Microbial battery for efficient energy recovery

Xing Xie, Meng Ye, Po-Chun Hsu, Nian Liu, Craig S. Criddle, and Yi Cui
PNAS October 1, 2013 110 (40) 15925-15930; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307327110

  1. Edited by Harry B. Gray, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, and approved August 9, 2013 (received for review April 18, 2013)

Significance

This work introduces a microbial battery for recovery of energy from reservoirs of organic matter, such as wastewater. Microorganisms at an anode oxidize dissolved organic substances, releasing electrons to an external circuit, where power can be extracted. The electrons then enter a solid-state electrode that remains solid as electrons accumulate within it. The solid-state electrode is periodically removed from the battery, oxidized, and reinstalled for sustained power production. Molecular oxygen is not introduced into the battery, and ion-exchange membranes are avoided, enabling high efficiencies of energy recovery.

Abstract

By harnessing the oxidative power of microorganisms, energy can be recovered from reservoirs of less-concentrated organic matter, such as marine sediment, wastewater, and waste biomass. Left unmanaged, these reservoirs can become eutrophic dead zones and sites of greenhouse gas generation. Here, we introduce a unique means of energy recovery from these reservoirs—a microbial battery (MB) consisting of an anode colonized by microorganisms and a reoxidizable solid-state cathode. The MB has a single-chamber configuration and does not contain ion-exchange membranes. Bench-scale MB prototypes were constructed from commercially available materials using glucose or domestic wastewater as electron donor and silver oxide as a coupled solid-state oxidant electrode. The MB achieved an efficiency of electrical energy conversion of 49% based on the combustion enthalpy of the organic matter consumed or 44% based on the organic matter added. Electrochemical reoxidation of the solid-state electrode decreased net efficiency to about 30%. This net efficiency of energy recovery (unoptimized) is comparable to methane fermentation with combined heat and power.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: yicui{at}stanford.edu or ccriddle{at}stanford.edu.

  • Author contributions: X.X., C.S.C., and Y.C. designed research; X.X., M.Y., P.-C.H., and N.L. performed research; X.X., M.Y., C.S.C., and Y.C. analyzed data; and X.X., M.Y., P.-C.H., N.L., C.S.C., and Y.C. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1307327110/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  1. ↵
    International Energy Agency (2012) Key World Energy Statistics (Int Energy Agency, Paris).
  2. ↵
    British Petroleum (2011) Statistical Review of World Energy (Brit Pet, London).
  3. ↵
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001) Climate change 2001: The scientific basis (Intergov Panel Clim Change, Cambridge United Kingdom).
  4. ↵
    1. Tiedje J,
    2. Donohue T
    (2008) Microbes in the energy grid. Science 320(5879):985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Yen TF ed (1977) Chemistry of Marine Sediments (Ann Arbor Sci, Ann Arbor, MI).
  6. ↵
    1. Logan BE,
    2. Rabaey K
    (2012) Conversion of wastes into bioelectricity and chemicals by using microbial electrochemical technologies. Science 337(6095):686–690.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. McCarty PL,
    2. Bae J,
    3. Kim J
    (2011) Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer—can this be achieved? Environ Sci Technol 45(17):7100–7106.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Sims REH ed (2003) Bioenergy Options for a Cleaner Environment (Elsevier, Amsterdam).
  9. ↵
    Ladanai S, Vinterbäck J (2009) Global Potential of Sustainable Biomass for Energy (Swed Univ Agric Sci, Uppsala).
  10. ↵
    Madigan MT, Martinko JM (2006) Brock Biology of Microorganisms (Pearson Ed, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
  11. ↵
    1. Rittmann BE,
    2. McCarty PL
    (2001) Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York).
  12. ↵
    Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Opportunities for and Benefits of Combined Heat and Power at Wastewater Treatment Facilities (Environ Prot Agency, Washington, DC).
  13. ↵
    1. Chaudhuri SK,
    2. Lovley DR
    (2003) Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nat Biotechnol 21(10):1229–1232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Tender LM,
    2. et al.
    (2002) Harnessing microbially generated power on the seafloor. Nat Biotechnol 20(8):821–825.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bond DR,
    2. Holmes DE,
    3. Tender LM,
    4. Lovley DR
    (2002) Electrode-reducing microorganisms that harvest energy from marine sediments. Science 295(5554):483–485.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Liu H,
    2. Ramnarayanan R,
    3. Logan BE
    (2004) Production of electricity during wastewater treatment using a single chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 38(7):2281–2285.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Logan BE
    (2009) Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 7(5):375–381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Rabaey K,
    2. Verstraete W
    (2005) Microbial fuel cells: Novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends Biotechnol 23(6):291–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Rao MLB,
    2. Anantharaman PN,
    3. Mathur PB
    (1963) Production of positive plates for silver oxide-zinc batteries. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 2(2):155–157.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Cheng S,
    2. Liu H,
    3. Logan BE
    (2006) Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. Environ Sci Technol 40(7):2426–2432.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Logan B,
    2. Cheng S,
    3. Watson V,
    4. Estadt G
    (2007) Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 41(9):3341–3346.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Xie X,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Carbon nanotube-coated macroporous sponge for microbial fuel cell electrodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 5(1):5265–5270.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Xie X,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Graphene-sponge as high-performance low-cost anodes for microbial fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 5(5):6862–6866.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Reguera G,
    2. et al.
    (2005) Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature 435(7045):1098–1101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Gorby YA,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(30):11358–11363.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Haynes WM ed (2013) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 94th Ed.
  27. ↵
    1. de Rooij A
    (1989) The oxidation of silver by atomic oxygen. Eur. Space Agency J 13(4):363–382.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Rehren C,
    2. Muhler M,
    3. Bao X,
    4. Schlogl R,
    5. Ertl G
    (1991) The interaction of silver with oxygen: an investigation with thermal desorption and photoelectron spectroscopy. Z Phys Chem 174(1):11–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Lavrenko VA,
    2. Malyshevskaya AI,
    3. Kuznetsova LI,
    4. Litvinenko VF,
    5. Pavlikov VN
    (2006) Features of high-temperature oxidation in air of silver and alloy Ag-Cu, and adsorption of oxygen on silver. Powder Metall Met Ceram 45(9-10):476–480.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Lok C-N,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Silver nanoparticles: Partial oxidation and antibacterial activities. J Biol Inorg Chem 12(4):527–534.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Full Text
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
Microbial battery for efficient energy recovery
Xing Xie, Meng Ye, Po-Chun Hsu, Nian Liu, Craig S. Criddle, Yi Cui
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2013, 110 (40) 15925-15930; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1307327110
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Article Classifications

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (25)
Current Issue

Submit

Jump to section

You May Also be Interested in

Tidewater glacier in Southeast Greenland, summer of 2018. Image courtesy of Eric Rignot.
Loss of Greenland Ice Sheet mass
Since 1972, ice loss from Greenland has contributed to an estimated 13.7 mm rise in global sea level, with the largest contributions coming from northwest, southeast, and central west Greenland, according to a study.
Image courtesy of Eric Rignot.
The change in annual surface air temperature resulting from historical anthropogenic climate forcing. Image courtesy of Noah S. Diffenbaugh and Marshall Burke.
Economic inequality and global warming
Global warming has likely increased the economic disparity between the top and bottom population deciles across the world, thereby generating greater economic inequality than would have occurred without global warming, according to a study.
Image courtesy of Noah S. Diffenbaugh and Marshall Burke.
Soldier nymphs of Nipponaphis monzeni repairing a gall breach by discharging coagulating body fluid. Image courtesy of Mayako Kutsukake.
Social aphids defend colonies against predators
Some species of aphids use a form of social defense to protect colonies from predators, uncovering potential molecular clues to the evolutionary roots of altruistic social defense, according to a study.
Image courtesy of Mayako Kutsukake.
QnAs with NAS member and materials scientist Stephen Forrest
Featured QnAs
QnAs with NAS member and materials scientist Stephen Forrest
Image courtesy of Michigan Photography, University of Michigan.