Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Involvement of Toso in activation of monocytes, macrophages, and granulocytes

Karl S. Lang, Philipp A. Lang, Andreas Meryk, Aleksandra A. Pandyra, Louis-Martin Boucher, Vitaly I. Pozdeev, Michael W. Tusche, Joachim R. Göthert, Jillian Haight, Andrew Wakeham, Annick J. You-Ten, David R. McIlwain, Katja Merches, Vishal Khairnar, Mike Recher, Garry P. Nolan, Yasumichi Hitoshi, Pauline Funkner, Alexander A. Navarini, Admar Verschoor, Namir Shaabani, Nadine Honke, Linda Z. Penn, Pamela S. Ohashi, Dieter Häussinger, Kyeong-Hee Lee, and Tak W. Mak
PNAS February 12, 2013 110 (7) 2593-2598; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222264110
Karl S. Lang
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;cInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp A. Lang
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Meryk
bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;cInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aleksandra A. Pandyra
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;cInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louis-Martin Boucher
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vitaly I. Pozdeev
bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael W. Tusche
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joachim R. Göthert
dDepartment of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jillian Haight
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Wakeham
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annick J. You-Ten
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David R. McIlwain
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katja Merches
cInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;eDepartment of Physiology 1, University of Tübingen, Gmelinstr. 5, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vishal Khairnar
cInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mike Recher
fDivision of Immunology, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA;gPrimary Immunodeficiency Clinic, Medical Outpatient Division and Immunobiology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Garry P. Nolan
hDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasumichi Hitoshi
iRigel Inc., South San Francisco, CA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pauline Funkner
bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander A. Navarini
jDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;kDivision of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, St. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, King's College, London, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Admar Verschoor
lInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, D-81675 Munich, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Namir Shaabani
cInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadine Honke
bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;cInstitute of Immunology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Z. Penn
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela S. Ohashi
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dieter Häussinger
bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyeong-Hee Lee
mDivision of Molecular Immunology, Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, 23845 Borstel, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tak W. Mak
aCampbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tmak@uhnres.utoronto.ca
  1. Contributed by Tak W. Mak, December 20, 2012 (sent for review November 15, 2012)

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Is Toso/IgM Fc receptor (FcμR) expressed by innate immune cells?

See related content:

  • Reply to Honjo et al.: Functional relevant expression of Toso on granulocytes
    - Jul 09, 2013
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Rapid activation of immune responses is necessary for antibacterial defense, but excessive immune activation can result in life-threatening septic shock. Understanding how these processes are balanced may provide novel therapeutic potential in treating inflammatory disease. Fc receptors are crucial for innate immune activation. However, the role of the putative Fc receptor for IgM, known as Toso/Faim3, has to this point been unclear. In this study, we generated Toso-deficient mice and used them to uncover a critical regulatory function of Toso in innate immune activation. Development of innate immune cells was intact in the absence of Toso, but Toso-deficient neutrophils exhibited more reactive oxygen species production and reduced phagocytosis of pathogens compared with controls. Cytokine production was also decreased in Toso−/− mice compared with WT animals, rendering them resistant to septic shock induced by lipopolysaccharide. However, Toso−/− mice also displayed limited cytokine production after infection with the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes that was correlated with elevated presence of Listeria throughout the body. Accordingly, Toso−/− mice succumbed to infections of L. monocytogenes, whereas WT mice successfully eliminated the infection. Taken together, our data reveal Toso to be a unique regulator of innate immune responses during bacterial infection and septic shock.

  • sepsis
  • ROS
  • LPS

During systemic bacterial infection, bacteria have to be controlled within the first few hours to days to guarantee survival. Macrophages, monocytes, and granulocytes are major contributors to antibacterial immune defense. Each of these cell types contributes to control of infection through phagocytosis of bacteria, production of antibacterial substances, and generation of cytokines, which recruit additional immune cells. Antibacterial immune responses can cause substantial collateral damage to tissue, and therefore immune effector functions have to be well controlled. How the innate immune system manages to restrict activation of effector cells largely to the sites of bacterial infection is still under intensive investigation.

Toso is a plasma membrane protein that contains an extracellular region with homology to the Ig variable (IgV) domains and a cytoplasmic region with partial homology to Fas-activated serine/threonine kinase (FAST kinase) (1). Toso was first identified as a molecule expressed on activated T cells capable of protecting T cells from programmed cell death (1). Toso is additionally expressed on B cells, overexpressed in B-cell lymphomas (2, 3), and is important for macrophage homeostasis (4). Mechanistically, Toso was originally described to influence Fas signaling (1, 5). We previously reported that TNF-induced apoptosis is enhanced in the absence of Toso (6, 7). Other work has shown that Toso can act as an Fc receptor for IgM (8, 9) and is important for the phagocytosis of IgM-coated targets (10). However, the physiological relevance of the diverse functions attributed to Toso remains to be verified.

In this study, we analyzed how Toso influences innate immune activation during bacterial infection in vitro and in vivo. We generated gene-targeted Toso-null (Toso−/−) mutant mice and found that phagocytosis of pathogenic bacteria into both granulocytes and monocytes is influenced by IgM and Toso. In vivo, the lack of Toso reduced antibacterial cytokines, resulting in enhanced tolerance toward LPS-induced septic shock. However, Toso−/− mice were found to succumb to infection with Listeria monocytogenes more readily than WT controls.

Results

Toso Is Expressed on Granulocytes and Monocytes.

To study the physiological role of Toso, we first generated Toso-deficient mice as described in Experimental Procedures and Fig. S1. We then analyzed Toso expression on bone marrow–derived granulocytes from WT and Toso−/− animals using a Toso-specific antibody (7). Immature (Ly6Gmed) and mature (Ly6Ghi) granulocytes from WT bone marrow exhibited expression of Toso (Fig. 1A). Next we analyzed expression of spleen-derived monocytes. Monocytes showed clear expression of Toso (Fig. 1B). These findings indicate that Toso is present on innate immune cells such as monocytes and granulocytes.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Toso is expressed on granulocytes and monocytes. (A) Bone marrow cells from WT and Toso−/− mice were immunostained with anti-Ly6G (high expressing cells = mature granulocytes, medium expressing cells = immature granulocytes) plus rat anti-mouse Toso antibody. Red shows staining for WT cells; gray area shows staining of Toso−/− cells. One of two experiments is shown. (B) Splenocytes from WT and Toso−/− mice were stained with anti-CD115 (monocytes) plus rat anti-mouse Toso antibody (red). Red shows staining for WT cells; gray area shows staining of Toso−/− cells. One of two experiments is shown.

Toso Does Not Influence Differentiation of Granulocytes and Monocytes.

To determine whether Toso is important for the generation of myeloid cells, differentiation of granulocytes and monocytes from myeloid precursors was analyzed in WT and Toso−/− mice (Fig. 2A). Pre-GM and GMP cells were comparable between WT and Toso−/− mice (Fig. 2 B and C). Monocytes and immature and mature granulocytes were also present in similar numbers in WT and Toso−/− mice (Fig. 2 D and E), suggesting that differentiation of granulocytes and monocytes was not dramatically impaired in the absence of Toso.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Toso does not influence granulomonopoiesis in the bone marrow. (A) Scheme of granulocytes and monocyte development in bone marrow. (B and C) Flow cytometric analysis of early granulomonocytic progenitor compartments (PreGM and GMP) of WT mice and Toso−/− mice by staining for CD150, CD105, FcgRII/III, lineage markers, c-kit, Sca-1, and CD41. Original FACS contour plots (B) and quantification of progenitor compartments (C, n = 3) are shown. One of two experiments is shown. (D and E) Flow cytometric analysis of WT mice and Toso−/− mice stained for CD11b, Ly6G, CD115, and lymphoid markers (lymph). Original FACS contour plots (D) and quantification of different granulo- and monocytic subsets (E, n = 3) are shown. One of two experiments is shown.

Lack of Toso Enhances Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Granulocytes.

Next, the function of Toso in mature granulocytes was investigated by stimulation with N-formyl-methionine-leucine-phenylalanine (fMLP). fMLP engages the formyl peptide receptor (encoded by the Fpr1 gene) on granulocytes, mimicking pathogen contact (11, 12). About 10% of WT granulocytes produced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and degranulated following fMLP treatment (Fig. 3 A and B). In contrast, treatment with fMLP activated 50% of Toso−/− granulocytes, suggesting that the activation threshold to produce ROS is reduced in Toso-deficient granulocytes (Fig. 3 A and B). Even without fMLP treatment Toso−/− granulocytes also showed enhanced release of ROS compared with WT granulocytes (3.5 ± 0.6% vs. 1.4 ± 0.3%; P = 0.003). This phenotype could be reproduced using an independent strain of Toso KO mice (Tosodel/del; Fig. S2). Treatment with either LPS or GM-CSF, two stimuli known to prime granulocytes (13, 14), in combination with fMLP showed similarly enhanced ROS production in Toso-deficient granulocytes. Cellular stress (such as heat or cold shock) can also activate primed granulocytes (15) and represents a source of stimulation thought to contribute significantly to (auto)inflammatory diseases (16⇓–18). To determine whether Toso−/− granulocytes were unusually prone to such activation, we incubated WT and Toso−/− granulocytes for 30 min at a range of temperatures and measured numbers of degranulating neutrophils. Temperature reduction from 37 °C to 14 °C induced degranulation in about 30% of Toso−/− granulocytes but in only a negligible percentage of WT granulocytes (Fig. 3D). These findings indicated that the absence of Toso triggered enhanced ROS production in granulocytes.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Lack of Toso enhances ROS production in granulocytes. (A and B) Blood cells from WT or Toso−/− mice were incubated with or without the indicated concentrations of fMLP for 30 min at 37 °C, and granulocyte activation was assessed by measuring ROS production (dihydro-rhodamine staining) and degranulation (side-scatter) as described in Experimental Procedures. (Left) Representative dot plot of cells gated on total granulocytes (A). The mean percentage ± SEM of total granulocytes that was activated at each fMLP concentration (B, n = 6). (C) Blood cells from WT and Toso−/− mice (n = 6/group) were primed by incubation for 30 min with 40 ng/mL GM-CSF supernatant or 500 ng/mL LPS, and activated by stimulation with 2 µM fMLP for 15 min. The percentage of activated granulocytes was determined as for A. (D) Blood cells from WT and Toso−/− mice (n = 6/group) were incubated at the indicated temperatures for 30 min. The percentage of granulocytes that had degranulated was measured using flow cytometric side scatter as described in Experimental Procedures. Results shown are the mean percentage of degranulated cells ± SEM.

Toso Influences Phagocytosis of Granulocytes and Monocytes.

Next we analyzed whether Toso is involved in the phagocytosis of bacteria. Toso is described as an Fc receptor for IgM, which is internalized after IgM binding (8⇓–10). To determine whether Toso and/or IgM are important for triggering granulocyte-mediated phagocytosis of Listeria, we incubated samples of peripheral blood from WT, Toso−/−, or sIgM−/− mice with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled Listeria monocytogenes and used flow cytometry to evaluate Listeria binding by Ly6G-positive granulocytes. WT granulocytes showed greater binding of Listeria than either Toso−/− or sIgM−/− granulocytes (Fig. 4A). Although a significant proportion of Listeria could still bind to granulocytes in the absence of Toso, confocal microscopy confirmed that reduced binding of CFSE-positive Listeria was also correlated with reduced Listeria uptake in Toso deficiency (Fig. S3). Next, we further investigated the mechanism of reduced Listeria binding to Toso−/− granulocytes by incubating CFSE-labeled Listeria with granulocytes isolated from WT or Toso−/− mice in the presence of serum obtained on day 3 postinfection from Listeria-infected WT or sIgM−/− mice. Binding of Listeria by Toso−/− granulocytes was reduced compared with WT controls under normal serum conditions, but not in the absence of serum IgM (Fig. 4B). Similar to granulocytes, Toso-deficient monocytes also showed reduced binding of Listeria (Fig. 4C). These data suggest that Toso is integrally involved in the IgM-mediated attachment of Listeria. Absence of Toso led to reduced phagocytosis of Listeria in Toso−/− granulocytes.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Toso influences phagocytosis of granulocytes and monocytes. (A) Peripheral blood was incubated for 60 min with 106 CFU of CFSE-labeled Listeria and CSFE-positive granulocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. Data points are values for individual mice (n = 3–6/group). (B) Blood leukocytes from WT or Toso−/− mice were washed three times to remove IgM. Granulocytes were then incubated for 60 min with CFSE-labeled Listeria plus serum from WT or sIgM−/− mice that had been infected with Listeria 3 d prior. Listeria uptake by granulocytes was analyzed. Horizontal line, mean for IgM independent Listeria uptake. Results are the mean ± SEM (n = 10). (C) Peripheral blood was incubated for 60 min with 106 CFU of CFSE-labeled Listeria, and CSFE-positive monocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. Data points are values for individual mice (n = 6/group).

Toso Deficiency Leads to Reduced NF-κB Phosphorylation and Cytokine Production.

We previously demonstrated that Toso limits signaling induced by the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α (7). Limited signaling was mainly linked to defects in NF-κB activation. Because Toso-deficient granulocytes showed enhanced ROS production and granulocytes and monocytes exhibited defective phagocytosis, we wondered whether toll like receptor (TLR)-induced cytokine production might also be impaired. Indeed, LPS-stimulated Toso−/− macrophages exhibited delayed NF-κB activation after LPS stimulation compared with WT macrophages (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Toso deficiency leads to reduced NF-κB phosphorylation, Bone marrow–derived macrophages were generated from WT and Toso−/− bone marrow. Cells were challenged with LPS (100 ng/mL). NF-κB activation was analyzed after different time points. One of three similar experiments is shown.

Lack of Toso Reduces the LPS Response In Vivo.

Next we analyzed cytokine production in WT and Toso−/− mice during treatment with LPS. We found that systemic injection of LPS led to reduced IL-6 and TNF-α production in Toso−/− mice relative to controls (Fig. 6 A and B). In line with this, Toso−/− mice survived LPS treatment, whereas WT mice died (Fig. 6C). Those data show that, although ROS production was enhanced in Toso−/− mice, the cytokine response during LPS challenge was functionally limited.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Lack of Toso reduces the LPS response in vivo. WT and Toso−/− mice were injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 25 mg/kg. (A) TNF-α was analyzed after 4 h (n = 6). (B) IL-6 was analyzed after 2 h (n = 11). (C) Survival was monitored (n = 11).

Impaired Control of Listeria in Toso-Deficient Mice.

Our data showed that lack of Toso correlated with enhanced ROS production but reduced cytokine production and phagocytosis. To determine the impact of those deficiencies on the control of bacterial infection, we infected WT and Toso−/− mice with L. monocytogenes. Consistent with our in vitro results, peripheral blood granulocytes obtained from Toso−/− mice on day 2 after systemic Listeria inoculation (1 × 104 CFUs) showed elevated ROS production compared with granulocytes from infected WT mice (Fig. 7A). This observation correlated with the increased release of myeloperoxidase (MPO) protein into the serum of infected Toso−/− mice compared with infected WT animals (Fig. 7B). There were no obvious differences in the number of granulocytes in infected organs (Fig. 7C). However, the number of bacteria was enhanced within the granulomas compared with WT mice (Fig. 7C). Reduced bacterial control in the presence of granulocytes suggested that infiltration of granulocytes into target tissues was not defective in the absence of Toso, but likely that these granulocytes displayed reduced effector function within the tissues. Consistently, cytokine production was reduced in Toso−/− mice compared with WT mice after L. monocytogenes infection compared with WT animals (Fig. 7D). Three days after infection, higher Listeria titers were found in Toso−/− spleen, liver, and brain tissue compared with the WT tissue (Fig. 7E). As a result, Toso−/− mice rapidly succumbed to a dose of Listeria that was generally lethal to only 20% of WT mice (Fig. 7F), indicating that Toso is essential for effective control of Listeria in vivo. Taken together, the absence of Toso resulted in limited cytokine production after L. monocytogenes infection and death of infected Toso−/− mice.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Impaired control of Listeria in Toso-deficient mice. WT and Toso−/− mice were infected with 1 × 104 CFU Listeria or 1 × 105 CFU Listeria for B. (A) ROS production on the indicated days postinfection by granulocytes from peripheral blood of WT and Toso−/− mice (n = 4–5). (B) Levels of MPO protein in the plasma of uninfected WT mice and at 6 h postinfection in the plasma (n = 4/group). (C) Listeria and granulocyte infiltration was analyzed in the liver on day 3. One of three representative slides is shown. (Scale bar = 50 µm; Scale bar inset, 25 µm.) (D) IFN-γ, IL-12, and IL-6 concentrations were analyzed in the serum at different time points (n = 4). (E) Listeria titers on day 3–4 postinfection in spleen, liver, and brain of WT and Toso−/− mice (n = 6/group). (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for WT (n = 15) and Toso−/− (n = 8) mice.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that Toso regulates ROS production, cytokine production, and phagocytosis. A previous report established that the presence of Toso on T cells rendered them less sensitive to Fas-induced cell death (1), and we have recently shown that Toso overexpression reduces apoptotic signaling induced by TNF-α treatment (6, 7). In addition, we found here that Toso is involved in IgM-dependent phagocytosis and that the lack of Toso reduces cytokine responses after LPS treatment. The latter effect correlated with reduced NF-κB phosphorylation. Taking those effects together, we suggest that Toso is probably involved in several signaling pathways. From our findings, we conclude two functions of Toso: (i) Toso can act as an FcR that can bind to IgM-coated pathogens, triggering phagocytosis; and (ii) Toso regulates surface signals that drive antipathogenic signaling. Such dual functions have been previously described for other granulocyte receptors, including αM-integrin (CD11b). CD11b not only acts as receptor for several ligands (ICAM-1, iC3b, collagen, fibrinogen) (19) but also negatively regulates TLR signaling (20⇓–22). The mechanism of phagocytosis probably involves small GTPases and actin polymerization (23); however, how these are linked to Toso remains to be studied.

We found that the susceptibility of Toso-deficient mice to bacterial infection correlated with reduced phagocytic capacity and enhanced ROS production. Even without any additional stimulation, ROS were detectable in Toso-deficient granulocytes. Together those data suggest that fMLP signaling was probably not affected specifically by Toso. More likely, Toso expression generally enhances the activation threshold of granulocytes. From our data, we would interpret that the absence of this mechanism in Toso deficiency would result in activation of granulocytes without any additional stimulus. Recently, Cole et al. showed that ROS production enhanced the spread of Listeria between cells (24), hastening mouse death. In line with that, depletion of monocytes rather than depletion of granulocytes enhanced susceptibility to Listeria infection in mice (25). These studies, and the data described here, underscore that enhanced ROS production of granulocytes likely has an overall negative impact in the control of Listeria. How early and enhanced ROS production can negatively impact Listeria infection remains largely unexplained. We found that deficiency of Toso led to enhanced bacterial titers in the spleen, liver, and brain. Using histology, we also found enhanced Listeria numbers within granulomas. As the granulomas did not show an obvious difference in size between WT and Toso−/− mice, we suggest that homing to the site of infection was not altered between WT and Toso−/− mice. Instead, it was likely the effector function within the infected tissue, which was defective in the absence of Toso.

We found that, Toso−/− granulocytes were still able to uptake Listeria, albeit at a reduced level. Because Toso−/− was nevertheless more susceptible to Listeria infection, it is unclear whether additional mechanisms besides Listeria uptake are also defective in the absence of Toso. As activation of innate immune cells can partially depend on the phagocytosis of pathogenic pattern molecules, we postulate that Toso is not only directly affecting innate immune cell effector functions, but perhaps more importantly is regulating the immune activation, which strongly impacts pathogen control. Indeed, using LPS treatment, we found that Toso influences cytokine induction during this model of sterile immune activation.

Enhanced ROS production and deficient cytokine response in parallel to reduced phagocytosis are likely the reason for the rapid death of Toso-deficient mice during Listeria infection (26, 27). Theoretically, enhanced ROS levels could also lead to death of mice due to collateral damage to tissue (28). However, because we saw significantly enhanced bacterial titers in the brains of Toso-deficient mice and because we could rescue Listeria susceptibility of Toso-deficient mice with transfer of WT granulocytes (Fig. S4), we would rather speculate that bacterial burden was the reason for the hastened death of Toso-deficient mice.

Although the main function of granulocytes is the early control of pathogens, hyperactivation of these cells is a hallmark of autoinflammatory disorders such as periodic fever syndromes and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, and autoinflammatory lung injury (18, 29⇓–31). The reasons for these instances of inappropriate granulocyte activation are not known (16, 17). In particular, vasculitis is associated with enhanced granulocyte activation and/or autoantibodies directed against granulocytic components (31, 32). Consistent with this disease, Toso-deficient animals exhibit autoantibody formation (33). Future studies will examine the exciting possibility that Toso also influences granulocyte activation in human inflammatory diseases.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that Toso is a regulator of granulocyte activation. Toso thus plays a key role in the coordination of granulocyte phagocytosis, ROS production, and degranulation and is critical for the normal control of bacterial infection in mice.

Experimental Procedures

Mice.

Genomic DNA fragments containing the Toso gene were isolated from a mouse genomic DNA library (129J/Ola; J. Rossant, SickKids Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada) using a mouse full-length Toso cDNA as a probe. The KO construct was assembled using two PCR-generated fragments: a 6.5-kb fragment found within an intron located in the 5′ leader sequence of the gene and a 0.65-kb fragment downstream of the last methionine. Both fragments were inserted on either side of a neomycin (neo) expression cassette, such that homologous recombination caused the replacement of almost all of the Toso coding region by neo (Fig. S1A). An artificial EcoRI site was added to reduce the WT 6-kb EcoRI fragment to a 2.3-kb size when probed on a Southern blot with a flanking probe. The KO construct was electroporated into D3 embryonic stem (ES) cells, and a clone demonstrating homologous recombination was injected into E3.5 C57/BL6 blastocysts, which were implanted in pseudopregnant ICR mice. The chimeric progeny were bred until germ-line transmission was achieved, and heterozygotes bearing the KO allele were intercrossed to generate homozygous progeny. Deletion of Toso was confirmed by PCR and RT-PCR analyses of various tissues (Fig. S1 B–D). Toso−/− mice were backcrossed into the C57BL/6 background for more than nine generations before use in experiments. Tosodel/del mice, an independent line of Toso KO mice on the C57BL/6 background, have been previously described (7). sIgM−/− mice were also maintained on the C57BL/6 genetic background. All experiments were performed in single ventilated cages. Animal experiments were carried out in Germany and Canada under the authorization of the Veterinäramt of Duesseldorf and in accordance with German laws for animal protection and according to institutional guidelines at the Ontario Cancer Institute of the University Health Network.

Listeria Infection and In Vitro Phagocytosis.

L. monocytogenes (ATCC strain 43251) bacteria were the kind gift of Klaus Pfeffer (Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany) and were maintained in heart infusion agar as previously described (34). If not otherwise indicated, mice were infected i.v. with 2 × 104 CFU of Listeria. For CFSE labeling, 109 CFUs Listeria were incubated for 10 min with 50 µM CSFE (Invitrogen) in 10 mL PBS. After two washes in PBS/10% (vol/vol) FCS and an additional three washes in medium, CSFE-labeled Listeria were incubated for indicated time points with granulocytes in antibiotic-free, FCS-free medium.

Granulocyte Activation and FACS.

Stimuli for granulocyte activation were fMLP (Sigma Aldrich), LPS (Sigma), and GM-CSF (self-made from GM-CSF–producing cells [X63O]). For granulocyte activation studies, mouse peripheral blood was incubated with DMEM/2% FCS containing fMLP plus anti-Gr1, anti-CD11b antibody (eBiosciences) and dihydro-rhodamine (Alexis). For priming studies, granulocytes were pretreated for 30 min with cytokines followed by 15-min activation with fMLP. Granulocytes, which produced enhanced levels of ROS and showed degranulation in SSC-A, were considered activated granulocytes. Toso expression was analyzed by an anti-Toso antibody generated previously in the laboratory of K.-H.L. Absolute counts of bone marrow cells were determined on a Z2 cell counter (Beckman Coulter). FACS analysis was performed on a LSRII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) after staining with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (Becton Dickinson, eBioscience, Biolegend) as previously described (35, 36). Toso expression was analyzed by a monoclonal antibody against murine Toso (clone B68) that was generated in the laboratory of K.-H.L. (7).

Bone Marrow–Derived Macrophages.

Bone marrow cells were treated with macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) derived from L929 cells in very low endotoxin DMEM 10% FCS. After 8–10 d, cells were used for experiments.

LPS Treatment.

WT and Toso-deficient animals were injected i.p. with a 25-mg/kg dose of LPS (026:B6; Sigma).

Myeloperoxidase.

Levels of myeloperoxidase protein in serum were quantified by ELISA (Hycult Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative RT-PCR.

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed using Trifast (peqlab) and the QuantiTec Rev. Transcription Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Analysis of specific gene expression was performed using Toso (Faim3) kits (Applied Biosystems or Qiagen). The mRNA expression levels of all target genes were normalized against GAPDH or 18sRNA.

Temperature Shock Experiment.

Mouse peripheral blood (10 µL) was incubated with 100 µL DMEM/2% FCS plus anti-Gr1 and anti-CD11b for 30 min either at 4 °C, 15 °C, 24 °C, 37 °C, or 42 °C. Degranulated granulocytes were determined by SSC-A.

Immunoblotting.

Bone marrow–derived macrophages were seeded in six-well tissue-culture plates and treated as indicated. Cells were washed with PBS and lysed using 1.1% SDS, 11% glycerol, and 0.1 M Tris, pH 6.8, with 10% β-mercaptoethanol. Blots were probed with anti–phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536), anti–phospho-IκBα (Ser32), anti-IκBα, anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling), and anti–NF-κB p65 (Santa Cruz).

Histology.

Histological analyses were performed on snap-frozen tissues as previously described (34). Slides were stained for anti–Gr1-FITC (eBiosciences) and rabbit anti-Listeria (Abcam), followed by staining with anti-rabbit phycoerythrin (Jackson Laboratories).

ELISAs.

Supernatant or serum cytokine levels were detected using the IL-6 (eBioscience), TNFα (eBioscience), and INFγ (eBioscience) detection kits.

Statistical Analyses.

Where appropriate, data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistically significant differences between two groups were analyzed using the unpaired Student t test. Analyses of multiple groups were performed using one-way ANOVA in conjunction with the Bonferroni or Dunnett test. Statistically significant differences between experimental groups over multiple time points were calculated using two-way ANOVA (repeated measurements). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgments

We thank Alisha Elford for technical support and Mary Saunders for scientific editing. K.S.L. and P.A.L. were funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (SKA2008 and SKA2010). This study was supported by the German research foundation (DFG) with projects: CRC974, TTR60, LA2558/3-1, and LA1419/5-1. M.R. was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant PASMP3-127678/1. In addition, this work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [Funding Reference Number 79434 (to P.S.O.)] and the research also funded in part by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. P.S.O. holds a Canada Research Chair in Autoimmunity and Tumor Immunity.

Footnotes

  • ↵1K.S.L., P.A.L., A.M., and A.A.P. contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵2K.-H.L. and T.W.M. contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tmak{at}uhnres.utoronto.ca.
  • Author contributions: K.S.L., P.A.L., A.M., A.A.P., L.-M.B., P.S.O., K.-H.L., and T.W.M. designed research; K.S.L., P.A.L., A.M., A.A.P., L.-M.B., V.I.P., M.W.T., J.R.G., K.M., V.K., N.H., P.S.O., and K.-H.L. performed research; L.-M.B. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; K.S.L., P.A.L., A.M., A.A.P., V.I.P., M.W.T., J.R.G., J.H., A.W., A.J.Y.-T., D.R.M., K.M., V.K., M.R., G.P.N., Y.H., P.F., A.A.N., A.V., N.S., N.H., L.Z.P., P.S.O., D.H., K.-H.L., and T.W.M. analyzed data; and K.S.L., P.A.L., A.A.P., D.R.M., K.-H.L., and T.W.M. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1222264110/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hitoshi Y,
    2. et al.
    (1998) Toso, a cell surface, specific regulator of Fas-induced apoptosis in T cells. Immunity 8(4):461–471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Pallasch CP,
    2. et al.
    (2008) Overexpression of TOSO in CLL is triggered by B-cell receptor signaling and associated with progressive disease. Blood 112(10):4213–4219.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Proto-Siqueira R,
    2. et al.
    (2008) SAGE analysis demonstrates increased expression of TOSO contributing to Fas-mediated resistance in CLL. Blood 112(2):394–397.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Sigruener A,
    2. et al.
    (2007) E-LDL upregulates TOSO expression and enhances the survival of human macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 359(3):723–728.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Song Y,
    2. Jacob CO
    (2005) The mouse cell surface protein TOSO regulates Fas/Fas ligand-induced apoptosis through its binding to Fas-associated death domain. J Biol Chem 280(10):9618–9626.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Nguyen XH,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Antiapoptotic function of Toso (Faim3) in death receptor signaling. Blood 119(7):1790–1791.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Nguyen XH,
    2. et al.
    (2011) Toso regulates the balance between apoptotic and nonapoptotic death receptor signaling by facilitating RIP1 ubiquitination. Blood 118(3):598–608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Shima H,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Identification of TOSO/FAIM3 as an Fc receptor for IgM. Int Immunol 22(3):149–156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kubagawa H,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Identity of the elusive IgM Fc receptor (FcmuR) in humans. J Exp Med 206(12):2779–2793.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Vire B,
    2. David A,
    3. Wiestner A
    (2011) TOSO, the Fcmicro receptor, is highly expressed on chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells, internalizes upon IgM binding, shuttles to the lysosome, and is downregulated in response to TLR activation. J Immunol 187(8):4040–4050.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Selvatici R,
    2. Falzarano S,
    3. Mollica A,
    4. Spisani S
    (2006) Signal transduction pathways triggered by selective formylpeptide analogues in human neutrophils. Eur J Pharmacol 534(1–3):1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Graves V,
    2. et al.
    (1992) Simultaneous mobilization of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) and formyl peptide chemoattractant receptors in human neutrophils. Blood 80(3):776–787.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Guthrie LA,
    2. McPhail LC,
    3. Henson PM,
    4. Johnston RB Jr.
    (1984) Priming of neutrophils for enhanced release of oxygen metabolites by bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Evidence for increased activity of the superoxide-producing enzyme. J Exp Med 160(6):1656–1671.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dahinden CA,
    2. Zingg J,
    3. Maly FE,
    4. de Weck AL
    (1988) Leukotriene production in human neutrophils primed by recombinant human granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and stimulated with the complement component C5A and FMLP as second signals. J Exp Med 167(4):1281–1295.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Werz O,
    2. Bürkert E,
    3. Samuelsson B,
    4. Rådmark O,
    5. Steinhilber D
    (2002) Activation of 5-lipoxygenase by cell stress is calcium independent in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Blood 99(3):1044–1052.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Nathan C
    (2006) Neutrophils and immunity: Challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol 6(3):173–182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Cascão R,
    2. Rosário HS,
    3. Fonseca JE
    (2009) Neutrophils: Warriors and commanders in immune mediated inflammatory diseases. Acta Reumatol Port 34(2B):313–326.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Mayadas TN,
    2. Tsokos GC,
    3. Tsuboi N
    (2009) Mechanisms of immune complex-mediated neutrophil recruitment and tissue injury. Circulation 120(20):2012–2024.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Ross GD
    (2002) Role of the lectin domain of Mac-1/CR3 (CD11b/CD18) in regulating intercellular adhesion. Immunol Res 25(3):219–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Han C,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Integrin CD11b negatively regulates TLR-triggered inflammatory responses by activating Syk and promoting degradation of MyD88 and TRIF via Cbl-b. Nat Immunol 11(8):734–742.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Means TK,
    2. Luster AD
    (2010) Integrins limit the Toll. Nat Immunol 11(8):691–693.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Mócsai A,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Integrin signaling in neutrophils and macrophages uses adaptors containing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs. Nat Immunol 7(12):1326–1333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Castellano F,
    2. Chavrier P,
    3. Caron E
    (2001) Actin dynamics during phagocytosis. Semin Immunol 13(6):347–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Cole C,
    2. Thomas S,
    3. Filak H,
    4. Henson PM,
    5. Lenz LL
    (2012) Nitric oxide increases susceptibility of Toll-like receptor-activated macrophages to spreading Listeria monocytogenes. Immunity 36(5):807–820.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Shi C,
    2. et al.
    (2011) Ly6G+ neutrophils are dispensable for defense against systemic Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Immunol 187(10):5293–5298.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Pfeffer K,
    2. et al.
    (1993) Mice deficient for the 55 kd tumor necrosis factor receptor are resistant to endotoxic shock, yet succumb to L. monocytogenes infection. Cell 73(3):457–467.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. McIlwain DR,
    2. et al.
    (2012) iRhom2 regulation of TACE controls TNF-mediated protection against Listeria and responses to LPS. Science 335(6065):229–232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Tsuboi N,
    2. Asano K,
    3. Lauterbach M,
    4. Mayadas TN
    (2008) Human neutrophil Fcgamma receptors initiate and play specialized nonredundant roles in antibody-mediated inflammatory diseases. Immunity 28(6):833–846.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Hirahashi J,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) links inflammation and thrombosis after glomerular injury. Circulation 120(13):1255–1265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Witko-Sarsat V,
    2. Rieu P,
    3. Descamps-Latscha B,
    4. Lesavre P,
    5. Halbwachs-Mecarelli L
    (2000) Neutrophils: Molecules, functions and pathophysiological aspects. Lab Invest 80(5):617–653.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Kain R,
    2. Firmin DA,
    3. Rees AJ
    (2010) Pathogenesis of small vessel vasculitis associated with autoantibodies to neutrophil cytoplasmic antigens: New insights from animal models. Curr Opin Rheumatol 22(1):15–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Pagnoux C,
    2. Guilpain P,
    3. Guillevin L
    (2007) Churg-Strauss syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19(1):25–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Ouchida R,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Critical role of the IgM Fc receptor in IgM homeostasis, B-cell survival, and humoral immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(40):E2699–E2706.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Navarini AA,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Increased susceptibility to bacterial superinfection as a consequence of innate antiviral responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(42):15535–15539.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Sprussel A, et al. (2012) Lysine-specific demethylase 1 restricts hematopoietic progenitor proliferation and is essential for terminal differentiation. Leukemia 26(9):2039–2051.
  36. ↵
    1. Pronk CJ,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Elucidation of the phenotypic, functional, and molecular topography of a myeloerythroid progenitor cell hierarchy. Cell Stem Cell 1(4):428–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Involvement of Toso in activation of monocytes, macrophages, and granulocytes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Toso in activating myeloid cells
Karl S. Lang, Philipp A. Lang, Andreas Meryk, Aleksandra A. Pandyra, Louis-Martin Boucher, Vitaly I. Pozdeev, Michael W. Tusche, Joachim R. Göthert, Jillian Haight, Andrew Wakeham, Annick J. You-Ten, David R. McIlwain, Katja Merches, Vishal Khairnar, Mike Recher, Garry P. Nolan, Yasumichi Hitoshi, Pauline Funkner, Alexander A. Navarini, Admar Verschoor, Namir Shaabani, Nadine Honke, Linda Z. Penn, Pamela S. Ohashi, Dieter Häussinger, Kyeong-Hee Lee, Tak W. Mak
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2013, 110 (7) 2593-2598; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222264110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Toso in activating myeloid cells
Karl S. Lang, Philipp A. Lang, Andreas Meryk, Aleksandra A. Pandyra, Louis-Martin Boucher, Vitaly I. Pozdeev, Michael W. Tusche, Joachim R. Göthert, Jillian Haight, Andrew Wakeham, Annick J. You-Ten, David R. McIlwain, Katja Merches, Vishal Khairnar, Mike Recher, Garry P. Nolan, Yasumichi Hitoshi, Pauline Funkner, Alexander A. Navarini, Admar Verschoor, Namir Shaabani, Nadine Honke, Linda Z. Penn, Pamela S. Ohashi, Dieter Häussinger, Kyeong-Hee Lee, Tak W. Mak
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2013, 110 (7) 2593-2598; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222264110
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (13)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Experimental Procedures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Tracing the origin of Europe’s megaliths
Tracing the origin of Europe’s megaliths
Bettina Schulz Paulsson explains the origin and spread of Europe's megaliths, including Stonehenge.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Researchers are mining the stuff we excrete to get a window on drug use, antibiotic resistance, and the overall health of populations. Image credit: Biobot Analytics.
News Feature: Interested in gauging a population’s health? Look to sewage
Researchers are mining the stuff we excrete to get a window on drug use, antibiotic resistance, and the overall health of populations.
Image credit: Biobot Analytics.
For too long, the considerable importance and impacts of recreational fisheries have been ignored. Policymakers and managers need to do a better job acknowledging and addressing this very influential sector.
Opinion: Governing the recreational dimension of global fisheries
For too long, the considerable importance and impacts of recreational fisheries have been ignored. Policymakers and managers need to do a better job acknowledging and addressing this very influential sector.
Image credit: Florian Möllers (photographer).
PNAS QnAs with NAS foreign associate and physicist Anne L’Huillier
Featured QnAs
PNAS QnAs with NAS foreign associate and physicist Anne L’Huillier.
Image courtesy of Erika Weiland (photographer).
Brain. Image courtesy of Pixabay/geralt.
Sex differences in metabolic brain aging
Brain metabolism scans in individuals aged 20–82 years revealed that compared with male brains, female brains appeared three to four years younger on average, suggesting potential links between sex and human brain aging.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/geralt.

More Articles of This Classification

Biological Sciences

  • Prion protein quantification in human cerebrospinal fluid as a tool for prion disease drug development
  • Ephemeral states in protein folding under force captured with a magnetic tweezers design
  • Spontaneous ribosomal translocation of mRNA and tRNAs into a chimeric hybrid state
Show more

Immunology

  • Selection in immune receptor repertoires
  • Abp1 negatively regulates BCR signaling
  • Testosterone regulates lymphocyte differentiation
Show more

Related Content

  • Toso expression on granulocytes
  • No Toso/FcμR expression in phagocytes
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Secretory IgM Exacerbates Tumor Progression by Inducing Accumulations of MDSCs in Mice
  • sIgM-Fc{mu}R Interactions Regulate Early B Cell Activation and Plasma Cell Development after Influenza Virus Infection
  • The Essential Role of Neutrophils during Infection with the Intracellular Bacterial Pathogen Listeria monocytogenes
  • Nomenclature of Toso, Fas Apoptosis Inhibitory Molecule 3, and IgM FcR
  • Toso controls encephalitogenic immune responses by dendritic cells and regulatory T cells
  • Reply to Honjo et al.: Functional relevant expression of Toso on granulocytes
  • Is Toso/IgM Fc receptor (Fc{mu}R) expressed by innate immune cells?
  • Scopus (30)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490