analysis.

Three independent RNA samples were collected from the isogenic Ts21 and control iPSCs (DS1, DS4, and DS2U) between passages 24 and 48 and from day 30 neurons. All samples were compared with Universal Human Reference RNA (Stratagene). RNA amplification, fluorescent labeling, array hybridization, scanning, scoring, and cataloging online were performed by the University of Wisconsin at Madison Biotechnology Center using Affymetrix human U133 Plus 2.0 gene chips. Statistical analyses of the microarray data were carried out using Genesifter software (Geospiza). Student t tests were conducted for each dataset, with only genes with a P value < 0.05 being considered in the statistical analysis. Subsequent analyses used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) posthoc tests. Data sharing is accomplished by deposition of the data into the Gene Expression Omnibus, a public functional genomics data repository supporting minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-compliant data submissions (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). qPCR validation of changed genes was carried out on all lines.

Oxidative Stress Assays.

Oxidative stress was measured using DHE (Life Technologies). Mitochondrial membrane potential was assayed using membrane-permeable JC-1 dye (Cayman Chemical).

Electrophysiological Recordings.

Whole-cell patch clamp recordings were performed on paired, age-matched populations of Ts21 and control cells after 5 and 6 wk of differentiation (n = 9 independent paired experiments) (SI Materials and Methods).

Acknowledgments

We thank Qiang Chang, David Gamm, and Jeffrey R. Jones for their critical reading of the manuscript and helpful advice. We also thank Karen Montgomery, Seth Taapken, and Benjamin Nisler at WiCell for helpful discussions. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health—National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant 2R01NS045926 (to S.-C.Z.), the Jerome LeJeune Foundation (A.B.), National Institutes of Health—National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant R21HD060134 (to A.B.), and the Charles and MaryClaire Phipps Foundation (A.B.). This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health—National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Core Grant P30 HD03352 (to the Waisman Center).

Footnotes

  • ↵1Present address: Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131.

  • ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bhattacharyy{at}waisman.wisc.edu.
  • Author contributions: J.P.W., D.L.H., S.-C.Z., and A.B. designed research; J.P.W., D.L.H., G.F.B., M.E.D., Y.L., C.M., A.C., J.A.K., K.M., M.M., L.Y., Y.Y., J.L., and X.Z. performed research; J.P.W., D.L.H., G.F.B., M.E.D., Y.L., and A.B. analyzed data; and J.P.W., S.-C.Z., and A.B. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • Data deposition: The data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1216575110/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Parker SE,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 88(12):1008–1016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lejeune J,
    2. Turpin R,
    3. Gautier M
    (1959) Le mongolisme, premier exemple d'aberration autosomique humaine. Annals of Genetics 1(2):41–49.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Gardiner K,
    2. Davisson M
    (2000) The sequence of human chromosome 21 and implications for research into Down syndrome. Genome Biol 1(2):REVIEWS0002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sturgeon X,
    2. Gardiner KJ
    (2011) Transcript catalogs of human chromosome 21 and orthologous chimpanzee and mouse regions. Mamm Genome 22(5–6):261–271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Letourneau A,
    2. Antonarakis SE
    (2012) Genomic determinants in the phenotypic variability of Down syndrome. Prog Brain Res 197(2012):15–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Takahashi K,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131(5):861–872.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Devlin L,
    2. Morrison PJ
    (2004) Mosaic Down’s syndrome prevalence in a complete population study. Arch Dis Child 89(12):1177–1178.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Maclean GA,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Altered hematopoiesis in trisomy 21 as revealed through in vitro differentiation of isogenic human pluripotent cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(43):17567–17572.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Bock C,
    2. et al.
    (2011) Reference Maps of human ES and iPS cell variation enable high-throughput characterization of pluripotent cell lines. Cell 144(3):439–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Guenther MG,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Chromatin structure and gene expression programs of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7(2):249–257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hu BY,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(9):4335–4340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Seki T,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human terminally differentiated circulating T cells. Cell Stem Cell 7(1):11–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Luong MX,
    2. et al.
    (2011) A call for standardized naming and reporting of human ESC and iPSC lines. Cell Stem Cell 8(4):357–359.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Boulting GL,
    2. et al.
    (2011) A functionally characterized test set of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 29(3):279–286.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Mayshar Y,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7(4):521–531.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Pax6 is a human neuroectoderm cell fate determinant. Cell Stem Cell 7(1):90–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Reeves RH,
    2. Baxter LL,
    3. Richtsmeier JT
    (2001) Too much of a good thing: Mechanisms of gene action in Down syndrome. Trends Genet 17(2):83–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gardiner K,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Down syndrome: From understanding the neurobiology to therapy. J Neurosci 30(45):14943–14945.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Epstein CJ
    (1990) The consequences of chromosome imbalance. Am J Med Genet Suppl 7(1990):31–37.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Antonarakis SE
    (2001) Chromosome 21: From sequence to applications. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11(3):241–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Biancotti JC,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Human embryonic stem cells as models for aneuploid chromosomal syndromes. Stem Cells 28(9):1530–1540.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hui CC,
    2. Angers S
    (2011) Gli proteins in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27:513–537.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Wisniewski KE,
    2. Laure-Kamionowska M,
    3. Wisniewski HM
    (1984) Evidence of arrest of neurogenesis and synaptogenesis in brains of patients with Down’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 311(18):1187–1188.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ross MH,
    2. Galaburda AM,
    3. Kemper TL
    (1984) Down’s syndrome: Is there a decreased population of neurons? Neurology 34(7):909–916.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Larsen KB,
    2. et al.
    (2008) Reduced cell number in the neocortical part of the human fetal brain in Down syndrome. Ann Anat 190(5):421–427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Golden JA,
    2. Hyman BT
    (1994) Development of the superior temporal neocortex is anomalous in trisomy 21. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 53(5):513–520.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Li XJ,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Coordination of sonic hedgehog and Wnt signaling determines ventral and dorsal telencephalic neuron types from human embryonic stem cells. Development 136(23):4055–4063.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Pankratz MT,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Directed Neural Differentiation of hESCs via an Obligated Primitive Anterior Stage. Stem Cells 25(6):1511–1520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Wisniewski KE
    (1990) Down syndrome children often have brain with maturation delay, retardation of growth, and cortical dysgenesis. Am J Med Genet Suppl 7(1990):274–281.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Schmidt-Sidor B,
    2. Wisniewski KE,
    3. Shepard TH,
    4. Sersen EA
    (1990) Brain growth in Down syndrome subjects 15 to 22 weeks of gestational age and birth to 60 months. Clin Neuropathol 9(4):181–190.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Haydar TF,
    2. Nowakowski RS,
    3. Yarowsky PJ,
    4. Krueger BK
    (2000) Role of founder cell deficit and delayed neuronogenesis in microencephaly of the trisomy 16 mouse. J Neurosci 20(11):4156–4164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Colon EJ
    (1972) The structure of the cerebral cortex in Down's Syndrome: A quantitative analysis. Neuropädiatrie 3(4):362–376.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Chakrabarti L,
    2. Galdzicki Z,
    3. Haydar TF
    (2007) Defects in embryonic neurogenesis and initial synapse formation in the forebrain of the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. J Neurosci 27(43):11483–11495.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Bhattacharyya A,
    2. Svendsen CN
    (2003) Human neural stem cells: A new tool for studying cortical development in Down’s syndrome. Genes Brain Behav 2(3):179–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Bhattacharyya A,
    2. McMillan E,
    3. Chen SI,
    4. Wallace K,
    5. Svendsen CN
    (2009) A critical period in cortical interneuron neurogenesis in down syndrome revealed by human neural progenitor cells. Dev Neurosci 31(6):497–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Helguera P,
    2. et al.
    (2005) ets-2 promotes the activation of a mitochondrial death pathway in Down’s syndrome neurons. J Neurosci 25(9):2295–2303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Busciglio J,
    2. et al.
    (2002) Altered metabolism of the amyloid beta precursor protein is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in Down’s syndrome. Neuron 33(5):677–688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Helguera P,
    2. et al.
    (2013) Adaptive downregulation of mitochondrial function in down syndrome. Cell Metab 17(1):132–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Belichenko PV,
    2. Kleschevnikov AM,
    3. Salehi A,
    4. Epstein CJ,
    5. Mobley WC
    (2007) Synaptic and cognitive abnormalities in mouse models of Down syndrome: Exploring genotype-phenotype relationships. J Comp Neurol 504(4):329–345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Kleschevnikov AM,
    2. et al.
    (2004) Hippocampal long-term potentiation suppressed by increased inhibition in the Ts65Dn mouse, a genetic model of Down syndrome. J Neurosci 24(37):8153–8160.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Wu H,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Integrative genomic and functional analyses reveal neuronal subtype differentiation bias in human embryonic stem cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(34):13821–13826.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Weick JP,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Zhang SC
    (2011) Human embryonic stem cell-derived neurons adopt and regulate the activity of an established neural network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(50):20189–20194.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Fernandez F,
    2. Garner CC
    (2007) Over-inhibition: A model for developmental intellectual disability. Trends Neurosci 30(10):497–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Chakrabarti L,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Olig1 and Olig2 triplication causes developmental brain defects in Down syndrome. Nat Neurosci 13(8):927–934.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Floor E
    (1998) Hydrogen peroxide inhibits the vacuolar H+-ATPase in brain synaptic vesicles at micromolar concentrations. J Neurochem 70(2):646–652.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Chen BT,
    2. Avshalumov MV,
    3. Rice ME
    (2001) H(2)O(2) is a novel, endogenous modulator of synaptic dopamine release. J Neurophysiol 85(6):2468–2476.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Busciglio J,
    2. Yankner BA
    (1995) Apoptosis and increased generation of reactive oxygen species in Down’s syndrome neurons in vitro. Nature 378(6559):776–779.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Esposito G,
    2. et al.
    (2008) Genomic and functional profiling of human Down syndrome neural progenitors implicates S100B and aquaporin 4 in cell injury. Hum Mol Genet 17(3):440–457.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Coskun PE,
    2. Busciglio J
    (2012) Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in Down's syndrome: Relevance to aging and dementia. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2012(2012):383170.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Briggs JA,
    2. et al.
    (2013) Integration-free induced pluripotent stem cells model genetic and neural developmental features of down syndrome etiology. Stem Cells 31(3):467–478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Zigman WB,
    2. Lott IT
    (2007) Alzheimer’s disease in Down syndrome: Neurobiology and risk. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 13(3):237–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Lee HG,
    3. Perry G,
    4. Smith MA
    (2007) Alzheimer disease, the two-hit hypothesis: An update. Biochim Biophys Acta 1772(4):494–502.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Zana M,
    2. Janka Z,
    3. Kálmán J
    (2007) Oxidative stress: A bridge between Down’s syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 28(5):648–676.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Perluigi M,
    2. Butterfield DA
    (2012) Oxidative stress and Down syndrome: A route toward Alzheimer-like dementia. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2012(2012):724904.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Weitzdoerfer R,
    2. Dierssen M,
    3. Fountoulakis M,
    4. Lubec G
    (2001) Fetal life in Down syndrome starts with normal neuronal density but impaired dendritic spines and synaptosomal structure. J Neural Transm Suppl 61(2001):59–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Takashima S,
    2. Becker LE,
    3. Armstrong DL,
    4. Chan F
    (1981) Abnormal neuronal development in the visual cortex of the human fetus and infant with down’s syndrome. A quantitative and qualitative Golgi study. Brain Res 225(1):1–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Shi Y,
    2. et al.
    (2012) A human stem cell model of early Alzheimer's disease pathology in Down syndrome. Sci Transl Med 4(124):124ra29.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Yu J,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318(5858):1917–1920.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Hu BY,
    2. Zhang SC
    (2010) Directed differentiation of neural-stem cells and subtype-specific neurons from hESCs. Methods Mol Biol 636(2010):123–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Zhang SC,
    2. Wernig M,
    3. Duncan ID,
    4. Brüstle O,
    5. Thomson JA
    (2001) In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 19(12):1129–1133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Zhang SC
    (2006) Neural subtype specification from embryonic stem cells. Brain Pathol 16(2):132–142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Deficits in human trisomy 21 iPSCs and neurons
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Deficits in human Down syndrome neurons
Jason P. Weick, Dustie L. Held, George F. Bonadurer, Matthew E. Doers, Yan Liu, Chelsie Maguire, Aaron Clark, Joshua A. Knackert, Katharine Molinarolo, Michael Musser, Lin Yao, Yingnan Yin, Jianfeng Lu, Xiaoqing Zhang, Su-Chun Zhang, Anita Bhattacharyya
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2013, 110 (24) 9962-9967; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216575110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Deficits in human Down syndrome neurons
Jason P. Weick, Dustie L. Held, George F. Bonadurer, Matthew E. Doers, Yan Liu, Chelsie Maguire, Aaron Clark, Joshua A. Knackert, Katharine Molinarolo, Michael Musser, Lin Yao, Yingnan Yin, Jianfeng Lu, Xiaoqing Zhang, Su-Chun Zhang, Anita Bhattacharyya
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2013, 110 (24) 9962-9967; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216575110
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (8)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

Biological Sciences

  • DNA helicase RecQ1 regulates mutually exclusive expression of virulence genes in Plasmodium falciparum via heterochromatin alteration
  • Calcineurin dephosphorylates Kelch-like 3, reversing phosphorylation by angiotensin II and regulating renal electrolyte handling
  • Impacts of the Northwest Forest Plan on forest composition and bird populations
Show more

Neuroscience

  • Genetically eliminating Purkinje neuron GABAergic neurotransmission increases their response gain to vestibular motion
  • TrkB-expressing neurons in the dorsomedial hypothalamus are necessary and sufficient to suppress homeostatic feeding
  • Persistent metabolic youth in the aging female brain
Show more

Related Content

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Neuron-Specific Gene 2 (NSG2) Encodes an AMPA Receptor Interacting Protein That Modulates Excitatory Neurotransmission
  • In vivo modeling of human neuron dynamics and Down syndrome
  • The telomerase inhibitor AZT enhances differentiation and prevents overgrowth of human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural progenitors
  • Stem and progenitor cell dysfunction in human trisomies
  • Perspectives for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Technology: New Insights Into Human Physiology Involved in Somatic Mosaicism
  • Scopus (71)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490